Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2022, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 11:57 am

Huey » 29 Jun 2022, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 11:56 am

I know you have and will hit the bong again.  

The real reason you voted for Ford was it was the cool thing to do.  Voting for Ford once does not make you a republican.

No..

Don't retell.

Let's do the math.

Learn what a slack jawed rube you are.
 

 

How about you just provide the narrative and cliff note version.  Afraid to go on record?  

Huey » 29 Jun 2022, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 11:58 am

At least you did not run to the forum to start a thread about her.

Did you tell her about all of your right seat PIC flight time?

But you seem to want to go on and on about it.

Huey » 29 Jun 2022, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 12:00 pm

How about you just provide the narrative and cliff note version.  Afraid to go on record?

I have cast 4 votes for the most fiscally responsible presidents in your lifetime.

You haven't,  while yapping what you've been told to believe. 

Is that clear?
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2022, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 12:00 pm

Huey » 29 Jun 2022, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 11:58 am

At least you did not run to the forum to start a thread about her.

Did you tell her about all of your right seat PIC flight time?

But you seem to want to go on and on about it.

 

You are a funny guy.  You are a wall street wiz, a world class skier, you lived with Swedish Royalty, attended an Ivy League college, had options, claim rich investors come to you for advice although you drive a 10 year old **** stained hoopte, are a world class Huey pilot, get hit by 20 year olds, and know just about everything about everything.

WHo can beat what you think you are in your min?

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2022, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 12:02 pm

Huey » 29 Jun 2022, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 12:00 pm

How about you just provide the narrative and cliff note version.  Afraid to go on record?

I have cast 4 votes for the most fiscally responsible presidents in your lifetime.

You haven't,  while yapping what you've been told to believe. 

Is that clear?
 

 

This isn't about me?  It is about your lie you are a republican.  Is that clear?

Huey » 29 Jun 2022, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 12:04 pm

You are a funny guy.  You are a wall street wiz, a world class skier, you lived with Swedish Royalty, attended an Ivy League college, had options, claim rich investors come to you for advice although you drive a 10 year old **** stained hoopte, are a world class Huey pilot, get hit by 20 year olds, and know just about everything about everything.

WHo can beat what you think you are in your min?

triggering further excerpts from the Epic of Blackvegetable.
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2022, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 12:05 pm

Huey » 29 Jun 2022, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 12:04 pm

You are a funny guy.  You are a wall street wiz, a world class skier, you lived with Swedish Royalty, attended an Ivy League college, had options, claim rich investors come to you for advice although you drive a 10 year old **** stained hoopte, are a world class Huey pilot, get hit by 20 year olds, and know just about everything about everything.

WHo can beat what you think you are in your min?

triggering further excerpts from the Epic of Blackvegetable.
 

 

LMAO!

You are a funny guy.  You are a wall street wiz, a world class skier, you lived with Swedish Royalty, attended an Ivy League college, had options, claim rich investors come to you for advice although you drive a 10 year old **** stained hoopte, are a world class Huey pilot, get hit by 20 year olds, and know just about everything about everything.

WHo can beat what you think you are in your min?

Huey » 29 Jun 2022, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 12:04 pm

This isn't about me?  It is about your lie you are a republican.  Is that clear?

But, Tiny...it is.

You chose that criterion.

You are an idiot.

Do you want to talk about spending or not?
 

Huey » 29 Jun 2022, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 12:06 pm

LMAO!

You are a funny guy.  You are a wall street wiz, a world class skier, you lived with Swedish Royalty, attended an Ivy League college, had options, claim rich investors come to you for advice although you drive a 10 year old **** stained hoopte, are a world class Huey pilot, get hit by 20 year olds, and know just about everything about everything.

WHo can beat what you think you are in your min?

Why do you reyap?
 

Huey » 29 Jun 2022, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 12:06 pm

LMAO!

You are a funny guy.  You are a wall street wiz, a world class skier, you lived with Swedish Royalty, attended an Ivy League college, had options, claim rich investors come to you for advice although you drive a 10 year old **** stained hoopte, are a world class Huey pilot, get hit by 20 year olds, and know just about everything about everything.

WHo can beat what you think you are in your min?

the early part of my story has already been told....with a far greater attention to detail, I might add...

https://youtu.be/hYTYqs-ytSk
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2022, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 12:06 pm

Huey » 29 Jun 2022, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 12:04 pm

This isn't about me?  It is about your lie you are a republican.  Is that clear?

But, Tiny...it is.

You chose that criterion.

You are an idiot.

Do you want to talk about spending or not?
 

 

My point has been proven. 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2022, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 12:07 pm

Huey » 29 Jun 2022, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 12:06 pm

LMAO!

You are a funny guy.  You are a wall street wiz, a world class skier, you lived with Swedish Royalty, attended an Ivy League college, had options, claim rich investors come to you for advice although you drive a 10 year old **** stained hoopte, are a world class Huey pilot, get hit by 20 year olds, and know just about everything about everything.

WHo can beat what you think you are in your min?

Why do you reyap?
 

 

Just making sure you see it.  Not reading and striking thru was your downfall on the gun issue. 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2022, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 12:31 pm

the early part of my story has already been told....with a far greater attention to detail, I might add...


 

You are a legend in your own mind.  

Huey » 29 Jun 2022, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 12:33 pm

Just making sure you see it.  Not reading and striking thru was your downfall on the gun issue.

That's impossible. 

The AR-15 was designed for the battle field.

It's capabilities as an Assault Rifle (not to be confused with Machine Gun) were optimized by a round developed specifically for a military Doctrine.

