Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 2:15 pm

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 2:13 pm

I didn't lie.  You misrepresented yet another discussion with your retellings.  You got your *** handed to you yesterday.  The debate was over what VA voters thought were the top 3 issues in the election.  Whether you feel the economy is good or bad, considering you live in Bum **** White Boy NH, is not relevant to the discussion.

No...You got burned by your own words....again


How can you kick ANYTHING by rebleating talking points?

 

 

Not really.  You brought the economy to this thread.

But, you are diverting.  Right now I would like to see you post your case concerning the spam you have posted over the last 2 years concerning what I posted here.  Get your point on record so we can stop your squirming.  I have been consistent posting my words form two years ago (which were correct).  

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 2:17 pm

Not really.  You brought the economy to this thread.

But, you are diverting.  Right now I would like to see you post your case concerning the spam you have posted over the last 2 years concerning what I posted here.  Get your point on record so we can stop your squirming.  I have been consistent posting my words form two years ago (which were correct).

No...you're diverting....as the record you've been shown clearly demonstrates..

From your own reframe.....

While running, and lying....

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 2:21 pm

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 2:17 pm

Not really.  You brought the economy to this thread.

But, you are diverting.  Right now I would like to see you post your case concerning the spam you have posted over the last 2 years concerning what I posted here.  Get your point on record so we can stop your squirming.  I have been consistent posting my words form two years ago (which were correct).

No...you're diverting....as the record you've been shown clearly demonstrates..

From your own reframe.....

While running, and lying....

 

I didn't reframe.  i was replying to a different poster as to why you are so butthurt.  And now wish to change the topic to escape further embarrassment.  The record from yesterday shows you were attempting to hijack a thread with the economy.  The topic was not the economy nor was the question answered.  

I never run.  That's my problem and ultimately yours.

Now about that case.  You got it yet?  Or do I need to start ignoring your posts on this thread as I am doing on your failed PG thread where you PG answers to your questions.

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 2:25 pm

I didn't reframe.  i was replying to a different poster as to why you are so butthurt.  And now wish to change the topic to escape further embarrassment.  The record from yesterday shows you were attempting to hijack a thread with the economy.  The topic was not the economy nor was the question answered.  

I never run.  That's my problem and ultimately yours.

Now about that case.  You got it yet?  Or do I need to start ignoring your posts on this thread as I am doing on your failed PG thread where you PG answers to your questions.
 

That is not the reframe to which I was referring, Reframy

So I will forgo wading into the pile of **** you invented which follows.

Or do I need to start ignoring your posts on this thread as I am doing on your failed PG thread where you PG answers to your questions.

I'm not gonna try to fully decode this gibberish......

I will suggest that you read the very unambiguous directions in the OP...

The reason for the PG is that you are incapable of understanding the meaning of words.

When you make an honest effort to answer the questions, your post will remain.

As long as you continue to play your **** games, they won't.....

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 2:32 pm

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 2:25 pm

I didn't reframe.  i was replying to a different poster as to why you are so butthurt.  And now wish to change the topic to escape further embarrassment.  The record from yesterday shows you were attempting to hijack a thread with the economy.  The topic was not the economy nor was the question answered.  

I never run.  That's my problem and ultimately yours.

Now about that case.  You got it yet?  Or do I need to start ignoring your posts on this thread as I am doing on your failed PG thread where you PG answers to your questions.

 

That is not the reframe to which I was referring, Reframy

So I will forgo wading into the pile of **** you invented which follows.

Or do I need to start ignoring your posts on this thread as I am doing on your failed PG thread where you PG answers to your questions.

I'm not gonna try to fully decode this gibberish......

I will suggest that you read the very unambiguous directions in the OP...

The reason for the PG is that you are incapable of understanding the meaning of words.

When you make an honest effort to answer the questions, your post will remain.

As long as you continue to play your **** games, they won't.....

 

The reason for the PG thread is you so you can reframe and control the topic.  You do this every time your *** is beat.  You start a new thread (PG this time) and start reframing the issue without quotes and links.  You run from the thread that has the record so you can create a new one.  As you can see, you failed. 

And any thread where you ask a question, then PG the answer, I am not going to participate on.  You are a control freak, particularly when you are wrong.

Now state your case and then ask your questions.  You have lost the initial battle over two year ago. 

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 2:36 pm

The reason for the PG thread is you so you can reframe and control the topic.  You do this every time your *** is beat.  You start a new thread (PG this time) and start reframing the issue without quotes and links.  You run from the thread that has the record so you can create a new one.  As you can see, you failed. 

