Liberal Forum

Vegasgiants » 21 Apr 2021, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 3:22 pm

I just wish he would bring one thing to this debate other than whining

Be careful what you wish for..

Have you seen that mayfly try to reason?
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 2:36 pm

You're dumber than ****.....

Never, ever presume to dwarfslpain ANYTHING to anyone

So, we have destroyed your alleged counter argument concerning the number of magazines in circulation that will not fall under the law.  Let's move onto another point I made you did not address, simply calling it irrelevant which is your code that you have no clue what is being discussed.

Let's say this cheese law manages to pass.  Meaning no more magazines with 10 + round capacity.  You with me so far?  We will not be discussing clips. 

In this REAL world example I own a 380 EZ that I carry.  It is an 8+1 weapon.  I know you are not schooled in the terminology. That means the magazine carries 8 but I have one chambered when I carry it.  That is the +1 meaning I have nine ready to go.  In my front pocket I have another 8 round magazine.  That means I have 17 rounds.  Remember, it takes a second to change.  That is normally what I carry.

Now if I wanted too I could carry more.  I don't but I could.  I could put 2 magazines in each pocket.  That would be 4 mags x 8 =32.  You with me so far?  So, with the 9 in the weapon we are up to 41.  But wait, there is more.  

I have a shoulder holster I wear sometimes that has two magazine pouches.  Usually in the winter under a jacket.  Two more 8 round magazines = 16.  16 plus 41 is 57.  And no one would ever know.  And it is all perfectly legal under the law you support.  

So according to the law you support a person who was inclined (I am not) to do so could effectively shoot 57 people and the law has done nothing to stop it.  Just like the VA Tech shooting you claimed was irrelevant.  

That is how a man makes an argument Mr. Irrelevant.  I gave you a realistic REAL world example.  

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 2:38 pm

You tell me....I never have much luck trying to get you to understand that.

I understand it mine.  I don't run around the forum demanding people to tell me who's words or what.  As a matter of fact you are the one that does that.  I believe the only moron that does.  What does that tell you?  It tells me you can't read.  

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 3:26 pm

So, we have destroyed your alleged counter argument concerning the number of magazines in circulation that will not fall under the law.  Let's move onto another point I made you did not address, simply calling it irrelevant which is your code that you have no clue what is being discussed.

Let's say this cheese law manages to pass.  Meaning no more magazines with 10 + round capacity.  You with me so far?  We will not be discussing clips. 

In this REAL world example I own a 380 EZ that I carry.  It is an 8+1 weapon.  I know you are not schooled in the terminology. That means the magazine carries 8 but I have one chambered when I carry it.  That is the +1 meaning I have nine ready to go.  In my front pocket I have another 8 round magazine.  That means I have 17 rounds.  Remember, it takes a second to change.  That is normally what I carry.

Now if I wanted too I could carry more.  I don't but I could.  I could put 2 magazines in each pocket.  That would be 4 mags x 8 =32.  You with me so far?  So, with the 9 in the weapon we are up to 41.  But wait, there is more.  

I have a shoulder holster I wear sometimes that has two magazine pouches.  Usually in the winter under a jacket.  Two more 8 round magazines = 16.  16 plus 41 is 57.  And no one would ever know.  And it is all perfectly legal under the law you support.  

So according to the law you support a person who was inclined (I am not) to do so could effectively shoot 57 people and the law has done nothing to stop it.  Just like the VA Tech shooting you claimed was irrelevant.  

That is how a man makes an argument Mr. Irrelevant.  I gave you a realistic REAL world example.

Won't bother.

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 3:28 pm

I understand it mine.  I don't run around the forum demanding people to tell me who's words or what.  As a matter of fact you are the one that does that.  I believe the only moron that does.  What does that tell you?  It tells me you can't read.

I understand it mine

damn, you're a moron.

I don't run around the forum demanding people to tell me who's words or what. 

Lying little imbecile,

I can't get you to stipulate to your own words...what possible hope do I have of getting ANYWHERE with your endless demands?

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 3:29 pm

Won't bother.

