Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 10:29 am

Why the rewrite, Verbal?

Take your self inflicted beating like the dumb yapping little bitch you are....

My last few posts have completely curb stomped you to the point you need to seek help for that sucking head wound.  ALL the parts that are needed for a combat weapon were redesigned for the civilian sporter.  As I have demonstrated the Sporter WAS NOT designed for combat.  All the parts necessary was removed and redesigned.  

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 10:38 am

My last few posts have completely curb stomped you to the point you need to seek help for that sucking head wound.  ALL the parts that are needed for a combat weapon were redesigned for the civilian sporter.  As I have demonstrated the Sporter WAS NOT designed for combat.  All the parts necessary was removed and redesigned.

Dwarf,

You just committed hueycide by google again..

Why do you persist in a spin that is REPEATEDLY and CONSISTENTLY debunked, even by your own citations?
 

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 10:51 am

Dwarf,

You just committed hueycide by google again..

Why do you persist in a spin that is REPEATEDLY and CONSISTENTLY debunked, even by your own citations?

My last few posts have completely curb stomped you to the point you need to seek help for that sucking head wound.  ALL the parts that are needed for a combat weapon were redesigned for the civilian sporter.  As I have demonstrated the Sporter WAS NOT designed for combat.  All the parts necessary was removed and redesigned.
 

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 10:52 am

My last few posts have completely curb stomped you to the point you need to seek help for that sucking head wound.  ALL the parts that are needed for a combat weapon were redesigned for the civilian sporter.  As I have demonstrated the Sporter WAS NOT designed for combat.  All the parts necessary was removed and redesigned.

Regardless of how many times you rebleat the same lie, it won't change what your citations make clear.

You can get jiggy with words all you want, but you're clearly a moron, so no one cares.
 

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 10:57 am

Regardless of how many times you rebleat the same lie, it won't change what your citations make clear.

You can get jiggy with words all you want, but you're clearly a moron, so no one cares.

My citation makes clear that the Civilian Sporter was not designed for the battlefield.  It is a completely different weapon than the M16.  ****, you don't even know what those parts do.  
Now, the M16 was designed for the battlefield. Not the Sporter.  

Everytime you respond with your **** I repost the facts for you. 

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 10:59 am

My citation makes clear that the Civilian Sporter was not designed for the battlefield.  It is a completely different weapon than the M16.  ****, you don't even know what those parts do.  
Now, the M16 was designed for the battlefield. Not the Sporter.  

Everytime you respond with your **** I repost the facts for you.

No...it does not..


 

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:07 am

No...it does not..

I have already posted multiple citations saying the Sporter was designed for Civilians.

You have posted none that says it was designed for the battlefield.

You have posted nothing of what you claimed was modified.

The M16 fired a 5.56.  The Sporter fired a .223.  

The barrel twist was different.  

This will help you:

Comparison to military versions

The primary distinction between civilian semi-automatic rifles (no longer manufactured by Colt for civilian use) and military models is select fire. Military rifles were produced with firing modes, semi-automatic fire and either fully automatic fire mode or burst fire mode, in which the rifle fires three rounds in succession when the trigger is depressed. Most components are interchangeable between semi-auto and select fire rifles including magazines, sights, upper receiver, barrels and accessories.[19][20] The military M4 carbine typically uses a 14.5-inch (370 mm) barrel. Civilian rifles commonly have 16-inch or longer barrels to comply with the National Firearms Act.[21]In order to prevent a civilian semi-automatic AR-15 from being readily converted for use with the select fire components, Colt changed a number of features. Parts changed include the lower receiver, bolt carrier, hammer, trigger, disconnector, and safety/mode selector. The semi-automatic bolt carrier has a longer lightening slot to prevent the bolt's engagement with an automatic sear. Due to a decrease in mass the buffer spring is heavier. On the select fire version, the hammer has an extra spur which interacts with the additional auto-sear that holds it back until the bolt carrier group is fully in battery, when automatic fire is selected.[22] Using a portion of the select fire parts in a semi-automatic rifle will not enable a select fire option.[23] As designed by Colt the pins supporting the semi-auto trigger and hammer in the lower receiver are larger than those used in the military rifle to prevent interchangeability between semi-automatic and select fire components.[24]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colt_AR-15

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 10:35 am

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 10:23 am

I did..

