Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2017 12:29 pm » wrote: This is the thing about stupid queers - he's too retarded to see that I am hitting his bed buddy with his own standard.

this is the thing about psychotics. They'll tell any wild lie as they babble like imbeciles.

Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2017 12:32 pm » wrote:No games, little lady - using your own parsing and *** against you.

If you don't like your cheesy standard, don;t use it on others like a fairy.
So the fellow whose taxes are deferred for decades while his account grows and the fellow who is taxed before growth are treated the same?

And you're accusing me of linguistic games, you parsing, goal post moving dick sucker?

There has been no parsing on my end.

There is no government mandate that forces me to invest in anything ya **** moron. There is a government mandate that forces me to purchase a health care plan with specific coverages. There is a penalty if I do not.

When you show that the government MANDATES I invest money in a public corporation then you win. Until then, prattle on ignorantly.

No moron, not moving anything. YOU moved the goal post once your sorry *** was kicked on CU. You do pay taxes on your retirement, idiot. They are deffered until you withdraw the funds.

You are like obama. Your arrogance shines right thru when you feel defeated by one you think is inferior. You ain't king **** pal. Keep posting. it solidifies your ignorance.

Termin8tor » 18 Jan 2017 12:37 pm » wrote: this is the thing about psychotics. They'll tell any wild lie as they babble like imbeciles.

Mandrew is jockeying for your job, clemmy - he's on my nuts like a squirrel.

Huey » 18 Jan 2017 12:46 pm » wrote: There has been no parsing on my end.

There is no government mandate that forces me to invest in anything ya **** moron. There is a government mandate that forces me to purchase a health care plan with specific coverages. There is a penalty if I do not.

When you show that the government MANDATES I invest money in a public corporation then you win. Until then, prattle on ignorantly.

No moron, not moving anything. YOU moved the goal post once your sorry *** was kicked on CU. You do pay taxes on your retirement, idiot. They are deffered until you withdraw the funds.

You are like obama. Your arrogance shines right thru when you feel defeated by one you think is inferior. You ain't king **** pal. Keep posting. it solidifies your ignorance.

Any debate with you ends in some side alley brawl, because you are too dishonest to even grant the simple truth that there is legislation which advantages those who invest on wall street and disadvantages those who invest on main street.

That's where this all started - you being too dishonest to admit that a tax disadvantage is a form of compulsion. Whether the ACA fine is or is not a punishment is ONLY being debated because of your consistent dishonesty, ***.

Let's just both agree that you're a quibbling, dishonest parser-*** whose only intentions in a thread are to move goalposts, derail, or misrepresent facts, and call it a day.

Huey » 18 Jan 2017 12:46 pm » wrote: There is a government mandate that forces me to purchase a health care plan with specific coverages.

False.

You can pay an optional tax - as can those who invest on main street instead of wall street.

ENTIRELY optional - you have a choice. You are not being forced.

Just as I have a choice to invest my retirement savings on main street - no one is forcing me.

By the way, suck my dick.

Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2017 12:46 pm » wrote: Mandrew is jockeying for your job, clemmy - he's on my nuts like a squirrel.

Both of us know it's a waste of time citing evidence and logic to you. You'll evade, dissemble, obfuscate, lie, do your usual troll dance.

He's not tired of it, like I am.

Termin8tor » 18 Jan 2017 1:30 pm » wrote: Both of us know it's a waste of time citing evidence and logic to you.

That explains why you down low queers never take that tack.

Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2017 12:51 pm » wrote: Any debate with you ends in some side alley brawl, because you are too dishonest to even grant the simple truth that there is legislation which advantages those who invest on wall street and disadvantages those who invest on main street.

That's where this all started - you being too dishonest to admit that a tax disadvantage is a form of compulsion. Whether the ACA fine is or is not a punishment is ONLY being debated because of your consistent dishonesty, ***.

Let's just both agree that you're a quibbling, dishonest parser-*** whose only intentions in a thread are to move goalposts, derail, or misrepresent facts, and call it a day.

Any debate with you ends in some side alley brawl, because you are too dishonest to even grant the simple truth that there is legislation which advantages those who invest on wall street and disadvantages those who invest on main street.

****. This is your side alley brawl. YOU went down this road. Now you are changing the language to advantages. Advantages, asshole, is not forcing you by law.

That's where this all started - you being too dishonest to admit that a tax disadvantage is a form of compulsion. Whether the ACA fine is or is not a punishment is ONLY being debated because of your consistent dishonesty, ***.

