Liberal Forum

greatnpowerfuloz » 22 May 2014 10:13 am » wrote:
For a disingenuous twit, you're not very good at getting your *** out of the sling.

Huey » 22 May 2014 10:18 am » wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlPQkd_AA6c

Cannonpointer » 22 May 2014 6:49 pm » wrote: I hear you loud and clear, fraudboy.

Huey » 23 May 2014 5:03 am » wrote:
I didn;'t post that. But you are smart sometimes. You know the ignorant like Ozzie will see that with my name attached to it, won't read anything else, and think I posted it.

Good job.

Huey » 22 May 2014 5:13 am » wrote:
No sir. I am parroting the USSC court. You got you ignorant *** handed to you on this thread. It has been pointed out that you wish to stifle the liberty of individuals to form an association and practice their first amendment rights. You have been exposed as an anti constitutionalist so you unpinned the thread in the hopes this thread will die on the vine and be buried.

What other liberties do you and ozzie wish to wipe out? Just make a list Mr Marx.

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2017 6:04 am » wrote:If I recall, you ran your *** away from the board for months after this drubbing.

Your hysteria was so great you started imputing motives to me because my thread-pin expired.

More than a million views, negro. Thanks for playing your part - apparently, folks enjoy watching tiny dancers get their asses kicked.

Huey » 17 Jan 2017 6:28 am » wrote: I had a change in jobs that had me traveling for months on end to places that had limited internet access.

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2017 6:36 am » wrote:Well sure you did, Lucretia. Sure you did.

How does a thread on this backwater board - even and Twitter - get 13 million views???

I'm not bragging, or complaining - I'm wondering.

Huey » 17 Jan 2017 6:41 am » wrote: A glitch in the system.

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2017 6:53 am » wrote:Perhaps.

The massive number got me re-reading the thread, and I have to say, your first two posts, on page 7, were a tour de force in dick sucking.

You were off topic, looking to derail the thread. As always, your comment didn't address the OP. On top of THAT, your entire post was a copy-paste from some other thread, with no snapback, making it impossible to verify AND impossible to quote - a real *** show.

I have to hand it to you - you're a truly committed low budget troll.

Huey » 10 May 2014 8:49 am » wrote: Read it in context shinty. Cannon is arguing that wall street is writing regulation was in turn is killing entrepenuership. And killing jobs. I argue that wall street is not writing regulation that is killing either.

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2017 6:57 am » wrote:Since this drivel was written, it was learned that insurance industry lobbyists wrote ACA.

Huey » 17 Jan 2017 6:57 am » wrote:Do you really want to defend your position that people who form unions and corporations do not have the right to freely associate and spend their money as they see fit?

Huey » 17 Jan 2017 6:59 am » wrote:
Cannon, you truly are a troll.

Why not man up and post what I was replying to? You left that out of your other two post as well.

Huey » 10 May 2014 9:04 am » wrote: Citizens United, and the concept of unions, organizations, and yes, corporations which are all discussed in citizens united says that a group of people do not lose their rights because they are part of an organization. GE is not a person. A Union is not a person. But those that comprimise the group are. And they do not lose their rights because they formed a group.

Huey » 10 May 2014 9:06 am » wrote: Right now, and since the meltdown, the evil government is controlling markets.

Cannonpointer » 15 May 2014 1:35 pm » wrote:
They prattle whatever talking points their websites teach them. Earlier we saw one of his bedfellows using the trite routine of "praising with faint damnation" by referring to torture as, "three wet terrorists." Of course, the pretense that this web-site generated phrase covers our nation's entire trip down the torture hole is a lie; the pretense that the primary or only harm done by water-boarding is getting the victim wet is a lie (we executed japs for it); the pretense that there is a magical certainty pill that declares everyone strapped down, beaten, water boarded, sleep deprived, forced into homosexual acts, raped in American rape rooms, etc., etc., etc. - that declares each of these people were ACTUAL TERRORISTS - that was a lie; the pretense that there's a mystical, magical number of people a nation has to torture before it "really" reflects on them ("only" a "few"): THAT is a filthy, neocon talking point lie. But the guy prattling the lies? Oh, he was "against" torture - quite clear in his tisking of it (which preceded his effeminate piffling by less than a breath).

These progressive, big government poseurs want to suck in their guts and puff out their chests and bluff their best Frank Burns manhood impressions, currying favor with the guys in uniform - NEVER questioning ANYTHING done by a soldier. They have a fetish for executive authority and all of its accessories and adornments. But the cheapness of their manhood is manifest in their excuse-making for torture - their need for the nanny state to save them from fear like some helpless bitch tied to the tracks by Snidely Whiplash. It is only in a cartoon bubble reality that persons wishing their words to be seriously contemplated would ever venture to defend state torture - whether by outright endorsement or by the shabby dodge of using borrowed terminology tailored to minimize the crime and belittle the victims - accompanied by falsely pious "tisk-tisks" and, "I don't favor it - buts."

Huey » 16 May 2014 4:23 am » wrote: Yup, a tacit surrender on the topic. Whenever he brings up "torture" on a given subject you know he can no longer coherently discuss the subject at hand. Nor does he want to because the more in depth a subject goes the more his disdain for the consitution and individual liberty is revealed.