Too many words for Darth Evader. LOl. Trust me, I don't expect you to read all of the argument I gave. You are too dense. That is way too much reading for you. 


1. Gravity's Rainbow...How's Grote coming along?

Pathetically predictable. Just pathetic. 

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 3:26 pm

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 2:36 pm

You're dumber than ****.....

Never, ever presume to dwarfslpain ANYTHING to anyone

So, we have destroyed your alleged counter argument concerning the number of magazines in circulation that will not fall under the law.  Let's move onto another point I made you did not address, simply calling it irrelevant which is your code that you have no clue what is being discussed.

Let's say this cheese law manages to pass.  Meaning no more magazines with 10 + round capacity.  You with me so far?  We will not be discussing clips. 

In this REAL world example I own a 380 EZ that I carry.  It is an 8+1 weapon.  I know you are not schooled in the terminology. That means the magazine carries 8 but I have one chambered when I carry it.  That is the +1 meaning I have nine ready to go.  In my front pocket I have another 8 round magazine.  That means I have 17 rounds.  Remember, it takes a second to change.  That is normally what I carry.

Now if I wanted too I could carry more.  I don't but I could.  I could put 2 magazines in each pocket.  That would be 4 mags x 8 =32.  You with me so far?  So, with the 9 in the weapon we are up to 41.  But wait, there is more.  

I have a shoulder holster I wear sometimes that has two magazine pouches.  Usually in the winter under a jacket.  Two more 8 round magazines = 16.  16 plus 41 is 57.  And no one would ever know.  And it is all perfectly legal under the law you support.  

So according to the law you support a person who was inclined (I am not) to do so could effectively shoot 57 people and the law has done nothing to stop it.  Just like the VA Tech shooting you claimed was irrelevant.  

That is how a man makes an argument Mr. Irrelevant.  I gave you a realistic REAL world example.  

 

 

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 3:29 pm

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 3:26 pm

So, we have destroyed your alleged counter argument concerning the number of magazines in circulation that will not fall under the law.  Let's move onto another point I made you did not address, simply calling it irrelevant which is your code that you have no clue what is being discussed.

Let's say this cheese law manages to pass.  Meaning no more magazines with 10 + round capacity.  You with me so far?  We will not be discussing clips. 

In this REAL world example I own a 380 EZ that I carry.  It is an 8+1 weapon.  I know you are not schooled in the terminology. That means the magazine carries 8 but I have one chambered when I carry it.  That is the +1 meaning I have nine ready to go.  In my front pocket I have another 8 round magazine.  That means I have 17 rounds.  Remember, it takes a second to change.  That is normally what I carry.

Now if I wanted too I could carry more.  I don't but I could.  I could put 2 magazines in each pocket.  That would be 4 mags x 8 =32.  You with me so far?  So, with the 9 in the weapon we are up to 41.  But wait, there is more.  

I have a shoulder holster I wear sometimes that has two magazine pouches.  Usually in the winter under a jacket.  Two more 8 round magazines = 16.  16 plus 41 is 57.  And no one would ever know.  And it is all perfectly legal under the law you support.  

So according to the law you support a person who was inclined (I am not) to do so could effectively shoot 57 people and the law has done nothing to stop it.  Just like the VA Tech shooting you claimed was irrelevant.  

That is how a man makes an argument Mr. Irrelevant.  I gave you a realistic REAL world example.

Won't bother.

 

Figured you wouldn't.  Too many words for you to figure out.  Plus, it destroys your alleged argument.

Let the record show BV surrendered on the topic.  The cheese law will not stop mass shootings.  This particular law is a knee jerk reaction by ignorant legislators.  

Realistic examples stymie BV.
 

Vegas » 21 Apr 2021, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 3:32 pm

Too many words for Darth Evader. LOl. Trust me, I don't expect you to read all of the argument I gave. You are too dense. That is way too much reading for you. 

1. Gravity's Rainbow...How's Grote coming along?

Pathetically predictable. Just pathetic.

No, it's gibberish....like the **** you post..

Never worth the effort.
 