There are numerous VARIANTS, but only one DESIGN.

End of story.

What didn't I get right the first time?
 

Huey » 29 Jun 2022, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 12:35 pm

You are a legend in your own mind.

I didn't exercise total control over the script...some was dramatized, for effect.

But, in the main, it holds up.
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2022, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 11:54 am

I live on the opposite coast.

All kidding aside...if you haven't seen the movie "Aspen Extreme" you should check it out.

Lots of skiing...lots of chicks...and good actors.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMZ0f1hywBg
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2022, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 12:37 pm

Huey » 29 Jun 2022, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 12:33 pm

Just making sure you see it.  Not reading and striking thru was your downfall on the gun issue.

That's impossible. 

The AR-15 was designed for the battle field.

It's capabilities as an Assault Rifle (not to be confused with Machine Gun) were optimized by a round developed specifically for a military Doctrine.

There are numerous VARIANTS, but only one DESIGN.

End of story.

What didn't I get right the first time?
 

 

The AR-15 was designed for the battle field.

Yes, the Armalite Rifle 15, Which Colt named the c601, and later designated the M16, was designed for the battlefield.

It's capabilities as an Assault Rifle (not to be confused with Machine Gun) were optimized by a round developed specifically for a military Doctrine.

Yes, the Armalite Rifle 15, Which Colt named the c601, and later designated the M16, was an assault rifle as defined by the DOD definition.  The round was primarily "optimized' to be lighter than the 7.62 or .30 caliber so soldiers could carry more ammo.  It had to maintain velocity out to 500 yards.  It also defined as a machine gun by the NFAs that the ATF enforces.

There are numerous VARIANTS, but only one DESIGN.

Incorrect.  A variant is defined:

a form or version of something that differs in some respect from other forms of the same thing or from a standard.

The Colt SP1 did not fit the DOD definition of an assault rifle because of the DESIGN and operating change of the trigger function and the selector switch.  It also does not meet the definition of a machine gun by the NFAs that are enforced by the ATF. 

Are you ready to answer the questions concerning the lowers I posted?

 

Huey » 29 Jun 2022, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 1:21 pm

Yes, the Armalite Rifle 15, Which Colt named the c601, and later designated the M16, was designed for the battlefield.

Yes, the Armalite Rifle 15, Which Colt named the c601, and later designated the M16, was an assault rifle as defined by the DOD definition.  The round was primarily "optimized' to be lighter than the 7.62 or .30 caliber so soldiers could carry more ammo.  It had to maintain velocity out to 500 yards.  It also defined as a machine gun by the NFAs that the ATF enforces.

Incorrect.  A variant is defined:

a form or version of something that differs in some respect from other forms of the same thing or from a standard.

The Colt SP1 did not fit the DOD definition of an assault rifle because of the DESIGN and operating change of the trigger function and the selector switch.  It also does not meet the definition of a machine gun by the NFAs that are enforced by the ATF. 

Are you ready to answer the questions concerning the lowers I posted?

"Poll: 78% Believe Nation on Wrong Track, Up 27 Points Under Biden"

Huey » 29 Jun 2022, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 1:21 pm

Yes, the Armalite Rifle 15, Which Colt named the c601, and later designated the M16, was designed for the battlefield.

Yes, the Armalite Rifle 15, Which Colt named the c601, and later designated the M16, was an assault rifle as defined by the DOD definition.  The round was primarily "optimized' to be lighter than the 7.62 or .30 caliber so soldiers could carry more ammo.  It had to maintain velocity out to 500 yards.  It also defined as a machine gun by the NFAs that the ATF enforces.

Incorrect.  A variant is defined:

a form or version of something that differs in some respect from other forms of the same thing or from a standard.

The Colt SP1 did not fit the DOD definition of an assault rifle because of the DESIGN and operating change of the trigger function and the selector switch.  It also does not meet the definition of a machine gun by the NFAs that are enforced by the ATF. 

Are you ready to answer the questions concerning the lowers I posted?

No need to retell.

Incorrect.  A variant is defined:

No....you may stop there.

Google 

"Term of art".

Stop yapping stupid ****.
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2022, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 1:32 pm

Huey » 29 Jun 2022, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022, 1:21 pm

Yes, the Armalite Rifle 15, Which Colt named the c601, and later designated the M16, was designed for the battlefield.

Yes, the Armalite Rifle 15, Which Colt named the c601, and later designated the M16, was an assault rifle as defined by the DOD definition.  The round was primarily "optimized' to be lighter than the 7.62 or .30 caliber so soldiers could carry more ammo.  It had to maintain velocity out to 500 yards.  It also defined as a machine gun by the NFAs that the ATF enforces.

Incorrect.  A variant is defined:

a form or version of something that differs in some respect from other forms of the same thing or from a standard.

The Colt SP1 did not fit the DOD definition of an assault rifle because of the DESIGN and operating change of the trigger function and the selector switch.  It also does not meet the definition of a machine gun by the NFAs that are enforced by the ATF. 

Are you ready to answer the questions concerning the lowers I posted?

No need to retell.

Incorrect.  A variant is defined:

No....you may stop there.

Google 

"Term of art".

Stop yapping stupid ****.
 

 

Is your google broke.  I just accurately "retold" the history of the M16 and the SP1 using your terms.  

a form or version of something that differs in some respect from other forms of the same thing or from a standard.

The something that differs from the M16 is the selector switch, the trigger, and the lack of an auto sear.  You refuse to comment on the difference of the lowers. Keep in mind the definition of variant.  You are not doing well today with the language.