Liberal Forum

Str8tEdge » 12 Sep 2021, 7:46 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2021, 7:46 pm

You think it's a joke. Your criminal cyberstalking is NOT a joke.

You think your raping and murdering children is a JOKE?

My god, you are a sick ****.

Str8tEdge » 12 Sep 2021, 6:44 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2021, 6:44 pm

Of course. Once justice is done, it's done although it may be important to remind Isabel justice was done because she has a tendency to create her own reality. 

when you going to learn social justification isn't natural justice. Kinetics governed by potential leaves static charged ideas in command of perpetual motion within perpetual balancing results occupying space as specifically timed apart now in ever changing form shaped ancestrally present in organic DNA living within inorganic atmosphere.

I grew up being told everyone has to have a positive attitude real isn't real unless defined by vocabulary and social consensus. What happens with everyone being only positive real isn't real? God, Satan, intellect over instinct, symbolism over substance, alphabets inside ancestral progression of numerator ideas directing denominator whole population here.

Everyone becomes marginalized and characterized cradle to grave with life actually existing occupying time conceived to decomposed now.

Every generation is raised to disagree about biology limits existing to ancestrally displaced one at a time mutually evolving here now.

Common error never corrected within one species training next generations to wish real wasn't real into societal evolution by laws that rule social conduct globally until extinction event happens, and it will happen by people learned to honor self deception as a priority one, stay on message come hell or high water.

TB7 » 12 Sep 2021, 5:17 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2021, 5:17 pm

BOO..HOO..HOO..To Cannonpointer, this. You are good at thinking. But you do it too much. Next time, consult, and avoid. Also, no more use of racial slurs against Jagadeesh. He is complaining all day.

who gives a **** about the complainer Jagadeesh.

Instead of NO HOLDS BARRED...why not call the forum...uh..uh...our feelings matter too.

You are not the decider. I am the one to make the strong decision in forum matters.
 

Vegas » 10 Sep 2021, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

10 Sep 2021, 9:36 am

How about @Vegas giants  always flagging me because he is such a little bitch? Lol

According to the rules, vegas giant is allowed discrepancy for due to persistence of vaginal itch.

I have spoken!

Ronjul » 22 Nov 2021, 7:56 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2021, 7:56 pm

According to the rules, vegas giant is allowed discrepancy for due to persistence of vaginal itch.

I have spoken!

I never wrote that. Why is my name on it?

Vegas » 22 Nov 2021, 7:58 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2021, 7:58 pm

I never wrote that. Why is my name on it?

The question is of pale significance beside the fact that I have spoken.

Pay no attention to whatever you did or did not say. The matter which matters is what I say. Besides this, the implicit thesis that a drunken stumblebum who dabbled in the necromantic cult of veganism can remember every inanity he has uttered is preposterous beyond the silly concept of a single god controlling all things. You people never fail to underwhelm. And you will marry anyone, without a concern for caste or status. 

I have spoken!
 

Ronjul » 22 Nov 2021, 8:03 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2021, 8:03 pm

The question is of pale significance beside the fact that I have spoken.

Pay no attention to whatever you did or did not say. The matter which matters is what I say. Besides this, the implicit thesis that a drunken stumblebum who dabbled in the necromantic cult of veganism can remember every inanity he has uttered is preposterous beyond the silly concept of a single god controlling all things. You people never fail to underwhelm. And you will marry anyone, without a concern for caste or status. 

I have spoken!

You sound like Ohm.,
 

This thread is great fun, and It's worth reading through from the start.

We have the admin calling fools and DeVry out for their malicious doxxing of my PM's and their laughable lies about having proof of terrible things - TONS of it!,-  which they somehow never once managed to post.

We have them being ridiculed and laughed at for that clumsy **** con, their getting bitchslapped by the admin, when he said that they shot their wad with what they had already posted, and none of spoke badly about any mod here.

And then we have them weeping and sniveling about how UNFAIR it is that they WERE BANNED, sure was fun!

Then they both ran back to Fool's SafeSpace Board, crying and wailing and vowing revenge.
       

 
 

Isabel » 22 Nov 2021, 10:27 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2021, 10:27 pm

This thread is great fun, and It's worth reading through from the start.

We have the admin calling fools and DeVry out for their malicious doxxing of my PM's and their laughable lies about having proof of terrible things - TONS of it!,-  which they somehow never once managed to post.

We have them being ridiculed and laughed at for that clumsy **** con, their getting bitchslapped by the admin, when he said that they shot their wad with what they had already posted, and none of spoke badly about any mod here.

And then we have them weeping and sniveling about how UNFAIR it is that they WERE BANNED, sure was fun!

Then they both ran back to Fool's SafeSpace Board, crying and wailing and vowing revenge.
     

Where in the OP did it claim there was no proof of anything? 

Let me help you. It doesn’t exist.   

I posted proof you were cyberstalking Jamie Brinkman with your accomplice, Jamie Brinkman’s ex-husband. 

I got banned BEFORE posting the proof you handed out Jamie’s IP address to Jamie Brinkman’s ex husband who also ended up with quite a bit of legal issues. 