That says nothing about design.

But this part of your citation DOES.

Due to financial problems, and limitations in terms of manpower and production capacity, ArmaLite sold the AR-15 design and the AR-15 trademark along with the ArmaLite AR-10 to Colt's Manufacturing Company in 1959.[4] Colt started selling the semi-automatic version of the M16 rifle as the Colt AR-15 in 1964.[5][6][7] 

Nod.

This is the lower receiver:


That was redesigned.

This is the bolt carrier:



That was redesigned

This is the trigger group.  That was redesigned:



That is everything that makes a rifle an automatic battlefield weapon.  Even the barrell twist was different.  Remember, the Sporter did not fire 5.56.  It fired .223.

The first difference is the higher pressure level of the 5.56 NATO cartridge which runs at approximately 58,000 psi. A 223 Remington is loaded to approximately 55,000 psi. The second and most important difference between the two is the fact that a 5.56 NATO chamber has a . 125” longer throat.

You increase the chance of jamming if you use the wrong ammo.  The 5.56 was designed for combat and the higher pressure needed to cycle the bolt in combat.  
 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:07 am

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 10:59 am

My citation makes clear that the Civilian Sporter was not designed for the battlefield.  It is a completely different weapon than the M16.  ****, you don't even know what those parts do.  
Now, the M16 was designed for the battlefield. Not the Sporter.  

Everytime you respond with your **** I repost the facts for you.

No...it does not..


 

 

 

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:13 am

 

Yap....yap....yap...


Every single citation says you are wrong..

Every single one.
 

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:15 am

Yap....yap....yap...

Every single citation says you are wrong..

Every single one.

No, it doesn't.  If the Sporter was designed for the battlefield (it wasn't) they would not have had to come up with the civilian model.  They would have just sold the M16 as is as opposed to the major redesign.  

Duh!  Ivy league my ***. 

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:13 am

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 10:35 am

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 10:23 am

I did..

That says nothing about design.

But this part of your citation DOES.

Due to financial problems, and limitations in terms of manpower and production capacity, ArmaLite sold the AR-15 design and the AR-15 trademark along with the ArmaLite AR-10 to Colt's Manufacturing Company in 1959.[4] Colt started selling the semi-automatic version of the M16 rifle as the Colt AR-15 in 1964.[5][6][7] 

Nod.

This is the lower receiver:


That was redesigned.

This is the bolt carrier:



That was redesigned

This is the trigger group.  That was redesigned:



That is everything that makes a rifle an automatic battlefield weapon.  Even the barrell twist was different.  Remember, the Sporter did not fire 5.56.  It fired .223.

The first difference is the higher pressure level of the 5.56 NATO cartridge which runs at approximately 58,000 psi. A 223 Remington is loaded to approximately 55,000 psi. The second and most important difference between the two is the fact that a 5.56 NATO chamber has a . 125” longer throat.

You increase the chance of jamming if you use the wrong ammo.  The 5.56 was designed for combat and the higher pressure needed to cycle the bolt in combat.  
 


 

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:07 am

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 10:59 am

My citation makes clear that the Civilian Sporter was not designed for the battlefield.  It is a completely different weapon than the M16.  ****, you don't even know what those parts do.  
Now, the M16 was designed for the battlefield. Not the Sporter.  

Everytime you respond with your **** I repost the facts for you.

No...it does not..


 


 

 

 

@Blackvegetable  

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:13 am

I have already posted multiple citations saying the Sporter was designed for Civilians.

Due to financial problems, and limitations in terms of manpower and production capacity, ArmaLite sold the AR-15 design and the AR-15 trademark along with the ArmaLite AR-10 to Colt's Manufacturing Company in 1959.[4] Colt started selling the semi-automatic version of the M16 rifle as the Colt AR-15 in 1964.[5][6][7]
 

FIFY...

