Liberal Forum

Huey » 13 Jun 2021, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2021, 10:18 am

@Blackvegetable  

already answered.

You lose, coward.

the evidence...



the black ring covering Alabama - where did that come from?

and folks, THAT is what we’re up against: people who are so defiantly detached from reality that they’ll deny what is occurring directly in front of them.
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2021, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2021, 10:33 am

the evidence...



the black ring covering Alabama - where did that come from?

and folks, THAT is what we’re up against: people who are so defiantly detached from reality that they’ll deny what is occurring directly in front of them.

you forgot some:

This is a joke, right?

PS. Remember the last time you guys ranted about the AL comment I told you the original tracks had it crossing FL and heading to the Gulf. In a northwest direction? Look at the map and see where AL is. Seems to me you just down your own argument.
 

Huey » 13 Jun 2021, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2021, 10:36 am

you forgot some:

This is a joke, right?

PS. Remember the last time you guys ranted about the AL comment I told you the original tracks had it crossing FL and heading to the Gulf. In a northwest direction? Look at the map and see where AL is. Seems to me you just down your own argument.

​​

#readhissig

Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2021, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2021, 10:37 am

​​

#readhissig

#readmysig

Huey » 13 Jun 2021, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2021, 10:38 am

#readmysig

Irrelevant imitation.

Huey » 05 Sep 2019, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2019, 12:20 pm

Sorry, the track on the map has the storm heading over lake Okeechobee towards the northwest and the gulf. That track if it continued place alabama on the outer bands or what was at the time a CAT 5 hurricane. So it is correct that alabama at the time of that track was in the cone to be hit.

You wanna discuss stupid? Look in the mirror and see your face.

@Blackvegetable  

 

Huey » 13 Jun 2021, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2021, 10:41 am

@Blackvegetable

Dwarf,

The EVIDENCE IN FRONT OF YOUR FACE - what is the black circle around Alabama?
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2021, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2021, 10:45 am

Dwarf,

The EVIDENCE IN FRONT OF YOUR FACE - what is the black circle around Alabama?

Focus on my words.  

Huey » 05 Sep 2019, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑
05 Sep 2019, 1:20 pm
Sorry, the track on the map has the storm heading over lake Okeechobee towards the northwest and the gulf. That track if it continued place alabama on the outer bands or what was at the time a CAT 5 hurricane. So it is correct that alabama at the time of that track was in the cone to be hit.

You wanna discuss stupid? Look in the mirror and see your face.

I will discuss what I posted, not what you think I said.

Huey » 13 Jun 2021, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2021, 10:47 am

Focus on my words.  

Huey » 05 Sep 2019, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑
05 Sep 2019, 1:20 pm
Sorry, the track on the map has the storm heading over lake Okeechobee towards the northwest and the gulf. That track if it continued place alabama on the outer bands or what was at the time a CAT 5 hurricane. So it is correct that alabama at the time of that track was in the cone to be hit.

You wanna discuss stupid? Look in the mirror and see your face.

I will discuss what I posted, not what you think I said.

I will discuss what I posted, not what you think I said.

That's irrelevant..

It's about THE EVIDENCE..

**** idiot.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2021, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2021, 10:51 am

That's irrelevant..

It's about THE EVIDENCE..

**** idiot.

Huey » 05 Sep 2019, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑
05 Sep 2019, 1:20 pm
Sorry, the track on the map has the storm heading over lake Okeechobee towards the northwest and the gulf. That track if it continued place alabama on the outer bands or what was at the time a CAT 5 hurricane. So it is correct that alabama at the time of that track was in the cone to be hit.

You wanna discuss stupid? Look in the mirror and see your face.


That is the evidence. I a sticking to my words.  Your choice is to admit that those words are correct OR you will divert again.

Huey » 13 Jun 2021, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2021, 10:57 am

Huey » 05 Sep 2019, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑
05 Sep 2019, 1:20 pm
Sorry, the track on the map has the storm heading over lake Okeechobee towards the northwest and the gulf. That track if it continued place alabama on the outer bands or what was at the time a CAT 5 hurricane. So it is correct that alabama at the time of that track was in the cone to be hit.

You wanna discuss stupid? Look in the mirror and see your face.

That is the evidence. I a sticking to my words.  Your choice is to admit that those words are correct OR you will divert again.

That is the evidence. I a sticking to my words

No...it's a thoroughly debunked assertion.


**** moron.





 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2021, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2021, 11:00 am

No...it's a thoroughly debunked assertion.

**** moron.

This is not an assertion.  That was the published track on Aug 28/29th.  


Huey » 05 Sep 2019, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑
05 Sep 2019, 1:20 pm
Sorry, the track on the map has the storm heading over lake Okeechobee towards the northwest and the gulf. That track if it continued place alabama on the outer bands or what was at the time a CAT 5 hurricane. So it is correct that alabama at the time of that track was in the cone to be hit.