And any thread where you ask a question, then PG the answer, I am not going to participate on.  You are a control freak, particularly when you are wrong.

Now state your case and then ask your questions.  You have lost the initial battle over two year ago.

Dwarf,

That's why YOU resort to PG...

The thread about which you complain doesn't require bumping threads. This has been explained to you before - your unwillingness to understand it is irrelevant.

The entire story (exclusive of your reframy) is told in the photograph and the quote.

Attend to that and I will address your reframy.

 

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 2:40 pm

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 2:36 pm

The reason for the PG thread is you so you can reframe and control the topic.  You do this every time your *** is beat.  You start a new thread (PG this time) and start reframing the issue without quotes and links.  You run from the thread that has the record so you can create a new one.  As you can see, you failed. 

And any thread where you ask a question, then PG the answer, I am not going to participate on.  You are a control freak, particularly when you are wrong.

Now state your case and then ask your questions.  You have lost the initial battle over two year ago.

Dwarf,

That's why YOU resort to PG...

The thread about which you complain doesn't require bumping threads. This has been explained to you before - your unwillingness to understand it is irrelevant.

The entire story (exclusive of your reframy) is told in the photograph and the quote.

Attend to that and I will address your reframy.

 

 

Incorrect.  When I use PG the only posts I remove are those trying to change the subject to Trump, one liner attack posts, and anything not on topic.  If I ask a question and someone answers, it would be a ****** move to PG the comment.  

You are still running from having to state your case.  

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 2:43 pm

Incorrect.  When I use PG the only posts I remove are those trying to change the subject to Trump, one liner attack posts, and anything not on topic.  If I ask a question and someone answers, it would be a ****** move to PG the comment.  

You are still running from having to state your case.
 

 

If I ask a question and someone answers, it would be a ****** move to PG the comment.  

a) that's a lie

b) you haven't made any effort to answer the question.

your eccentric definitions of things have no currency on that thread....it is concerned with the answers to the questions asked.

You are still running from having to state your case.

Dorian did not threaten Alabama. The photograph represents unimpeachable evidence that this is so.


Acknowledge that it has been stated again.

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 2:50 pm

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 2:43 pm

Incorrect.  When I use PG the only posts I remove are those trying to change the subject to Trump, one liner attack posts, and anything not on topic.  If I ask a question and someone answers, it would be a ****** move to PG the comment.  

You are still running from having to state your case.

 

If I ask a question and someone answers, it would be a ****** move to PG the comment.  

a) that's a lie

b) you haven't made any effort to answer the question.

your eccentric definitions of things have no currency on that thread....it is concerned with the answers to the questions asked.

You are still running from having to state your case.

Dorian did not threaten Alabama. The photograph represents unimpeachable evidence that this is so.


Acknowledge that it has been stated again.

 

Proof it is a lie.

Dorian did not threaten Alabama. The photograph represents unimpeachable evidence that this is so.

I never said it did.  State your case and point.  

You get no acknowledgement until you acknowledge that you have been answered multiple time over the past two years and that my first post stated nothing about AL being threatened. 

Thanks.   We can put this to bed now. 
 

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 2:54 pm

Proof it is a lie.

Dorian did not threaten Alabama. The photograph represents unimpeachable evidence that this is so.

I never said it did.  State your case and point.  

You get no acknowledgement until you acknowledge that you have been answered multiple time over the past two years and that my first post stated nothing about AL being threatened. 

Thanks.   We can put this to bed now.
 

 

I never said it did.  State your case and point.  

Post your exact words.

State your case and point.

That's enough of that ****, Dwarf.

Acknowledge that my case has been stated.

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 2:56 pm

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 2:54 pm

Proof it is a lie.

Dorian did not threaten Alabama. The photograph represents unimpeachable evidence that this is so.

I never said it did.  State your case and point.  

You get no acknowledgement until you acknowledge that you have been answered multiple time over the past two years and that my first post stated nothing about AL being threatened. 

Thanks.   We can put this to bed now.

 

I never said it did.  State your case and point.  

Post your exact words.

State your case and point.

That's enough of that ****, Dwarf.

Acknowledge that my case has been stated.

 

That is enough of this ****.  I have posted my exact words numerous times over the last two years and today.  I am not doing it again.  Since you keep bugging me you have not stated your case.