Your argument is debunked by your own source - even if you can't process that emotionally, 37X.
 

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:13 am

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:07 am

No...it does not..

I have already posted multiple citations saying the Sporter was designed for Civilians.

You have posted none that says it was designed for the battlefield.

You have posted nothing of what you claimed was modified.

The M16 fired a 5.56.  The Sporter fired a .223.  

The barrel twist was different.  

This will help you:

Comparison to military versions

The primary distinction between civilian semi-automatic rifles (no longer manufactured by Colt for civilian use) and military models is select fire. Military rifles were produced with firing modes, semi-automatic fire and either fully automatic fire mode or burst fire mode, in which the rifle fires three rounds in succession when the trigger is depressed. Most components are interchangeable between semi-auto and select fire rifles including magazines, sights, upper receiver, barrels and accessories.[19][20] The military M4 carbine typically uses a 14.5-inch (370 mm) barrel. Civilian rifles commonly have 16-inch or longer barrels to comply with the National Firearms Act.[21]In order to prevent a civilian semi-automatic AR-15 from being readily converted for use with the select fire components, Colt changed a number of features. Parts changed include the lower receiver, bolt carrier, hammer, trigger, disconnector, and safety/mode selector. The semi-automatic bolt carrier has a longer lightening slot to prevent the bolt's engagement with an automatic sear. Due to a decrease in mass the buffer spring is heavier. On the select fire version, the hammer has an extra spur which interacts with the additional auto-sear that holds it back until the bolt carrier group is fully in battery, when automatic fire is selected.[22] Using a portion of the select fire parts in a semi-automatic rifle will not enable a select fire option.[23] As designed by Colt the pins supporting the semi-auto trigger and hammer in the lower receiver are larger than those used in the military rifle to prevent interchangeability between semi-automatic and select fire components.[24]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colt_AR-15

@Blackvegetable  
 

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:20 am

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:13 am

I have already posted multiple citations saying the Sporter was designed for Civilians.

Due to financial problems, and limitations in terms of manpower and production capacity, ArmaLite sold the AR-15 design and the AR-15 trademark along with the ArmaLite AR-10 to Colt's Manufacturing Company in 1959.[4] Colt started selling the semi-automatic version of the M16 rifle as the Colt AR-15 in 1964.[5][6][7]

 

FIFY...

Your argument is debunked by your own source - even if you can't process that emotionally, 37X.
 

 

 

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:13 am

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:07 am

No...it does not..

I have already posted multiple citations saying the Sporter was designed for Civilians.

You have posted none that says it was designed for the battlefield.

You have posted nothing of what you claimed was modified.

The M16 fired a 5.56.  The Sporter fired a .223.  

The barrel twist was different.  

This will help you:

Comparison to military versions

The primary distinction between civilian semi-automatic rifles (no longer manufactured by Colt for civilian use) and military models is select fire. Military rifles were produced with firing modes, semi-automatic fire and either fully automatic fire mode or burst fire mode, in which the rifle fires three rounds in succession when the trigger is depressed. Most components are interchangeable between semi-auto and select fire rifles including magazines, sights, upper receiver, barrels and accessories.[19][20] The military M4 carbine typically uses a 14.5-inch (370 mm) barrel. Civilian rifles commonly have 16-inch or longer barrels to comply with the National Firearms Act.[21]In order to prevent a civilian semi-automatic AR-15 from being readily converted for use with the select fire components, Colt changed a number of features. Parts changed include the lower receiver, bolt carrier, hammer, trigger, disconnector, and safety/mode selector. The semi-automatic bolt carrier has a longer lightening slot to prevent the bolt's engagement with an automatic sear. Due to a decrease in mass the buffer spring is heavier. On the select fire version, the hammer has an extra spur which interacts with the additional auto-sear that holds it back until the bolt carrier group is fully in battery, when automatic fire is selected.[22] Using a portion of the select fire parts in a semi-automatic rifle will not enable a select fire option.[23] As designed by Colt the pins supporting the semi-auto trigger and hammer in the lower receiver are larger than those used in the military rifle to prevent interchangeability between semi-automatic and select fire components.[24]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colt_AR-15

 

 

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 10:35 am

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 10:23 am

I did..

