Liberal Forum

Huey » 19 Jan 2017 1:58 pm » wrote: No, you cherry picked comments from a three year old discussion to run away from your errors. I posted entire comments.

Reverend Al Sharpton » 19 Jan 2017 5:06 pm » wrote:Shut the **** up, pinkie.

You know damn well da cannon be rite an tite. Walk dat **** back if you doan beleev it, instead a lying about it, nucka.

Corporations is not peeple, nigguh - and only people have rites. Abnegate the vituperative utterances you've expostulated, and clean yo slate.

Cannonpointer » 19 Jan 2017 5:04 pm » wrote:Nothing preventing you walking them back instead of lying about them, queer.

Here, let me give you a spot, you wheedling dick sucker:

___________________________________________________________________________________

^^^G'head. Walk it back.

Huey » 19 Jan 2017 5:09 pm » wrote: Lol!

No need to walk anything back. Yet you continue.

Huey » 19 Jan 2017 5:09 pm » wrote: Your *** is so sore you whipped out the sharpton SOK.

Cannonpointer » 19 Jan 2017 11:43 am » wrote:Save it, queer. I specifically talked about a home based business. You want to talk about something else? Find someone interested in that subject. I wager I know more about business, from start up to scale, than you do - but it's not relevant what I know or you know since you're not changing the subject, and getting me to play along.

I don't need you to tell me how hard capitalism is, in response to me telling you how EASY free enterprise used to be, before wall street used regulations to bleed and hog tie main street.

Sgt Bilko » 19 Jan 2017 6:52 pm » wrote: You still need to incorporate the overhead of a home based business. My wife takes tax deductions for use of the room, equipment, and other office equipment and supplies she uses for her home business. There is always overhead Dippidy Doo. TANSTAAFL always applies!!

Cannonpointer » 19 Jan 2017 6:58 pm » wrote:Child, I do not need education from a retarded old **** in hsi underpants. My point stands, and your point was beside the point - that's the point, ya pointy-headed zika baby.

Sgt Bilko » 20 Jan 2017 3:17 am » wrote: Poor Cannonpointer is reverting to his Alinsky method of debate. He obviously has a brain fart since first he says child and follows that with old fart. Poor dear can't reason with his brain flatulence!! Very sad!! It is obvious he has no concept of business. Therefore reverts to demonizing the opposition and refusing to discuss the issue like a good Alinsky disciple!!!

indago » 20 Jan 2017 4:35 am » wrote: "Alinsky" this, "Alinsky" that: admit that you are Fuktup!

Huey » 20 Jan 2017 8:28 am » wrote: He is just calling it as he sees it.

indago » 20 Jan 2017 4:35 am » wrote: "Alinsky" this, "Alinsky" that: admit that you are Fuktup!

Cannonpointer » 02 May 2014, 10:35 pm » wrote: ↑

02 May 2014, 10:35 pm

Instead of definitions, let's talk functions.

Look at the materials required to construct a solar panel.They cost about $200.00. Add a day's labor to that $200.00, and you've got yourself a solar panel. You could sell iffor $400.00, and you've got yourself a job. So, why isn't anyone doing it?We live in a free enterprise economy, do we not?

Not.

We live in a capitalist economy, which games the system to PREVENT free enterprise. You are not allowed to sell your solar panels without a stamp of approval from Underwriters Laboratories -and they are gate keepers for Wall Street.The cost of shaking hands with UL prevents free enterprisers from operating in that market -and the same thing is going on in almost every market. The little guy is locked out by the engineered and manipulated expense of sitting at the table - locked out. Only Wall Streeters, using OTHER PEOPLES' capital, can afford to play in the game.

We need to go back to a free enterprise economy, where the little guy does not face unsurmountable obstacles to starting a small business.

tharock220 » 02 May 2014, 11:06 pm » wrote: ↑

02 May 2014, 11:06 pm

You're a **** idiot!!!

Cannonpointer » 02 May 2014, 10:35 pm » wrote: ↑

02 May 2014, 10:35 pm

Instead of definitions, let's talk functions.

Look at the materials required to construct a solar panel.They cost about $200.00. Add a day's labor to that $200.00, and you've got yourself a solar panel. You could sell iffor $400.00, and you've got yourself a job. So, why isn't anyone doing it?We live in a free enterprise economy, do we not?

Not.

We live in a capitalist economy, which games the system to PREVENT free enterprise. You are not allowed to sell your solar panels without a stamp of approval from Underwriters Laboratories -and they are gate keepers for Wall Street.The cost of shaking hands with UL prevents free enterprisers from operating in that market -and the same thing is going on in almost every market. The little guy is locked out by the engineered and manipulated expense of sitting at the table - locked out. Only Wall Streeters, using OTHER PEOPLES' capital, can afford to play in the game.

We need to go back to a free enterprise economy, where the little guy does not face unsurmountable obstacles to starting a small business.

SJConspirator » 17 Jul 2022, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2022, 3:33 pm

so if capitalism is heavily regulated by the state, and sociism is too, what is the difference?

Cannonpointer » 17 Jul 2022, 5:23 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2022, 5:23 pm

I don't know - you would have to define socialism. 

If you define it as the state owning all or some of the means of production, then Singapore and Norway are socialist. You can look to those economies for the answer.