Liberal Forum

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 8:42 am

You have sent me so much spam this morning. (11 old threads, plus an attempt to hijack another thread) it got lost in the ****.

 
 

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 8:42 am

You have sent me so much spam this morning. (11 old threads, plus an attempt to hijack another thread) it got lost in the ****.

Nah...

You're a **** moron.
 

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 8:43 am

Dwarf,

Acknowledge that you have been COMPLETELY wrong on the subject of the Sporter.

I'm not indulging yet ANOTHER uninformed diversion.

No, I am not wrong on the Sporter.  It is a semi automatic that was designed for civilians.  What was modified on the Sporter?  I'll repost your comment.  

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 8:45 am

No, I am not wrong on the Sporter.  It is a semi automatic that was designed for civilians.  What was modified on the Sporter?  I'll repost your comment.

No, I am not wrong on the Sporter.

The AR-15 Sporter-1 (SP1) is a semi-automatic variant of the AR-15 series of assault rifles.

Define "variant", Verbal..

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 8:45 am

Nah...

You're a **** moron.

I have 30 Notifications from you this morning.  Over half unsolicited.  All since 0720.  You only have 17 from me.  

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 8:48 am

Define "variant", Verbal..

I have not argued the point.

You said it is a semi automatic and it was was modified.

What was modified?

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 8:49 am

I have 30 Notifications from you this morning.  Over half unsolicited.  All since 0720.  You only have 17 from me.

Do you want to go over the data?

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 1:58 pm

The original AR15 was designed for combat. The AR15 Sporter was a very short lived VERSION of the original design, modified to make it legal for civilan sale.

The "Colt AR15 style" sporting thing is a semiautomatic variant of the M-16 - a weapon designed for combat, borrowing many principles of the original AR15 design.

Period.

Done...

Shut the **** up now.

What was modified?

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 8:50 am

I have not argued the point.

You said it is a semi automatic and it was was modified.

What was modified?

Are these your words?

It is a semi automatic that was designed for civilians. 

Why do you continue to say this when you admit that it is false?

Vegasgiants » 23 Apr 2021, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 8:51 am

The trigger assembly

And it's not relevant..


It's just another Dwarfism.
 

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 8:50 am

Do you want to go over the data?

I just went over the data for today. 

Now, today's semi automatics are not variants of the M16.  Why should they be banned?  And what was modified on the Sporter to make it legal to sell to civilians?

Why you running from the questions, Forrest?  They are in reference to your own words? 

 

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 8:51 am

What was modified?

Why are you asking?

If you concede that it is modified, you admit you lost.

 

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 8:53 am

I just went over the data for today. 

Now, today's semi automatics are not variants of the M16.  Why should they be banned?  And what was modified on the Sporter to make it legal to sell to civilians?

Why you running from the questions, Forrest?  They are in reference to your own words?

I just went over the data for today. 

we're gonna need a definition of "cherry picked"

Now, today's semi automatics are not variants of the M16

Stop making assertions you know are false.

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 8:54 am

Why are you asking?

If you concede that it is modified, you admit you lost.

The modification is the most important part of your argument.  The modification is what changes it from a battlefield weapon to a weapon designed for civilians.  If you can't tell what was modified and how it affected function you have no argument. 

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 8:55 am

we're gonna need a definition of "cherry picked"

Stop making assertions you know are false.

Show that they are.  Prove it false.  They are simply semi automatics with metal and plastic pieces that make them look scary.  You proved that when you said the Ruger Mini that looks military should be banned but were ok with the same exact weapon looked like a hunting rifle.  

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 8:58 am

Show that they are.  Prove it false.  They are simply semi automatics with metal and plastic pieces that make them look scary.  You proved that when you said the Ruger Mini that looks military should be banned but were ok with the same exact weapon looked like a hunting rifle.

The AR-15 Sporter-1 (SP1) is a semi-automatic variant of the AR-15 series of assault rifles.

You proved that when you said

Diversion PLUS retelling.

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 9:00 am

The AR-15 Sporter-1 (SP1) is a semi-automatic variant of the AR-15 series of assault rifles.

Diversion PLUS retelling.

What was modified?

These are your words:

The Ruger Mini 14 IS about functionality...the AR15 is about Rambocosplay...

For you it is all about looks. 

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 9:02 am

What was modified?

These are your words:

The Ruger Mini 14 IS about functionality...the AR15 is about Rambocosplay...

For you it is all about looks.

What was modified?

Irrelevant, Askholio

These are your words:

The Ruger Mini 14 IS about functionality...the AR15 is about Rambocosplay...

​​​​​Yes.


Notice how a Man does that, Sheilagh.

These are yours.

For you it is all about looks.

Never, ever confuse the two.

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 9:09 am

Irrelevant, Askholio

The Ruger Mini 14 IS about functionality...the AR15 is about Rambocosplay...

​​​​​Yes.

Notice how a Man does that, Sheilagh.

These are yours.

Never, ever confuse the two.

It is all about appearance for you.

The modification is what makes one a weapon for the battlefield or a weapon for civilians.  The reason the M16 was a battlefield weapon was because it had the automatic selection.  The Sporter did not.  THAT was the modification.  It no longer functioned as a battlefield weapon.

And todays semi auto are purpose built for civilians.  They are not variants of the Sporter or M16.

Your Welcome.  

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 8:56 am

The modification is the most important part of your argument.  The modification is what changes it from a battlefield weapon to a weapon designed for civilians.  If you can't tell what was modified and how it affected function you have no argument.

 

The modification is the most important part of your argument

Which argument is that, Dwarf?

The modification is what changes it from a battlefield weapon to a weapon designed for civilians

no..

That's gibberish.

It is DESIGNED then MODIFIED.

It is not DESIGNED by a MODIFICATION.

Nod.