Liberal Forum

kfools » 16 Jun 2020, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2020, 8:41 am

No ****. So if somebody posts a news article with somebodies info it's Doxxing? Then everyone on both sites is guilty of it.

So the guy gets banned? Where is the victim on the board to cry foul? **** nowhere! 

Why would you give some **** poster access to someone's private messages?
That's really low.

AnnoyedLiberall » 16 Jun 2020, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2020, 9:10 am

Why would you give some **** poster access to someone's private messages?
That's really low.

Explain why.
 

duck615 » 16 Jun 2020, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2020, 8:27 am

Cannonpointer » 16 Jun 2020, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2020, 8:25 am

I am also inclined to believe the wurst about Isabel. But I also respect Ronjul's investigation-fu. He has never misinformed us.

I'm on the fence...

Are you sure you know this Ronjul? He could just be another sok...

You know all about socks right dead eye? 

 

duck615 » 16 Jun 2020, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2020, 8:32 am

GeorgeWashington » 16 Jun 2020, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2020, 8:31 am

According to Str8... 

He posted screenshots of Isabel's PMs

nothing wrong with that

You do know that the P in PM stands for PRIVATE, right Ducky?
 

Misty » 16 Jun 2020, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2020, 9:16 am

You do know that the P in PM stands for PRIVATE, right Ducky?

Have you ever looked at a members PM's?
 

kfools » 16 Jun 2020, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2020, 9:11 am

Explain why.
 

Private is the operative word.
The member has an expectation of privacy in their communications.
It's one thing if the Admin can see them, but to give access to them to members is unconscionable.

kfools » 16 Jun 2020, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2020, 8:53 am

People sometimes have to answer for things they do. 

I have long contended that there have been and still are dirty former mods on my site. Str8 now has the tools to get to the heart of what happened to him.

By the way....it was bad. I feel for the guy.  Let him clear his name with evidence.
​​​​ 
So let him dig. Nothing was posted that hadn't been posted a ton of times by Isabel herself which is brinkmans record. He is no more guilty than she is.

Brinkmans not a member of either site. 

So your call is moronic. 

You don't want him to post this **** here fine. Don't ban him though. I'll take the ban in his stead as I gave him access.

He was banned for posting Isabel's private messages.  He doxed Isabel, in textbook fashion, and she is a member here. 

dox
/däks/
verb
INFORMAL

1. search for and publish private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the Internet, typically with malicious intent.

If you are so butthurt that Str8's sadistic infatuation with Isabel has been quashed, then unban Isabel, and let her decide if she wants to continue to be doxed, browbeat, and otherwise attacked.  

But, I seriously doubt you give 2 **** about Str8.  You're in it for you.  You want him unbanned so he can keep spreading his vile, leaving a wake of defecation. We put up with his wretched behavior for far too long.  He's your problem, not ours.

Now, go give him the modship that he has earned at your behest, and don't use the early termination of his mission, due to our banning, as an excuse to withhold what he has rightfully earned.  He's done your dirty work as best he could. 
 
 
 

kfools » 16 Jun 2020, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2020, 9:18 am

Have you ever looked at a members PM's?
 

I don't think Senior Mods have that power.
If they do, I don't know about it.
It's never even occurred to me to look at another member's private communications.

GeorgeWashington » 16 Jun 2020, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2020, 9:20 am

He was banned for posting Isabel's private messages.  He doxed Isabel, in textbook fashion, and she is a member here. 

If you are so butthurt that Str8's sadistic infatuation with Isabel has been quashed, then unban Isabel, and let her decide if she wants to continue to be doxed, browbeat, and otherwise attacked.  

But, I seriously doubt you give 2 **** about Str8.  You're in it for you.  You want him unbanned so he can keep spreading his vile, leaving a wake of defecation. We put up with his wretched behavior for far too long.  He's your problem, not ours.

Now, go give him the modship that he has earned at your behest, and don't blame the early termination of his mission due to our banning as an excuse.  He's done your dirty work as best he could.

So wait...you banned him for posting PM's from my site?

That's ***.

