Liberal Forum

Huey » 04 Sep 2019, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2019, 4:15 pm

This is a joke, right?

PS. Remember the last time you guys ranted about the AL comment I told you the original tracks had it crossing FL and heading to the Gulf. In a northwest direction? Look at the map and see where AL is. Seems to me you just down your own argument.

Consider the source material, asshole.  This is not MSNBC, CBS, CNN, FOX, Breitbart, or NEWSMAX.  It's the Business Insider...a completely neutral, non-politically affiliated, moderate financial and news reporting website, that presents a wide range of information on a completely centrist model.

If Trump broke the law, if he purposefully altered official NOAA weather information for his own political benefit, and if that is a violation of federal statute, do you want us to just say..."Oh it's just Donald being Donald, he doesn't mean anything by it."...like we did when he was bragging about ****** grabbing?  Of course you do, trumper wanker.

You would politicize, and **** up a pleasant little wet dream.
 
 

Huey » 03 Nov 2021, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 9:35 am

Answer the question. I answered yours.  What date?  What are you afraid of?  If you felt your stance (well, as usual you are not man enough to take one) was solid you would simply answer.

No...you haven't.

But you may do so now.

Yes or no..


 
 

IkeBana » 03 Nov 2021, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 9:54 am

Consider the source material, asshole.  This is not MSNBC, CBS, CNN, FOX, Breitbart, or NEWSMAX.  It's the Business Insider...a completely neutral, non-politically affiliated, moderate financial and news reporting website, that presents a wide range of information on a completely centrist model.

If Trump broke the law, if he purposefully altered official NOAA weather information for his own political benefit, and if that is a violation of federal statute, do you want us to just say..."Oh it's just Donald being Donald, he doesn't mean anything by it."...like we did when he was bragging about ****** grabbing?  Of course you do, trumper wanker.

You would politicize, and **** up a pleasant little wet dream.

It's why he cannot answer the question.

Ike » wrote:

22 Jan 1970, 1:26 am

Huey » 04 Sep 2019, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2019, 4:15 pm

This is a joke, right?

PS. Remember the last time you guys ranted about the AL comment I told you the original tracks had it crossing FL and heading to the Gulf. In a northwest direction? Look at the map and see where AL is. Seems to me you just down your own argument.

Consider the source material, asshole.  This is not MSNBC, CBS, CNN, FOX, Breitbart, or NEWSMAX.  It's the Business Insider...a completely neutral, non-politically affiliated, moderate financial and news reporting website, that presents a wide range of information on a completely centrist model.

If Trump broke the law, if he purposefully altered official NOAA weather information for his own political benefit, and if that is a violation of federal statute, do you want us to just say..."Oh it's just Donald being Donald, he doesn't mean anything by it."...like we did when he was bragging about ****** grabbing?  Of course you do, trumper wanker.

You would politicize, and **** up a pleasant little wet dream.
 
 

 

You seem to forget that NOAA is part of the executive branch.  He was kinda the boss.  Be that as it may if you think he broke the law, asshole, go ahead and press charges. 

Catch up on the argument, ****. 

Blackvegetable » 03 Nov 2021, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 10:29 am

IkeBana » 03 Nov 2021, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 9:54 am

Consider the source material, asshole.  This is not MSNBC, CBS, CNN, FOX, Breitbart, or NEWSMAX.  It's the Business Insider...a completely neutral, non-politically affiliated, moderate financial and news reporting website, that presents a wide range of information on a completely centrist model.

If Trump broke the law, if he purposefully altered official NOAA weather information for his own political benefit, and if that is a violation of federal statute, do you want us to just say..."Oh it's just Donald being Donald, he doesn't mean anything by it."...like we did when he was bragging about ****** grabbing?  Of course you do, trumper wanker.

You would politicize, and **** up a pleasant little wet dream.

It's why he cannot answer the question.

 

I did answer the question, multiple times.  You refuse to specify what date or track you are discussing.  When you find your balls, if you ever had any to find, let me know. 

My answer stands.  

Huey » 03 Nov 2021, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 10:33 am

I did answer the question, multiple times.  You refuse to specify what date or track you are discussing.  When you find your balls, if you ever had any to find, let me know. 

My answer stands.
 

You refuse to specify what date or track you are discussing.

It is a very simple question....it requires no further elaboration..

How do we know that it is so?




This is how we can be certain - assuming that we aren't slack jawed morons with a pseudo softie for a stubby fingered vulgarian in a fake tan.

Huey » 03 Nov 2021, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 10:32 am

You seem to forget that NOAA is part of the executive branch.  He was kinda the boss.  Be that as it may if you think he broke the law, asshole, go ahead and press charges. 

Catch up on the argument, ****.

Dwarf,

Blackvegetable » 03 Nov 2021, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 9:37 am

I am a lying sack of ****.