Take my words and post exactly why your panties are in a snit.

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 2:58 pm

That is enough of this ****.  I have posted my exact words numerous times over the last two years and today.  I am not doing it again.  Since you keep bugging me you have not stated your case.

Take my words and post exactly why your panties are in a snit.
 

You were once so proud of that dodge..

. Since you keep bugging me you have not stated your case.

Acknowledge that you've been told....

 

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 3:00 pm

You were once so proud of that dodge..

Acknowledge that you've been told....

You get no acknowledgement until you acknowledge that you have been answered multiple time over the past two years and that my first post stated nothing about AL being threatened. 

Thanks.   We can put this to bed now.
 

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 3:03 pm

You get no acknowledgement until you acknowledge that you have been answered multiple time over the past two years and that my first post stated nothing about AL being threatened. 

Thanks.   We can put this to bed now.

It won't change the fact that mine is true, yours is a lie.

As I already stated, your diverty will be addressed once you answer the question.

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 3:05 pm

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 3:03 pm

You get no acknowledgement until you acknowledge that you have been answered multiple time over the past two years and that my first post stated nothing about AL being threatened. 

Thanks.   We can put this to bed now.

It won't change the fact that mine is true, yours is a lie.

As I already stated, your diverty will be addressed once you answer the question.

 

I told no lie in any answer or post number 2 to this thread.  You got curbstomped, again.  Now go start another tribute thread.

A real man, something you would never be accused of being, would have quote my answers and posts and made their case.  You have someting to hide so you lie. 

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 3:31 pm

I told no lie in any answer or post number 2 to this thread.  You got curbstomped, again.  Now go start another tribute thread.

A real man, something you would never be accused of being, would have quote my answers and posts and made their case.  You have someting to hide so you lie.

Be man enough to read that OP again.
 

Huey » 04 Sep 2019, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2019, 4:15 pm

This is a joke, right?

PS. Remember the last time you guys ranted about the AL comment I told you the original tracks had it crossing FL and heading to the Gulf. In a northwest direction? Look at the map and see where AL is. Seems to me you just down your own argument.

 

@Cannonpointer  

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 10:54 am

You have demonstrated no such thing.  Only in your warped mind, meltdown boy.  

My answer stands.  You question is not a yes or no answer.

If you had asked:

Did dorian threaten Alabama AFTER it turned north?

That would be a simple NO.  You did not ask that.

Again, you are not a TV lawyer.  You do not the skill to steer a discussion in the direction you want.  

The day that track was posted, and the few days after, AL was in the cone to feel affects of the storm.  ULTIMATLEY, the storm changed so no, AT THAT POINT AL was not in the path to feel any effects of the storm.

That is all you are gonna get, wanna be Perry Mason.

If you had asked:

Did dorian threaten Alabama AFTER it turned north?

That would be a simple NO.  You did not ask that.

only if we were concerned with your retelling..

We aren't


 

Blackvegetable » 05 Nov 2021, 7:45 am » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 7:45 am

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 10:54 am

You have demonstrated no such thing.  Only in your warped mind, meltdown boy.  

My answer stands.  You question is not a yes or no answer.

If you had asked:

Did dorian threaten Alabama AFTER it turned north?

That would be a simple NO.  You did not ask that.

Again, you are not a TV lawyer.  You do not the skill to steer a discussion in the direction you want.  

The day that track was posted, and the few days after, AL was in the cone to feel affects of the storm.  ULTIMATLEY, the storm changed so no, AT THAT POINT AL was not in the path to feel any effects of the storm.

That is all you are gonna get, wanna be Perry Mason.

If you had asked:

Did dorian threaten Alabama AFTER it turned north?

That would be a simple NO.  You did not ask that.

only if we were concerned with your retelling..

We aren't


 

 

There is no re-telling.  I posted my quotes, with date/time stamps, and links.  Same thing I said two years.  Same thing I said a few weeks ago.

Huey » 05 Nov 2021, 5:26 am » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2021, 5:26 am

@Cannonpointer

Reframy,

You got up on your little hind legs and yapped in defense of Grifty's lie.

Posters told you that you were wrong, and why.

When NOAA released its bogus unsigned statement at the command of Grifty's flunky, you claimed vindication.

Others patiently explained why it was bogus, but you persisted.

Then the **** started leaking, and I posted a thread wherein I reproduced many of the highlights of your self debasement..

It was so thorough in its evisceration that you took 2 days off to sulk.