Huh?
*Huey » 04 Sep 2019, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑ This is a joke, right?
PS. Remember the last time you guys ranted about the AL comment I told you the original tracks had it crossing FL and heading to the Gulf. In a northwest direction? Look at the map and see where AL is. Seems to me you just down your own argument.
A complete misrepresentation.
Try that again.Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2025, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑A complete misrepresentation.*Huey » 20 Jun 2025, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ This is a joke, right?
PS. Remember the last time you guys ranted about the AL comment I told you the original tracks had it crossing FL and heading to the Gulf. In a northwest direction? Look at the map and see where AL is. Seems to me you just down your own argument.
Again, when asked questions about this map, you ran.
What did the map to which you make reference say about Dorian and Alabama?
Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2025, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑ What did the map to which you make reference say about Dorian and Alabama?
Of course it is...*Huey » 20 Jun 2025, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑ That’s a question. Sorry. That TRACK MAP projects Dorian moving NW over Fl towards the Gulf.
Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2025, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Of course it is...
It makes my case, which is why you run like a little bitch.
:rofl:*Huey » 07 Sep 2019, 7:27 pm » wrote: ↑ And exactly what problem do you have with that post whiny bitch?
Take a stand punk. Go on record.
Also, do you realize how wrong you are on this thread? Lil punk bitch I see how hard you are trying to changed the subject.
*Huey » 20 Jun 2025, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑ you haven’t made a case. That track was 8 days out. Apart of the coast of AL are on the Hulf and NW of Fl ****.
That's the thing about your stupid....it's ageless.
:rofl:*Huey » 04 Sep 2019, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑ This is a joke, right?
PS. Remember the last time you guys ranted about the AL comment I told you the original tracks had it crossing FL and heading to the Gulf. In a northwest direction? Look at the map and see where AL is. Seems to me you just down your own argument.
:die:*Huey » 04 Sep 2019, 5:50 pm » wrote: ↑ So you are serious.
Lmmfao! Impeach the ****!!!! Now.![]()
![]()
You posted what I was talking about. Thank you. As one who lived above the panhandle when a cat 5 has that track ya pay attention.
*Huey » 05 Sep 2019, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Sorry, the track on the map has the storm heading over lake Okeechobee towards the northwest and the gulf. That track if it continued place alabama on the outer bands or what was at the time a CAT 5 hurricane. So it is correct that alabama at the time of that track was in the cone to be hit.
You wanna discuss stupid? Look in the mirror and see your face.
Nobody » 04 Sep 2019, 4:12 pm » wrote: ↑
Just saw him on TV still sticking with his lie that Alabama was in the original forecast.
And the King of the black sharpie has no idea how that black mark got on the map.
The man is so incapable of ever admitting he was wrong about anything that it looks like he may have altered an official NOAA map, which is illegal.
The original Tweet:
The Birmingham National Weather Service correction:
Still diverting from another curbstomping I see.
Obviously maps are not your schtick, Cubicle.