1. Show me where I said that I didn't know who Potus 2008 was?

Blackvegetable » 03 Nov 2021, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 9:37 am

No, you haven't answered the question.

 

The coward here still thinks everyone has an obligation to answer his questions when he never answers any. Dumb mother ****. 


1. Show me where I said that I didn't know who Potus 2008 was?

Vegas » 03 Nov 2021, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 10:54 am

Blackvegetable » 03 Nov 2021, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 9:37 am

No, you haven't answered the question.


 

The coward here still thinks everyone has an obligation to answer his questions when he never answers any. Dumb mother ****. 


1. Show me where I said that I didn't know who Potus 2008 was?

 

I this particular case the coward has been answered multiple times on multiple day based on how he asked the question and the context of the conversation.

He has watched to many Perry Mason or Matlock shows and fancies himself a trial lawyer.  He is clueless on how to question someone. 

Huey » 03 Nov 2021, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 12:01 pm

I this particular case the coward has been answered multiple times on multiple day based on how he asked the question and the context of the conversation.

He has watched to many Perry Mason or Matlock shows and fancies himself a trial lawyer.  He is clueless on how to question someone.

Oh look you flat out lie here too

Vegas » wrote:

22 Jan 1970, 1:29 am

Huey » 03 Nov 2021, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 12:01 pm

I this particular case the coward has been answered multiple times on multiple day based on how he asked the question and the context of the conversation.

He has watched to many Perry Mason or Matlock shows and fancies himself a trial lawyer.  He is clueless on how to question someone.

Oh look you flat out lie here too

 

If you are going to troll me I must insist you up your game and make it interesting. 

Huey » 03 Nov 2021, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 12:02 pm

If you are going to troll me I must insist you up your game and make it interesting.

Or what?


Will you tell me we are done here?


Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Huey » 03 Nov 2021, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 12:01 pm

I this particular case the coward has been answered multiple times on multiple day based on how he asked the question and the context of the conversation.

He has watched to many Perry Mason or Matlock shows and fancies himself a trial lawyer.  He is clueless on how to question someone.

based on how he asked the question and the context of the conversation.

Stuff like


Are these your words?


and

Did Dorian threaten Alabama?


Questions requiring nothing more than a confirmation of Objective Fact.

He has watched to many Perry Mason or Matlock shows and fancies himself a trial lawyer. 

I've done very well against lawyers..

Even judges

He is clueless on how to question someone

We know this because you CONSISTENTLY run from the question asked.


**** brick.

Vegasgiants » 03 Nov 2021, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 12:04 pm

Or what?

Will you tell me we are done here?

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Is there a more thoroughly deluded twat on the planet?

Blackvegetable » 03 Nov 2021, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 12:41 pm

Is there a more thoroughly deluded twat on the planet?

His work as a stewardess was above and beyond the call of duty
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Nov 2021, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 12:40 pm

Huey » 03 Nov 2021, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 12:01 pm

I this particular case the coward has been answered multiple times on multiple day based on how he asked the question and the context of the conversation.

He has watched to many Perry Mason or Matlock shows and fancies himself a trial lawyer.  He is clueless on how to question someone.

based on how he asked the question and the context of the conversation.

Stuff like


Are these your words?


and

Did Dorian threaten Alabama?


Questions requiring nothing more than a confirmation of Objective Fact.

He has watched to many Perry Mason or Matlock shows and fancies himself a trial lawyer. 

I've done very well against lawyers..

Even judges

He is clueless on how to question someone

We know this because you CONSISTENTLY run from the question asked.


**** brick.

 

But you are not in court.  You would suck if you had to the actual questioning.  You never, ever ask closed ended questions to start a session.

Anyhoo, your questioned has been answered.  You have yet to answer mine.  What date are you referring to?  Next, post where I said AL was Threatened by Dorian.

Thanks!

 

Huey » 03 Nov 2021, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 12:43 pm

But you are not in court.  You would suck if you had to the actual questioning.  You never, ever ask closed ended questions to start a session.

Anyhoo, your questioned has been answered.  You have yet to answer mine.  What date are you referring to?  Next, post where I said AL was Threatened by Dorian.

Thanks!

You never, ever ask closed ended questions to start a session.

You're a **** idiot.

I've actually done this....with money at stake.


That's why I understood the Motion to Dismiss the first time I looked at it....and you still don't.

Anyhoo, your questioned has been answered. 

No..it has not, Lying Little ****.

Two letters.
 

Vegasgiants » 03 Nov 2021, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 12:42 pm

His work as a stewardess was above and beyond the call of duty

Senator Craig insisted on Sheilagh..

Alzheimers » 03 Nov 2021, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 12:47 pm

 

No it isn't you are just an INBRED BRAINWASHED MORON so STUPID you never understand the issues you spew STUPIDITY about and who worships Trump like a GOD