That says nothing about design.

But this part of your citation DOES.

Due to financial problems, and limitations in terms of manpower and production capacity, ArmaLite sold the AR-15 design and the AR-15 trademark along with the ArmaLite AR-10 to Colt's Manufacturing Company in 1959.[4] Colt started selling the semi-automatic version of the M16 rifle as the Colt AR-15 in 1964.[5][6][7] 

Nod.

This is the lower receiver:


That was redesigned.

This is the bolt carrier:



That was redesigned

This is the trigger group.  That was redesigned:



That is everything that makes a rifle an automatic battlefield weapon.  Even the barrell twist was different.  Remember, the Sporter did not fire 5.56.  It fired .223.

The first difference is the higher pressure level of the 5.56 NATO cartridge which runs at approximately 58,000 psi. A 223 Remington is loaded to approximately 55,000 psi. The second and most important difference between the two is the fact that a 5.56 NATO chamber has a . 125” longer throat.

You increase the chance of jamming if you use the wrong ammo.  The 5.56 was designed for combat and the higher pressure needed to cycle the bolt in combat.  
 

 

The Sporter was not designed for the battlefield.  

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:20 am

https://youtu.be/tQsZujjZWs0
 

Damn right.

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:21 am

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:20 am

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:13 am

I have already posted multiple citations saying the Sporter was designed for Civilians.

Due to financial problems, and limitations in terms of manpower and production capacity, ArmaLite sold the AR-15 design and the AR-15 trademark along with the ArmaLite AR-10 to Colt's Manufacturing Company in 1959.[4] Colt started selling the semi-automatic version of the M16 rifle as the Colt AR-15 in 1964.[5][6][7]


 

FIFY...

Your argument is debunked by your own source - even if you can't process that emotionally, 37X.
 


 

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:13 am

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:07 am

No...it does not..

I have already posted multiple citations saying the Sporter was designed for Civilians.

You have posted none that says it was designed for the battlefield.

You have posted nothing of what you claimed was modified.

The M16 fired a 5.56.  The Sporter fired a .223.  

The barrel twist was different.  

This will help you:

Comparison to military versions

The primary distinction between civilian semi-automatic rifles (no longer manufactured by Colt for civilian use) and military models is select fire. Military rifles were produced with firing modes, semi-automatic fire and either fully automatic fire mode or burst fire mode, in which the rifle fires three rounds in succession when the trigger is depressed. Most components are interchangeable between semi-auto and select fire rifles including magazines, sights, upper receiver, barrels and accessories.[19][20] The military M4 carbine typically uses a 14.5-inch (370 mm) barrel. Civilian rifles commonly have 16-inch or longer barrels to comply with the National Firearms Act.[21]In order to prevent a civilian semi-automatic AR-15 from being readily converted for use with the select fire components, Colt changed a number of features. Parts changed include the lower receiver, bolt carrier, hammer, trigger, disconnector, and safety/mode selector. The semi-automatic bolt carrier has a longer lightening slot to prevent the bolt's engagement with an automatic sear. Due to a decrease in mass the buffer spring is heavier. On the select fire version, the hammer has an extra spur which interacts with the additional auto-sear that holds it back until the bolt carrier group is fully in battery, when automatic fire is selected.[22] Using a portion of the select fire parts in a semi-automatic rifle will not enable a select fire option.[23] As designed by Colt the pins supporting the semi-auto trigger and hammer in the lower receiver are larger than those used in the military rifle to prevent interchangeability between semi-automatic and select fire components.[24]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colt_AR-15


 

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 10:35 am

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 10:23 am

I did..

That says nothing about design.

But this part of your citation DOES.

