Shortly after this post, ohm was admitted to the hospital for treatment of a dislocated shoulder injury from patting himself on the back.omh » 23 Nov 2021, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑ where has anyone else ever took the stand I have in the last 2,021 years?
slander again. but my body doesn't fit your factual definition of who I should be by your social narrative. what is to pat myself on the back for since people with faith never accept physical absolutes as they evolve in plain sight being a result evolving in plain sight believing real isn't real and reality is all anyone needs to know cradle to grave.Ike Bana » 23 Nov 2021, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑ Shortly after this post, ohm was admitted to the hospital for treatment of a dislocated shoulder injury from patting himself on the back. :rolleyes:
There was an eclipse? didn't pay attention. just looked it up, longest eclipse in almost 6 hundred years.
My goal is to drive DeVry into yet another of his legendary meltdowns - posting a FULL PAGE of screeching, incoherent obscenities, in ALL CAPS HUGE RED FONT breakdowns, like the one he had on OLF.
yes.. I was up.. it was blacker then black at nite. Very next day we had a Karen encounter. Pharmacist Karen.omh » 23 Nov 2021, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑ There was an eclipse? didn't pay attention. just looked it up, longest eclipse in almost 6 hundred years.
all this just validates my instincts and debunks everything I was educated to accept or be cast aside. I chose being cast aside. Serenity isn't what context says it should be. Much better.sooted up Cyndi » 23 Nov 2021, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑ yes.. I was up.. it was blacker then black at nite. Very next day we had a Karen encounter. Pharmacist Karen. :)
GeorgeWashington » 16 Jun 2020, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑ He was banned for posting Isabel's private messages. He doxed Isabel, in textbook fashion, and she is a member here.If you are so butthurt that Str8's sadistic infatuation with Isabel has been quashed, then unban Isabel, and let her decide if she wants to continue to be doxed, browbeat, and otherwise attacked.dox
/däks/
verb
INFORMAL
- search for and publish private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the Internet, typically with malicious intent.
But, I seriously doubt you give 2 **** about Str8. You're in it for you. You want him unbanned so he can keep spreading his vile, leaving a wake of defecation. We put up with his wretched behavior for far too long. He's your problem, not ours.
Now, go give him the modship that he has earned at your behest, and don't use the early termination of his mission, due to our banning, as an excuse to withhold what he has rightfully earned. He's done your dirty work as best he could.
DeVry's malicious doxxing and relentless lying, being told that nothing he posted was "evidence", getting bitchslapped around the room, and finally getting banned is right in this thread, and he STILL tries to lie it all away.Phelix_Dacat » 23 Nov 2021, 4:08 pm » wrote: ↑ And just like that, the definition of "dox" shows up and it's not the nonsense lies Str8t's pushing.
Looks like someone got the proof in their PM box.Isabel » 23 Nov 2021, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑ No, you don't.
Your pathetic forgeries are irrelevant.
YOU: 2. I already stated I was banned before I presented the proof of you oh so willingly handing out Jamie’s IP address.
Same old lies.
You and fools were banned for posting PM's of mine, frantically trying to slander me - and yet, the whole time you were doing that, you never managed to post one single PM that said anything bad about me. Not one.
Why is that?
After you were banned, I had said that, as you are a pathological liar, it was inevitable that your next step would be to begin forging posts.
And, just as I predicted, you show up a year later, and start claiming that you suddenly, magically, conveniently "found" all these terrible PM's! You did you did! And not just a few! No - there are NINETY PAGES OF THEM!
They were under the sofa cushions this whole time!
You PROMISE!
![]()
![]()
![]()
YOU: I was just getting started.
Started? Your lies never stop.
You CAN'T stop.
It's your pathology.
Check you PM’s. Look in the mirror.Isabel » 23 Nov 2021, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑ You are just OBSESSED with how your lord and master, ****, **** you right in your fat ***, aren't you, DeVry.
