Liberal Forum

Huey » 05 Nov 2021, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 7:46 am

There is no re-telling.  I posted my quotes, with date/time stamps, and links.  Same thing I said two years.  Same thing I said a few weeks ago.

If the map you are insisting everyone misread with you was relevant to the question, Grifty would be holding that....not the actual forecast map he was obliged to deface.


**** idiot.

Huey » 05 Nov 2021, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 7:46 am

There is no re-telling.  I posted my quotes, with date/time stamps, and links.  Same thing I said two years.  Same thing I said a few weeks ago.

Dwarf,

Why did Grifty have to deface the map in the photo?
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Nov 2021, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 8:06 am

Huey » 05 Nov 2021, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 7:46 am

There is no re-telling.  I posted my quotes, with date/time stamps, and links.  Same thing I said two years.  Same thing I said a few weeks ago.

Dwarf,

Why did Grifty have to deface the map in the photo?
 

 

Scrawny, You would have to ask him.  I am not going by what someone did with a sharpie.  I am basing my comments on the projected path as of the date that map was created as well as the windage map.  There is no doubt according to the track and info available on that date that, AS I SAID, AL was projected to feel some effects of the storm.

Now, you question on your PG thread was answered.  Until you take those answers, make a coherent argument as to why I am wrong, without questions, I accept your concession that you agree I was correct. 

Huey » 05 Nov 2021, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 8:09 am

Scrawny, You would have to ask him.  I am not going by what someone did with a sharpie.  I am basing my comments on the projected path as of the date that map was created as well as the windage map.  There is no doubt according to the track and info available on that date that, AS I SAID, AL was projected to feel some effects of the storm.

Now, you question on your PG thread was answered.  Until you take those answers, make a coherent argument as to why I am wrong, without questions, I accept your concession that you agree I was correct.

Scrawny, You would have to ask him.  I am not going by what someone did with a sharpie. 

D


M


A



Grifty had to deface the map because the Truth was not consistent with his ****..




 

Huey » 05 Nov 2021, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 8:09 am

Scrawny, You would have to ask him.  I am not going by what someone did with a sharpie.  I am basing my comments on the projected path as of the date that map was created as well as the windage map.  There is no doubt according to the track and info available on that date that, AS I SAID, AL was projected to feel some effects of the storm.

Now, you question on your PG thread was answered.  Until you take those answers, make a coherent argument as to why I am wrong, without questions, I accept your concession that you agree I was correct.

There is no doubt according to the track and info available on that date that, AS I SAID, AL was projected to feel some effects of the storm.

post the effects suggested by the map in question.

Huey » 05 Sep 2019, 6:40 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2019, 6:40 pm

So now you lie when busted. There certainly was. Just stop.

From aug 30:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.montgo ... 2164905001

, from the 29th ya **** moron:



Link:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.orland ... P%2520HTML

LMMFAO!! You see the track and the green portion. **** you.

The image from noaa says you are a lying moron. JUST AS I SAID. LMMFAO!!!!!

@Blackvegetable  

Huey » 05 Nov 2021, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 10:43 am

@Blackvegetable

Dwarf,

Post what the key on your map says about the "threat" to Alabama.


 

Blackvegetable » 05 Nov 2021, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 12:16 pm

Huey » 05 Nov 2021, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 10:43 am

@Blackvegetable

Dwarf,

Post what the key on your map says about the "threat" to Alabama.

Sorry, we are at the point where you make your own case.  Keep in mind my words were AL was projected to feel some sort of effects.  Less than Tropical Storm wind are "some sort of effects".

Game.  Set. Match.

 
Ii said nothing about threats
 

Huey » 05 Nov 2021, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 12:20 pm

Sorry, we are at the point where you make your own case.  Keep in mind my words were AL was projected to feel some sort of effects.  Less than Tropical Storm wind are "some sort of effects".

Game.  Set. Match.

Ii said nothing about threats
 

This is about YOUR "evidence"

Sorry, we are at the point where you make your own case.  Keep in mind my words were AL was projected to feel some sort of effects.  Less than Tropical Storm wind are "some sort of effects".

I just did.

You ran from another question relating exclusively to Objective Fact.

This is why I used PG...

You can't pull this crap there......when you can't, you ALWAYS lose....in the course of 2 questions.

Huey » 05 Nov 2021, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 12:20 pm

Sorry, we are at the point where you make your own case.  Keep in mind my words were AL was projected to feel some sort of effects.  Less than Tropical Storm wind are "some sort of effects".

Game.  Set. Match.

Ii said nothing about threats
 

Then

Huey » 05 Sep 2019 12:20 pm » wrote:

Sorry, the track on the map has the storm heading over lake Okeechobee towards the northwest and the gulf. That track if it continued place alabama on the outer bands or what was at the time a CAT 5 hurricane. So it is correct that alabama at the time of that track was in the cone to be hit.

You wanna discuss stupid? Look in the mirror and see your face.

Now.....

Less than Tropical Storm wind are "some sort of effects".

Reframy.....

Blackvegetable » 05 Nov 2021, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 12:42 pm

Huey » 05 Nov 2021, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 12:20 pm

Sorry, we are at the point where you make your own case.  Keep in mind my words were AL was projected to feel some sort of effects.  Less than Tropical Storm wind are "some sort of effects".

Game.  Set. Match.

Ii said nothing about threats

 

Then

Huey » 05 Sep 2019 12:20 pm » wrote:

Sorry, the track on the map has the storm heading over lake Okeechobee towards the northwest and the gulf. That track if it continued place alabama on the outer bands or what was at the time a CAT 5 hurricane. So it is correct that alabama at the time of that track was in the cone to be hit.

