Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:46 am

It wasn't "designed", it was modified.

Apparently.

**** idiot.

The original AR 15 was designed for civilian use specifically as a semiautomatic.  You are confused with the M16 that was designed for the military.  Read my sig.  Are you going to start that thread considering you have hijacked this one?

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:48 am

That cup's retired..

Are these your words?

Not relevant.  You are going to have start a thread and bring forth the supporting documents and links and make an argument.

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:51 am

Not relevant.  You are going to have start a thread and bring forth the supporting documents and links and make an argument.

Not relevant.  You are going to have

leaves the mind reeling.

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:50 am

The original AR 15 was designed for civilian use specifically as a semiautomatic.  You are confused with the M16 that was designed for the military.  Read my sig.  Are you going to start that thread considering you have hijacked this one?

The original AR 15 was designed for civilian use specifically as a semiautomatic.

False.

 

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 9:01 am

False.

Prove it.  

Vegasgiants » 22 Apr 2021, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:59 am

The problem is many states dont have that law einstein

I have a feeling you are lying anyway because you alluded to the fact in the past  that you live in Nevada.  You said you can buy any weapon with out a background check from the gun shows you go to.  That is a lie since Jan 2020.  You also lied when you said you could buy from an FFL without a UBC.  That is a lie.  Federal Law says you are lying.  



 

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 9:09 am

Prove it.

AR.


 

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 9:14 am

AR.

Yeah, Armalite.  That is what that stands for.  Not assault rifle. 

Even if you were correct, and you are not, todays semiautomatic weapons are designed for civilian use.  Not the battlefield. 

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 9:15 am

Yeah, Armalite.  That is what that stands for.  Not assault rifle. 

Even if you were correct, and you are not, todays semiautomatic weapons are designed for civilian use.  Not the battlefield.

Yeah, Armalite.

Exactly....the ORIGINAL.

Even if you were correct

I am..

We can stop right there.
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 9:19 am

Exactly....the ORIGINAL.

I am..

We can stop right there.

As usual, you leave out part of the story.  Colt purchased the AR 15 from Amarillite when they ran out of money.  After some tweaks it was sold to the Military as teh M16.  Colt retained the copyright for the name.  Then designed a Semi Auto specifically for civilians and Law Enforcement.  A single shot per trigger squeeze.  They needed to name it something so they used the AR 15 name.  

If that weapon was the same as the M16 it never would have gotten the blessing of the Government o market it specifically to civilians. 

Modern Rifles are designed specifically for civilians and have no battlefield applications.  

We can stop right there. 

And you can stop with the Forrest Gump routine and return to the topic you are diverting from.

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 9:19 am

Exactly....the ORIGINAL.

I am..

We can stop right there.

Why Americans Are Buying Up AR-15s At A Record Pace

According to new data from firearms auction site GunBroker.com, which publishes its top-selling firearms on a month-to-month basis and is compiled by the NRA’s American Hunter, the Smith & Wesson M&P 15 Sport II was the top-selling semi-automatic rifle in March. It was followed by the Ruger AR-556 and the Colt AR-15. Clearly, the AR platform continues to sell despite calls from President Joe Biden as well as Democratic lawmakers to ban firearms, which they’ve erroneously labeled as “assault rifles” and “weapons of war.”

AR-15 Sales: Why the Spike? One factor is likely, that if such a ban were to be pushed through private ownership it would likely be “grandfathered” in. There have been calls for a federal buyback program, but lawmakers have indicated those already in private hands wouldn’t be ceased and owners wouldn’t be required to take part in the buyback.

 Such a compromise was already made with the 1994 Assault Weapon Ban (AWB), whereby no newly made AR-15s could be sold to consumers, but existing ones weren’t made illegal and owners could keep the guns they already had. Given that fact, it is easy to see why ARs could be hot sellers and may remain so in the weeks and months to come.Colt, which had actually exited the civilian AR market in 2019, made a sudden about face last year as sales of firearms picked up.

https://www.19fortyfive.com/2021/04/why ... cord-pace/

Rotsa Ruck, BV.  
 
 
 

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 9:46 am

Why Americans Are Buying Up AR-15s At A Record Pace

According to new data from firearms auction site GunBroker.com, which publishes its top-selling firearms on a month-to-month basis and is compiled by the NRA’s American Hunter, the Smith & Wesson M&P 15 Sport II was the top-selling semi-automatic rifle in March. It was followed by the Ruger AR-556 and the Colt AR-15. Clearly, the AR platform continues to sell despite calls from President Joe Biden as well as Democratic lawmakers to ban firearms, which they’ve erroneously labeled as “assault rifles” and “weapons of war.”

