Liberal Forum

Beekeeper » 05 Feb 2023, 8:26 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 8:26 pm

OH, so you admit your desires....

nonce (plural nonces)

1. (Britain, derogatory) A sex offender, especially one who is guilty of sexual offences against children. [1975)

Revealing...

try

Nonce definition, the present, or immediate, occasion or purpose (usually used in the phrase for the nonce).

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 8:19 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 8:19 pm

Was this before or after the storm turned north?

The Fed gov thought Al was threatened.  The state thought Al was threatened.  I guess you are calling them liars as well.  

Ylu can’t explain why FEMA STAGED EQUIPMENT in Al or why the guard was activated.

I don't have to.....It's not about me....

It's about the defacing of the map.....

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 8:29 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 8:29 pm

I don't have to.....It's not about me....

It's about the defacing of the map.....

That’s inconsequential.  That occurred days after the tweet.  Had no bearing on anything,

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 8:29 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 8:29 pm

That’s inconsequential.  That occurred days after the tweet.  Had no bearing on anything,

No, it isn't, you **** idiot...

People's jobs were threatened in an effort to mislead the country for the sole purpose of saving Grifty face...


 

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 8:32 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 8:32 pm

No, it isn't, you **** idiot...

People's jobs were threatened in an effort to mislead the country for the sole purpose of saving Grifty face...

Here comes the reframe.

This is about whether or not, based on the track of 29 Aug, Dorian threatened AL.

FEMA and the State thought it did.  BEFORE the tweet, 

The sharpie incident happened days later.  

Beekeeper » 05 Feb 2023, 8:26 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 8:26 pm

OH, so you admit your desires....

nonce (plural nonces)

1. (Britain, derogatory) A sex offender, especially one who is guilty of sexual offences against children. [1975)

NOAA Leaders Privately Disowned Agency’s Rebuke of Scientists Who Contradicted Trump
 Newly released emails show officials at NOAA told the agency’s scientists it did “not approve or support” a controversial agency statement issued after the president falsely said that Alabama was at risk from Hurricane Dorian.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/01/clim ... orian.html

**** rube...

@Huey  

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 8:29 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 8:29 pm

I don't have to.....It's not about me....

It's about the defacing of the map.....

I thought it was about whether or not Dorian threatened Al?  You asked me enough times about that.

Your hilarious, it is like an abbot and Costello comedy routine.

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 8:36 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 8:36 pm

Here comes the reframe.

This is about whether or not, based on the track of 29 Aug, Dorian threatened AL.

FEMA and the State thought it did.  BEFORE the tweet, 

The sharpie incident happened days later.

Here comes the entirely unsupported narrative......running headlong into the evidence...


again.

Yap furiously, Tiny Defender Toady...

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 8:38 pm

Here comes the entirely unsupported narrative......running headlong into the evidence...

again.

Yap furiously, Tiny Defender Toady...

I posted those articles earlier.  You should stike thru less.

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 8:37 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 8:37 pm

I thought it was about whether or not Dorian threatened Al?  You asked me enough times about that.

Your hilarious, it is like an abbot and Costello comedy routine.

You continue to contradict yourself...

I can't figure out why....except, of course, that you're a **** idiot....

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm

Not really.  I told no lie.  I guess these guys lied as well:

FEMA stages in Montgomery; Ala. National Guard preps ahead of Dorian

https://www.wsfa.com/2019/08/30/fema-st ... ad-dorian/

@Blackvegetable  

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 8:39 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 8:39 pm

You continue to contradict yourself...

I can't figure out why....except, of course, that you're a **** idiot....

You favorite go to.
 
 
 

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 8:38 pm

I posted those articles earlier.  You should stike thru less.

Tiny,

That news was rubbed vigorously in your face.....exactly because you had been so toadyishly wrong when the statement was issued.

Both Misty and I IMMEDIATELY called it out as a fraud...and, we were right..

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 8:07 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 8:07 pm

Goofball,

Take a minute....do your homework...

Hollaback....

You calling NPR and NOAA liars?
Clearly it was you who didn't do your homework and got schooled.

Class dismissed.
 
 

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 8:39 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 8:39 pm

You favorite go to.

Tiny,

You are on record as stating that Dorian DIDN'T threaten Alabama...you are also on record that it did.....you have insisted that the Sharpie edit you previously didn't see fit to mention was obliged by some unidentified treachery on the part of WH staff.

Meanwhile, over at the gun debate, your pal has stipulated that the Colt AR 15 is NOT a design, it is a variant - the good /bad news is that he thinks this brings his view into complete agreement with yours.

When you were asked to confirm you ran, when I asked @Redheaded Stranger  to ask you, he ran.

golfboy » 05 Feb 2023, 8:44 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 8:44 pm

You calling NPR and NOAA liars?
Clearly it was you who didn't do your homework and got schooled.

Class dismissed.

Did you read the article?

Would you prefer to see it from the NYPost?

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 8:46 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 8:46 pm

Did you read the article?

Would you prefer to see it from the NYPost?

I've read it.  It doesn't change the fact that Trump was right, and you were wrong. 
Seems like something you'd be used to by now.
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 8:41 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 8:41 pm

Tiny,

That news was rubbed vigorously in your face.....exactly because you had been so toadyishly wrong when the statement was issued.

Both Misty and I IMMEDIATELY called it out as a fraud...and, we were right..

Nom, you weren’t right.  

The lengths younwill go to…

Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2023, 8:45 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 8:45 pm

Tiny,

You are on record as stating that Dorian DIDN'T threaten Alabama...you are also on record that it did.....you have insisted that the Sharpie edit you previously didn't see fit to mention was obliged by some unidentified treachery on the part of WH staff.

Meanwhile, over at the gun debate, your pal has stipulated that the Colt AR 15 is NOT a design, it is a variant - the good /bad news is that he thinks this brings his view into complete agreement with yours.

When you were asked to confirm you ran, when I asked @Redheaded Stranger  to ask you, he ran.

This is what is am record saying:

Already asked and answered.  Again, for the functioning idiots, ultimately no (dorian did not threaten AL).  That chart was a projected a week out.  At that point the track was for the storm to cross Florida over Lake Okeechobee in a NW direction and head towards the Gulf.  AT THAT TIME, a week out, Alabama was projected to feel some effects. 

Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 8:51 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Feb 2023, 8:51 pm

This is what is am record saying:

Already asked and answered.  Again, for the functioning idiots, ultimately no (dorian did not threaten AL).  That chart was a projected a week out.  At that point the track was for the storm to cross Florida over Lake Okeechobee in a NW direction and head towards the Gulf.  AT THAT TIME, a week out, Alabama was projected to feel some effects. 
 

There's no need to repeat it...but if you insist.

 no (dorian did not threaten AL)

That would make Grifty a liar.