So there is no penalty.Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2017 1:14 pm » wrote: Your retirement income is taxed as regular income.
You are not allowed to work in your chosen field.
You were tied up on *** dick.
*** dick.
Right - just as ACA has no penalty - a tax is not a penalty.
Incorrect. The ACA does have a penalty if you do not carry insurance. You pay a fine.Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2017 1:21 pm » wrote:Right - just as ACA has no penalty - a tax is not a penalty.
Thanks for sucking my dick so well.
Liar. The SCOTUS called it a tax - sit down. And cross your **** legs when you do, puta.Huey » 17 Jan 2017 1:29 pm » wrote:
Incorrect. The ACA does have a penalty if you do not carry insurance. You pay a fine.
You are conflating to things which you are wont to do. Having to follow the mandate is the **** tax moron. If you fail to maintain insurance for the tax year you are FINED.Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2017 1:33 pm » wrote:Liar. The SCOTUS called it a tax - sit down. And cross your **** legs when you do, puta.
Keep sniveling, ****. It's a tax - collected by the same IRS that harvests your retirement money unless you agree to invest it on wall street - now, again, go suck some other dick. Mine is getting chaffed by your nancy pantying.Huey » 17 Jan 2017 1:43 pm » wrote:
You are conflating to things which you are wont to do. Having to follow the mandate is the **** tax moron. If you fail to maintain insurance for the tax year you are FINED.
Get your **** together, asshole, before you **** lecture me again.
Oh, I forgot.Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2017 1:16 pm » wrote: Show us the last citation you made, queer. All I see from you is this, and more of it:
That makes no sense whatsoever, except to a psychotic.Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2017 1:14 pm » wrote: Your retirement income is taxed as regular income.
.
Shut the **** up.. You **** clueless.Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2017 2:16 pm » wrote:Keep sniveling, ****. It's a tax - collected by the same IRS that harvests your retirement money unless you agree to invest it on wall street - now, again, go suck some other dick. Mine is getting chaffed by your nancy pantying.
No one appreciates a mouth that square dances while it sucks.
You really need this explained, *** for breakfast?Huey » 17 Jan 2017 3:44 pm » wrote:
Shut the **** up.. You **** clueless.
Yes, jackass, the mandate it self is a **** tax. I just posted that. If you do not have a policy in line with the mandate, ya stupid ****, you are penalized further.
*******, I am not penalized if I do not invest.
You sir, are ignorant.
ObamaCare Mandate: Those who choose not to purchase insurance will have to pay a tax “penalty” unless they qualify for an exemption. Exemptions from ObamaCare’s tax “penalty” mandate are available to a number of Americans.Huey » 17 Jan 2017 1:43 pm » wrote: You are conflating to things which you are wont to do. Having to follow the mandate is the **** tax moron. If you fail to maintain insurance for the tax year you are FINED.
Get your **** together, asshole, before you **** lecture me again.
Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2017 4:57 pm » wrote:You really need this explained, *** for breakfast?
NO ONE has to pay that - EVER. Every person in America has a choice to not pay that fine. Those who DO pay it, CHOOSE it. They see it as an alternative minimum tax to the tax that is obamacare.
If you CHOOSE the negative consequence - like, say, paying taxes on your retirement accounts for not investing them wall street, or not getting the job you want because you refuse to join the union - then it's a choice you made. No one forced you.
I'm amazed you're so stupid you needed that explained. Don't you make a mental note of your cowardly evasions and effeminate parsing?
He'll babble something stupid and evasive.Huey » 18 Jan 2017 6:23 am » wrote:So where is my penalty for not investing, *** munch?
Remember, that is YOUR argument.
Chop chop, pops.
With the ACA your forced, coerced, to buy the mandated services the government dictates under penalty of fines and taxes enforced by government.Termin8tor » 18 Jan 2017 8:55 am » wrote: He'll babble something stupid and evasive.
I'm penalized for not raising race horses, because those who do get a tax break but I have to pay higher taxes on my income.
I'm a victim of the oppressive Corporate Beltway System!
Ask the psychotic.![]()
![]()
![]()
Huey » 18 Jan 2017 9:04 am » wrote: With the ACA your forced, coerced, to buy the mandated services the government dictates under penalty of fines and taxes enforced by government.
With investing there is no penalty for not doing something.
So back to the CU argument. CP's argument when down in flames.
There's no PENALTY, ******* - you just get the BONUS of paying taxes on your retirement account. Just as there's no penalty for not having insurance - you get the OPPORTUNITY to pay 700 dollars, or whatever that number is.Huey » 18 Jan 2017 6:23 am » wrote: So where is my penalty for not investing, *** munch?
Remember, that is YOUR argument.
Chop chop, pops.
LOL!.Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2017 10:15 am » wrote:There's no PENALTY, ******* - you just get the BONUS of paying taxes on your retirement account. Just as there's no penalty for not having insurance - you get the OPPORTUNITY to pay 700 dollars, or whatever that number is.
Now, YOU may frame paying taxes on your retirement savings, and paying an alternative minimum tax instead of insurance (which is the purchase of a commodity, not a tax, sonny), as either penalties, or as opportunities - makes no difference to me, gay. YOU choose.
That they are both the same, even a cock worshiper like you cannot deny - and that moots your *** quibbling.
Didn't the psychotic just write a small book claiming there was?Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2017 10:15 am » wrote: There's no PENALTY, *******......
How do you know when the psychotic has lost an argument?That they are both the same, even a cock worshiper like you cannot deny - and that moots your *** quibbling.
This is the thing about stupid queers - he's too retarded to see that I am hitting his bed buddy with his own standard.Termin8tor » 18 Jan 2017 12:14 pm » wrote: Didn't the psychotic just write a small book claiming there was?![]()
![]()
No games, little lady - using your own parsing and *** against you.
So the fellow whose taxes are deferred for decades while his account grows and the fellow who is taxed before growth are treated the same?Huey » 18 Jan 2017 10:28 am » wrote: PS. You do pay taxes on your retirement. What happens when you start drawing on it?