Liberal Forum

Market Based Solutions.


Call me.

Huey » 11 Dec 2019 12:57 pm » wrote:
BV has gone done another rabitt hole. Is not very informed on guns themselves, gun laws or anything gun related. He is a self admitted gun grabber. Don't go down his path of diversion.

Speaking of "Irredeemable Moron"...

Blackvegetable » 11 Dec 2019 12:51 pm » wrote:
"Suicide by firearm"....so the very same angry white imbeciles who get hysterical at the thought of anyone knowing that they are ammosexual provide, in checking out by firearm, a reliable proxy for their dirty little secret...

Is to laugh, non?

Yeah, that's a real knee-slapper! So it's only "white imbeciles" who commit suicide using a gun? Is that the stupidity you're trying to get across? And how many of them use a rifle or "long gun" to commit suicide since that was the weapon as described by the police in this bodega shooting? Can you just picture that suicide attempt?

You feel better now being able to add a worthless comment like that to this topic of a NJ Mass Shooting? If there's a more empty-headed eggplant on you in this forum, I'd sure like to hear from him!

Lucifershammer » 11 Dec 2019 1:08 pm » wrote:

Under pressure, NRA voices support for gun violence restraining orders

NICOLE GAUDIANO | USA TODAY | 2:23 pm EDT March 23, 2018




WASHINGTON —Facing intense public pressure, the National Rifle Association is starting to talk about the types of gun violence restraining orders it would support after years of opposing them.

The orders, also known as "extreme risk protection orders," allow a court to temporarily restrict individuals' access to firearms when they exhibit "red flags" that they are a danger to themselves or others. Such “red flag” laws have received additional attention following the Valentine’s Day mass shooting in Parkland, Fla.

Zeets2 » 11 Dec 2019 1:09 pm » wrote:
Yeah, that's a real knee-slapper! So it's only "white imbeciles" who commit suicide using a gun? Is that the stupidity you're trying to get across? And how many of them use a rifle or "long gun" to commit suicide since that was the weapon as described by the police in this bodega shooting? Can you just picture that suicide attempt?

You feel better now being able to add a worthless comment like that to this topic of a NJ Mass Shooting? If there's a more empty-headed eggplant on you in this forum, I'd sure like to hear from him!

Even if you don't grasp it, I want you to lay eyes on the Irony...


Are you ever gonna thank me for Pt. 1 of that employment data tutorial?

Blackvegetable » 11 Dec 2019 1:12 pm » wrote:
Under pressure, NRA voices support for gun violence restraining orders

NICOLE GAUDIANO | USA TODAY | 2:23 pm EDT March 23, 2018




WASHINGTON —Facing intense public pressure, the National Rifle Association is starting to talk about the types of gun violence restraining orders it would support after years of opposing them.

The orders, also known as "extreme risk protection orders," allow a court to temporarily restrict individuals' access to firearms when they exhibit "red flags" that they are a danger to themselves or others. Such “red flag” laws have received additional attention following the Valentine’s Day mass shooting in Parkland, Fla.

That has absolutely nothing to do with what I posted.

Lucifershammer » 11 Dec 2019 1:15 pm » wrote: That has absolutely nothing to do with what I posted.

That's what the lunatic fringe group responsible for your poster wants you to believe.

Blackvegetable » 11 Dec 2019 12:32 pm » wrote:

Zeets2 » 11 Dec 2019 12:20 pm » wrote: Of what possible use would that have? Would it show how many law-abiding citizens own guns in the country? Or would it show how many criminals have ILLEGAL guns? So explain what possible relevance such a statistic would have, regarding a singular murder spree in a bodega?

Why do you waste your time with such drivel? If you've got something intelligent to say, then dispute the LOGIC that dopes like you would expect CRIMINALS AND MURDERERS to obey another gun law?

Can you shut the **** up and answer the question?

Just this once?

So explain what possible relevance such a statistic would have, regarding a singular murder spree in a bodega?

Can you shut the **** up and answer the question?

Just this once?

Huey » 11 Dec 2019 2:00 pm » wrote:


Can you shut the **** up and answer the question?

Just this once?

After you clear up part of yesterday's tab, Dwarf.....