No, asshole, it started when I told you that if you did not like a corporation you did not have to invest in it. THe government is not forcing you. You went off on tangents trying to justify your argument. Next, I argued the ACA mandate is not only force, because you are forced to purchase services that you do not need, but you are punished if you do not. No, you went down this road, not me.

Again, there is NO LAW that forces you to invest in a corporation. They you do that of your own free will. That is YOUR choice, asshole. And you want big daddy government to step in.

Stop blaming your own games on others. Are you ashamed?

Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2017 12:53 pm » wrote:False.

You can pay an optional tax - as can those who invest on main street instead of wall street.

ENTIRELY optional - you have a choice. You are not being forced.

Just as I have a choice to invest my retirement savings on main street - no one is forcing me.

By the way, suck my dick.

Since no one is forcing you your argument RE: CU (where this began) is null and void. You do not have to invest in a corporation if you choose not to.

Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2017 12:53 pm » wrote:False.

You can pay an optional tax - as can those who invest on main street instead of wall street.

ENTIRELY optional - you have a choice. You are not being forced.

Just as I have a choice to invest my retirement savings on main street - no one is forcing me.

By the way, suck my dick.

RE the ACA.

Yes, idiot, the ACA does force me under penalty to pay for coverages I no longer need.

Huey » 18 Jan 2017 1:34 pm » wrote: Again, there is NO LAW that forces you to invest in a corporation.

There's no law that forces you to get insurance, either. Putting a penalty there doesn't count, **** sack - you just said so.

Huey » 18 Jan 2017 1:36 pm » wrote:
RE the ACA.

Yes, idiot, the ACA does force me under penalty to pay for coverages I no longer need.

Nope. You CHOOSE to.

You could pay the tax instead.

Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2017 1:37 pm » wrote:Nope. You CHOOSE to.

You could pay the tax instead.

The mandate is the tax. And if you are paying attention you know the fine is going to be higher than the cost of coverage.

Tell me where I can get an insurance policy where I am not paying for maternity, BC, pediatrics, mental health?

Did the government mandate that ALL insurance policies must have that coverage?

Huey » 18 Jan 2017 1:35 pm » wrote: Since no one is forcing you your argument RE: CU (where this began) is null and void. You do not have to invest in a corporation if you choose not to.

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/force

Force (fawrs, fohrs)

power to influence, affect, or control; efficacious power:

The federal government, through its tax laws, influences me to invest in wall street in favor of main street.

Thanks for playing.

Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2017 1:32 pm » wrote: That explains why you down low queers never take that tack.

Yes, yes, you always go suddenly blind when I cite sources, use logic or ask key questions.


Which party wrote Fannie Mae into law?

Which party wrote liberal lending laws into legislation?

Oh gosh, your vision failed yet again!

Huey » 18 Jan 2017 1:39 pm » wrote: The mandate is the tax.

Stopping you at your first lie.

Taxes go to the treasury and are collected by its agents.

The "fine" is the tax. You may be seated.

Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2017 1:40 pm » wrote: http://www.dictionary.com/browse/force

Force (fawrs, fohrs)

power
to
influence,
affect,
or
control;
efficacious
power:


The federal government, through its tax laws, influences me to invest in wall street in favor of main street.

Thanks for playing.

No sir, it does not. It gives you an incentive. I do not have to invest if I do not want to. Neither do you.

So back to the CU argument you are sprinting from. Since the government does not force you to invest in any company, nor does it penalize you if you don't, you are free not to invest with a company you politically disagree with.

Keep playing word games pops.

Thanks for allowing me this opportunity to kick your ***.

Huey » 18 Jan 2017 1:44 pm » wrote: No sir, it does not. It gives you an incentive.

Incentivizing investment in wall street dicinsentivizes investment in main street.

Take a chair, kid.

Huey » 18 Jan 2017 1:44 pm » wrote: So back to the CU argument you are sprinting from. Since the government does not force you to invest in any company, nor does it penalize you if you don't, you are free not to invest with a company you politically disagree with.

Even if this were not a proven lie, CU would still be getting an unfair advantage from the tax code, which disadvantages my free speech, **** -and it IS a proven lie.

Keep playing word games sunny.

Thanks for allowing me this opportunity to kick your ***.

Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2017 1:45 pm » wrote:Incentivizing investment in wall street dicinsentivizes investment in main street.

Take a chair, kid.

As it pertains to the CU argument whether you invest in Wall Street or Main Street is irrelevant.

Nice reframe pops. Not biting.

So again, as it pertains to CU what law requires you to invest?

Ill answer for you.

None.

The circles this asshole will run in order to sprint away from a topic.