Liberal Forum

RichClem » 11 Dec 2014 11:10 pm » wrote:
Oh look, the psychopath once again dodged the question.

Go f*** yourself, as usual.

Nor have I ever burned books, you babbling imbecile.

You applauded people being arrested for reading the worng books - for discussing the wrong books. What is the difference, you slobbering statist goon? You just got owned, you jack boot licking sycophant. Your POSTS decry you, book burner - censorship fan - witch hunter.

Cannonpointer » 12 Dec 2014 2:14 am » wrote: You applauded people being arrested for reading the worng books - for discussing the wrong books. What is the difference, you slobbering statist goon? You just got owned, you jack boot licking sycophant. Your POSTS decry you, book burner - censorship fan - witch hunter.

No one was arrested for reading or discussing books, you babbling psychotic. Great job at cutting out what I did write.

How about answering my question?

Do you think the federal government should be able to censor books, movies, pamphlets, etc. just because they're done by corporations?

Cannonpointer » 12 Dec 2014 2:11 am » wrote: Hey, chump change: He was going after people who went to the wrong cocktail party.

There's the moonbat version of history.

You support his book burning, censorship ways, you ignorant turd.

That means YOU - the guy harrumphing about censorship - have a SOLID HISTORY ON THIS BOARD OF ADVOCATING FOR CENSORSHIP, you stupid hypocrite.

Your *** is busted out, fraud. Get new talking points, you stupid freak.

When have I ever advocated censorship, psycho? Make something up, you babbling liar.

RichClem » 12 Dec 2014 8:57 am » wrote: No one was arrested for reading or discussing books, you babbling psychotic. Great job at cutting out what I did write.

How about answering my question?

Lying sack of ****. Where does the child molesting community THINK Marx expressed his views, you **** ape?

RichClem » 12 Dec 2014 8:57 am » wrote:Do I think the federal government should be able to censor books, movies, pamphlets, etc. just because they're done by Karl Marx?

That's a stupid question little queer. You're already on record stating SPECIFICALLY that you do.

Trying to hide from your words again, fairy queen?

RichClem » 12 Dec 2014 9:00 am » wrote:
When have I ever advocated censorship, psycho? Make something up, you babbling liar.

When you defended Pinochet's murder spree? When you applauded the freedomy-ness of Singapore, where political dissidents are beaThere's the moonbat version of history. ten in the streets summarily - and chewing gum is a crime punished by street-beatings? When you ballyhooed Joe McCarthy for tracking down anyone who even TALKED ABOUT Das Kapital, you **** moron?

Jeses, kid. Either be a fascist boot licker or don;t, you relentlessly, unremittingly obtuse ***.

Cannonpointer » 12 Dec 2014 3:54 pm » wrote: Lying sack of ****. Where does the child molesting community THINK Marx expressed his views, you **** ape?

Reading Marx wasn't a particularly big deal. Adulating Communism was, moonbat.

That's a stupid question little queer. You're already on record stating SPECIFICALLY that you do.

Trying to hide from your words again, fairy queen?

What a useless lying sack of s*** you are.

Cannonpointer » 12 Dec 2014 4:01 pm » wrote: When you defended Pinochet's murder spree?

Never did, but since when have facts ever gotten in the way of your lies?

When you ballyhooed Joe McCarthy for tracking down anyone who even TALKED ABOUT Das Kapital, you **** moron?

Stunningly stupid and ignorant, as usual. He was concerned with traitors and other leftists who were betraying their country, as the rest of the liberal-left slept or attacked anti-Communists.

And almost every accusation he made has been proven to be factually correct.

Jeses, kid. Either be a fascist boot licker or don;t, you relentlessly, unremittingly obtuse ***.

Go f*** yourself.

RichClem » 12 Dec 2014 6:19 pm » wrote: Reading Marx wasn't a particularly big deal. Adulating Communism was, moonrbat.

Got it.

So it was ADULATING that you wanted censored - not the book being adulated. That your final position, homosexual?

RichClem » 12 Dec 2014 6:23 pm » wrote:
Never did, but since when have facts ever gotten in the way of your lies?


