Liberal Forum

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:37 am

Did the real path threaten Al?  Nope.  Did an earlier projected path on the 29th of August put AL in line for the outer bands of the storm?  Yup.

Definition of NOPE

Definition of nope 
informal
: NO entry 1

No...take another look at the map.


Try again.


 

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:37 am

Did the real path threaten Al?  Nope.  Did an earlier projected path on the 29th of August put AL in line for the outer bands of the storm?  Yup.

Definition of NOPE

Definition of nope 
informal
: NO entry 1

Post Grifty's Dorian tweet.

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2022, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:40 am

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:37 am

Did the real path threaten Al?  Nope.  Did an earlier projected path on the 29th of August put AL in line for the outer bands of the storm?  Yup.

Definition of NOPE

Definition of nope 
informal
: NO entry 1

Post Grifty's Dorian tweet.

 

Pound Sand!

I don't care about Trump's tweet.  I never said Dorian threatened AL.  If you like you can admit I have answered your question multiple times over the years and YOU can post his tweet.

From elsewhere on this thread:

Already asked and answered.  Again, for the functioning idiots, ultimately no (dorian did not threaten AL).

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:42 am

Pound Sand!

I don't care about Trump's tweet.  I never said Dorian threatened AL.  If you like you can admit I have answered your question multiple times over the years and YOU can post his tweet.

From elsewhere on this thread:

Already asked and answered.  Again, for the functioning idiots, ultimately no (dorian did not threaten AL).

I'm sure you don't.....now, Reframy.

But you certainly rose to its defense then.

Have you managed to acknowledge that defacing the map was the act of a child?
 

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:42 am

Pound Sand!

I don't care about Trump's tweet.  I never said Dorian threatened AL.  If you like you can admit I have answered your question multiple times over the years and YOU can post his tweet.

From elsewhere on this thread:

Already asked and answered.  Again, for the functioning idiots, ultimately no (dorian did not threaten AL).

https://images.app.goo.gl/29eSiAgbUd6zELdu7
 
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2022, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:44 am

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:42 am

Pound Sand!

I don't care about Trump's tweet.  I never said Dorian threatened AL.  If you like you can admit I have answered your question multiple times over the years and YOU can post his tweet.

From elsewhere on this thread:

Already asked and answered.  Again, for the functioning idiots, ultimately no (dorian did not threaten AL).

I'm sure you don't.....now, Reframy.

But you certainly rose to its defense then.

Have you managed to acknowledge that defacing the map was the act of a child?
 

 

I am not bent out of shape over the President of the United States marking on a map of an agency he oversees.  Not sure why you are still acting like a child about  this 3years later.

Have you managed to acknowledge the fact that in the last three years I have answered your question multiple times?  You can use ST all you like the record is clear.  

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2022, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:48 am

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:42 am

Pound Sand!

I don't care about Trump's tweet.  I never said Dorian threatened AL.  If you like you can admit I have answered your question multiple times over the years and YOU can post his tweet.

From elsewhere on this thread:

Already asked and answered.  Again, for the functioning idiots, ultimately no (dorian did not threaten AL).

https://images.app.goo.gl/29eSiAgbUd6zELdu7
 
 

 

Don't see the word threatened in that tweet.  On the track posted ONE WEEK OUT they were in line to feel something.  

So  you must have a case in there somewhere. 

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:50 am

Don't see the word threatened in that tweet.  On the track posted ONE WEEK OUT they were in line to feel something.  

So  you must have a case in there somewhere.

I sense Bpanic.    

roadkill » 19 Jul 2022, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:51 am

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:50 am

Don't see the word threatened in that tweet.  On the track posted ONE WEEK OUT they were in line to feel something.  

So  you must have a case in there somewhere.

I sense Bpanic.

 

 
 

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:50 am

Don't see the word threatened in that tweet.  On the track posted ONE WEEK OUT they were in line to feel something.  

So  you must have a case in there somewhere.

Post what you DID see...

 

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:54 am

US Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross had threatened to fire senior staff at the federal weather agency unless they backed President Donald Trump's claim that Hurricane Dorian might hit Alabama, the New York Times reports.

 It says this led to last week's statement by the agency, disavowing an earlier position by a regional office that the US state was not at risk.

 The commerce department has dismissed the newspaper's report as "false".

 Alabama was not hit by the storm.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49645498

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2022, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 10:15 am

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:50 am

Don't see the word threatened in that tweet.  On the track posted ONE WEEK OUT they were in line to feel something.  

So  you must have a case in there somewhere.