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 3:33 pm

Figured you wouldn't.  Too many words for you to figure out.  Plus, it destroys your alleged argument.

Let the record show BV surrendered on the topic.  The cheese law will not stop mass shootings.  This particular law is a knee jerk reaction by ignorant legislators.  

Realistic examples stymie BV.

Dwarf, 

I have no reason to contest your fantasy life...you only "appear" to do things...

Who the **** knows, or even cares?
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 3:33 pm

No, it's gibberish....like the **** you post..

Never worth the effort.

You wouldn't know. You never read it. You saw that it was longer than 6 words, so you just crossed it all out and chalked it up to gibberish. 


Moron. Coward. 

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 3:32 pm

damn, you're a moron.

Lying little imbecile,

I can't get you to stipulate to your own words...what possible hope do I have of getting ANYWHERE with your endless demands?

I always stipulate in my own words.  As a matter fact, when you cherry pick, I post the comment with a link and acknowledge they are my words.  If you say otherwise you are a liar.  

You think you are some kinda Perry Mason or Matlock.  This is not a court a law, you are not a lawyer, and you have no questioning skills.  You do this to avoid making an argument.  Keep this in mind every time you use that tactic.

Today I acknowledged my words 5 **** times.

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 3:34 pm

Dwarf, 

I have no reason to contest your fantasy life...you only "appear" to do things...

Who the **** knows, or even cares?

That is not a fantasy, BV.  That is the real world.  A world you or the politicians are clueless about.  But I accept your surrender and acknowledge your defeat.

This law is cheese.  

You lose.  

Vegas » 21 Apr 2021, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 3:35 pm

You wouldn't know. You never read it. You saw that it was longer than 6 words, so you just crossed it all out and chalked it up to gibberish. 

Moron. Coward.

Be easy on the retard.  I just slammed dunked the **** out of his scrawny *** on the topic.  He is in tears at the moment 

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 3:37 pm

That is not a fantasy, BV.  That is the real world.  A world you or the politicians are clueless about.  But I accept your surrender and acknowledge your defeat.

This law is cheese.  

You lose.

Another loser rant.
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 3:33 pm

No, it's gibberish....like the **** you post..

Never worth the effort.

It is not gibberish.  It is real.  Do you need pictures and illustrations?  

Have a good cry. 

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 3:37 pm

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 3:34 pm

Dwarf, 

I have no reason to contest your fantasy life...you only "appear" to do things...

Who the **** knows, or even cares?

That is not a fantasy, BV.  That is the real world.  A world you or the politicians are clueless about.  But I accept your surrender and acknowledge your defeat.

This law is cheese.  

You lose.  

 

 

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 3:39 pm

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 3:37 pm

That is not a fantasy, BV.  That is the real world.  A world you or the politicians are clueless about.  But I accept your surrender and acknowledge your defeat.

This law is cheese.  

You lose.

Another loser rant.
 

 

I didn't lose.  I just slammed dunk the **** out of your argument.  
 

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 3:41 pm

I didn't lose.  I just slammed dunk the **** out of your argument.

Dwarf,

You don't understand what an argument is....it is entirely independent of your occasional ability to type 6 marginally intelligible sentence fragments.
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 3:44 pm

Dwarf,

You don't understand what an argument is....it is entirely independent of your occasional ability to type 6 marginally intelligible sentence fragments.

I just constructed an argument.  Go ahead and give a counter argument that refutes it.  You can't.  YOU HAVE BEEN WEIGHED, YOU HAVE BEEN MEASURED, AND YOU HAVE BEEN FOUND NOT WANTING

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 3:47 pm

I just constructed an argument.  Go ahead and give a counter argument that refutes it.  You can't.  YOU HAVE BEEN WEIGHED, YOU HAVE BEEN MEASURED, AND YOU HAVE BEEN FOUND NOT WANTING

Post what you understand to be the general structure of an argument.

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 3:48 pm

Post what you understand to be the general structure of an argument.

More demands.  I have made my point.  Your turn.  Plus, I have already done that.  Less round capacity?  Carry more magazines.