Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 11:39 am

Is your current position that Grifty DID lie?

sorry, that's not a stand.  Your are struggling right now because you accusation fell apart with your own evidence.

Sorry.  You have to say what I lied about. Specifically.  This mean, Rainman, you will have to take a stand.  Also meaning I am not that concerned.

You’re not man enough.

​​​​​​​I am unclear as to what you think I lied about,

 

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 11:42 am

sorry, that's not a stand.  Your are struggling right now because you accusation fell apart with your own evidence.

Sorry.  You have to say what I lied about. Specifically.  This mean, Rainman, you will have to take a stand.  Also meaning I am not that concerned.

You’re not man enough.

I am unclear as to what you think I lied about,

It looks somewhat like 2, 1Stands...
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 11:52 am

It looks somewhat like 2, 1Stands...

Right now you are swinging in the dark looking for something to be randomly hit.  You have yet to name the lie or post these two stands.

sorry, that's not a stand.  Your are struggling right now because you accusation fell apart with your own evidence.

Sorry.  You have to say what I lied about. Specifically.  This mean, Rainman, you will have to take a stand.  Also meaning I am not that concerned.

You’re not man enough.

I am unclear as to what you think I lied about,

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 11:59 am

Right now you are swinging in the dark looking for something to be randomly hit.  You have yet to name the lie or post these two stands.

No, Tiny...I'm not...

You keep bleating that you don't understand what my posting of that picture represents...

It has been explained to you repeatedly. You were shown examples.

The clear and unambiguous meaning of that photo is that Grifty lied.

But you can't even bring yourself to see the Sharpie modification.
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 12:02 pm

No, Tiny...I'm not...

You keep bleating that you don't understand what my posting of that picture represents...

It has been explained to you repeatedly. You were shown examples.

The clear and unambiguous meaning of that photo is that Grifty lied.

But you can't even bring yourself to see the Sharpie modification.

**** BIDEN
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 12:02 pm

No, Tiny...I'm not...

You keep bleating that you don't understand what my posting of that picture represents...

It has been explained to you repeatedly. You were shown examples.

The clear and unambiguous meaning of that photo is that Grifty lied.

But you can't even bring yourself to see the Sharpie modification.

No, Rainman, it hasn’t been explained.  You fail to Remeber that the track map was a week prior to making land fall. I’ll find one of my posts.

 

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 12:09 pm

No, Rainman, it hasn’t been explained. You fail to Remeber that the track map was a week prior to making land fall. I’ll find one of my posts.

I posted the evidence, verbatim....with links.

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 10:07 am

Question:

1) What can we conclude, with certainty, about the threat posed to the State of Alabama by Hurricane Dorian with the aid of nothing more than this photograph?
(please keep answers focused and to the point.)

Answer:

Already asked and answered.  Again, for the functioning idiots, ultimately no (dorian did not threaten AL).  That chart was a projected a week out.  At that point the track was for the storm to cross Florida over Lake Okeechobee in a NW direction and head towards the Gulf.  AT THAT TIME, a week out, Alabama was projected to feel some effects.  

Nothing in that answer is false or inaccurate.

@Blackvegetable  


 

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 12:11 pm

I posted the evidence, verbatim....with links.

You never said what the lie was.  I just bumped a post for you.  As I said I would.

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 12:12 pm

@Blackvegetable

Yes...I know that you have taken a qualified stance based on a complete misrepresentation of a map that the WH never bothered handing The Galoot.....

Now clarify it...

Did Grifty lie?

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 12:09 pm

No, Rainman, it hasn’t been explained.  You fail to Remeber that the track map was a week prior to making land fall. I’ll find one of my posts.

The FACTS ARE, it never made landfall on ANY Track NOAA and the NHC predicted. So they too "lied" about it all....


https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2019/D ... aphics.php

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 12:13 pm

You never said what the lie was.  I just bumped a post for you.  As I said I would.

TinyReframer,

Focus.

What have I told you that photo represents?
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 12:15 pm

Yes...I know that you have taken a qualified stance based on a complete misrepresentation of a map that the WH never bothered handing The Galoot.....

Now clarify it...

Did Grifty lie?

Sorry, you need to speed this up.  Post my lie and take a stance.  I have a very good football game to watch shortly.  

It gets tiring beating this diversion of yours every years or so.  

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 12:17 pm

Sorry, you need to speed this up. Post my lie and take a stance.  I have a very good football game to watch shortly.  

It gets tiring beating this diversion of yours every years or so.

Did Grifty lie?

Beekeeper » 05 Feb 2023, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 12:16 pm

The FACTS ARE, it never made landfall on ANY Track NOAA and the NHC predicted. So they too "lied" about it all....

https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2019/D ... aphics.php

Yup.  I guess they lied about Katrina as well.  

And after Katrina, if Cat 5 a week out it looked like it was heading in a certain direction and they said nothing these people would be all over that.

@Blackvegetable  

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 12:19 pm

Did Grifty lie?

Already discussed.  Now you are diverting.  You claimed I lied.  Post it.

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 12:19 pm

Yup.  I guess they lied about Katrina as well.  

And after Katrina, if Cat 5 a week out it looked like it was heading in a certain direction and they said nothing these people would be all over that.

@Blackvegetable

Katrina started out as a Tropical depression and inside of 48 hours it was a Cat 3 hurricane heading to hit New Orleans inside of 36 hours. There was NO time to call for a mass evacuation, get it organized and people heading out.

But it was "Bushes fault" that the roads and bridges to get into NO were either flooded or washed out and the ONLY way in was by helicopter and even then, there was virtually no place for it to land. I know. I went there trying to help and you couldn't find a way in that didn't have all of the above in your path.

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 12:20 pm

Already discussed. Now you are diverting.  You claimed I lied.  Post it.

3 keystrokes...you said you were in a hurry..

Have I, or have I not, explained the purpose that photo serves when posted?

(Keep it focused)

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm

3 keystrokes...you said you were in a hurry..

Have I, or have I not, explained the purpose that photo serves when posted?

(Keep it focused)

Sorry, you claimed I lied.  Post.  Take a stand.  What did I lie about.  I am gonna post your words, Rainman.
 

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 12:24 pm

Sorry, you claimed I lied.  Post.  Take a stand.  What did I lie about.  I am gonna post your words, Rainman.

You lied when you said I hadn't.