Post what you DID see...

 

 

Pound Sand.

You keep asking using the words "threaten" and Alabama.  Which I have answered multiple times over the past 3 years.  The word threaten does not appear in that tweet.  If you have another point to make, go for it.  

 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2022, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 10:17 am

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:54 am

US Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross had threatened to fire senior staff at the federal weather agency unless they backed President Donald Trump's claim that Hurricane Dorian might hit Alabama, the New York Times reports.

 It says this led to last week's statement by the agency, disavowing an earlier position by a regional office that the US state was not at risk.

 The commerce department has dismissed the newspaper's report as "false".

 Alabama was not hit by the storm.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49645498

So?  
 

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 10:23 am

So?

QED

Huey » 04 Sep 2019, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2019, 4:15 pm

This is a joke, right?

PS. Remember the last time you guys ranted about the AL comment I told you the original tracks had it crossing FL and heading to the Gulf. In a northwest direction? Look at the map and see where AL is. Seems to me you just down your own argument.

@Blackvegetable  

The record.

Huey » 04 Sep 2019, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2019, 4:15 pm

This is a joke, right?

Did anybody die who would have evacuated if they hadn't seen the lying cocksucker's fraud weather report?  Don't know if federal law was broken or not, but I suspect that the orange cocksucker could be subject to civil suit for providing knowingly fake information for political purposes, and caused harm or death to anybody who experienced such harm due to this disinformation.

He was the President.  Is the President liable for providing disinformation that caused harm to the citizens he/she is responsible for?  Is the President responsible for providing accurate information in such situations?  I believe so.  If a licensed financial advisor or financial agent provides disinformation to clients that cause the clients a loss, is that financial advisor subject to criminal indictment and civil suit for such disinformation.

You bet your *** that financial specialist is...just ask Bernie Madoff.

Your entire participation on this forum is a sick joke, Baby Huey.

IkeBana » 15 Jan 2023, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jan 2023, 10:08 am

Did anybody die who would have evacuated if they hadn't seen the lying cocksucker's fraud weather report?  Don't know if federal law was broken or not, but I suspect that the orange cocksucker could be subject to civil suit for providing knowingly fake information for political purposes, and caused harm or death to anybody who experienced such harm due to this disinformation.

He was the President.  Is the President liable for providing disinformation that caused harm to the citizens he/she is responsible for?  Is the President responsible for providing accurate information in such situations?  I believe so.  If a licensed financial advisor or financial agent provides disinformation to clients that cause the clients a loss, is that financial advisor subject to criminal indictment and civil suit for such disinformation.

You bet your *** that financial specialist is...just ask Bernie Madoff.

Your entire participation on this forum is a sick joke, Baby Huey.

Hmm, *******, that was the official Hurricane Center track a week out.  Read the thread and get back to me.

 

Huey » 15 Jan 2023, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jan 2023, 10:10 am

Hmm, *******, that was the official Hurricane Center track a week out.  Read the thread and get back to me.

Says you.  Trump lied and still lies about everything.  He's a pathological liar...he lies when there's no reason to lie.  He lies when it's of no direct benefit to himself...why do pathological liars like Trump do that?  Because if their lies cause harm or distress to others, it brings a remarkable level of pleasure to a vile malignant narcissist like Donald Trump.  "I just grab 'em by the ******."

Go **** yourself and get back to me.
 

IkeBana » 15 Jan 2023, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jan 2023, 10:24 am

Says you.  Trump lied and still lies about everything.  He's a pathological liar...he lies when there's no reason to lie.  He lies when it's of no direct benefit to himself...why do pathological liars like Trump do that?  Because if their lies cause harm or distress to others, it brings a remarkable level of pleasure to a vile malignant narcissist like Donald Trump.  "I just grab 'em by the ******."

Go **** yourself and get back to me.

Thata boy, show that strong TDS you have. Biden is the one on the hot seat now.... keep deflecting.

IkeBana » 15 Jan 2023, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jan 2023, 10:24 am

Says you.  Trump lied and still lies about everything.  He's a pathological liar...he lies when there's no reason to lie.  He lies when it's of no direct benefit to himself...why do pathological liars like Trump do that?  Because if their lies cause harm or distress to others, it brings a remarkable level of pleasure to a vile malignant narcissist like Donald Trump.  "I just grab 'em by the ******."

Go **** yourself and get back to me.

Dude, look at the picture that Bv spams the forum with,  moron.  

I am guessing that since I just slammed you the next step in your argument is to say trump had the hurricane center publish a false track.