Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 2:03 pm

(In a minute, you'll get it too)

Do you get it yet?

There is nothing to get.  In good time we will move on to the others.  

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 2:04 pm

Wi.

 You got that argument as to why the bill discussed in the OP is not cheese?

No, although the bill is cheese and your alleged counter argument is cheese we are not discussing Wisconsin. 

solon » 21 Apr 2021, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 2:04 pm

YOU ARE A liar. The argument you made was that they wont OBEY the law so we dont need it. By that logic NO LAWS are useful. IT was STUPID but it was your ARGUMENT. Typiceal IGHORANT TreasonMonkey LIAR that you are

Then you do the TYPICAL TreasonMonkey STUPIIDTY you attack ME personally then WHINE and snivel like a PUNK that I treat you the same way GFY ignorant child. Stop being RUDE to me and I will stop being rude to you otherwise FOAD

You really should take a reading comprehension class...you will look stupid less often.  My argument is, if they aren't obeying EXISTING law, why do we need a new law and what makes you think they will obey that one?

You are the one that said "Saying we already HAVE laws so we don't need laws is dumb."  Read that VERY CAREFULLY.  I never said we don't need laws.  That makes YOUR comment about what I said a lie.  You may not like that, but it's not my fault you lied about what I said.

Apparently you are #triggered
 

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 2:09 pm

There is nothing to get.  In good time we will move on to the others.

Let me explain it to you, vic


See, I asked you to tell me where my direct answer to your question fell :rofl:  short :rofl:   of your :die:  standards :die:  , fully anticipating that your wouldn't even try to answer the question.....

And you didn't....


and now you insist that you didn't walk into anything....

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 2:15 pm

See, I asked you to tell me where my direct answer to your question fell  short   of your  standards  , fully anticipating that your wouldn't even try to answer the question.....


 

Darth Evader is whining about his questions going unanswered. Every member here should assert the rule against you, Askholio, until you **** man up. 

1. Your going to ask for the video again. Lol "What rule?" derrrr......

Vegas » 21 Apr 2021, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 2:26 pm

Darth Evader is whining about his questions going unanswered. Every member here should assert the rule against you, Askholio, until you **** man up. 

1. Your going to ask for the video again. Lol "What rule?" derrrr......

Are these my words, moron?

I asked you to tell me where my direct answer to your question

 

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 2:29 pm

Are these my words, moron?

What does the quote function tell you?  

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 2:15 pm

Let me explain it to you, vic

See, I asked you to tell me where my direct answer to your question fell  short   of your  standards  , fully anticipating that your wouldn't even try to answer the question.....

And you didn't....

and now you insist that you didn't walk into anything....

Have no clue what you are ranting about but none of that tells me how the bill will reduce mass killings.

But, I am off to the store and I will be carrying because I can and there is nothing you can do about.  I will have my 380 with an 8 +1 capability and a spare magazine in my pocket.  

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 2:29 pm

Are these my words, moron?

So where are these direct answers? And don't **** turn it around on me. 

1. You'll turn it around on me. 

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 2:34 pm

Have no clue what you are ranting about but none of that tells me how the bill will reduce mass killings.

But, I am off to the store and I will be carrying because I can and there is nothing you can do about.  I will have my 380 with an 8 +1 capability and a spare magazine in my pocket.

You're dumber than ****.....

Never, ever presume to dwarfslpain ANYTHING to anyone

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 2:32 pm

What does the quote function tell you?

You tell me....I never have much luck trying to get you to understand that.

Vegas » 21 Apr 2021, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 2:36 pm

So where are these direct answers? And don't **** turn it around on me. 

1. You'll turn it around on me.

**** your question.

Vegasgiants » 21 Apr 2021, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 2:38 pm

The US has a higher rate of gun violence than any other similarly wealthy country. Why not try to change that?

because there are too many guns.


QED.

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 2:38 pm

**** your question.

Yeah, I didn't think you could produce it. Darth Evader.

Vegas » 21 Apr 2021, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 2:39 pm

Yeah, I didn't think you could produce it. Darth Evader.

I don't have to produce **** until you acknowledge the facts presented

Vegasgiants » 21 Apr 2021, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 2:39 pm

The US has far more mass shootings than just about any country in the world. Of countries with at least 10 million people, there are more mass shootings per capita in only Yemen, which has the second-highest per-capita rate of gun ownership (the US has the highest).

because there aren't enough bump stocks for granny to practice self defense techniques...because libruls


QED

Vegasgiants » 21 Apr 2021, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 2:40 pm

The US is not inherently a more violent society. What sets the country apart is that it has a lot of guns that are still really easy to get. The data that we have indicates that some gun-control measures — like banning some types of weapons, improving background checks, and putting more restrictions on weapon access — could help.

Curtailing the manufacture and distribution of guns will do nothing to affect the supply of guns.

Because there are too many guns.

QED
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 2:40 pm

I don't have to produce **** until you acknowledge the facts presented

As predicted, turned it around on me. 100% accuracy. Too easy.

Always turning it around on others. True coward. Only you can take a simple task, and make it into a **** **** storm. Textbook narcissism. 

1. You'll turn it around on me again...and again...and again...

Vegas » 21 Apr 2021, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 2:43 pm

As predicted, turned it around on me. 100% accuracy. Too easy.

Always turning it around on others. True coward. Only you can take a simple task, and make it into a **** **** storm. Textbook narcissism. 

1. You'll turn it around on me again...and again...and again...

I posted a fact contradicting your rant.

I asked you to acknowledge it.

You're a coward.

Vegasgiants » 21 Apr 2021, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 2:34 pm

So you believe gun rights cant be regulated?

Say that

Personally...no, I don't.  However, that decision is not entirely up to me.  Even though I don't have a gun (and have never had one), I will still oppose legislation regulating them and will not, all other factors being relatively equal, support any candidate that votes to regulate them.