After all your obedient moaning and groaning and sucking of her ***, after you had your modship STRIPPED from you for your cheering and giggling while she doxxed and stalked members, she went and did that to her poor flunky and asspuppet.
Now you JUST CAN'T STOP sniveling about her.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Need me to PM you more proof of your lies and wrong doing?Isabel » 23 Nov 2021, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ Never happened.
Now you are telling THE ADMIN that he "missed" all that nonexistent "evidence"?
LOLOL!
Remember when you told THE ADMIN that THE ADMIN must have hidden all the posts with all that "evidence" to hide it from THE ADMIN.
Because THAT was hilarious..
YOU: Spent two years criminally cyberstalking Jamie Brinkman with said ex-husband calling prosepective employers, employers, renters, banks, police depatments, etc.
I see you've added some NEW lies, even more ridiculous than the first.
What's wrong, DeVry? Your first set of lies not getting enough traction?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
YOU: Basicially, the same exact **** @Isabel had accused Jamie Brinkman of.
So you are STILL weeping about how your lord and master psycho felon **** **** you right i8nyoru fat ***.
You sucked her *** for YEARS, and cheered her vicious and violent doxxing and real life stalking of a member there.
You had your modship stripped from you for that vile display (and you lost your mind over it), and then she goes and does THAT to her obedient *** puppet? How COULD she?
So now you snivel endlessly about how MEAN and BAD she is. Too funny.
YOU: The question is, how did Jamie Brinkman's ex husband and @Isabel end up in a relationship to begin with?
And did the lawsuits end the relationship?
Inquiring minds want to know.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Ah - HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Your desperate lunacy is getting worse by the post.
Dude get over itStr8tEdge » 23 Nov 2021, 6:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Need me to PM you more proof of your lies and wrong doing?![]()
Based on your syntax, may I inquire your origin? Is it Pakistan, or Bangladesh?omh » 17 Jun 2020, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑ @Ronjul,
People of character are intellectually self stereotyped ancestors wishing life were more than reproductions occupying space as directly positioned being actively timed apart now.
A solid character in reality denies now is physically eternity so as to keep each added reproduction compromising away their time adapting to eternally part of life never exceeding their point of origin as conceived to decomposed after dead. A body only navigates as one of a kind between leaving the womb and dead so far.
Reality and relativity are compounding estimations life must exceed only being alive now parcticed within one species limited to naturally living as timed apart in this atmosphere. i.e. everyone and everything universally positioned is never the same total sum shape and form from point of becoming something to never being duplicated as before again.
Simple compounding combinations of reproductive cells. Inverted conversions of finite material(chemical periodic table) perpetually balancing out to universal point of kinetically here as physically existing until not anymore.
Adapt or become extinct applies to anything occupying space as timed apart so far. Knowing, and believing are two separate ways of interpreting being alive, one works in complete honesty, the other corrupts every ancestor added from now on.
Choices. Following believers or adapting to never being the same total sum again limited to occupying space as timed apart since conceived until dead governed by vernacular tribalism cradle to grave as traditionally done ancestrally here per geographically centered now.
There is no society in this atmosphere trying to correct human error practed for the last 7,000 years since intelelct training replacements to repeat defying now is eternity.
???
You have no proof.Str8tEdge » 23 Nov 2021, 6:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Need me to PM you more proof of your lies and wrong doing?![]()
He can't. That's the point,.
Isabel » 23 Nov 2021, 6:51 pm » wrote: ↑ ???
This is the exact same thing I have been posting for weeks now, grinding your face into your laughable lies, and making sure everyone knows what happened to send you into this drooling, panicky narcissistic frenzy of trying to lie your humiliations away.
Sure I do. They are located in your PM box. I can provide MORE if you request.Isabel » 23 Nov 2021, 6:52 pm » wrote: ↑ You have no proof.
Your laughable forgeries are irrelevant.