Stunningly stupid and ignorant, as usual. He was concerned with traitors and other leftists who were betraying their country, as the rest of the liberal-left slept or attacked anti-Communists.

And almost every accusation he made has been proven to be factually correct.


Go f*** yourself.

Let's review. "Traitors who were betraying." So what made them traitors was betraying, and the betrayal was being a traitor, you hedging, hemming, hawing ***?

And ya say "almost" every accusation, he "has been proven factually correct?"

Is that so, butt munch? How many accusations were made? How many were proved correct? What constitutes "almost" in Bluffy McBlufftardville, you little rat faced weasel?

DO YOU REALLY THINK YOUR SILLY, CHILDISH, EMPTY RHETORIC IS SEEN AS ANYTHING BUT A TRANSPARENT BLUFF - BY ANYONE? DO YOU REALLY SUPPOSE THAT ANYONE THINKS YOU HAVE A HANDLE ON YOUR HERO'S STATS, YOU DRUNKEN, SLOSHY, STUPID, PHONING-IT-IN KOOLAID PITCHER?

Cannonpointer » 13 Dec 2014 5:35 am » wrote: Got it.

So it was ADULATING that you wanted censored - not the book being adulated. That your final position, homosexual?

There was no censorship I'm aware of, nor have I ever heard of McCarthy advocating it.


Nice try at hiding behind rhetorical bulls*** rather than admit you're painfully ignorant about the Era.

Cannonpointer » 13 Dec 2014 5:44 am » wrote: Let's review. "Traitors who were betraying." So what made them traitors was betraying, and the betrayal was being a traitor, you hedging, hemming, hawing ***?

And ya say "almost" every accusation, he "has been proven factually correct?"

Is that so, butt munch? How many accusations were made? How many were proved correct? What constitutes "almost" in Bluffy McBlufftardville, you little rat faced weasel?

Here's my 22-page thread about the McCarthy Era, psycho. How did you manage to miss the facts I cited?

http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f ... e-mccarthy

DO YOU REALLY THINK YOUR SILLY, CHILDISH, EMPTY RHETORIC IS SEEN AS ANYTHING BUT A TRANSPARENT BLUFF - BY ANYONE? DO YOU REALLY SUPPOSE THAT ANYONE THINKS YOU HAVE A HANDLE ON YOUR HERO'S STATS, YOU DRUNKEN, SLOSHY, STUPID, PHONING-IT-IN KOOLAID PITCHER?

Go f*** yourself, you dishonest retard.

Cannonpointer » 06 Apr 2014 11:09 pm » wrote:Again and again on this board, I have pointed out that capitalism - not "crony" capitalism, not red or green or blue capitalism, but CAPITALISM - lives by the government gun. From soup to nuts, from inception to forever, all Wall Street firms count on the government to socialize risks, privatize profits, and bully cornered markets.

Typical moonbat idiocy.

Mis-use the term "capitalism" in defiance of the actual definition, then blame everything on it.

RichClem » 13 Dec 2014 9:45 am » wrote:
Typical moonbat idiocy.

Mis-use the term "capitalism" in defiance of the actual definition, then blame everything on it.

The "definition" is a cover story, moron. In 1969, Websters dropped "fiat currency" for a number of years. Coincidentally, thjaat was the year we went to - get ready for it: FIAT CURRENCY, So your girlish assumption that dictionaries are incorruptible fails - like your pecker except among prepubescent boys,, Falstaff.

A thing is what it DOES, not what it SAYS.

Con men "define" themselves as honest. By yur dopey standard, we must treat them as honest men, since that is what they SAY they are.


Moron.

Cannonpointer » 13 Dec 2014 10:00 am » wrote:

The "definition" is a cover story, moron.

Aha, so dictionaries are part of the vast conspiracy!

There's no hope for the deadly combination of psychotic and stupid.

Cannonpointer » 13 Dec 2014 10:00 am » wrote:

A thing is what it DOES, not what it SAYS.

How freaking stupid. How can a psychotic possibly attribute actions to "Capitalism," but not to, say, Socialism?

Capitalism is Free Market Capitalism, and what's happening is a leftist/ corporate corruption of it.

Con men "define" themselves as honest. By yur dopey standard, we must treat them as honest men, since that is what they SAY they are.