​​​​
 

AnnoyedLiberall » 16 Jun 2020, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2020, 9:24 am

I don't think Senior Mods have that power.
If they do, I don't know about it.
It's never even occurred to me to look at another member's private communications.

Well you should.

You can uncover a lot.

Like people plotting to steal your format to clone your site for instance. Using your email database to do so.
 

In fact. I posted PM's of Isabel's first. How come I'm not banned for doxxing?

Ronjul » 16 Jun 2020, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2020, 7:44 am

<snip>

To the complainant, which is the character Phelix_Dacat. You are correct to flag the post and incorrect later in your argument with Cannonpointer. Refrain from considerations such as you named, but it is clear you were frustrated with a misfeasance from admin, so the harm is offset and at the feet of that admin.

<snip>

No, I was not wrong in my argument with CP. If what str8 did was OK, what I proposed was OK, too. For the same reasons. I didn't think that either was OK. That was my point. It flew over a pointy headed dudes point head who then went on and on about the N word.

The funny part: all bluff. If called on it I would have to pull some random stuff off the internet to make the threads. LOL I don't know who the guy is IRL. He is paranoid and thinks I do. Maybe I could figure it out. Between doing that and playing chess, I'd rather spend my time playing chess.
 
 

kfools » 16 Jun 2020, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2020, 9:18 am

Have you ever looked at a members PM's?

There is only 1 way to look at PM's here, and that is direct access to the database. No mod can do that except me, and I let the board die for an entire month.  I go on hiatus for years at a time, leaving this place in the good hands of the mod team.  I couldn't care less what people say in private.  This is their community.  

This forum runs open-source software, viewing member PM's will never be a feature, and any discussion of the sort is discouraged by the community responsible for maintaining the software. 

You run corporate software, beholden to the dollar and the dollar only, where skeevy behavior like reading private messages will always come standard.  

 
 

Phelix_Dacat » 16 Jun 2020, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2020, 9:30 am

No, I was not wrong in my argument with CP. If what str8 did was OK, what I proposed was OK, too. For the same reasons. I didn't think that either was OK. That was my point. It flew over a pointy headed dude who then went on and on about the N word.

The funny part: all bluff. If called on it I would have to pull some random stuff off the internet to make the threads. LOL I don't know who the guy is IRL. He is paranoid and thinks I do. Maybe I could figure it out. Between doing that a playing chess, I'd rather spend my time playing chess.

You are a ***.
 

kfools » 16 Jun 2020, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2020, 9:24 am

So wait...you banned him for posting PM's from my site?

That's ***.

​​​​

That's sweet, puddin   

kfools » 16 Jun 2020, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2020, 9:27 am

In fact. I posted PM's of Isabel's first. How come I'm not banned for doxxing?

How did I miss that?  

Take a walk.

kfools » 16 Jun 2020, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2020, 9:31 am

You are a ***.

You're related to JTZilla? LOL

This explains so many, many, many things. Completely. LOL
 

Misty » 16 Jun 2020, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2020, 9:16 am

You do know that the P in PM stands for PRIVATE, right Ducky?

We're they addressed to straiht? 

kfools » 16 Jun 2020, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2020, 9:26 am

Well you should.

You can uncover a lot.

Like people plotting to steal your format to clone your site for instance. Using your email database to do so.
 

No thanks.
It's unseemly and it reeks of paranoia.

kfools » 16 Jun 2020, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2020, 8:34 am

Are you retarded?

If Brinkman isn't a member then who cares? 

Doxxing applies to members. Thousands of links to articles on both sites that have hundreds of people's info in them. Why do we allow them? 

It's because they aren't members so what do we care?

If he didn't dox Isabel (and he didn't) then he didn't break any rules at all.

I am from a family of intellectuals. We have professors and tax accountants. Also train engineers and government ministers. No one from third cousins inwards works with his hands. Not one family member. That answers question one.

Answer to question two is, Isabel is a member. Her private information is being repeated. That is the doxxing. The Brinkman character is secondary, but she was a member here before banning, which protections once given cannot be taken away.

The important matter is that you provided the material for your menial to accomplish his bad work. In this regard, you are the master mind and must be banned. I will leave your account active long enough for you to read this, to know your fate here. Good day!