Imagine the legal implications if Jamie were to actually find out what you two were doing through your PM’s. 

As  I’ve stated, anyone who wants proof of your cyberstalking and handing out IP addresses feel free to PM me and I will send them. 

2. You literally cannot “doxx” an anonymous member by posting anonymous PM’S so the actually banning was wrong. The entire purpose of doxxing is to out someone publically. 

Furthermore, members have posted other members PM’s to them frequently with no repercussions whatsoever because…. It’s not doxxing, has never been doxxing and never will be doxxing. 

So once again, anyone who wants proof @Isabel  is lying about the entire incident, criminally cyberstalked another member with her ex-husband and also gave said ex -husband Jamie’s IP address, feel free to PM me. 

Although everyone here is likely already familiar with @Isabel  being a pathological liar. 
 

duck615 » 16 Jun 2020, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2020, 7:47 am

Isabel is a liar

First post NAILED it.             

Str8tEdge » 23 Nov 2021, 12:58 am » wrote: ↑

23 Nov 2021, 12:58 am

Where in the OP did it claim there was no proof of anything?

GeorgeWashignton said that you and fools already blew your wad with what was posted, and none of it spoke ill of any mod here.
He also said "YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE".
Then he banned your stupid, lying asses while you screamed and wept.

YOU:   Let me help you. It doesn’t exist.  

Just LOOK at you shrieking in terror.  LOL.

YOU:   I posted proof you were cyberstalking Jamie Brinkman with your accomplice, Jamie Brinkman’s ex-husband. 

Same old lies.
Over and over like RainMan.
never any proof.

YOU:   I got banned BEFORE posting the proof you handed out Jamie’s IP address to Jamie Brinkman’s ex husband who also ended up with quite a bit of legal issues. 

You have never posted any proof.

YOU:   Imagine the legal implications if Jamie were to actually find out what you two were doing through your PM’s. 

Same old lies.
Repeated over and over like RainMan.
Never any proof.

YOU:   As  I’ve stated, anyone who wants proof of your cyberstalking and handing out IP addresses feel free to PM me and I will send them. 

You have no proof.
Your pathetic forgeries are irrelevant.

YOU:   2. You literally cannot “doxx” an anonymous member by posting anonymous PM’S so the actually banning was wrong. The entire purpose of doxxing is to out someone publically. 

Then you better tell Ronjul how WRONG he is, while you whine and snivel some more about how VICTIMIZED you are!  Wah wah wah!

YOU:   Furthermore, members have posted other members PM’s to them frequently with no repercussions whatsoever because…. It’s not doxxing, has never been doxxing and never will be doxxing. 

I already told you to go snivel to Ronjul, you mental case.

YOU:   So once again, anyone who wants proof @Isabel  is lying about the entire incident, criminally cyberstalked another member with her ex-husband and also gave said ex -husband Jamie’s IP address, feel free to PM me. 

You have no proof.
Your pathetic forgeries are irrelevant.

YOU:   Although everyone here is likely already familiar with @Isabel  being a pathological liar.

Pure projection.
 

Ronjul » 16 Jun 2020, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2020, 7:44 am

First is to admonish Cannonpointer, who had the duty to ban Str8tEdge or at least notify me. A point in your detriment, sir.

Second, Str8tEdge is banned for the time of investigation for doxxing. It appears true what Cannonpointer said that the doxxing was an accident and only incidental to the post. But for this, there is another point in consideration for the justice-minded. Str8tEdge is an agent of another party who is very angry to a poster here named Isabel, whose case I have reviewed and found her to be of solid character. I have looked at all sides of her dealings on both boards. She was intended as the victim, but held strong against a known felon, and so was neither victim nor villain. Also, she occupied the role of care taker against the said felon, maximizing safety for others. That is the care taker role, reserved for brave and selfless people.

The person who is against Isabel gave access to Isabel's account and information in order for str8tEdge to use in his errand of mischief. This colors the episode. To have an accident is one thing. To have that accident during a bank robbery is another. Str8tEdge, being guilty of bad intentions, cannot receive the presumption of innocence, because he is in the role of the bank robbery suspect. Is this not obvious?

To Cannonpointer, this. You are good at thinking. But you do it too much. Next time, consult, and avoid. Also, no more use of racial slurs against Jagadeesh. He is complaining all day.

To Str8tEdge. You are banned and cannot read this, so, no message to you, sir.

To the complainant, which is the character Phelix_Dacat. You are correct to flag the post and incorrect later in your argument with Cannonpointer. Refrain from considerations such as you named, but it is clear you were frustrated with a misfeasance from admin, so the harm is offset and at the feet of that admin.

To all board members. Do not flag in your safety measures against the Covid. Risk often requires bravery but more often involves stupidity. Safety is first.

@Isabel  

GeorgeWashignton said that you and fools already blew your wad with what was posted, and none of it spoke ill of any mod here.
He also said "YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE".

This is a lie. 

2. I not only have evidence, I have PROOF and so does about half the board.....                                                                  

GeorgeWashington » 16 Jun 2020, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2020, 8:27 am

What kind of lowlife digs through someone's private messages in an effort to humiliate, intimidate, and torment?

