I have been quite clear.Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Because you speak in vague and contradictory terms, and never answer questions trying to clarify your gibberish?
Don’t really care.
You tell me. I have already answered that. All of that happened well AFTER FEMA and the State acted. And Remember, that had track had Dorian making landfall only a few days AFTER the Aug 29th track map. So of course the states and FEMA had to react.
You tell me. I have already answered that. All of that happened well AFTER FEMA and the State acted. And Remember, that had track had Dorian making landfall only a few days AFTER the Aug 29th track map. So of course the states and FEMA had to react.
Tiny,Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑ I have been quite clear.
You leave out many details.
The Aug 29th Map predicted land fall with days over Florida and moving in western direction towards the Gulf and slightly North.
You also you leave out the fact of the major turn NORTH that changed the entire track.
So you don't.
the only reason you have them is I reposted them numerous times for you.Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Are these your words?
ultimately no (dorian did not threaten AL)
do they mean anything?
Mary,Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
Focus...
The question is
"Did Dorian threaten Alabama?"
You've answered no and yes.
you have already lost.
It’s over.
More lies and gibberish.Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑ No, I posted your words showing that you HAVEN'T taken a stand.
"Threaten" isn't an "yes and ultimately no" issue....Either it did, or didn't.
Period.
This isn't about the administration, it is about a stupid tweet, and the even more stupid effort to rewrite the narrative by threat.Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑ you have already lost.
Hurricane Ian was projected to make landfall in Tampa. Based on the best info available at the time Tampa did evacs. But it make landfall there. Inguess the Biden admin lied,
Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑ @Vegas
Mary wants to argue where the Hurricane actually went, which was not known on on Aug 29th. We all know Dorian turned. You have to make decisions based on the information available at the time.
No....You're going on in an effort to reconcile a half dozen different stands.Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑ @Vegas
Mary wants to argue where the Hurricane actually went, which was not known on on Aug 29th. We all know Dorian turned. You have to make decisions based on the information available at the time.
More lies and gibberish.Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑ This isn't about the administration, it is about a stupid tweet, and the even more stupid effort to rewrite the narrative by threat.
I am having too much fun.Vegas » 05 Feb 2023, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Forget what he wants. He is always demanding ****. Always. Has he answered any of your questions? If not, then **** him.
Yes...
As displayed my “stand” or story has never changed.Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑ No....You're going on in an effort to reconcile a half dozen different stands.
Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Mary,
At the time of the Aug 29th Track, Yes, Al was under some level of threat within days,
Already asked and answered. Again, for the functioning idiots, ultimately no (dorian did not threaten AL). That chart was a projected a week out. At that point the track was for the storm to cross Florida over Lake Okeechobee in a NW direction and head towards the Gulf. AT THAT TIME, a week out, Alabama was projected to feel some effects.
count the standsYes, Al was under some level of threat within days,
Already asked and answered. Again, for the functioning idiots, ultimately no (dorian did not threaten AL).