Liberal Forum

Huey » 17 Jan 2017 8:00 am » wrote:
No, I have a right to ignore a non topical response or an edited response.

Particularly one not rooted in truth.

You have the right to dance - which you are proving.

Huey » 17 Jan 2017 7:59 am » wrote:
See above post. It might not be a good choice but it is still a choice.

Giving your money to a gunman is a choice, you fapping little dancer.

A choice in response to force - not an exercise of free will, hence abolishing your **** narrative.

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2017 8:00 am » wrote:Keep dancing, lady.

You brought up force - I brought in the dictionary, and linked it so you could verify.

I proved that force is brought to bear, ending for any adult your prattle that free exercise of rights occurs when lobbyists spend union members' money against their wishes.

Now, dance, you little bitch.

No need to dance. And this has been addressed. I am not going to repeat myself over and over. You quoted the answer.

Huey » 17 Jan 2017 8:10 am » wrote:
No need to dance. And this has been addressed. I am not going to repeat myself over and over. You quoted the answer.

You've ben pwned, dancer. Keep groveling.

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2017 8:12 am » wrote:You've ben pwned, dancer. Keep groveling.

Nah, once again I have shown how futile your argument is.

Huey » 17 Jan 2017 8:12 am » wrote: Nah, once again I have shown how futile your argument is.

Heh heh. I gave you a swirly, little bitch.

You thought yourself clever bringing up unions - and I shoved the unions down your cock intake.

That was fun, little dancer - beating your perceived ace with a deuce of your own trump, chump.

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2017 7:53 am » wrote: Are people free to not join a union, fairy?

Or are they coerced (influenced, forced) to join if they want to work?

And if they are forced to join, how hypocritical is it of you to pretend they are exercising free will, and the union is their legitimate voice?

If unions are truly representing members, why didn't hillary carry the union vote, dancing fraud?

And if they are NOT representing their members, when will you stop lying that unon members are "exercising their individual rights" when they're forced to pay lobbyists to go against their positions?

Bump for the guy who says union members are "freely associating to exercise their free speech rights."

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2017 8:14 am » wrote:Heh heh. I gave you a swirly, little bitch.

You thought yourself clever bringing up unions - and I shoved the unions down your cock intake.

That was fun, little dancer - beating your perceived ace with a deuce of your own trump, chump.

Nah, you have helped prove that no one is forced to either invest money in a company or join a union.

Whenever you need another comeuppance let me know.

And you are not a fan of our right to freely associate and collectively exercise individual rights.

Got any other 3 year old topics you want to discuss?

Huey » 17 Jan 2017 8:25 am » wrote: Nah, you have helped prove that no one is forced to either invest money in a company or join a union.

And the dancing queer argues with the dictionary!

When refuted, queenie starts to DAHNCE!

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2017 7:53 am » wrote: Are people free to not join a union, fairy?

Or are they coerced (influenced, forced) to join if they want to work?

And if they are forced to join, how hypocritical is it of you to pretend they are exercising free will, and the union is their legitimate voice?

If unions are truly representing members, why didn't hillary carry the union vote, dancing fraud?

And if they are NOT representing their members, when will you stop lying that unon members are "exercising their individual rights" when they're forced to pay lobbyists to go against their positions?

Bump for the lady who picks fights with Daniel Webster.

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2017 8:28 am » wrote:And the dancing queer argues with the dictionary!

When refuted, queenie starts to DAHNCE!

I don't dance. White man's disease.

Plus, I have not been refuted.

Like your problems with the word "let", you prattle along reframing.

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2017 8:29 am » wrote:Bump for the lady who picks fights with Daniel Webster.

It is all about choice pops. You libs love that word. Not all choices are good. But it is still a choice.

Cannonpointer » 02 May 2014 10:35 pm » wrote: We live in a capitalist economy, which games the system to PREVENT free enterprise.

There's the psychotic definition of "capitalism."

What is actual "capitalism?"

Definition of capitalism

:
an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/capitalism

Huey » 17 Jan 2017 8:36 am » wrote: It is all about choice pops. You libs love that word. Not all choices are good. But it is still a choice.

Join a union or go jobless? Invest in the market or be penalized with taxes? Give the robber your money or be shot?

You are effeminate.

Keep dancing, bitch.

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2017 7:53 am » wrote: Are people free to not join a union, fairy?

Or are they coerced (influenced, forced) to join if they want to work?

And if they are forced to join, how hypocritical is it of you to pretend they are exercising free will, and the union is their legitimate voice?

If unions are truly representing members, why didn't hillary carry the union vote, dancing fraud?

And if they are NOT representing their members, when will you stop lying that unon members are "exercising their individual rights" when they're forced to pay lobbyists to go against their positions?

Bump for the dancing queen.

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2017 8:52 am » wrote:Join a union or go jobless? Invest in the market or be penalized with taxes? Give the robber your money or be shot?

You are effeminate.

Keep dancing, bitch.

It is about choices pops. There are millions of us working who are not in a union.

The tax answer is a hoot.

Huey » 17 Jan 2017 9:24 am » wrote: It is about choices pops. There are millions of us working who are not in a union.

The tax answer is a hoot.

Dahnce.

Enjoy that swirly, bitch. You brought up force - and you ate that word along with pieces of teeth. You brought up unions, and you got unions shoved right back down your effeminate pie hole.

The only salve to your worn out ****** is hoping not too many people watched me kicking your ***, Nance. But I know - and you know - and we both know we both know. And that actually works for me, kid. Owning you, and you knowing it.

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2017 9:53 am » wrote:Dahnce.

Enjoy that swirly, bitch. You brought up force - and you ate that word along with pieces of teeth. You brought up unions, and you got unions shoved right back down your effeminate pie hole.

The only salve to your worn out ****** is hoping not too many people watched me kicking your ***, Nance. But I know - and you know - and we both know we both know. And that actually works for me, kid. Owning you, and you knowing it.

Boy, don't you feel stupid. Are you not smart enough to know you don't have to invest nor do you have to join a union.

How do so many 10s of millions of people work? Remember, including government workers only around 10% of the work force is union. Seems the other 90% were not forced to join a union.

Nice try pops.

As far as the taxes your answer can apply to any number of things. Non home owners don't get the mortgage interest deduction. If you don't own a business there is no deductions. Just a couple of examples.

No sir, you keep up the dance. I will sit here and keep the music going for you.

Huey » 17 Jan 2017 10:06 am » wrote: Are you not smart enough to know you don't have to invest nor do you have to join a union.

And that means chairs should have rights, dancer.

You know that I know that you suck my dick.

Speaking of arguing with dictionaries, where's the psychotic to respond to this?

Off babbling uselessly.

Termin8tor » 17 Jan 2017 8:50 am » wrote: There's the psychotic definition of "capitalism."

What is actual "capitalism?"