Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 24 Jul 2025, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jul 2025, 8:50 am

What asshole sent this to WC, @Deezer Shoove  ?

It's been a leap year and a half...  (6 years, stupid).
Dorian has been replaced by numerous hurricanes meanwhile.
You assholes are bitching about guns more than that now irrelevant storm...

Give it a **** rest, Alice. Does anyone actually care except a whiner?!

DeezerShoove » 24 Jul 2025, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jul 2025, 2:15 pm

It's been a leap year and a half...  (6 years, stupid).
Dorian has been replaced by numerous hurricanes meanwhile.
You assholes are bitching about guns more than that now irrelevant storm...

Give it a **** rest, Alice. Does anyone actually care except a whiner?!

I guess that answers my question. 

Blackvegetable » 24 Jul 2025, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jul 2025, 2:31 pm

I guess that answers my question.

And you seem to agree as well.
Good for you.

*Huey » 04 Sep 2019, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2019, 4:15 pm

This is a joke, right?

PS. Remember the last time you guys ranted about the AL comment I told you the original tracks had it crossing FL and heading to the Gulf. In a northwest direction? Look at the map and see where AL is. Seems to me you just down your own argument.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 12 Aug 2025, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2025, 2:05 pm

*Huey » 12 Aug 2025, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2025, 2:04 pm

Agan, here is the link to the original thread:

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=43263

It has all the applicable posts. Not rehashing it here.

No need to hide...

There's plenty of curb here for you...
 

 

You can stop running at any time.

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019, 8:28 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2019, 8:28 am

Never mind, Huey...

Is this it?

The statement led to such confusion that the National Weather Service immediately contradicted the statement, without mentioning Trump, of course. “Alabama will NOT see any impacts from #Dorian,” the National Weather Service office in Birmingham, Alabama, tweeted.

Ouch...

Blackvegetable » 24 Jul 2025, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jul 2025, 2:31 pm

I guess that answers my question. 

 

You can find what I posted about Dorian and Alabama on this thread.  

Huey » 05 Jan 2026, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2026, 8:01 am

You can find what I posted about Dorian and Alabama on this thread.

And you can find anything I've posted (exclusive of the consequences of **** storage) in my archives.


Now stop being such a ******...

Blackvegetable » 05 Jan 2026, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2026, 8:04 am

And you can find anything I've posted (exclusive of the consequences of **** storage) in my archives.


Now stop being such a ******...

 

Blackvegetable
 Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
6 minutes ago
It is your turn to acknowledge objective fact.  This is not about your narrative...this is about the facts, and the lies you've told.

I haven't told any lies.



For your other post:

you didn’t say anything about Alabama.  I didn’t say anything about Al.  You asked what I see in the pic.  

Make your point, lil one.

We will get to alabama AFTER you answer or make your point.  I am not going to be the only one answering questions.  

Huey » 05 Sep 2019, 7:04 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2019, 7:04 pm

#readMYsig.

**** brick.

:rofl:  

Just run.

Blackvegetable » 24 Jul 2025, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jul 2025, 2:31 pm

I guess that answers my question.

**** you ya traitor *** pedo bastard!

Delete

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 6:52 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:52 pm

 

Just run.

Somebody is butt hurt.  Digging up old posts again.

Huey » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

Somebody is butt hurt.  Digging up old posts again.

Is it the Haunting......or the Taunting?

 

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Huey » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

Somebody is butt hurt.  Digging up old posts again.

Is it the Haunting......or the Taunting?

 

 

I have told you, I laugh at you.  There is no context where you will haunt or taunt me.  I stand behind what I said about that map, 100%.  '

You, on the other hand, like most of your endeavors and threats, are not man enough to go on record and say what I am wrong about.

Balls in your court, Snow Bunny.

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

I have told you, I laugh at you.  There is no context where you will haunt or taunt me.  I stand behind what I said about that map, 100%.  '

You, on the other hand, like most of your endeavors and threats, are not man enough to go on record and say what I am wrong about.

Balls in your court, Snow Bunny.

Blackvegetable » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

Huey » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

I have told you, I laugh at you.  There is no context where you will haunt or taunt me.  I stand behind what I said about that map, 100%.  '

You, on the other hand, like most of your endeavors and threats, are not man enough to go on record and say what I am wrong about.

Balls in your court, Snow Bunny.

 

Nice NOAA forecast track map of a hurricane showing a storm heading west, slightly northwest, over the Lake Okeechobee area of FL, 8 days prior to landfall. The cone so to speak shows that if continues move northwest the gulf states could see some sore of effects form the storm.  It appears that someone took a sharpie to demonstrate that.

Of course the storm ended up turning north and making land fall at Cape Hatteras as a Cat 2.

 

Huey » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

20 minutes ago

Nice NOAA forecast track map of a hurricane showing a storm heading west, slightly northwest, over the Lake Okeechobee area of FL, 8 days prior to landfall. The cone so to speak shows that if continues move northwest the gulf states could see some sore of effects form the storm.  It appears that someone took a sharpie to demonstrate that.

Of course the storm ended up turning north and making land fall at Cape Hatteras as a Cat 2.

The cone so to speak shows that if continues move northwest the gulf states could see some sore of effects form the storm.

The "cone" was color coded to reflect the probability of certain "effects".

What did it predict for the boundaries of the forecasted track?

It appears that someone took a sharpie to demonstrate that.

why would "someone" need to do so?

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

The "cone" was color coded to reflect the probability of certain "effects".

What did it predict for the boundaries of the forecasted track?

why would "someone" need to do so?

Unless you are taking the pledge you will have to make your case without questions.

My description of the Track Map is spot on.

Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Unless you are 

There's no point.

You don't answer questions. 

The code suggested a very low probability (5%) of 15 mph winds....

The updated track didn't show Alabama affected at all...

The only person who needed to deface the document was the cretin lying about it.

He is pictured.

 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

There's no point.

You don't answer questions. 

The code suggested a very low probability (5%) of 15 mph winds....

The updated track didn't show Alabama affected at all...

The only person who needed to deface the document was the cretin lying about it.

He is pictured.

I said not g of how strong it would be, did I?  Rhetorical questions.  The answer is no.
  Here are my words:

The cone so to speak shows that if continues move northwest the gulf states could see some sort of effects form the storm.

Take your L.  And stop lying about me answering questions..  Grab your measly sack, man up, and take the pledge.  I will prove you wrong.  As usual.

You won't.  Oh, If you take the pledge I will not answer any question based on an edited post.