Moron.

That's stunningly stupid, as expected.

You define yourself as sane, which is obviously false advertising.

RichClem » 13 Dec 2014 10:17 am » wrote:
Aha, so dictionaries are part of the vast conspiracy!

There's no hope for the deadly combination of psychotic and stupid.

Dictionaries are not the word of God, moron - not that you'd have any such distinction.

Dictionaries are a handy tool - a tool one should master.

That you have been mastered by the dictionary means that YOU are the tool, *******.

Your authority worship is only another of the many failings in your actual manhood, little girl. You keep referencing the road map, moron. I'll keep referencing the road.

Cannonpointer » 13 Dec 2014 10:24 am » wrote: Dictionaries are not the word of God, moron - not that you'd have any such distinction.

Dictionaries are a handy tool - a tool one should master.

That you have been mastered by the dictionary means that YOU are the tool, *******.

Here's a hint. You don't need a dictionary to know that Capitalism is a voluntary transaction that has existed since the beginning of civilization.

"Voluntary" is the key characteristic of Capitalism.

Your authority worship is only another of the many failings in your actual manhood, little girl. You keep referencing the road map, moron. I'll keep referencing the road.

You're referencing your leftist psychosis, moonbat.

Here's a hint. Almost all that's wrong with our existing hybrid economy was put in place by liberal-left presidents and politicians on the basis of liberal-left philosophy.

Then when things go wrong as conservatives predicted, you leftists whine about "Capitalism."

Even a moonbat like you might figure that out.

RichClem » 13 Dec 2014 10:36 am » wrote: Here's a hint. You don't need a dictionary to know that Capitalism is a voluntary transaction that has existed since the beginning of civilization.

"Voluntary" is the key characteristic of Capitalism.

Every capitalist dreams of cornering the market. You don't know what that means - clearly. Here's what it DOESN'T mean, retard. It DOESN'T mean "voluntary," you hack.

When the market is divided among oligarchs, the pretense of competition is as believable as your previous lies about "three wet terrorists." You were full of **** then - passing on lies like a witless cow. You're doing the same now, moron.

RichClem » 13 Dec 2014 10:36 am » wrote:You're referencing your leftist psychosis, moonbat.

Here's a hint. Almost all that's wrong with our existing hybrid economy was put in place by liberal-left presidents and politicians on the basis of liberal-left philosophy.

Then when things go wrong as conservatives predicted, you leftists whine about "Capitalism."

Even a moonbat like you might figure that out.

And there's the fairy, telling his fairy tale. This is the same slave who calls the brutal socialist dictatorship in Singapore "2nd freest on earth" because his masters said so. This is the same slave who defends Pinochet's murders as necessary, as having "saved the nation" - who every day on this board cheers Joe McCarthy's book burning and witch hunting campaigns. This is the same slave who lies that the term "banana republic" reflects an ANOMALY of capitalism, and not the NORM - notwithstanding it came into being to describe the governments created by dozens of engineered coups in Latin America, Philippines, Iran, etc., which ousted legitimate executives and replaced them with fruit company executives - or oil company, rubber company, mining company, construction company, financial group, or other wall street, capitalist concern.

This *** hat pretends that a federally regulated EMPLOYEE running a wall street company (the CEO) is participating in an identical economy with a mom and pop grocery or plumbing supply or dry cleaner wherein the risk takers are NOT anonymous, voiceless investors but the principals themselves, captaining their OWN ships.

The capitalism of wall street and the free enterprise of main street are entirely different economic models, which any but a brain addled child molester like clemmie can clearly see.

Cannonpointer » 13 Dec 2014 10:30 pm » wrote: Every capitalist dreams of cornering the market. You don't know what that means - clearly. Here's what it DOESN'T mean, retard. It DOESN'T mean "voluntary," you hack.

Don't bother me with your endless psychotic ranting.

How freaking stupid to take some silly impossible fantasy and try to attack Capitalism with it.

RichClem » 13 Dec 2014 10:34 pm » wrote: Don't bother me with your endless psychotic ranting.

How freaking stupid to take some silly impossible fantasy and try to attack Capitalism with it.

translation: i got nothin