Liberal Forum

Misty » 09 Sep 2019 8:44 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 09 Sep 2019 5:14 pm » wrote:I say you're full of crap, as usual.

Given that you've admitted you never read my threads or what I cite, you're lying your teeth when you make any claims about my sources.

And when I've listed them and asked you to appraise them, you never respond, except to lie.

Rule Number 1: the liberal left lies.

And to that I say **** YOU AND THE HORSE YOU RODE IN ON.

You post links in my threads all the time you gaping asshole.
None of them are from the WSJ.

Misty » 08 Sep 2019 8:19 pm » wrote: So first I'm 'shrieking and wailing' then I'm 'whining' and now I'm 'mad.'

Too bad you guys can't hear me.
I'm sitting here LMAO.

Misty » 09 Sep 2019 5:03 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 09 Sep 2019 4:44 pm » wrote:

Misty » 09 Sep 2019 4:04 pm » wrote:WTF are you talking about?
How often do you use the WSJ as a source?

Aside from the fact that they are entirely on board about my biggest scandal in US history claim, they're almost entirely in line with most of my sources, both factually and philosophically.

I didn't ask if they were on board with you.
I asked how often you use them as a source here.

I say almost never.
What do you say?

White House Pressed Agency to Repudiate Weather Forecasters Who Contradicted Trump

WASHINGTON — The White House was directly involved in pressing a federal scientific agency to repudiate the weather forecasters who contradicted President Trump’s claim that Hurricane Dorian would probably strike Alabama, according to several people familiar with the events.

Mick Mulvaney, the acting White House chief of staff, told Wilbur Ross, the commerce secretary, to have the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration publicly disavow the forecasters’ position that Alabama was not at risk.

NOAA, which is part of the Commerce Department, issued an unsigned statement last Friday in response, saying that the Birmingham, Ala., office was wrong to dispute the president’s warning.

In pressing NOAA’s acting administrator to take action, Mr. Ross warned that top employees at the agency could be fired if the situation was not addressed, The New York Times previously reported.

Mr. Ross’s spokesman has denied that he threatened to fire anyone, and a senior administration official on Wednesday said Mr. Mulvaney did not tell the commerce secretary to make such a threat.

The release of the NOAA statement provoked complaints that the Trump administration was improperly intervening in the professional weather forecasting system to justify the president’s mistaken assertion.

The Commerce Department’s inspector general is investigating how that statement came to be issued, saying it could call into question scientific independence.

Cannonpointer » 10 Sep 2019 10:25 am » wrote:

Misty » 08 Sep 2019 8:19 pm » wrote:So first I'm 'shrieking and wailing' then I'm 'whining' and now I'm 'mad.'
Too bad you guys can't hear me.
I'm sitting here LMAO.

Will you PLEASE STOP with the insane cackling? It's scaring the dogs!!!

Huey » 08 Sep 2019 6:07 pm » wrote:
Prolly because morons like you continue to claim (falsely) that he was wrong.

Huey » 04 Sep 2019 4:15 pm » wrote:This is a joke, right?

PS. Remember the last time you guys ranted about the AL comment I told you the original tracks had it crossing FL and heading to the Gulf. In a northwest direction? Look at the map and see where AL is. Seems to me you just down your own argument.

Huey » 04 Sep 2019 5:50 pm » wrote:
So you are serious.

Lmmfao! Impeach the ****!!!! Now. :rofl: :clap: :rolleyes:

You posted what I was talking about. Thank you. As one who lived above the panhandle when a cat 5 has that track ya pay attention.

Huey » 04 Sep 2019 5:52 pm » wrote:I dunno what is worse. This or the golf shoes.

Well, I got better better things to think about than what snowflakes are whining about now. I am right on the edge of the latest hurricane warnings.

Lucifershammer » 04 Sep 2019 7:57 pm » wrote: So what you're saying is trump posted an image today of the model he was shown on the day of the tweet proving that at the time the model he was shown proved him right? Gotcha...

Huey » 05 Sep 2019 8:12 am » wrote:
No, because all you have done on this thread is post trolling like snipes.

Termin8tor » 05 Sep 2019 2:42 pm » wrote:
Oh my gosh, he used a map that was superseded? :o

This is much bigger than illegal spying on the Trump campaign / presidency and the attempted coup. :rofl: :rofl:

Huey » 07 Sep 2019 9:35 am » wrote:
BV says
There was no such "early track" from any official weather service.

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=43263&start=160#p1265402

There certainly was

crimsongulf » 06 Sep 2019 3:21 pm » wrote:
I don't know what the hell you don't understand other than your TDS has caused dementia. When DJT said it, Alabama was out of the cone, but yes they were.

If you are a prog, you can say something wrong and it is a mistake, a conservative is stupid.

How many damned threads are you going to start on this meaningless issue, also how long are you going to cling to it.

DJT has done more in 2 years than Soetoro did in 8.

User avatar Huey +6 06 Sep 2019, 4:22 pm

Misty » 04 Sep 2019 4:12 pm » wrote:Trump may have broken federal law by altering Hurricane Dorian's path on a map

Termin8tor » 26 Mar 2020 10:03 am » wrote:
Every bit as valid as the Russian Collusion Hoax. :rofl:

The Trump-committed-treason hoax. :clap:

The indictable illegal campaign contribution hoax.

The Trump-laundered-money-for-the-Russian-Mob hoax.

The Ukrainian Quid Pro Quo hoax.

The Impeachment Clown Show hoax.

And all the rest of the **** Democrat psychopaths have spread.

Blackvegetable » 26 Mar 2020 10:18 am » wrote:

Termin8tor » 26 Mar 2020 10:03 am » wrote:Every bit as valid as the Russian Collusion Hoax.

The Trump-committed-treason hoax.

The indictable illegal campaign contribution hoax.

The Trump-laundered-money-for-the-Russian-Mob hoax.

The Ukrainian Quid Pro Quo hoax.

The Impeachment Clown Show hoax.

And all the rest of the **** Democrat psychopaths have spread.

Shut the **** up, Chlammy..

Trump’s fake map and the administration’s insistence on defending it despite evidence to the contrary — dubbed #SharpieGate on Twitter — shows how the administration has prioritized politics over science, even during a fast-moving, life-threatening situation.

Officials and scientists, both inside and outside the government, were horrified, the newly released emails show

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/zahrahirji/sharpiegate-fake-hurricane-map-emails

Termin8tor » 26 Mar 2020 10:21 am » wrote:
Buzzfeed, that first published the Fake Steele Dossier? :clap:

And defended it for months if not years?

You're kidding, right? :rofl: :rofl:

Never mind that no one in the country cares about the silly **** you bumped.