The same place where it declares that the agency itself cannot alter its own maps.Misty » 04 Sep 2019 8:34 pm » wrote: Where does it say in the statute that the POTUS is excluded from that law?
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2074
You know who you sound like?
Richard Nixon: "Well when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal."
By your logic he also subsumes the IRS, so would you be okay if he took his sharpie to your tax returns?
Aside from the fact that he may have broken a law, which his supporters don't seem to mind, call me crazy but I have a little issue with a POTUS who acts like a 3 year old.
From your link. I thought this was funMisty » 04 Sep 2019 8:34 pm » wrote: Where does it say in the statute that the POTUS is excluded from that law?
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2074
You know who you sound like?
Richard Nixon: "Well when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal."
By your logic he also subsumes the IRS, so would you be okay if he took his sharpie to your tax returns?
Aside from the fact that he may have broken a law, which his supporters don't seem to mind, call me crazy but I have a little issue with a POTUS who acts like a 3 year old.
Except none of those things were illegal.Cannonpointer » 04 Sep 2019 8:33 pm » wrote:The conjobs did the exact same thing - a raucus "tan suit gate" thread started by *** jim recently celebrated the many over-reactions of the right to Obama's every move. How he bowed, what he wore, how much time he spent golfing - these were all fodder for the OMG-mill.Lucifershammer » 04 Sep 2019 8:30 pm » wrote:There are so many real problems with the guy why jump on some dumb gaffe to hope for some big gotcha moment. Hell if Biden gets elected that **** will be a full time job.
The left is merely proving they are just as stupid as the right.
Well, bamans can panic in one hand and buy **** from home depot in the other, and let us all know how that works for them.Misty » 04 Sep 2019 8:39 pm » wrote: Except none of those things were illegal.
And none of them caused any panic by the people in one state who believed that they were going to get hit by a hurricane.
Lol nobody at all panicked. Not a single person. I'm sure most people in Alabama watch TV and were quite aware where the storm was. Now you're just being asinine.Misty » 04 Sep 2019 8:39 pm » wrote: Except none of those things were illegal.
And none of them caused any panic by the people in one state who believed that they were going to get hit by a hurricane.
First of all, that sounds like ****.Cannonpointer » 04 Sep 2019 8:36 pm » wrote:If the president alters a map, that map is not altered. It is work product.
In the path of a hurricane? So you're working on the premise that Alabama has no TV, no Internet, no newspapers, nothing. None have been watching this storm for the 6 **** days the media has been blathering on about it?Misty » 04 Sep 2019 8:43 pm » wrote: First of all, that sounds like ****.
And secondly promoting a false weather report could be dangerous and cause chaos to the people who falsely believe that they are in the path of a hurricane.
Yeah, Ima sit here and secretly think that's stretching victimhood to the max - a shopworn democrat trick. It implicitly pretends that causing a panic was trump's motive - that he wasn't just incorrect, but evil. Snidely "the weatherman" Whiplash evil. I'm not gonna say that outright. I'm just gonna secretly think it.Misty » 04 Sep 2019 8:43 pm » wrote: First of all, that sounds like ****.
And secondly promoting a false weather report could be dangerous and cause chaos to the people who falsely believe that they are in the path of a hurricane.
If the path was the same they would be bitching it is his fault they did think of AL.Lucifershammer » 04 Sep 2019 8:45 pm » wrote:In the path of a hurricane? So you're working on the premise that Alabama has no TV, no Internet, no newspapers, nothing. None have been watching this storm for the 6 **** days the media has been blathering on about it?Misty » 04 Sep 2019 8:43 pm » wrote: First of all, that sounds like ****.
And secondly promoting a false weather report could be dangerous and cause chaos to the people who falsely believe that they are in the path of a hurricane.
Well, if I can't dazzle you with brilliance, what do you EXPECT me to baffle you with?Misty » 04 Sep 2019 8:43 pm » wrote: First of all, that sounds like ****.
And you know that how?Lucifershammer » 04 Sep 2019 8:42 pm » wrote:Lol nobody at all panicked. Not a single person.Misty » 04 Sep 2019 8:39 pm » wrote:Except none of those things were illegal.
And none of them caused any panic by the people in one state who believed that they were going to get hit by a hurricane.
But Trump said that it was headed their way.Lucifershammer » 04 Sep 2019 8:42 pm » wrote:I'm sure most people in Alabama watch TV and were quite aware where the storm was.
It's Alabama Lucifer.Lucifershammer » 04 Sep 2019 8:42 pm » wrote:Now you're just being asinine.






I want to go to bed, but I can't stop looking at the #TrumpSharpie Tweets.nuckin futz » 05 Sep 2019 12:02 am » wrote:And , lets not forget, I was the one who posted the ORIGINAL OBAMA TAN SUIT THREAD!!!!DAMMIT!
sniff, harumph!