2 questions. Each relating directly to the Objective Evidence..Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑ He has been hanging is hat on that forever. He refuses to admit that the original tracks showed AL, GA and the Panhandle would feel some effects from Dorian. The moron has been chasing me for two years about this with the same stupid question that was answered time and time again.
I guess he is not smart enough to know that storms move. No one knows what would have happened if that storm had maintained that track over the warm waters of the Gulf of which AL borders.

Enough of your lying, ReframyHuey » 04 Nov 2021, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Last time. Make a case. For two years you have been reframing. My case is made and is correct.
Make your case.Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑2 questions. Each relating directly to the Objective Evidence..Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑ He has been hanging is hat on that forever. He refuses to admit that the original tracks showed AL, GA and the Panhandle would feel some effects from Dorian. The moron has been chasing me for two years about this with the same stupid question that was answered time and time again.
I guess he is not smart enough to know that storms move. No one knows what would have happened if that storm had maintained that track over the warm waters of the Gulf of which AL borders.
What does the Key to the map the two of you idiots are waving around tell us about what might might happen in the areas shaded Dark Green?
How can we tell, simply by looking at this photograph, that Dorian DIDN'T threaten Alabama?
I did! The ORIGINAL TRACK OF Dorian's HURRICANE WINDS SHOWED THEY WOULD HIT ALABAMA!
It's anything he can divert attention away from the incredible failures of the demented moron he admits voting for!Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑ He has been hanging is hat on that forever. He refuses to admit that the original tracks showed AL, GA and the Panhandle would feel some effects from Dorian. The moron has been chasing me for two years about this with the same stupid question that was answered time and time again.
I guess he is not smart enough to know that storms move. No one knows what would have happened if that storm had maintained that track over the warm waters of the Gulf of which AL borders.
Zeets2 » 04 Nov 2021, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑I did! The ORIGINAL TRACK OF Dorian's HURRICANE WINDS SHOWED THEY WOULD HIT ALABAMA!
Go ahead and try to deny it, asshole!
And a dope like you would have been the first one to scream at Trump if the path HAD hit Alabama and Trump didn't warn them! THAT'S the kind of deranged mental patient you are!
Zeets2 » 04 Nov 2021, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑ I did! The ORIGINAL TRACK OF Dorian's HURRICANE WINDS SHOWED THEY WOULD HIT ALABAMA!
Go ahead and try to deny it, asshole!
And a dope like you would have been the first one to scream at Trump if the path HAD hit Alabama and Trump didn't warn them! THAT'S the kind of deranged mental patient you are!
Go ahead and try to deny it, asshole!

Zeets2 » 04 Nov 2021, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑It's anything he can divert attention away from the incredible failures of the demented moron he admits voting for!Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑ He has been hanging is hat on that forever. He refuses to admit that the original tracks showed AL, GA and the Panhandle would feel some effects from Dorian. The moron has been chasing me for two years about this with the same stupid question that was answered time and time again.
I guess he is not smart enough to know that storms move. No one knows what would have happened if that storm had maintained that track over the warm waters of the Gulf of which AL borders.
He doesn't realize he's the only one dwelling on a story that began and ended over two years ago!
I have.
Diverty,Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑ He is still butthurt over the election threads he got whooped on yesterday. You can tell when he is not having a good dgo of it on the topics of a day because he always will divert with this ****. It is his go to. And the argument about who decimated the military in the 90s. The second decade I served during (he didn't) abd saw what was going on.
Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 12:59 pm » wrote: ↑Diverty,Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑ He is still butthurt over the election threads he got whooped on yesterday. You can tell when he is not having a good dgo of it on the topics of a day because he always will divert with this ****. It is his go to. And the argument about who decimated the military in the 90s. The second decade I served during (he didn't) abd saw what was going on.
Please focus.
You were invited to discuss the economy, but you wilted.
As you always do.
I just reminded you that I invited you to talk about the economy, and you wilted.Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑ LMAO!
You were invited to discuss the top three issues important to VA voters. You diverted. Get it right. You retellings are epic fictional accounts.
Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑I just reminded you that I invited you to talk about the economy, and you wilted.Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑ LMAO!
You were invited to discuss the top three issues important to VA voters. You diverted. Get it right. You retellings are epic fictional accounts.
List the 3 top priorities according to your source..
No, Dwarf..Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Already listed on the thread in question, with the source. Go find it.
Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 12:59 pm » wrote: ↑Diverty,Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑ He is still butthurt over the election threads he got whooped on yesterday. You can tell when he is not having a good dgo of it on the topics of a day because he always will divert with this ****. It is his go to. And the argument about who decimated the military in the 90s. The second decade I served during (he didn't) abd saw what was going on.
Please focus.
You were invited to discuss the economy, but you wilted.
As you always do.
Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑No, Dwarf..Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Already listed on the thread in question, with the source. Go find it.
You raised the matter....and lied by omission.
Was the economy one of the issues?
Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 1:08 pm » wrote: ↑
No Scrawny...
As you can see you raised the matter. I was just looking at the thread in question. Go to the advanced search function, in keyword type important, in author type Huey, scroll down and you will find that post.
Are these your words?He is still butthurt over the election threads he got whooped on yesterday.
Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 1:08 pm » wrote: ↑
No Scrawny...
As you can see you raised the matter. I was just looking at the thread in question. Go to the advanced search function, in keyword type important, in author type Huey, scroll down and you will find that post.Are these your words?He is still butthurt over the election threads he got whooped on yesterday.
Stop doing this ****, Brick...
Dwarf,Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑ LMAO! If yuo wish to discuss it you know how find it. On this thread all I wan to see out of you is your case. So we can hold you to it.
Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑Dwarf,Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑ LMAO! If yuo wish to discuss it you know how find it. On this thread all I wan to see out of you is your case. So we can hold you to it.
You lie....then you get smacked in the face...
While twitching on the canvas you yammer about "making a case"..
SSDD
No...You got burned by your own words....againHuey » 04 Nov 2021, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑ I didn't lie. You misrepresented yet another discussion with your retellings. You got your *** handed to you yesterday. The debate was over what VA voters thought were the top 3 issues in the election. Whether you feel the economy is good or bad, considering you live in Bum **** White Boy NH, is not relevant to the discussion.