I like a good **** fight as much as the next person, but what str8 did was over the line.

Apparently you missed the part where she:

Outed Jamie Brinkman's IP address to Jamie Brinkman's ex-husband HBrogan57.

Spent two years criminally cyberstalking Jamie Brinkman with said ex-husband calling prosepective employers, employers, renters, banks, police depatments, etc. 

Basicially, the same exact **** @Isabel  had accused Jamie Brinkman of. 

The question is, how did Jamie Brinkman's ex husband and @Isabel  end up in a relationship to begin with? 

And did the lawsuits end the relationship? 

Inquiring minds want to know.           
 

Ronjul » 22 Nov 2021, 7:56 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2021, 7:56 pm

According to the rules, vegas giant is allowed discrepancy for due to persistence of vaginal itch.

I have spoken!

WELL...GLAD TO SEE YOU ARE WELL AWARE OF THINGS AND YOU RESPOND IN A TIMELY MANNER. THAT POST IS  ABOUT 72 DAYS OLD.     

Ronjul » 22 Nov 2021, 7:55 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2021, 7:55 pm

You are not the decider. I am the one to make the strong decision in forum matters.
 

Tyranny results in self destruction ignoring the natural process of evolving in plain sight.

Your decisions are misdirecting everyone else to your advantage.
that isn't adapting to time living in series parallel ancestral changing of people occupying space as relative to added so far.

Str8tEdge » 12 Sep 2021, 7:46 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2021, 7:46 pm

Isabel » 12 Sep 2021, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2021, 7:44 pm

No, I didn't!

I ALSO have PROOF - straight from your own child murdering posts!!
I magically "found" your posts where you confessed!!!!  
THOUSANDS of them!!!!!!

             

You think it's a joke. Your criminal cyberstalking is NOT a joke. 

Isabel » 12 Sep 2021, 7:51 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2021, 7:51 pm

Str8tEdge » 12 Sep 2021, 7:46 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2021, 7:46 pm

You think it's a joke. Your criminal cyberstalking is NOT a joke.

You think your raping and murdering children is a JOKE?

My god, you are a sick ****.

Your theatrics aren't working anymore. It is obvious you two are working an illusion to get people to copy your mantra in accusing anyone defending their relative time mutually evolving as mentally unstable to those protecting humanity's rules of engaging in the arts of expanding self deception into human rights to pretend life is more than equally conceived to the numbers occupying space now.

Vegas » 22 Nov 2021, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2021, 8:38 pm

You sound like Ohm.,
:rofl:  

nowhere close. ronjul is repeating that channeling nonsense from the 80's. Not to mention annoyed liberal kind of admitted to being Ronjul. really don't care if that is true or not because when different ancestor collectively behave by one idea, they collectively mind one system of denying life as biologically separating ancestries evolving 5 generations alive now never same ancestor twice inception to extinction.

simple compounding to sustain the complete numbers occupying space in this atmosphere specifically located geographically conceived to decomposed.

Welcome to talking to someone that completely gets kinetic eternity in plain sight. Thermodynamics 101.

omh » 23 Nov 2021, 6:21 am » wrote: ↑

23 Nov 2021, 6:21 am

nowhere close. ronjul is repeating that channeling nonsense from the 80's. Not to mention annoyed liberal kind of admitted to being Ronjul. really don't care if that is true or not because when different ancestor collectively behave by one idea, they collectively mind one system of denying life as biologically separating ancestries evolving 5 generations alive now never same ancestor twice inception to extinction.

simple compounding to sustain the complete numbers occupying space in this atmosphere specifically located geographically conceived to decomposed.

Welcome to talking to someone that completely gets kinetic eternity in plain sight. Thermodynamics 101.

You don't know who Ronjul is?  

sooted up Cyndi » 23 Nov 2021, 6:45 am » wrote: ↑

23 Nov 2021, 6:45 am

You don't know who Ronjul is? :lol:  

I don't care, whomever Ronjul is, that person doesn't respect the kinetics that sustains their being alive now. See Biology is God, humanity is Satan.

Last generation conceived are angels to the vampires, werewolves, intellectual zombies, demons they will become as siblings to those that became 1 of 2 parents, 1 of 4 grandparents, 1 of 8 great grandparents, 1 of 16 great great grandparents in this atmosphere where kinetics keeps each timed apart conceived to decomposed now with one rule, adapt or become extinct as mutually timed apart here.

The old "Skin in the game" ante up your children to serve humanity's ideas of better tomorrows today or "we will block their chances of survival without taking care of us that didn't reproduce replacement to this ever changing population present.

Humanity still governs from dark ages social justification intellect must be more than what physically appears here never staying the same again forward..

Without perpetual balancing kinetics, there is no induced static energy.

omh » 23 Nov 2021, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑

23 Nov 2021, 6:47 am

I don't care, whomever Ronjul is, that person doesn't respect the kinetics that sustains their being alive now. See Biology is God, humanity is Satan.

If he isn't real how could he not respect the kinetics.