You wanna discuss stupid? Look in the mirror and see your face.

Now.....

Less than Tropical Storm wind are "some sort of effects".

Reframy.....

 

I see no argument that disputes what I said.  Try again.  You are spinning like a top.  There is no reframing.  You lose.  Don't ever bring it up again on an unrelated topic.  All your questions have been answered.  One thing missing is your explanation at to why you think I am wrong. 

Huey » 05 Nov 2021, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 12:46 pm

I see no argument that disputes what I said.  Try again.  You are spinning like a top.  There is no reframing.  You lose.  Don't ever bring it up again on an unrelated topic.  All your questions have been answered.  One thing missing is your explanation at to why you think I am wrong.

Dwarf,

"Hit"?

"In the cone"?

What does the map you've been waving around say about that, exactly?

Blackvegetable » 05 Nov 2021, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 12:36 pm

Huey » 05 Nov 2021, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 12:20 pm

Sorry, we are at the point where you make your own case.  Keep in mind my words were AL was projected to feel some sort of effects.  Less than Tropical Storm wind are "some sort of effects".

Game.  Set. Match.

Ii said nothing about threats

 

This is about YOUR "evidence"

Sorry, we are at the point where you make your own case.  Keep in mind my words were AL was projected to feel some sort of effects.  Less than Tropical Storm wind are "some sort of effects".

I just did.

You ran from another question relating exclusively to Objective Fact.

This is why I used PG...

You can't pull this crap there......when you can't, you ALWAYS lose....in the course of 2 questions.

 

The only crap bieng pulled is on your end because you have had your *** handed to you for 2 years on the topic.  You are a **** liar, a coward, and ****.  Make a **** a case, loser.  No more questions will be answered nor will your demands be met.  It is your turn, wannabe Perry Mason.

No wonder your neighbor pepper sprayed you.  You are one cowardly waste of a ****.  

Blackvegetable » 05 Nov 2021, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 12:47 pm

Huey » 05 Nov 2021, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 12:46 pm

I see no argument that disputes what I said.  Try again.  You are spinning like a top.  There is no reframing.  You lose.  Don't ever bring it up again on an unrelated topic.  All your questions have been answered.  One thing missing is your explanation at to why you think I am wrong.

Dwarf,

"Hit"?

"In the cone"?

What does the map you've been waving around say about that, exactly?

 

No, questions.  Make an argument.

 

Huey » 05 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm

The only crap bieng pulled is on your end because you have had your *** handed to you for 2 years on the topic.  You are a **** liar, a coward, and ****.  Make a **** a case, loser.  No more questions will be answered nor will your demands be met.  It is your turn, wannabe Perry Mason.

No wonder your neighbor pepper sprayed you.  You are one cowardly waste of a ****.

No, Reframy...

You lost this battle several times...


You keep bleeding out on the same point...


What does the Key on YOUR map say about "hit in the cone"?

 

Blackvegetable » 05 Nov 2021, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 12:54 pm

Huey » 05 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm

The only crap bieng pulled is on your end because you have had your *** handed to you for 2 years on the topic.  You are a **** liar, a coward, and ****.  Make a **** a case, loser.  No more questions will be answered nor will your demands be met.  It is your turn, wannabe Perry Mason.

No wonder your neighbor pepper sprayed you.  You are one cowardly waste of a ****.

No, Reframy...

You lost this battle several times...


You keep bleeding out on the same point...


What does the Key on YOUR map say about "hit in the cone"?

 

 

Already addressed.  Make your case or STFU.  Now.  Are you afraid to be on record where YOUR words get to be questioned.  Like in real life you are ******. 

Huey » 05 Nov 2021, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 12:51 pm

No, questions.  Make an argument.

You lied.


Got it, Reframy?

Huey » 05 Nov 2021, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 12:56 pm

Already addressed.  Make your case or STFU.  Now.  Are you afraid to be on record where YOUR words get to be questioned.  Like in real life you are ******.

No...You are lying....

As you always do when you find yourself in "the box".

Dorian did not threaten Alabama....

Grifty was making **** up.

If your map had ANY bearing whatsoever on the question, Grifty would be holding THAT in the photo - not one he defaced with a Sharpie..


**** brick...

Blackvegetable » 05 Nov 2021, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 12:57 pm

Huey » 05 Nov 2021, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 12:51 pm

No, questions.  Make an argument.

You lied.


Got it, Reframy?

 

You say that a lot Nancy Boy.  Rarely do you make a case without questions.  Now is your time to do just that.  Start by saying they would be hit by hurricane as opposed to some sort of affect from the storm.  Also add in there the part where I said on it's current path it was headed towards the gulf in a NW direction.  

Get to work or STFU and take our L.  You lost. 

Blackvegetable » 05 Nov 2021, 12:59 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 12:59 pm

Huey » 05 Nov 2021, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 12:56 pm

Already addressed.  Make your case or STFU.  Now.  Are you afraid to be on record where YOUR words get to be questioned.  Like in real life you are ******.

No...You are lying....

As you always do when you find yourself in "the box".

Dorian did not threaten Alabama....

Grifty was making **** up.

If your map had ANY bearing whatsoever on the question, Grifty would be holding THAT in the photo - not one he defaced with a Sharpie..


**** brick...

 

Never said it did threaten AL.  I said on the current path AL was projected to feel some sort of affect.

Now run along loser, you bore me with your ****** ways.  No lie was told.  You **** worthless POS.