Cannonpointer » 07 Apr 2014 7:11 pm » wrote:
Why does littlehawk always want to introduce the topic of child sex to the forum?
Every thread, he starts talking about **** children or molesting children - or he brings up hisrown children and then accusse others of doing it - or he accuses another poster of **** his own children, knowing that it's a TOS violation.
Why does he always have to push the subject to child ****, bait dad that he is? Is there something he needs to tell us?
More troll crap.littlehawk12 » 07 Apr 2014 7:35 pm » wrote:Don't like being exposed for the hypocrite you are, then you need to either stop voting for it, or stop bitching about what YOU voted for. LMAO! I am enjoying watching you squirm, and writhe in your own steaming pile of ****. LMAO!
As a purveyor of finer alternatives to smoking I occasionally consider sending celebrities samples. To do this I must know who is currently using them. If I could land Rush or Bruno Mars as a customer.....business would reach epic heights. Rush claims to have stopped using his....perhaps I could get Obama to evolve his opinion on the things because its his FDA and others that are attempting to hand the industry over to the cancer merchants. Right now I am enjoying my business as a hobby, helping people directly, as a tribute to my father, grandfather and favorite uncle who died from smoking related lung cancers. And as a hobby dedicated to the way I found to stop my own 25 year death spiral. Mass market success would kill some of that.Cannonpointer » 07 Apr 2014 6:29 pm » wrote: Nothing will remove the black mark from the formerly nicotine stained fat-face who bled purple piss into the golden EIB microphone on behalf of the cigarette lobby.
It concerns me that you know his habits.
And there ya have it folks! I have reduced the mental midget to this. LMFAO!!!Cannonpointer » 07 Apr 2014 7:40 pm » wrote: More troll crap.
This is only the most current and accessible example of what I've been saying on these boards since 2009. This is NOT an anomaly. This is NOT "crony" capitalism. It is the DESIGN of capitalism - it is, as Rand would put it if she were a truth teller, "capitalism qua capitalism."NeoConvict » 07 Apr 2014 7:41 pm » wrote: As a purveyor of finer alternatives to smoking I occasionally consider sending celebrities samples. To do this I must know who is currently using them. If I could land Rush or Bruno Mars as a customer.....business would reach epic heights. Rush claims to have stopped using his....perhaps I could get Obama to evolve his opinion on the things because its his FDA and others that are attempting to hand the industry over to the cancer merchants. Right now I am enjoying my business as a hobby, helping people directly, as a tribute to my father, grandfather and favorite uncle who died from smoking related lung cancers. And as a hobby dedicated to the way I found to stop my own 25 year death spiral. Mass market success would kill some of that.
Yes, and that is the design of capitalism: eternal life, endless money, profit uber alles by any means necessary, endless expansion and domination of markets. You can give it any name you wish, but it's what Wall Street IS. We must end it and re-institute free markets.NeoConvict » 08 Apr 2014 9:53 am » wrote:Its more similar to corporatism than capitalism. Its corporations so large that they control the very mechanizms of the government, including parts allegedly designed to police and monitor their industries. The foxes are running the hen house.
False. That's what Free Enterprise means.tharock220 » 08 Apr 2014 5:41 pm » wrote:Capitalism means private ownership of inustry...that's all.
Then they're synonymous, and this thread is pure silliness.Cannonpointer » 08 Apr 2014 5:42 pm » wrote:
False. That's what Free Enterprise means.
correct...you cant have publicly traded private entities can you?Cannonpointer » 08 Apr 2014 5:42 pm » wrote:
False. That's what Free Enterprise means.
they are similar...but not synonymous....tharock220 » 08 Apr 2014 5:43 pm » wrote:
Then they're synonymous, and this thread is pure silliness.
So, you refuse to recognize any distinction between what occurs on Main Street and what occurs on Wall Street, and you are committed to attacking anyone who DOES make distinctions, in order to muddy the waters? That your final answer?tharock220 » 08 Apr 2014 5:43 pm » wrote:
Then they're synonymous, and this thread is pure silliness.
They can be pseudo-private, but they come from a publicly regulated market, so...bigsky » 08 Apr 2014 5:44 pm » wrote:
correct...you cant have publicly traded private entities can you?
They are antagonistic. Wall Street exists to take everything Main Street has.bigsky » 08 Apr 2014 5:45 pm » wrote:
they are similar...but not synonymous....
I certainly see the distinction, but they don't represent capitalism or anything else in a mutually exclusive fashion.Cannonpointer » 08 Apr 2014 5:45 pm » wrote:
So, you refuse to recognize any distinction between what occurs on Main Street and what occurs on Wall Street, and you are committed to attacking anyone who DOES make distinctions, in order to muddy the waters? That your final answer?
I hope you're being paid well, son. Honor should not be sold cheap.
But but but. You say but, and then you add zip.tharock220 » 08 Apr 2014 5:48 pm » wrote:
I certainly see the distinction, but they don't represent capitalism or anything else in a mutually exclusive fashion.