Liberal Forum

Huey » 02 Apr 2022, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2022, 3:09 pm

There is rule Daddy’s lil Nazi.  I am not repeating an argument we have had a hundred times when all the info and answers are here.

You have deep rooted psychological issues that you need to have addressed.  Changing threads to this topic while you play some childish game of gotcha (that you continue to lose) shows you can’t let your loses go.

Once again.

You refuse to acknowledge both your own words, and objective fact.

That's pathological.
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Apr 2022, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2022, 3:11 pm

Once again.

You refuse to acknowledge both your own words, and objective fact.

That's pathological.

Post the words you want acknowledged on this topic.  

Huey » 02 Apr 2022, 3:17 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2022, 3:17 pm

Post the words you want acknowledged on this topic.

No...not qualified.


Your words. Period.


 

Blackvegetable » 02 Apr 2022, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2022, 3:41 pm

No...not qualified.

Your words. Period.

Well until you post the words that have you in mega meltdown mode I can’t do nuttin’ for ya.

Post the specific words, in context.  That has got to be some reason you are chasing me all over the forum daily with your stupid ****.

Huey » 02 Apr 2022, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2022, 3:44 pm

Well until you post the words that have you in mega meltdown mode I can’t do nuttin’ for ya.

Post the specific words, in context.  That has got to be some reason you are chasing me all over the forum daily with your stupid ****.

No, Tiny..

Well until you post the words that have you in mega meltdown mode I can’t do nuttin’ for ya.

This is ****.

Melting down is what you do.

Post the specific words, in context.

No, little ****.

Acknowledge your words.

Then if you believe they are taken out of context, don't assert it, demonstrate it.

As a man would.

That has got to be some reason you are chasing me all over the forum daily with your stupid ****.

That's another lie.

You run to every thread and every post crying "make a case", then you proceed down your zerointegrity path.
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Apr 2022, 3:58 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2022, 3:58 pm

No, Tiny..

This is ****.

Melting down is what you do.

No, little ****.

Acknowledge your words.

Then if you believe they are taken out of context, don't assert it, demonstrate it.

As a man would.

That's another lie.

You run to every thread and every post crying "make a case", then you proceed down your zerointegrity path.

Dum Dum, I can’t acknowledge any words until you post them.  You have very little time left to get this done.  Remember, when you cherry pick I have to all the work to find it, Post them in context with a link, and then listen to you whine that I did not acknowledge my words.
 
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Apr 2022, 3:58 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2022, 3:58 pm

No, Tiny..

This is ****.

Melting down is what you do.

No, little ****.

Acknowledge your words.

Then if you believe they are taken out of context, don't assert it, demonstrate it.

As a man would.

That's another lie.

You run to every thread and every post crying "make a case", then you proceed down your zerointegrity path.

PS Daddy’s little Vagina.  When I do demonstrate you cherry picked out of context by supply complete quotes and links you whine I did not acknowledge my words because I did not use your Nazi command of yes or no.  Bring it on ****.  I am taking the family out to dinner while you spend another lonely Saturday night posting.

Huey » 02 Apr 2022, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2022, 4:02 pm

Dum Dum, I can’t acknowledge any words until you post them.  You have very little time left to get this done.  Remember, when you cherry pick I have to all the work to find it, Post them in context with a link, and then listen to you whine that I did not acknowledge my words.

You failed to do so when I did, lying little ****.

You've made this bed.
 

Huey » 02 Apr 2022, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2022, 4:05 pm

PS Daddy’s little Vagina.  When I do demonstrate you cherry picked out of context by supply complete quotes and links you whine I did not acknowledge my words because I did not use your Nazi command of yes or no.  Bring it on ****.  I am taking the family out to dinner while you spend another lonely Saturday night posting.

What is the current discussion about, Sheilagh?
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Apr 2022, 4:09 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2022, 4:09 pm

What is the current discussion about, Sheilagh?

You want me to acknowledge some words.  Post them.  I am about leave.  I can’t acknowledge, or refute, what you don’t have the balls to post.  I am not playing your cryptic, babbling question game.

Huey » 02 Apr 2022, 4:10 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2022, 4:10 pm

You want me to acknowledge some words.  Post them.  I am about leave.  I can’t acknowledge, or refute, what you don’t have the balls to post.  I am not playing your cryptic, babbling question game.