AR-15 Sales: Why the Spike? One factor is likely, that if such a ban were to be pushed through private ownership it would likely be “grandfathered” in. There have been calls for a federal buyback program, but lawmakers have indicated those already in private hands wouldn’t be ceased and owners wouldn’t be required to take part in the buyback.

 Such a compromise was already made with the 1994 Assault Weapon Ban (AWB), whereby no newly made AR-15s could be sold to consumers, but existing ones weren’t made illegal and owners could keep the guns they already had. Given that fact, it is easy to see why ARs could be hot sellers and may remain so in the weeks and months to come.Colt, which had actually exited the civilian AR market in 2019, made a sudden about face last year as sales of firearms picked up.

https://www.19fortyfive.com/2021/04/why ... cord-pace/

Rotsa Ruck, BV.

Diversion, right?

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 10:00 am

Diversion, right?

As you would say this is my thread.  I am simply going down fork in the road you took.  Plus, I added the part of the AR 15 story YOU always leave out.

Next, today's AR 15s are not the AER 15 Sporter of 1964.  Different manufactures, different design, etc.

Since you are stuck on the name I will not argue with you concerning the AR 15 Sporter.  Your argument does not pertain to any modern day weapon.  Here is the pic:




But not this one.  It is a Ruger 556, not related to Armalite, the M16, or the AR 15 Sporter.  It was designed specifically for civilian use.  


 

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 10:06 am

As you would say this is my thread.  I am simply going down fork in the road you took.  Plus, I added the part of the AR 15 story YOU always leave out.

Next, today's AR 15s are not the AER 15 Sporter of 1964.  Different manufactures, different design, etc.

Since you are stuck on the name I will not argue with you concerning the AR 15 Sporter.  Your argument does not pertain to any modern day weapon.  Here is the pic:



But not this one.  It is a Ruger 556, not related to Armalite, the M16, or the AR 15 Sporter.  It was designed specifically for civilian use.  

It's uncanny...

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 9:27 am

As usual, you leave out part of the story. Colt purchased the AR 15 from Amarillite when they ran out of money.  After some tweaks it was sold to the Military as teh M16.  Colt retained the copyright for the name.  Then designed a Semi Auto specifically for civilians and Law Enforcement.  A single shot per trigger squeeze.  They needed to name it something so they used the AR 15 name.  

If that weapon was the same as the M16 it never would have gotten the blessing of the Government o market it specifically to civilians. 

Modern Rifles are designed specifically for civilians and have no battlefield applications.  

We can stop right there. 

And you can stop with the Forrest Gump routine and return to the topic you are diverting from.

it is not relevant to the question.

Learn to focus, loser....perhaps the Streak might end.
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 11:08 am

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 10:06 am

As you would say this is my thread.  I am simply going down fork in the road you took.  Plus, I added the part of the AR 15 story YOU always leave out.

Next, today's AR 15s are not the AER 15 Sporter of 1964.  Different manufactures, different design, etc.

Since you are stuck on the name I will not argue with you concerning the AR 15 Sporter.  Your argument does not pertain to any modern day weapon.  Here is the pic:



But not this one.  It is a Ruger 556, not related to Armalite, the M16, or the AR 15 Sporter.  It was designed specifically for civilian use.  

It's uncanny...

 

 

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 11:10 am

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 9:27 am

As usual, you leave out part of the story. Colt purchased the AR 15 from Amarillite when they ran out of money.  After some tweaks it was sold to the Military as teh M16.  Colt retained the copyright for the name.  Then designed a Semi Auto specifically for civilians and Law Enforcement.  A single shot per trigger squeeze.  They needed to name it something so they used the AR 15 name.  

If that weapon was the same as the M16 it never would have gotten the blessing of the Government o market it specifically to civilians. 

Modern Rifles are designed specifically for civilians and have no battlefield applications.  

We can stop right there. 

And you can stop with the Forrest Gump routine and return to the topic you are diverting from.

it is not relevant to the question.

Learn to focus, loser....perhaps the Streak might end.
 

