Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
The Water Cooler Chat Room
‹
Trump may have broken federal law by altering Hurricane Dorian's path on a map.
Trump may have broken federal law by altering Hurricane Dorian's path on a map.
By Nobody
4 Sep 2019 4:12 pm in The Water Cooler Chat Room
9 Sep 2019 2:27 pm
WATCH: National Weather Service Birmingham forecasters get standing ovation for rebuking Trump.
National Weather Service Director Louis Uccellini is siding with weather forecasters who disagreed with President Donald Trump’s amateur forecast for Hurricane Dorian.
The Associated Press reported that Uccellini said in a statement to the National Weather Association on Monday that forecasters did the right thing by knocking down Trump’s misinformation about Hurricane Dorian hitting Alabama.
Uccellini said that forecasters in Birmingham “did what any office would do to protect the public” when they issued the rebuke of Trump.
“They did that with one thing in mind: public safety,” he told the crowd before asking members of the Birmingham office to stand for applause.
National Weather Service Director Louis Uccellini is siding with weather forecasters who disagreed with President Donald Trump’s amateur forecast for Hurricane Dorian.
The Associated Press reported that Uccellini said in a statement to the National Weather Association on Monday that forecasters did the right thing by knocking down Trump’s misinformation about Hurricane Dorian hitting Alabama.
Uccellini said that forecasters in Birmingham “did what any office would do to protect the public” when they issued the rebuke of Trump.
“They did that with one thing in mind: public safety,” he told the crowd before asking members of the Birmingham office to stand for applause.
9 Sep 2019 2:36 pm
Almost all of which is factual, right?Termin8tor » 09 Sep 2019 12:35 pm » wrote:"All?"Misty » 09 Sep 2019 11:38 am » wrote:That TDS **** is all you have left.
I have an 84-page thread of his accomplishments.
Anyway, I wasn't even talking to you, you gaping asshole.Termin8tor » 09 Sep 2019 1:07 pm » wrote:Reality is "propaganda," wackjob?Misty » 09 Sep 2019 12:55 pm » wrote:Oh look, it's the forum's minister of propaganda.
Almost all of that is factual.
If you're sleepy, go take a nap.Termin8tor » 09 Sep 2019 12:35 pm » wrote:zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
9 Sep 2019 2:38 pm
Wow! You **** up that quote didn't you?Termin8tor » 09 Sep 2019 12:44 pm » wrote:Wow, so not one single source in the entire country is honest.Misty » 09 Sep 2019 11:49 am » wrote:Termin8tor » 09 Sep 2019 9:13 am » wrote: I have 84 pages of Trump accomplishments you refuse to even read.
I prefer to read non-fiction.
Without your pre-written Democrat Talking Point Lies, you suck as liar.
You admitted that your 84 pages are fiction.
A little tweaking and it's perfect.
9 Sep 2019 2:46 pm
You mean like The Washington Post or CNN or all the other sources you refer to as the MS-LSD?Termin8tor » 09 Sep 2019 12:44 pm » wrote:Wow, so not one single source in the entire country is honest.
I rest my case.
You buy every word of **** fed to you by wingnut sites like gatewaypundit, pajamas media or powerline blog and dismiss all legitimate news sources, because you don't want to hear the truth.
9 Sep 2019 3:01 pm
The corrupt Fake Media sources that actively covered up Clinton's crimes, impeachable acts and rapes?Misty » 09 Sep 2019 2:46 pm » wrote:You mean like The Washington Post or CNN or all the other sources you refer to as the MS-LSD?Termin8tor » 09 Sep 2019 12:44 pm » wrote:Wow, so not one single source in the entire country is honest.
Without your pre-written Democrat Talking Point Lies, you suck as liar.
That carried 2 1/2 years of Fake News about Trump collaborating with Russia, committing treason and all that rest of that leftist ****?
Why would I possibly believe one single word from them, psycho?
My sources are far, far, FAR more accurate.
9 Sep 2019 3:04 pm
Your sources are a bunch of far right wingnut conspiracy theory hoax sites, you **** brainwashed cult member.Termin8tor » 09 Sep 2019 3:01 pm » wrote:The corrupt Fake Media sources that actively covered up Clinton's crimes, impeachable acts and rapes?Misty » 09 Sep 2019 2:46 pm » wrote:You mean like The Washington Post or CNN or all the other sources you refer to as the MS-LSD?Termin8tor » 09 Sep 2019 12:44 pm » wrote:Wow, so not one single source in the entire country is honest.
Without your pre-written Democrat Talking Point Lies, you suck as liar.
That carried 2 1/2 years of Fake News about Trump collaborating with Russia, committing treason and all that rest of that leftist ****?
