Liberal Forum

littlehawk12 » 07 Apr 2014 6:43 pm » wrote: Again, YOU voted for this TWICE! Suck it up ****!

Cannonpointer » 07 Apr 2014 6:43 pm » wrote:
Of course they should listen to their teachers. As a parent, why would you send your kids to school and instruct them to ignore their teachers? That is retarded. Politics are fine until you have retarded, illiterate children, just so you can call yourself a good conjob.

Cannonpointer » 07 Apr 2014 6:45 pm » wrote: Asshole, the thread is about capitalism, not who I voted for.

Keep running from the topic, queer. Your derails are noted.

Cannonpointer » 07 Apr 2014 6:45 pm » wrote:
Asshole, the thread is about capitalism, not who I voted for.

Keep running from the topic, queer. Your derails are noted.

golfboy » 07 Apr 2014 9:44 am » wrote: This ******* claims that the government going after e-cigs is "capitalism"?
Thank you for proving once again what a tenuous grip you liberals have on reality.

littlehawk12 » 07 Apr 2014 6:47 pm » wrote: The topic is you whining about government overreach, that YOU voted for! LMAO!

bigsky » 07 Apr 2014 6:46 pm » wrote:
i send them to school because my wife makes me....they learn far more when they are home than when they are there...getting shot at...molested....bullied....and all the other crap that goes on in those liberal torture camps

Cannonpointer » 07 Apr 2014 6:57 pm » wrote: No, you little ***. the thread is about the true nature of capitalism. You are a troll, here to derail it. **** you, you little punk. You add nothing to the board but drool. Go troll someone else's thread - you lack the intellect to improve this one,other than by leaving it.

littlehawk12 » 07 Apr 2014 7:01 pm » wrote: bla bla.

Cannonpointer » 07 Apr 2014 7:00 pm » wrote:
Whatever, dude. You live in ****, Montana. The teachers are your **** neighbors. Maybe you should move to a more conservative part of Montana, if the teachers are getting caught reading and thinking and doing other such liberal things.

Cannonpointer » 07 Apr 2014 7:03 pm » wrote: You foolow orders like a good little dicksucker.

littlehawk12 » 07 Apr 2014 7:05 pm » wrote: Whatever you want to dream up in that delusional pea-brain, government overreach lover.

Cannonpointer » 07 Apr 2014 7:06 pm » wrote: Good job - keep following orders, dicksucker.

littlehawk12 » 07 Apr 2014 7:07 pm » wrote: Okay, kiddie-****. I will.

NeoConvict » 07 Apr 2014 10:21 am » wrote: As an ecig business owner for the past three years and one who has been a customer of the industry is its amazing to see just how much power that big tobacco has. After the first generation e-cigs were shown to help smokers quit at rates three or four times better than any drug, patch available on the market. This created an unholy union arrayed against the fledgling, predominately mom and pop, ecig cottage industry. The FDA tried to ban ecigs as drug delievery devices, while big tobacco tried to convince people that switching from their cancer sticks to inhaling radiator fluid was stupid idea. They spent millions on a disinformation campaign. Big pharma is also a player trying, with the FDA, to label ecigarettes as drug delivery devices and subject them to huge taxes and required them complete millions of dollars worth of blind and double blind tests to prove effectiveness.

This is not the way capatilizm is supposed to work. A superior product, a better mouse trap, is being attacked and buried by the lethal tobacco industry and government agencies allegedly functioning in the publics best interest. Now that ecigs are here to stay big tobbaco have entered into the market place with inferior hardware. They have purchased some of the more experienced small juice production businesses. Their next move is "THINK OF THE CHILDREN". They are moving to ban online sales, ensuring that gas stations and wall mart are the places people can buy their inferior product. A product I believe is delibrately designed to provide a inferior experience to lower the conversion rate of smokers to vapers.

Cannonpointer » 07 Apr 2014 7:11 pm » wrote: Why do you always want to introduce the topic of child sex to the forum?

Every thread, you start talking about **** children or molesting children - or you bring up your own children and then accuse others of doing it - or you accuse another poster of **** his own children, knowing that it's a TOS violation.

Why do you always have to push the subject to child ****, bait dad? Is there something you need to tell us?

Cannonpointer » 07 Apr 2014 7:11 pm » wrote:
Why do you always want to introduce the topic of child sex to the forum?

Every thread, you start talking about **** children or molesting children - or you bring up your own children and then accuse others of doing it - or you accuse another poster of **** his own children, knowing that it's a TOS violation.

Why do you always have to push the subject to child ****, bait dad? Is there something you need to tell us?