Once again..
5-20 percent chance.Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2021, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑ No evidence to that effect...you posted a map showing a 5% probability that a small part of Alabama would see winds from 0-35 categorized as "tropical storm force"..
no...that remains a lie..
You may now answer the question.
Already answered.Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2021, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Once again..
What does the green portion represent..
Quote the legend in full and verbatim.
Which is not relevant to the Hurricane track...Huey » 14 Jun 2021, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ 5-20 percent chance.
I also said outer bands. Where those winds would be.
You lose.
But you keep lying about it, Zerointegrity..
Not the bold portion. I once again answered your question.Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2021, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑Which is not relevant to the Hurricane track...Huey » 14 Jun 2021, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ 5-20 percent chance.
I also said outer bands. Where those winds would be.
You lose.
You continue to lose.
Huey » 14 Jun 2021, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Not the bold portion. I once again answered your question.
Of course it is relevant ****. The wind map is **** based on the probable track, moron. You are trying hard but continually falling on your face. How embarrassing. You just admitted a small portion of AL was in that.
Thanks!
post the source of each map.Of course it is relevant ****. The wind map is **** based on the probable track, moron.
@BlackvegetableHuey » 14 Jun 2021, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2021, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑ Already done...as well as on a dedicated thread...
No, the legend supports my posts. 7 days it out Alabama had a 5-20% chance of tropical storm force winds according to the projected track. That state west of GA (to the left) is AL. Note the green portions.
You lose again. So now you get to post what I got wrong.
Sorry, this is your case. Make it yourself. But I bet it is on the Pics.
You just made it....again...Huey » 14 Jun 2021, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Sorry, this is your case. Make it yourself. But I bet it is on the Pics.
Right there you killed your argument. Thanks! Remember, my original comment did not say how strong. It simply said outer bands which people with intelligence understand to be lower force winds.Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2021, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑ No evidence to that effect...you posted a map showing a 5% probability that a small part of Alabama would see winds from 0-35 categorized as "tropical storm force"..
no...that remains a lie..
You may now answer the question.
Huey » 14 Jun 2021, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Right there you killed your argument. Thanks! Remember, my original comment did not say how strong. It simply said outer bands which people with intelligence understand to be lower force winds.
Dwarf,Remember, my original comment did not say how strong.

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2021, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Dwarf,
What comments are you now inventing to deflect from the fact that Grifty lied....and you can't accept it?
Dwarf,Huey » 14 Jun 2021, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑ You are now diverting. We are discussing what I posted. And my post was correct.
Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2021, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Dwarf,
How do you find yourself "correct" defending yourself with debunked "evidence"?

The legend readsHuey » 14 Jun 2021, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑ You have not debunked any evidence. I will repost this:
Note the 5 days goes even deeper into Alabama. Exactly as I posted. You can read the legend this time, right old man? And you see the source, right?
You are losing bigly.
Did you post the bogus statement from NOAA?You have not debunked any evidence
Better question. Because this is about what I said. Where did I post that?Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2021, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑ The legend reads
Tropical Force Wind Speed Probabilities..
Where does it suggest Alabama is threatened by a Hurricane?
Did you post the bogus statement from NOAA?