Why would I possibly believe one single word from them, psycho?
My sources are far, far, FAR more accurate.
Donald Trump: 'What you're seeing and what you're reading is not what's happening.'
9 Sep 2019 3:06 pm
You aren't citing Salon for factual information, but for its lunatic left opinions.Misty » 09 Sep 2019 2:46 pm » wrote:I rest my case.
Imbecile.
****, I have specifically said that I do not find everything on Gateway to be reliable. Unlike the **** you cite regularly, I don't.You buy every word of **** fed to you by wingnut sites like gatewaypundit, pajamas media or powerline blog and dismiss all legitimate news sources, because you don't want to hear the truth.
But PJ Media is excellent, and Powerline among the best.
9 Sep 2019 3:09 pm
National Review, The American Spectator, the WSJ, Powerline and the rest of my excellent sources are "far right wingnut conspiracy hoax sites?"Misty » 09 Sep 2019 3:04 pm » wrote:Your sources are a bunch of far right wingnut conspiracy theory hoax sites, you **** brainwashed cult member.Termin8tor » 09 Sep 2019 3:01 pm » wrote:The corrupt Fake Media sources that actively covered up Clinton's crimes, impeachable acts and rapes?
That carried 2 1/2 years of Fake News about Trump collaborating with Russia, committing treason and all that rest of that leftist ****?
Why would I possibly believe one single word from them, psycho?
My sources are far, far, FAR more accurate.
They're the most reliable, popular conservatives sources in the country, wackjob.
Without your pre-written Talking Point Lies, you suck at lying.
9 Sep 2019 3:12 pm
Oh my, the number one oped page in the largest newspaper in the country is a, giggle, "far right wingnut conspiracy theory hoax site."Misty » 09 Sep 2019 3:04 pm » wrote:Your sources are a bunch of far right wingnut conspiracy theory hoax sites, you **** brainwashed cult member.
Find a freasking therapist, wackjob.
9 Sep 2019 3:13 pm
"Admitted." Sure, right.Misty » 09 Sep 2019 2:38 pm » wrote:Termin8tor » 09 Sep 2019 12:44 pm » wrote:Wow, so not one single source in the entire country is honest.
Wow! You **** up that quote didn't you?
You admitted that your 84 pages are fiction.
A little tweaking and it's perfect.
Without your pre-written Democrat Talking Point Lies, you suck as liar.
9 Sep 2019 3:19 pm
Termin8tor » 09 Sep 2019 3:06 pm » wrote:I have specifically said that I do not find everything on Gateway to be reliable. Unlike the **** you cite regularly, I don't.
But PJ Media is excellent, and Powerline among the best.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com
9 Sep 2019 3:21 pm
What a brainless freaking twit you are.Misty » 09 Sep 2019 3:19 pm » wrote:https://mediabiasfactcheck.comTermin8tor » 09 Sep 2019 3:06 pm » wrote:But PJ Media is excellent, and Powerline among the best.
Your "trust sources" carried 2 1/2 years of **** about Trump.
What have my sources carried that compares in the slightest to that lunacy?
Run, Forrest, run!
9 Sep 2019 3:59 pm
Check it out.
I called **** on that unsigned statement from NOAA from the minute it was put out.
It was obvious that it was put out under duress.
****.Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross threatened to fire top NOAA staff after office contradicted Trump on Hurricane Dorian.
Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross reportedly threatened to fire top employees at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) after officials contradicted President Trump’s claim that Alabama could be impacted by Hurricane Dorian.
Trump faced pushback from meteorologists last week after stating that Alabama would potentially feel the effects of Dorian.
The warning, which came via tweet, prompted the National Weather Service's Birmingham branch to emphasize on Twitter that the state would not be affected by the storm.
Trump adamantly defended his position throughout the week and at one point displayed a map in the Oval Office that appeared to show a marker-drawn addition to indicate Dorian would hit Alabama.
Ross contacted acting NOAA Administrator Neil Jacobs two days later and asked him to fix issues related to the perception that the agency had contradicted Trump, The New York Times reported Monday, citing three people familiar with the discussion.
The newspaper said that Jacobs initially objected.
He was then told that political staff at NOAA would be dismissed if the situation wasn't resolved.
The threat was followed by an unsigned NOAA statement affirming Trump's claims and disavowing the tweet from the National Weather Service in Birmingham about the hurricane.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administra ... ntradicted
I called **** on that unsigned statement from NOAA from the minute it was put out.
It was obvious that it was put out under duress.