Due to financial problems, and limitations in terms of manpower and production capacity, ArmaLite sold the AR-15 design and the AR-15 trademark along with the ArmaLite AR-10 to Colt's Manufacturing Company in 1959.[4] Colt started selling the semi-automatic version of the M16 rifle as the Colt AR-15 in 1964.[5][6][7] 

Nod.

This is the lower receiver:


That was redesigned.

This is the bolt carrier:



That was redesigned

This is the trigger group.  That was redesigned:



That is everything that makes a rifle an automatic battlefield weapon.  Even the barrell twist was different.  Remember, the Sporter did not fire 5.56.  It fired .223.

The first difference is the higher pressure level of the 5.56 NATO cartridge which runs at approximately 58,000 psi. A 223 Remington is loaded to approximately 55,000 psi. The second and most important difference between the two is the fact that a 5.56 NATO chamber has a . 125” longer throat.

You increase the chance of jamming if you use the wrong ammo.  The 5.56 was designed for combat and the higher pressure needed to cycle the bolt in combat.  
 


 

The Sporter was not designed for the battlefield.  

 

 

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:22 am

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:20 am

https://youtu.be/tQsZujjZWs0

 

Damn right.

 

 

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:21 am

The Sporter was not designed for the battlefield.

The AR-15 Sporter-1 (SP1) is a semi-automatic variant of the AR-15 series of assault rifles. It was produced by Colt, the same manufacturer of the military M16 on the same production lines as the military rifle.[3]


Nobody needs that dwarfsplained....

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:22 am

 

You've lost, Loser.
 

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:24 am

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:21 am

The Sporter was not designed for the battlefield.

The AR-15 Sporter-1 (SP1) is a semi-automatic variant of the AR-15 series of assault rifles. It was produced by Colt, the same manufacturer of the military M16 on the same production lines as the military rifle.[3]


Nobody needs that dwarfsplained....

 

 

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:22 am

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:21 am

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:20 am

FIFY...

Your argument is debunked by your own source - even if you can't process that emotionally, 37X.
 



 

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:13 am

I have already posted multiple citations saying the Sporter was designed for Civilians.

You have posted none that says it was designed for the battlefield.

You have posted nothing of what you claimed was modified.

The M16 fired a 5.56.  The Sporter fired a .223.  

The barrel twist was different.  

This will help you:

Comparison to military versions

The primary distinction between civilian semi-automatic rifles (no longer manufactured by Colt for civilian use) and military models is select fire. Military rifles were produced with firing modes, semi-automatic fire and either fully automatic fire mode or burst fire mode, in which the rifle fires three rounds in succession when the trigger is depressed. Most components are interchangeable between semi-auto and select fire rifles including magazines, sights, upper receiver, barrels and accessories.[19][20] The military M4 carbine typically uses a 14.5-inch (370 mm) barrel. Civilian rifles commonly have 16-inch or longer barrels to comply with the National Firearms Act.[21]In order to prevent a civilian semi-automatic AR-15 from being readily converted for use with the select fire components, Colt changed a number of features. Parts changed include the lower receiver, bolt carrier, hammer, trigger, disconnector, and safety/mode selector. The semi-automatic bolt carrier has a longer lightening slot to prevent the bolt's engagement with an automatic sear. Due to a decrease in mass the buffer spring is heavier. On the select fire version, the hammer has an extra spur which interacts with the additional auto-sear that holds it back until the bolt carrier group is fully in battery, when automatic fire is selected.[22] Using a portion of the select fire parts in a semi-automatic rifle will not enable a select fire option.[23] As designed by Colt the pins supporting the semi-auto trigger and hammer in the lower receiver are larger than those used in the military rifle to prevent interchangeability between semi-automatic and select fire components.[24]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colt_AR-15



 

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 10:35 am

This is the lower receiver:


That was redesigned.

This is the bolt carrier:



That was redesigned

This is the trigger group.  That was redesigned:



That is everything that makes a rifle an automatic battlefield weapon.  Even the barrell twist was different.  Remember, the Sporter did not fire 5.56.  It fired .223.

