Liberal Forum

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:02 pm

Well, then make it.  What are you afraid of?  Here is my original statement again:

PS. Remember the last time you guys ranted about the AL comment I told you the original tracks had it crossing FL and heading to the Gulf. In a northwest direction? Look at the map and see where AL is. Seems to me you just down your own argument.

And:

Already asked and answered.  Again, for the functioning idiots, ultimately no.  That chart was a projected a week out.  At that point the track was for the storm to cross Florida over Lake Okeechobee in a NW direction and head towards the Gulf.  AT THAT TIME, a week out, Alabama was projected to feel some effects.

All that tripe is DEBUNKED by the answer to my question and this photograph...


 

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:03 pm

Are these my words?

Seriously, Sheilagh....

He just lies every **** day

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:05 pm

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:02 pm

Well, then make it.  What are you afraid of?  Here is my original statement again:

PS. Remember the last time you guys ranted about the AL comment I told you the original tracks had it crossing FL and heading to the Gulf. In a northwest direction? Look at the map and see where AL is. Seems to me you just down your own argument.

And:

Already asked and answered.  Again, for the functioning idiots, ultimately no.  That chart was a projected a week out.  At that point the track was for the storm to cross Florida over Lake Okeechobee in a NW direction and head towards the Gulf.  AT THAT TIME, a week out, Alabama was projected to feel some effects.

All that tripe is DEBUNKED by the answer to my question and this photograph...


 

 

Make your case.  

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:04 pm

Make your case.

Acknowledge that you are too stupid, far too credulous, to figure out what the evidence directly in front of your face is telling you...

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:06 pm

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:04 pm

Make your case.

Acknowledge that you are too stupid, far too credulous, to figure out what the evidence directly in front of your face is telling you...

 

Acknowledge you are too chicken **** to go on record with your case.  You tell me.  And quote my original post and the answer to your original question when you do it. 

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:07 pm

Acknowledge you are too chicken **** to go on record with your case.  You tell me.  And quote my original post and the answer to your original question when you do it.
 

Acknowledge you are too chicken **** to go on record with your case

This is a lie.

Why do you always do this?

.  And quote my original post and the answer to your original question when you do it.

Controlly,

There's no need..



 

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:06 pm

Make your case.

Provide the answer to the question, and I will show you.

Vegasgiants » 04 Nov 2021, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:05 pm

He just lies every **** day

and she never learns....

She just retells...

 

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:12 pm

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:06 pm

Make your case.

Provide the answer to the question, and I will show you.

 

Make your case.  All you will do is ask more questions and never answer any.   Make your case and ask your question or take your L.  Basing this on MY words you are arguing AL was never projected to feel any affects from Dorian.

If you point is something else you have done what you usually do.  Hide your defeat by reframing and crating a straw man argument. 

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:11 pm

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:07 pm

Acknowledge you are too chicken **** to go on record with your case.  You tell me.  And quote my original post and the answer to your original question when you do it.

 

Acknowledge you are too chicken **** to go on record with your case

This is a lie.

Why do you always do this?

.  And quote my original post and the answer to your original question when you do it.

Controlly,

There's no need..



 

 

If you are not a chicken **** prove I am a liar and make your case then ask questions.  Simple concept, really. 
 

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:15 pm

If you are not a chicken **** prove I am a liar and make your case then ask questions.  Simple concept, really.

You need to make a case that my case hasn't been made.

You've exhausted this bluff as well...

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:14 pm

Make your case.  All you will do is ask more questions and never answer any.   Make your case and ask your question or take your L.  Basing this on MY words you are arguing AL was never projected to feel any affects from Dorian.

If you point is something else you have done what you usually do.  Hide your defeat by reframing and crating a straw man argument.

Stop retelling....

I've already told you.

Dorian DID NOT threaten Alabama, and this photograph is unimpeachable evidence of that fact

can you figure out why?

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:19 pm

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:14 pm

Make your case.  All you will do is ask more questions and never answer any.   Make your case and ask your question or take your L.  Basing this on MY words you are arguing AL was never projected to feel any affects from Dorian.

If you point is something else you have done what you usually do.  Hide your defeat by reframing and crating a straw man argument.

Stop retelling....

I've already told you.

Dorian DID NOT threaten Alabama, and this photograph is unimpeachable evidence of that fact

can you figure out why?