9 Sep 2019 4:04 pm
WTF are you talking about?Termin8tor » 09 Sep 2019 3:12 pm » wrote:Oh my, the number one oped page in the largest newspaper in the country is a, giggle, "far right wingnut conspiracy theory hoax site."Misty » 09 Sep 2019 3:04 pm » wrote:Your sources are a bunch of far right wingnut conspiracy theory hoax sites, you **** brainwashed cult member.
How often do you use the WSJ as a source?
Almost all of your regular sources are far right websites.
9 Sep 2019 4:44 pm
Aside from the fact that they are entirely on board about my biggest scandal in US history claim, they're almost entirely in line with most of my sources, both factually and philosophically.Misty » 09 Sep 2019 4:04 pm » wrote:WTF are you talking about?Termin8tor » 09 Sep 2019 3:12 pm » wrote:Oh my, the number one oped page in the largest newspaper in the country is a, giggle, "far right wingnut conspiracy theory hoax site."
Find a freasking therapist, wackjob.
How often do you use the WSJ as a source?
Kim Strassel among several have written in fine and outraged detail about it.
You have zero from my sources that compares to 2 1/2 years of Fake News about Russian collusion and the rest of that fabricated ****.
Why don't you respond to that point, psycho?
Because it blows your **** right out of the water.
Without your pre-written Talking Point Lies, you suck at lying.Almost all of your regular sources are far right websites.
9 Sep 2019 4:48 pm
Yeah, the full and accurate Constitution, Free Markets and traditional values are really wacky and extremist, right psycho?Misty » 09 Sep 2019 4:04 pm » wrote:Almost all of your regular sources are far right websites.
9 Sep 2019 5:03 pm
I didn't ask if they were on board with you.Termin8tor » 09 Sep 2019 4:44 pm » wrote:Aside from the fact that they are entirely on board about my biggest scandal in US history claim, they're almost entirely in line with most of my sources, both factually and philosophically.Misty » 09 Sep 2019 4:04 pm » wrote:WTF are you talking about?Termin8tor » 09 Sep 2019 3:12 pm » wrote:Oh my, the number one oped page in the largest newspaper in the country is a, giggle, "far right wingnut conspiracy theory hoax site."
Find a freasking therapist, wackjob.
How often do you use the WSJ as a source?
I asked how often you use them as a source here.
I say almost never.
What do you say?
9 Sep 2019 5:14 pm
I say you're full of crap, as usual.Misty » 09 Sep 2019 5:03 pm » wrote:I didn't ask if they were on board with you.Termin8tor » 09 Sep 2019 4:44 pm » wrote:Aside from the fact that they are entirely on board about my biggest scandal in US history claim, they're almost entirely in line with most of my sources, both factually and philosophically.
Kim Strassel among several have written in fine and outraged detail about it.
You have zero from my sources that compares to 2 1/2 years of Fake News about Russian collusion and the rest of that fabricated ****.
Why don't you respond to that point, psycho?
Because it blows your **** right out of the water.
Without your pre-written Talking Point Lies, you suck at lying.
I asked how often you use them as a source here.
I say almost never.
What do you say?
Given that you've admitted you never read my threads or what I cite, you're lying your teeth when you make any claims about my sources.
And when I've listed them and asked you to appraise them, you never respond, except to lie.
Rule Number 1: the liberal left lies.
9 Sep 2019 8:44 pm
And to that I say **** YOU AND THE HORSE YOU RODE IN ON.Termin8tor » 09 Sep 2019 5:14 pm » wrote:I say you're full of crap, as usual.Misty » 09 Sep 2019 5:03 pm » wrote:I didn't ask if they were on board with you.
I asked how often you use them as a source here.
I say almost never.
What do you say?
You post links in my threads all the time you gaping asshole.Termin8tor » 09 Sep 2019 5:14 pm » wrote:Given that you've admitted you never read my threads or what I cite, you're lying your teeth when you make any claims about my sources.
None of them are from the WSJ.
9 Sep 2019 8:50 pm
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s acting chief scientist said in an email to colleagues Sunday that he is investigating whether the agency’s response to President Trump’s Hurricane Dorian tweets constituted a violation of NOAA policies and ethics.
Also on Monday, the director of the National Weather Service broke with NOAA leadership over its handling of Trump’s Dorian tweets and statements.
In an email to NOAA staff that was obtained by The Washington Post, NOAA’s Craig McLean, called the agency’s response “political” and a “danger to public health and safety.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/ ... Rc8QBW0jEf
Who is online
In total there are 2876 users online :: 7 registered, 13 bots, and 2856 guests
Bots: proximic, okhttp, ADmantX, DuckDuckBot, YandexBot, Googlebot, CriteoBot, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google, facebookexternalhit, bingbot, Baiduspider, Applebot