The first difference is the higher pressure level of the 5.56 NATO cartridge which runs at approximately 58,000 psi. A 223 Remington is loaded to approximately 55,000 psi. The second and most important difference between the two is the fact that a 5.56 NATO chamber has a . 125” longer throat.

You increase the chance of jamming if you use the wrong ammo.  The 5.56 was designed for combat and the higher pressure needed to cycle the bolt in combat.  
 



 

The Sporter was not designed for the battlefield.  


 

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:22 am

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:20 am

https://youtu.be/tQsZujjZWs0


 

Damn right.


 

 

 

The sporter was not designed for the battlefield.  If that were the case they would have just sold the M16.

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:24 am

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:22 am

 

You've lost, Loser.
 

 

 

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:13 am

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:07 am

No...it does not..

I have already posted multiple citations saying the Sporter was designed for Civilians.

You have posted none that says it was designed for the battlefield.

You have posted nothing of what you claimed was modified.

The M16 fired a 5.56.  The Sporter fired a .223.  

The barrel twist was different.  

This will help you:

Comparison to military versions

The primary distinction between civilian semi-automatic rifles (no longer manufactured by Colt for civilian use) and military models is select fire. Military rifles were produced with firing modes, semi-automatic fire and either fully automatic fire mode or burst fire mode, in which the rifle fires three rounds in succession when the trigger is depressed. Most components are interchangeable between semi-auto and select fire rifles including magazines, sights, upper receiver, barrels and accessories.[19][20] The military M4 carbine typically uses a 14.5-inch (370 mm) barrel. Civilian rifles commonly have 16-inch or longer barrels to comply with the National Firearms Act.[21]In order to prevent a civilian semi-automatic AR-15 from being readily converted for use with the select fire components, Colt changed a number of features. Parts changed include the lower receiver, bolt carrier, hammer, trigger, disconnector, and safety/mode selector. The semi-automatic bolt carrier has a longer lightening slot to prevent the bolt's engagement with an automatic sear. Due to a decrease in mass the buffer spring is heavier. On the select fire version, the hammer has an extra spur which interacts with the additional auto-sear that holds it back until the bolt carrier group is fully in battery, when automatic fire is selected.[22] Using a portion of the select fire parts in a semi-automatic rifle will not enable a select fire option.[23] As designed by Colt the pins supporting the semi-auto trigger and hammer in the lower receiver are larger than those used in the military rifle to prevent interchangeability between semi-automatic and select fire components.[24]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colt_AR-15

 

 

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:13 am

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 10:35 am

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 10:23 am

I did..

That says nothing about design.

But this part of your citation DOES.

Due to financial problems, and limitations in terms of manpower and production capacity, ArmaLite sold the AR-15 design and the AR-15 trademark along with the ArmaLite AR-10 to Colt's Manufacturing Company in 1959.[4] Colt started selling the semi-automatic version of the M16 rifle as the Colt AR-15 in 1964.[5][6][7] 

Nod.

This is the lower receiver:


That was redesigned.

This is the bolt carrier:



That was redesigned

This is the trigger group.  That was redesigned:



That is everything that makes a rifle an automatic battlefield weapon.  Even the barrell twist was different.  Remember, the Sporter did not fire 5.56.  It fired .223.

The first difference is the higher pressure level of the 5.56 NATO cartridge which runs at approximately 58,000 psi. A 223 Remington is loaded to approximately 55,000 psi. The second and most important difference between the two is the fact that a 5.56 NATO chamber has a . 125” longer throat.

You increase the chance of jamming if you use the wrong ammo.  The 5.56 was designed for combat and the higher pressure needed to cycle the bolt in combat.  
 


 

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 11:07 am

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 10:59 am

My citation makes clear that the Civilian Sporter was not designed for the battlefield.  It is a completely different weapon than the M16.  ****, you don't even know what those parts do.  
Now, the M16 was designed for the battlefield. Not the Sporter.  

Everytime you respond with your **** I repost the facts for you.

No...it does not..


 


 

 

 

The Sporter was not designed for the battlefield.  If it was THAT would have been sold to the government instead of the M16.  Duh!