You wanna discuss stupid? Look in the mirror and see your face.

I stand my words.  Can you show that was not the published track?

Huey » 13 Jun 2021, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2021, 11:11 am

This is not an assertion.  That was the published track on Aug 28/29th.  

Huey » 05 Sep 2019, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑
05 Sep 2019, 1:20 pm
Sorry, the track on the map has the storm heading over lake Okeechobee towards the northwest and the gulf. That track if it continued place alabama on the outer bands or what was at the time a CAT 5 hurricane. So it is correct that alabama at the time of that track was in the cone to be hit.

You wanna discuss stupid? Look in the mirror and see your face.

I stand my words.  Can you show that was not the published track?

Dwarf,

The evidence..

Look at it..


 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2021, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2021, 11:13 am

Dwarf,

The evidence..

Look at it..

Huey » 05 Sep 2019, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑
05 Sep 2019, 1:20 pm
Sorry, the track on the map has the storm heading over lake Okeechobee towards the northwest and the gulf. That track if it continued place alabama on the outer bands or what was at the time a CAT 5 hurricane. So it is correct that alabama at the time of that track was in the cone to be hit.

You wanna discuss stupid? Look in the mirror and see your face.

Can you prove that was not the track or not.   Remember, all I said was That track if it continued place alabama on the outer bands or what was at the time a CAT 5 hurricane. So it is correct that alabama at the time of that track was in the cone to be hit.

see what Said?  Outer bands.
 

Huey » 13 Jun 2021, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2021, 11:15 am

Huey » 05 Sep 2019, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑
05 Sep 2019, 1:20 pm
Sorry, the track on the map has the storm heading over lake Okeechobee towards the northwest and the gulf. That track if it continued place alabama on the outer bands or what was at the time a CAT 5 hurricane. So it is correct that alabama at the time of that track was in the cone to be hit.

You wanna discuss stupid? Look in the mirror and see your face.

Can you prove that was not the track or not.   Remember, all I said was That track if it continued place alabama on the outer bands or what was at the time a CAT 5 hurricane. So it is correct that alabama at the time of that track was in the cone to be hit.

see what Said?  Outer bands.

Can you prove that was not the track or not.

it was not the track...had it been, it would have been reflected - originally - on the map Grifty was holding..

It wasn't....

Furthermore, it is clear from THE RECORD, as opposed to your assertions, that NOAA was alarmed about Grifty's cretinous freelancing.

Cap nailed it....and you're too stupid to avoid proving him right.

​​​​​Who decimated the military?
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2021, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2021, 11:20 am

it was not the track...had it been, it would have been reflected - originally - on the map Grifty was holding..

It wasn't....

Furthermore, it is clear from THE RECORD, as opposed to your assertions, that NOAA was alarmed about Grifty's cretinous freelancing.

Cap nailed it....and you're too stupid to avoid proving him right.

​​​​​Who decimated the military?

It was reflected on that map.  I stand by my words. Exactly what I said.  You are making assertions I am wrong but refuse to explain what I was wrong about.



 

Huey » 13 Jun 2021, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2021, 11:22 am

It was reflected on that map.  I stand by my words. Exactly what I said.  You are making assertions I am wrong but refuse to explain what I was wrong about.

It was reflected on that map.

if so, why did Grifty have to draw it in with a Sharpie?

I stand by my words. Exactly what I said.  You are making assertions I am wrong but refuse to explain what I was wrong about.

The photograph....of the NOAA map Grifty is holding..

Comment on the evidence....not your hallucinations.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2021, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2021, 11:29 am

if so, why did Grifty have to draw it in with a Sharpie?

The photograph....of the NOAA map Grifty is holding..

Comment on the evidence....not your hallucinations.

I don’t give a **** what Trump did.  We are discussing my words.  Now show I a, wrong or move on.  I am not backing down from them.  The Aug28/29 track is exactly as I described it.

Huey » 13 Jun 2021, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2021, 11:31 am

I don’t give a **** what Trump did.  We are discussing my words.  Now show I a, wrong or move on.  I am not backing down from them.  The Aug28/29 track is exactly as I described it.

I don’t give a **** what Trump did.  

he is holding the evidence..

We are discussing my words.  

no...we are discussing your inabiliiy to acknowledge EVIDENCE IN FRONT OF YOUR FACE.

Your words are only further evidence of said inability.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2021, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2021, 11:35 am

he is holding the evidence..

no...we are discussing your inabiliiy to acknowledge EVIDENCE IN FRONT OF YOUR FACE.

Your words are only further evidence of said inability.

No, we are discussing my words.  And I stand by them.  The track was exactly as I posted it on the dates I posted.  That is irrefutable.