 

Learn to focus.  You argument is the AR 15 Sporter should be banned because you claim it was designed for the battlefield because you claim it comes from the M16 family.  Well go ahead and ban it.  You are wrong but go for it.  

The weapon I posted is not a colt, not related to the sporter or the M16 and was not based on a design for the battelfield.  It was designed SPECIFICALLY for civilian use.  Not the battlefield.  You using your faulty logic it is a good weapon. 

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 11:15 am

Learn to focus.  You argument is the AR 15 Sporter should be banned because you claim it was designed for the battlefield because you claim it comes from the M16 family.  Well go ahead and ban it.  You are wrong but go for it.  

The weapon I posted is not a colt, not related to the sporter or the M16 and was not based on a design for the battelfield.  It was designed SPECIFICALLY for civilian use.  Not the battlefield.  You using your faulty logic it is a good weapon.

The Sporter plays no part in MY argument.

We need not go any further..

 

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 11:15 am

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 11:08 am

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 10:06 am

As you would say this is my thread.  I am simply going down fork in the road you took.  Plus, I added the part of the AR 15 story YOU always leave out.

Next, today's AR 15s are not the AER 15 Sporter of 1964.  Different manufactures, different design, etc.

Since you are stuck on the name I will not argue with you concerning the AR 15 Sporter.  Your argument does not pertain to any modern day weapon.  Here is the pic:



But not this one.  It is a Ruger 556, not related to Armalite, the M16, or the AR 15 Sporter.  It was designed specifically for civilian use.  

It's uncanny...


 

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 11:10 am

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 9:27 am

As usual, you leave out part of the story. Colt purchased the AR 15 from Amarillite when they ran out of money.  After some tweaks it was sold to the Military as teh M16.  Colt retained the copyright for the name.  Then designed a Semi Auto specifically for civilians and Law Enforcement.  A single shot per trigger squeeze.  They needed to name it something so they used the AR 15 name.  

If that weapon was the same as the M16 it never would have gotten the blessing of the Government o market it specifically to civilians. 

Modern Rifles are designed specifically for civilians and have no battlefield applications.  

We can stop right there. 

And you can stop with the Forrest Gump routine and return to the topic you are diverting from.

it is not relevant to the question.

Learn to focus, loser....perhaps the Streak might end.
 


 

Learn to focus.  You argument is the AR 15 Sporter should be banned because you claim it was designed for the battlefield because you claim it comes from the M16 family.  Well go ahead and ban it.  You are wrong but go for it.  

The weapon I posted is not a colt, not related to the sporter or the M16 and was not based on a design for the battelfield.  It was designed SPECIFICALLY for civilian use.  Not the battlefield.  You using your faulty logic it is a good weapon. 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 11:17 am

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 11:15 am

Learn to focus.  You argument is the AR 15 Sporter should be banned because you claim it was designed for the battlefield because you claim it comes from the M16 family.  Well go ahead and ban it.  You are wrong but go for it.  

The weapon I posted is not a colt, not related to the sporter or the M16 and was not based on a design for the battelfield.  It was designed SPECIFICALLY for civilian use.  Not the battlefield.  You using your faulty logic it is a good weapon.

The Sporter plays no part in MY argument.

We need not go any further..

 

 

Learn to focus.  This really is uncanny.  The sporter, ****, is the weapon YOU claim was originally designed for the battlefiled.  I will repost your words. 

Yes, we need to continue because you are ignorant.  I am not going to say your lying because you are too stupid concerning the topic. 
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 9:01 am

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:50 am

The original AR 15 was designed for civilian use specifically as a semiautomatic.  You are confused with the M16 that was designed for the military.  Read my sig.  Are you going to start that thread considering you have hijacked this one?

The original AR 15 was designed for civilian use specifically as a semiautomatic.

False.

 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 9:14 am

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 9:09 am

Prove it.

AR.


 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 9:19 am

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 9:15 am

Yeah, Armalite.  That is what that stands for.  Not assault rifle. 

Even if you were correct, and you are not, todays semiautomatic weapons are designed for civilian use.  Not the battlefield.

Yeah, Armalite.

Exactly....the ORIGINAL.

Even if you were correct

I am..

We can stop right there.
 

 

Idiot, the original AR 15 marketed to civilians was the Sporter.
 

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 11:21 am

Idiot, the original AR 15 marketed to civilians was the Sporter.

Are these your words?

The original AR 15 was designed for civilian use

Asshole.