Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 2:35 pm

You have taken the following stands

1) Dorian threatened Alabama 

2) Dorian threatened Alabama in a map describing the path of the hurricane.

3) What Sharpie?

4) Dorian didn't threaten Alabama,  but Grifty was right for reasons other than the map he had to deface

5) Grifty had to deface the map because it was lying to him.

I may have missed others...

I don’t see my posts up there.  Let me help you out.  

Nice try.  This is why I go to the record.
 

Huey » 05 Sep 2019, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2019, 12:20 pm

Sorry, the track on the map has the storm heading over lake Okeechobee towards the northwest and the gulf. That track if it continued place alabama on the outer bands or what was at the time a CAT 5 hurricane. So it is correct that alabama at the time of that track was in the cone to be hit.

You wanna discuss stupid? Look in the mirror and see your face.

@Blackvegetable  

theres more.  Wait before replying.  

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 10:07 am

Question:

1) What can we conclude, with certainty, about the threat posed to the State of Alabama by Hurricane Dorian with the aid of nothing more than this photograph?
(please keep answers focused and to the point.)

Answer:

Already asked and answered.  Again, for the functioning idiots, ultimately no (dorian did not threaten AL).  That chart was a projected a week out.  At that point the track was for the storm to cross Florida over Lake Okeechobee in a NW direction and head towards the Gulf.  AT THAT TIME, a week out, Alabama was projected to feel some effects.  

Nothing in that answer is false or inaccurate.

@Blackvegetable  

No contradictions there.  You may reply now.
 

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 2:37 pm

Huey » 05 Sep 2019, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2019, 12:20 pm

Sorry, the track on the map has the storm heading over lake Okeechobee towards the northwest and the gulf. That track if it continued place alabama on the outer bands or what was at the time a CAT 5 hurricane. So it is correct that alabama at the time of that track was in the cone to be hit.

You wanna discuss stupid? Look in the mirror and see your face.

@Blackvegetable  

theres more.  Wait before replying.  

 

Bump
 

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 2:40 pm

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 10:07 am

Question:

1) What can we conclude, with certainty, about the threat posed to the State of Alabama by Hurricane Dorian with the aid of nothing more than this photograph?
(please keep answers focused and to the point.)

Answer:

Already asked and answered.  Again, for the functioning idiots, ultimately no (dorian did not threaten AL).  That chart was a projected a week out.  At that point the track was for the storm to cross Florida over Lake Okeechobee in a NW direction and head towards the Gulf.  AT THAT TIME, a week out, Alabama was projected to feel some effects.  

Nothing in that answer is false or inaccurate.

@Blackvegetable  

No contradictions there.  You may reply now.
 

 

Bump

As you run to the other topic.
 

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 2:36 pm

I don’t see my posts up there.  Let me help you out.  

Nice try.  This is why I go to the record.

Whoa...you asked me for your numerous stands, not your words..

"no.....ultimately"


It either did, or did not threaten.

The evidence of such threat would be an agency map confirming it.

The fact that Grifty had to draw it in tells you that no such map could be found on his behalf.

Do you understand my stand?




 

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 2:52 pm

Bump

As you run to the other topic.

You can stop twatting about now...

you indicted yourself again.

 

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 2:53 pm

Whoa...you asked me for your numerous stands, not your words..

"no.....ultimately"

It either did, or did not threaten.

The evidence of such threat would be an agency map confirming it.

The fact that Grifty had to draw it in tells you that no such map could be found on his behalf.

Do you understand my stand?

I posted my words.  Not your retellings.  They have been posted twice.  

My stand has not changed in three years.  As my words show.  Keep flailing around.
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 2:54 pm

You can stop twatting about now...

you indicted yourself again.

No, I posted my words that’s how you are wrong Mary. 

What else you got?

@Vegas  

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 2:54 pm

I posted my words.  Not your retellings.  They have been posted twice.  

My stand has not changed in three years.  As my words show.  Keep flailing around.

I still have no idea wtf your "stand" is.

Either Dorian did, or did not, threaten Alabama. 

What's your stand?
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 2:56 pm

I still have no idea wtf your "stand" is.

Either Dorian did, or did not, threaten Alabama. 

What's your stand?

Because you keep lining my words out.

I posted my stand from 2019.

I posted my Stand from 2021.

I posted my stand from this year.

Same every time.  
 

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 2:55 pm

No, I posted my words that’s how you are wrong Mary. 

What else you got?

@Vegas

No, I posted your words showing that you HAVEN'T taken a stand.

"Threaten" isn't an "yes and ultimately no" issue....Either it did, or didn't. 

Period.


 

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 2:56 pm

I still have no idea wtf your "stand" is.

Either Dorian did, or did not, threaten Alabama. 

What's your stand?

BV NEEDS AN AJUSTMENT

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 2:56 pm

I still have no idea wtf your "stand" is.

Either Dorian did, or did not, threaten Alabama. 

What's your stand?

Already addressed.

 

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 2:57 pm

Because you keep lining my words out.

I posted my stand from 2019.

I posted my Stand from 2021.

I posted my stand from this year.

Same every time.

Just post your **** stand.

 

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 2:58 pm

Already addressed.

It's about ANSWERING it.

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 2:58 pm

No, I posted your words showing that you HAVEN'T taken a stand.

"Threaten" isn't an "yes and ultimately no" issue....Either it did, or didn't. 

Period.

You have not posted my words.  I did.  And you lost.  

 

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 2:59 pm

It's about ANSWERING it.

it has been answered. 

You keep lining my words out.

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 2:58 pm

Just post your **** stand.

Already done meltdown Mary.  I’ll do it again.

@Vegas  

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 2:59 pm

You have not posted my words.  I did.  And you lost.

Did you use the words "no.....ultimately" to describe your "stand"?

I have explained why that is not a stand, given your other stands