Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 10:22 am » wrote:

Huey » 07 Sep 2019 10:17 am » wrote:
Yes, your continued spin and twists trying to justify your statement is pathetic

BV says
There was no such "early track" from any official weather service.

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=43263&start=160#p1265402

There certainly was

Argue with NOAA

What does the green represent, Tiny..

Just post the number

BV says
There was no such "early track" from any official weather service.

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=43263&start=160#p1265402

There certainly was

Argue with NOAA

Huey » 07 Sep 2019 10:59 am » wrote:
BV says
There was no such "early track" from any official weather service.

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=43263&start=160#p1265402

There certainly was

Argue with NOAA

I'm not...

I'm talking about your **** map.

Which you want to point to, but not discuss...


#readhissig

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 10:47 am » wrote:
Unless he's wearing a pant suit, of course.

But seriously, assuming I was possessed of such lofty ambition, how would I go about trying to make The Grifter look " hinkier"?

I don't do theoretical physics, but I understand it starts with increasing infinity. To you and me, that's impossible. Like divding zero.

Your question is better addressed to Steven Hawking.

I just know America is great again, and that's good enough for me. But then, I have a raging hardon for this country. I wanna poke the very dirt of America. I wanna pull a Chattanooga Choo Choo up in this ****. I would fondle Alabama's wetlands while servicing Florida.

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 10:48 am » wrote:
What does the green indicate?

sorry you can't read... stay in the ghetto

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 11:00 am » wrote:

Huey » 07 Sep 2019 10:59 am » wrote:
BV says
There was no such "early track" from any official weather service.

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=43263&start=160#p1265402

There certainly was

Argue with NOAA

I'm not...

I'm talking about your **** map.

Which you want to point to, but not discuss...

#readhissig

BV says
There was no such "early track" from any official weather service.

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=43263&start=160#p1265402

There certainly was

Argue with NOAA

Huey » 07 Sep 2019 11:09 am » wrote:
BV says
There was no such "early track" from any official weather service.

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=43263&start=160#p1265402

There certainly was

Argue with NOAA

The map, Huey....

The green represents what, a probability?

Of what magnitude?

No one cares about the Damage Control..

Just answer the question.

deadeyeshot » 07 Sep 2019 11:06 am » wrote: sorry you can't read... stay in the ghetto

I can't read it..

It isn't legible.


Neither you nor your fellow clown can tell me.

Why are you people such cowards?

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 11:25 am » wrote:
I can't read it..

It isn't legible.

Neither you nor your fellow clown can tell me.

Why are you people such cowards?

come out into the country, see if we are cowards...
stay in the ghetto have more crack babies and live off welfare...

deadeyeshot » 07 Sep 2019 11:27 am » wrote: come out into the country, see if we are cowards...
stay in the ghetto have more crack babies and live off welfare...

I think I've got a map somewhere that Sherman gave me.

deadeyeshot » 07 Sep 2019 11:27 am » wrote: come out into the country, see if we are cowards...
stay in the ghetto have more crack babies and live off welfare...

I'm still waiting for the answer, btw.

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 11:24 am » wrote:

Huey » 07 Sep 2019 11:09 am » wrote:
BV says
There was no such "early track" from any official weather service.

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=43263&start=160#p1265402

There certainly was

Argue with NOAA

The map, Huey....

The green represents what, a probability?

Of what magnitude?

No one cares about the Damage Control..

Just answer the question.

BV says
There was no such "early track" from any official weather service.

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=43263&start=160#p1265402

There certainly was

Argue with NOAA

Huey » 07 Sep 2019 11:47 am » wrote:
BV says
There was no such "early track" from any official weather service.

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=43263&start=160#p1265402

There certainly was

Argue with NOAA

There certainly was

Running from yet another of your own citations....

How do you do it?

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 11:43 am » wrote:

I think I've got a map somewhere that Sherman gave me.

you will lose and rot in HELL like Sherman

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 11:50 am » wrote:

Huey » 07 Sep 2019 11:47 am » wrote:
BV says
There was no such "early track" from any official weather service.

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=43263&start=160#p1265402

There certainly was

Argue with NOAA

There certainly was

Running from yet another of your own citations....

How do you do it?

I’m not running. You are running from your comments. You have the map. The comments from NOAA. Now make a point. Go on record.

Huey » 07 Sep 2019 12:10 pm » wrote:
I’m not running. You are running from your comments. You have the map. The comments from NOAA. Now make a point. Go on record.

You have the map.

But that's not the POINT.

The question is, what does it tell you about Alabama?

deadeyeshot » 07 Sep 2019 11:52 am » wrote: you will lose and rot in HELL like Sherman

Sherman won.

Huey » 07 Sep 2019 12:10 pm » wrote:
I’m not running. You are running from your comments. You have the map. The comments from NOAA. Now make a point. Go on record.

I already have..

Absent your answer to the question relating directly to your evidence, I've made a second.

MarkMathews » 07 Sep 2019 9:10 am » wrote:The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) said that "information provided by NOAA and the National Hurricane Center to President Trump and the wider public demonstrated that tropical-storm force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama."

Why is that statement unsigned MM?
Who wrote it?

It says 'Statement attributable to a NOAA spokesperson.'
WTF does that mean?

I smell ****.

Released six days after Trump’s first tweet on the matter, the NOAA statement was unsigned, neither from the acting head of the agency nor any particular spokesman.

It also came a day after the president’s homeland security and counterterrorism adviser (Rear Adm. Peter Brown) released a statement justifying Trump’s claims of the Alabama threat.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/ ... icted-him/

So he got two people to fall on the sword for him, one of which refused to even attach their name to it.

Dan Sobien, president of the NWS Employees Union, stated in a tweet Friday evening that “The hard-working employees of the NWS had nothing to do with the utterly disgusting and disingenuous tweet sent out by NOAA management tonight.”



And a meteorologist in Alabama Tweeted this:

Meteorologists are not having it.









Why is that statement from NOAA unsigned?

James Spann is a prominent meteorologist based in Birmingham, Alabama.

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2019 12:41 pm » wrote:

Huey » 07 Sep 2019 12:10 pm » wrote:
I’m not running. You are running from your comments. You have the map. The comments from NOAA. Now make a point. Go on record.

You have the map.

But that's not the POINT.

The question is, what does it tell you about Alabama?

Exactly what I posted it said. Now make a point.