Blackvegetable » 11 Dec 2019 8:49 am » wrote:

nefarious101 » 11 Dec 2019 3:43 am » wrote:like pavlov's dog the progressive communist democratics, which is what they like to be called, only drool on cue....like when CNN rings the bell. Just look at BV, Misty, Ricky, Billtard and the rest....they have been well trained to salivate on cue.

like pavlov's dog the progressive communist democratics,

Nothing conditioned about that bleat...

Seriously,

Have you ever had your IQ taken?

coming from you that's hilarious....you also lack social skills and are well trained to be extremely gullible to anything progressive communist in nature

[quote="Blackvegetable » 11 Dec 2019 2:01 pm"][quote="[url=https://liberalforum

My tab is clean.

that question was from another poster. And those are your words to him. I suggest you stop demanding **** and stop running.

carry on.

Huey » 11 Dec 2019 4:18 pm » wrote:

My tab is clean.

Shall we go to the Record?

nefarious101 » 11 Dec 2019 3:40 pm » wrote:
coming from you that's hilarious....you also lack social skills and are well trained to be extremely gullible to anything progressive communist in nature

Whatever......

How about answering the question?

Zeets2 » 11 Dec 2019 9:10 am » wrote:
guns laws make it easy for criminals to get guns

So you're guessing that these criminals bought these guns, hundreds of rounds of ammunition, and the bomb-making equipment all legally, huh? Any evidence of that? Or maybe you'd like to admit the obvious fact that THIEVES AND POTENTIAL MURDERERS PROBABLY WON'T BOTHER FOLLOWING ANY GUN LAWS, right?

Nah, that would make far too much logic, wouldn't it?

ASK YOURSELF A QUESTION... now try to think I know its hard.. imagine for a moment , bombs were legal amor piercing ammo could be bought at walmart, hand grenades and flame throwers on sale in isle 4! get your biol chemical weapons 1/2 off sale.. ricen and bubonic plague, plutonium rods for bombs rock bottom prices! think idiot think about all these things being legal acid poisons fertilizer to make explosives all these substances that are now being regulated and restricted to keep out of the hands of terrorists https://www.technologyreview.com/s/514046/fertilizer-you-cant-make-bombs-out-of/ imagine you could get all these things LEGALLY like you can a assault type rifle? now would that make the problem worse or better? you **** moron !!! https://www.csgv.org/myth-black-market/
But most importantly, we must learn to overcome our own misconceptions of the problem. As Kairys writes, “the common image of an underground, illegal market is largely fictional.” The ability of dangerous people to easily obtain guns is the result of
our weak gun laws, which do little to regulate the firearms industry. The good news? Significant progress can be made in reducing gun violence as soon as our elected officials are made to realize that “the loss of life, the economic and social costs, and the undermining of the safety and the quality of life in America are unacceptable.”

Blackvegetable » 11 Dec 2019 4:21 pm » wrote:

Huey » 11 Dec 2019 4:18 pm » wrote:

My tab is clean.

Shall we go to the Record?

No, not on this thread. If you wish to bump something, go for it.

Everyone knows your agenda is to **** up as many threads as possible.

Progtards have to run from this one. *** killing Jews.

Jersey has the 2nd toughest gun laws in the nation...............................how did that work out?

https://www.nj.com/politics/2019/08/nj-has-the-2nd-toughest-gun-laws-in-the-nation-what-are-they.html

Huey » 11 Dec 2019 5:33 pm » wrote:
No, not on this thread. If you wish to bump something, go for it.

Everyone knows your agenda is to **** up as many threads as possible.

But you lied on THIS thread, sniveling little douche...

Blackvegetable » 11 Dec 2019 6:10 pm » wrote:

Huey » 11 Dec 2019 5:33 pm » wrote:
No, not on this thread. If you wish to bump something, go for it.

Everyone knows your agenda is to **** up as many threads as possible.

But you lied on THIS thread, sniveling little douche...

Just another BV meltdown. (To the tune of Manic Monday)

Man Child, I am done with you on this thread UNLESS you wanna grab your sac, offer an argument concerning the OP, and defend it with out demanding questions be answered.

I see our resident dumbalina infestation is scared to death over this event not fitting their progtard agendas.