No...that is your version.

It is about the fact that you are such a rancid little ****** that you won't acknowledge your own words, and objective facts.

In such a context, you shouldn't call anyone a vagina, Sheilagh.


 

Blackvegetable » 02 Apr 2022, 4:14 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2022, 4:14 pm

No...that is your version.

It is about the fact that you are such a rancid little ****** that you won't acknowledge your own words, and objective facts.

In such a context, you shouldn't call anyone a vagina, Sheilagh.

Bagina, I acknowledge my words quite often.  You get pissed because I don’t your cherry picked ****, that is in many cases taken from a partial sentence, and automatically acknowledge them.  You get even more pissed when I post the entire quote with a link and sometimes include what I responded to.

And what really pisses you off is when I don’t cede to your demands of a simple yes or no answer.  Lying Daddy’s Vagina, you chalk anything answered in your required format.

Times up.  I’ll look tomorrow 

Huey » 02 Apr 2022, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2022, 4:17 pm

Bagina, I acknowledge my words quite often.  You get pissed because I don’t your cherry picked ****, that is in many cases taken from a partial sentence, and automatically acknowledge them.  You get even more pissed when I post the entire quote with a link and sometimes include what I responded to.

And what really pisses you off is when I don’t cede to your demands of a simple yes or no answer.  Lying Daddy’s Vagina, you chalk anything answered in your required format.

Times up.  I’ll look tomorrow

you don't.

You are a lying zero integrity piece of ****.

Blackvegetable » 02 Apr 2022, 4:21 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2022, 4:21 pm

you don't.

You are a lying zero integrity piece of ****.

     

Not really.  Since you posted no words on the topic that I need “acknowledge” I deem you full of snot, as usual. 

I guess we are done here.  And remember all comments on this topic will be addressed here.

Huey » 14 Jun 2021, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2021, 10:35 am

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2021, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2021, 10:26 am

It's irrelevant.......which is why Grifty had to take a sharpie to the REAL map.....

Now, returning to the evidence...

Did Dorian threaten Alabama?

I am not concerned with what Trump did.  I am concerned with your disingenuous characterization of my comments.  You have not proven them wrong. 

I have already answered that question.  Last time:  

Did the real path threaten Al?  Nope.  Did an earlier projected path on the 29th of August put AL in line for the outer bands of the storm?  Yup.

You lose.

@Blackvegetable  z
 

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:29 am

@Blackvegetable  z

Yes, no, or Can't recall.

Very simple, Tiny..

Here's a hint.


 
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2022, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:33 am

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:29 am

@Blackvegetable  z

Yes, no, or Can't recall.

Very simple, Tiny..

Here's a hint.


 
 

 

I have already bumped TWO threads with the answer.  Take it or leave it.  I have given you a strait up yes or no answer already.  

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:36 am

I have already bumped TWO threads with the answer.  Take it or leave it.  I have given you a strait up yes or no answer already.

Yes


No


Can't recall.



Simple.

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:29 am

Huey » 14 Jun 2021, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2021, 10:35 am

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2021, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2021, 10:26 am

It's irrelevant.......which is why Grifty had to take a sharpie to the REAL map.....

Now, returning to the evidence...

Did Dorian threaten Alabama?

I am not concerned with what Trump did.  I am concerned with your disingenuous characterization of my comments.  You have not proven them wrong. 

I have already answered that question.  Last time:  

Did the real path threaten Al?  Nope.  Did an earlier projected path on the 29th of August put AL in line for the outer bands of the storm?  Yup.

You lose.

@Blackvegetable  z

Did the real path threaten Al?  Nope.  Did an earlier projected path on the 29th of August put AL in line for the outer bands of the storm?  Yup.

Definition of NOPE

Definition of nope 
informal
: NO entry 1
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2022, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:36 am

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:36 am

I have already bumped TWO threads with the answer.  Take it or leave it.  I have given you a strait up yes or no answer already.

Yes

No

Can't recall.

Simple.

Definition of nope 
informal
: NO entry 1


Did the real path threaten Al?  Nope.  Did an earlier projected path on the 29th of August put AL in line for the outer bands of the storm?  Yup.