Liberal Forum

Huey » 19 Apr 2021, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2021, 9:03 am

@Blackvegetable  mark your calendar 

https://www.19fortyfive.com/2021/04/hig ... dy-failed/

This new piece of gun control legislation would ban the sale, manufacture, transfer, importation, and even possession of firearms magazines that can hold more than ten rounds.Gun Magazine Ban: Why It Won’t WorkHowever, the Department of Justice (DoJ) conducted a study in 2004 that concluded that such a ban actually did little to reduce gun violence.“Should it be renewed, the ban’s effects on gun violence are likely to be small at best and perhaps too small for reliable measurement,” the study concluded.

Even it if it passes there is no way to control the number of magazines already in circulation.  Many, if not most, sidearms have magazines that hold well over 10 rounds.  Additionally, if your mass shooter is a law abiding sort he will just carry MORE magazines.  Only takes a second.  Take the VA Tech shooter.  He killed 33 and shot 17 others with two handguns.

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:23 am

It isn't an argument, dwarf..

You have no idea what one looks like..

Which makes you so Usefool.

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:30 am

Remember when they tried to keep grandma from feeling the power of 400 rpm by banning sporting thing bump stocks, and we sent them running by arguing that a belt buckle will do the same thing?

Ammosexuals are the dumbest **** alive.

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:30 am

Not if you need trunk to move them.  You should have read my argument, cheese boy.

In order for you to even attempt to make a point you have to go with an unrealistic example, fiction.  I gave you a real world example.  You lose.  As Usual.

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:31 am

Have a nice day, forrest.  Bump stocks are not part of the conversation.

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:32 am

Why?

You wouldn't see it coming, even less so than the guy carrying 8 9 round magazines..

And he could wear 2 belts...

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:31 am

Have a nice day, forrest.  Bump stocks are not part of the conversation.

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:32 am

Your stupid very much is, though....

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:33 am

Go ahead and try it, Forrest.

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:34 am

How is the belt buckle "argument" IN ANY WAY different from the tripe you claim is an argument..

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:34 am

No, Forrest, your idiotic examples are pretty stupid.  

You may have the last word unless you formulate a realistic counter to my argument about the OP.

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:39 am

Dwarf,

The fact that a belt buckle can conceivably be used to make an AR15 sporting thing perform in the manner for which it was originally designed, was not deemed reason to keep them alive.

This is the direct analog for your multiple mag line...

And rather than PREDICTING a result, we can look back and check Reality.

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:35 am

The gelt buckle method is highly inaccurate and can't be performed with a hand gun which is the example in my argument.  Do you not know what a 380 is?

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:40 am

The AR 15 sport rifle was originally designed as a semi automatic with one shot for one trigger pull.  

You got the dumb post of the day award.

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:41 am

It's not about a handgun, dwarf..

It is about the "point" of your "argument"....and how readily you idiots bleat what you are spoonfed.

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:42 am

Your chronic inability to read is indeed a source of endless mirth......along with my sig.

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:42 am

Ok, it is your argument reframe boy.  You realize you need magazines.

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:44 am

Go ahead and start a thread explaining how the AR 15 Semiautomatic was not originally designed to a one trigger squeeze one shot weapon.  Use PG if you like.

not originally designed

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:40 am

The AR 15 sport rifle was originally designed as a semi automatic with one shot for one trigger pull.  

You got the dumb post of the day award.

Your welcome for the english lesson.

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:45 am

Dwarf,

That is not a "reframe"..

It is about your argument.

The fact that you can carry 4 of one thing isn't at all relevant to any other thing.