 

I did not say the words threaten.  I said AL was projected to feel the affects as the graph I posted I did.  That is absolutely 100% correct.

And remember NH hick boy hurricans move.  On that track, as I stated earlier, if maintained, would have put the outer cone over the panhandle and lower alabama.

You lose.  Let your meltdown begin. I notice your meltdown ****** thread is not getting much play.  And as I said earlier I pretty much own you.  I got you talking about it on this thread.  You can not PG responses and answers to your posts and questions.  That was a ****** move on  your part. You instigate a fight then have a temper tantrum when you win.  That is why you got pepper sprayed. 

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:22 pm

I did not say the words threaten.  I said AL was projected to feel the affects as the graph I posted I did.  That is absolutely 100% correct.

And remember NH hick boy hurricans move.  On that track, as I stated earlier, if maintained, would have put the outer cone over the panhandle and lower alabama.

You lose.  Let your meltdown begin. I notice your meltdown ****** thread is not getting much play.  And as I said earlier I pretty much own you.  I got you talking about it on this thread.  You can not PG responses and answers to your posts and questions.  That was a ****** move on  your part. You instigate a fight then have a temper tantrum when you win.  That is why you got pepper sprayed.

Dwarf,

Focus on the question....

No one gives a **** about what you've told yourself...it is irrelevant.

Now try again.

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:24 pm

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:22 pm

I did not say the words threaten.  I said AL was projected to feel the affects as the graph I posted I did.  That is absolutely 100% correct.

And remember NH hick boy hurricans move.  On that track, as I stated earlier, if maintained, would have put the outer cone over the panhandle and lower alabama.

You lose.  Let your meltdown begin. I notice your meltdown ****** thread is not getting much play.  And as I said earlier I pretty much own you.  I got you talking about it on this thread.  You can not PG responses and answers to your posts and questions.  That was a ****** move on  your part. You instigate a fight then have a temper tantrum when you win.  That is why you got pepper sprayed.

Dwarf,

Focus on the question....

No one gives a **** about what you've told yourself...it is irrelevant.

Now try again.

 

Scrawny, Focus on your case.  The time for Askholio is over.   Now try again.  Or be ignored.  As far as I am concerned I was 100% correct.  

 

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 11:49 am

Look at the Key...

You know what that is, don't you?

Are you under the impression that the map DOESN'T show the path of Dorian's high wind speeds were possibly going to hit Alabama?
Isn't THAT the only point?  

You've lost!  AGAIN!  Get over it, snowflake, and go make your appointment with someone who can help your TDS!
 

Zeets2 » 04 Nov 2021, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:36 pm

Are you under the impression that the map DOESN'T show the path of Dorian's high wind speeds were possibly going to hit Alabama?
Isn't THAT the only point?  

You've lost!  AGAIN!  Get over it, snowflake, and go make your appointment with someone who can help your TDS!

Are you under the impression that the map DOESN'T show the path of Dorian's high wind speeds were possibly going to hit Alabama?
Isn't THAT the only point?  

That is THE point..

Now answer the question.

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:35 pm

Scrawny, Focus on your case.  The time for Askholio is over.   Now try again.  Or be ignored.  As far as I am concerned I was 100% correct.

Reframy,

Answer the question.


 

Zeets2 » 04 Nov 2021, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:36 pm

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 11:49 am

Look at the Key...

You know what that is, don't you?

Are you under the impression that the map DOESN'T show the path of Dorian's high wind speeds were possibly going to hit Alabama?
Isn't THAT the only point?  

You've lost!  AGAIN!  Get over it, snowflake, and go make your appointment with someone who can help your TDS!
 

 

He has been hanging is hat on that forever.  He refuses to admit that the original tracks showed AL, GA and the Panhandle would feel some effects from Dorian.  The moron has been chasing me for two years about this with the same stupid question that was answered time and time again.

I guess he is not smart enough to know that storms move.  No one knows what would have happened if that storm had maintained that track over the warm waters of the Gulf of which AL borders.  

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:39 pm

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 12:35 pm

Scrawny, Focus on your case.  The time for Askholio is over.   Now try again.  Or be ignored.  As far as I am concerned I was 100% correct.

Reframy,

Answer the question.


 

 

Last time.  Make a case.  For two years you have been reframing.  My case is made and is correct.