Liberal Forum

Huey » 20 Apr 2021, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Apr 2021, 1:02 pm

Attitudes like yours is why we have places in this country, like parts of Chicago, that are worse than Afghanistan.  T

supraTruth » 20 Apr 2021, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Apr 2021, 2:41 pm

No, it is u degenerate RNC gun scum that ensure that any gang banger can get a gun to murder that creates the likes of Chicago.

Huey » 19 Apr 2021, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2021, 10:12 am

Here is a link to the page of one of the sponsors:

https://degette.house.gov/media-center/ ... nationwide

They go on and on about high capacity magazines.  But the magic number is now 10.  As stated above many, if not most semi auto sidearms come with 10 or more rounds magazines.  So now the manufactures would have to retool their manufacturing process and produce 9 round magazines that firearm specific.  Good luck with that.

As I said, this bill is cheese.

Huey » 19 Apr 2021, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2021, 9:03 am

@Blackvegetable  mark your calendar 

https://www.19fortyfive.com/2021/04/hig ... dy-failed/

This new piece of gun control legislation would ban the sale, manufacture, transfer, importation, and even possession of firearms magazines that can hold more than ten rounds.Gun Magazine Ban: Why It Won’t WorkHowever, the Department of Justice (DoJ) conducted a study in 2004 that concluded that such a ban actually did little to reduce gun violence.“Should it be renewed, the ban’s effects on gun violence are likely to be small at best and perhaps too small for reliable measurement,” the study concluded.

Even it if it passes there is no way to control the number of magazines already in circulation.  Many, if not most, sidearms have magazines that hold well over 10 rounds.  Additionally, if your mass shooter is a law abiding sort he will just carry MORE magazines.  Only takes a second.  Take the VA Tech shooter.  He killed 33 and shot 17 others with two handguns.

FOS » 20 Apr 2021, 6:25 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Apr 2021, 6:25 pm

The entire argument from the left about gun control is very easily destroyed with one simple statistic: how many legal gun owners commit gun crime.

That is it. The argument need not go any deeper than that. The only thing that more 'educated' lefties will cite is suicide. As if they care about law abiding white middle aged men commiting suicide. 

But I personally think people should be allowed to kill themselves if they want, since the left has managed to make life intolerable anyway.

The entire argument from the left about gun control is very easily destroyed with one simple statistic: how many legal gun owners commit gun crime.

Blackvegetable » 20 Apr 2021, 6:44 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Apr 2021, 6:44 pm

A nematode has 4....FOUR nerves, each terminating at its multifunction orifice.

FOS » 20 Apr 2021, 6:48 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Apr 2021, 6:48 pm

Are you jealous?

Blackvegetable » 20 Apr 2021, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Apr 2021, 6:11 pm

You ASSERT that the bill is "Cheese", but you only cite the qualified 17 year old conclusion of a DoJ under an ammosexual administration.

The rest is rant.

Get caught with a 10+ round mag?.

You are "cell block cutie"..

FOS » 20 Apr 2021, 6:25 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Apr 2021, 6:25 pm

The entire argument from the left about gun control is very easily destroyed with one simple statistic: how many legal gun owners commit gun crime.

That is it. The argument need not go any deeper than that. The only thing that more 'educated' lefties will cite is suicide. As if they care about law abiding white middle aged men commiting suicide. 

But I personally think people should be allowed to kill themselves if they want, since the left has managed to make life intolerable anyway.

Blackvegetable » 20 Apr 2021, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Apr 2021, 6:11 pm

You ASSERT that the bill is "Cheese", but you only cite the qualified 17 year old conclusion of a DoJ under an ammosexual administration.

The rest is rant.

Get caught with a 10+ round mag?.

You are "cell block cutie"..

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 6:30 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 6:30 am

I asserted a number of things:
1.  There are too many in circulation.

2.  Many, if not most, sidearms have magazines that hold well over 10 rounds.

3.   Additionally, if your mass shooter is a law abiding sort he will just carry MORE magazines.  Only takes a second.  

4.  Take the VA Tech shooter.  He killed 33 and shot 17 others with two handguns.

Do you have an argument to counter those assertion?  I'll answer.  Nope, you don't.

There are too many in circulation

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 7:41 am

That's not an argument or evidence.

2 is irrelevant

3 is irrelevant

4 is irrelevant

There is no "Argument"..

It's just a rant.

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 5:14 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 5:14 am

You are dumb.

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 7:46 am

If you are saying there are not too many in circulation than you do not need to be in this discussion.

#2 is certainly relevant.  Again, you are ignorant of the topic.  When you buy a magazine fed semi automatic rifle it comes, in many cases,  TWO magazines.  And I would say most of those are between 10 and 20 rounds.  

#3 is how the VA Tech shooter shot 50 people.  He brought extra magazines that only take a second to change.  Knock the number down to 9 rounds and that so you bring more magazines.  

#4.  See number 3.

If you have an argument in favor of this bill please bring it on.  If not, you are trolling like yesterday and the day before.  Well, most of your time here is spent trolling.

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 7:48 am

Repeating your Stupid doesn't make it less Stupid.

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 7:51 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 7:51 am

I guess we are done on this thread.  You are simply trolling.  You don't have an argument.

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 7:53 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 7:53 am

No, Dwarf..

I have debunked a piece of **** you celebrated as "Argument".

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 7:57 am

No, you ranted about it, deemed everything about it as irrelevant and made a general *** of yourself.

Since you did not read the article provided I will enlighten you.  The bill does not affect magazines already in circulation.  If this cheese bill managed to pass all those magazines already in possession are not going to be confiscated.  They just can't be sold or transferred.  So the bill is cheese.  

Did you say something about being irrelevant?

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 8:00 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 8:00 am

No...I separated the crap from the only "evidence"..