Liberal Forum

Huey » 07 Sep 2019 8:24 am » wrote:
There was an official track with Dorian threatening AL. And there articles posted talking about it. Sorry, no more double posts because you can’t read.

THERE IS NO MENTION OF ALABAMA AND YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THE MAP SAYS ABOUT IT.

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 8:29 am » wrote:
THERE IS NO MENTION OF ALABAMA AND YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THE MAP SAYS ABOUT IT.

Poor retarded blackie… go have a colt 45

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 8:29 am » wrote:

Huey » 07 Sep 2019 8:24 am » wrote:
There was an official track with Dorian threatening AL. And there articles posted talking about it. Sorry, no more double posts because you can’t read.

THERE IS NO MENTION OF ALABAMA AND YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THE MAP SAYS ABOUT IT.

#readthethread

deadeyeshot » 07 Sep 2019 8:37 am » wrote: Poor retarded blackie… go have a colt 45

Do you see Alabama mentioned?

**** inbred cretin

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 8:42 am » wrote:

deadeyeshot » 07 Sep 2019 8:37 am » wrote: Poor retarded blackie… go have a colt 45

Do you see Alabama mentioned?

**** inbred cretin

GA, SC, and NC weren’t mentioned either.

Huey » 07 Sep 2019 8:37 am » wrote: #readthethread

#hueysgotnothing...again

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 8:43 am » wrote:

Huey » 07 Sep 2019 8:37 am » wrote: #readthethread

#hueysgotnothing...again

I got a lot. I completely destroyed your lie.

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 8:29 am » wrote:

Huey » 07 Sep 2019 8:24 am » wrote:
There was an official track with Dorian threatening AL. And there articles posted talking about it. Sorry, no more double posts because you can’t read.

THERE IS NO MENTION OF ALABAMA AND YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THE MAP SAYS ABOUT IT.

You tell us what the map says abou it. Oh, you also we’re wrong about the color code.

The federal agency that monitors hurricanes said Friday that Hurricane Dorian could have impacted Alabama, backing claims by President Trump that he was right to tweet a warning over the weekend about the storm affecting the state. In an unsigned statement, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) said that "information provided by NOAA and the National Hurricane Center to President Trump and the wider public demonstrated that tropical-storm force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama."
The advisories in question were dated from Wednesday, Aug. 28 to Monday, Sept. 2, the agency said.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/weather-officials-say-dorian-could-have-impacted-alabama-as-trump-said: )

Huey » 07 Sep 2019 8:48 am » wrote:
You tell us what the map says abou it. Oh, you also we’re wrong about the color code.

Now YOU tell us...

We are all here with the official statements of the Weather Service...

You have The Grifter.


If the color code IS included, why after repeated requests do we not know what the green indicates?

#readhissig

MarkMathews » 07 Sep 2019 8:48 am » wrote:The federal agency that monitors hurricanes said Friday that Hurricane Dorian could have impacted Alabama, backing claims by President Trump that he was right to tweet a warning over the weekend about the storm affecting the state. In an unsigned statement, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) said that "information provided by NOAA and the National Hurricane Center to President Trump and the wider public demonstrated that tropical-storm force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama."
The advisories in question were dated from Wednesday, Aug. 28 to Monday, Sept. 2, the agency said.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/weather-officials-say-dorian-could-have-impacted-alabama-as-trump-said: )

An unsigned statement?

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 8:51 am » wrote:

Huey » 07 Sep 2019 8:48 am » wrote:
You tell us what the map says abou it. Oh, you also we’re wrong about the color code.

Now YOU tell us...

We are all here with the official statements of the Weather Service...

You have The Grifter.

If the color code IS included, why after repeated requests do we not know what the green indicates?

#readhissig

I already did tell you. No more questions for you. Either admit you were wrong, or explain how the track map does not show an impact on Al. Make a **** case, loser, or run the **** along.

You were wrong. You are such an idiot you can read a **** map. And we are supposed to believe you do what you claim for a living?

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 8:52 am » wrote:
An unsigned statement?

Face it, beevee. The Prez is right again and there's nothing you can do about it. So sorry. : (

Huey » 07 Sep 2019 8:59 am » wrote:
I already did tell you. No more questions for you. Either admit you were wrong, or explain how the track map does not show an impact on Al. Make a **** case, loser, or run the **** along.

You were wrong. You are such an idiot you can read a **** map. And we are supposed to believe you do what you claim for a living?

No...you posted a citation which doesn't support your claim...

You are insisting that the illustration does, but won't say what the Green indicates..

And claiming victory.


You're a **** idiot.

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 9:02 am » wrote:

Huey » 07 Sep 2019 8:59 am » wrote:
I already did tell you. No more questions for you. Either admit you were wrong, or explain how the track map does not show an impact on Al. Make a **** case, loser, or run the **** along.

You were wrong. You are such an idiot you can read a **** map. And we are supposed to believe you do what you claim for a living?

No...you posted a citation which doesn't support your claim...

You are insisting that the illustration does, but won't say what the Green indicates..

And claiming victory.

You're a **** idiot.

I can read a map. Apparently you can’t. All because you refuse to admit you were wrong.

MarkMathews » 07 Sep 2019 9:00 am » wrote:
Face it, beevee. The Prez is right again and there's nothing you can do about it. So sorry. : (

Sez who?

A macedonian flunky

A braindead dwarf

and a guy they call

The Grifter..

I'm good, Marky

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 9:02 am » wrote:

Huey » 07 Sep 2019 8:59 am » wrote:
I already did tell you. No more questions for you. Either admit you were wrong, or explain how the track map does not show an impact on Al. Make a **** case, loser, or run the **** along.

You were wrong. You are such an idiot you can read a **** map. And we are supposed to believe you do what you claim for a living?

No...you posted a citation which doesn't support your claim...

You are insisting that the illustration does, but won't say what the Green indicates..

And claiming victory.

You're a **** idiot.

Here is another link.

https://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/st ... 164905001/

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 9:04 am » wrote:

MarkMathews » 07 Sep 2019 9:00 am » wrote:
Face it, beevee. The Prez is right again and there's nothing you can do about it. So sorry. : (

Sez who?

A macedonian flunky

A braindead dwarf

and a guy they call

The Grifter..

I'm good, Marky

Sez who? NOAA projection maps you don’t know how to read.

Huey » 07 Sep 2019 9:05 am » wrote:
Sez who? NOAA projection maps you don’t know how to read.

Only in the retelling..

Huey » 07 Sep 2019 9:04 am » wrote:
Here is another link.

https://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/st ... 164905001/

You should have looked at it first.

That map has no tint whatsoever near Alabama.

Another Hueycide by Google