Liberal Forum

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 3:48 pm

@Blackvegetable  

Clem, How does your argument concerning a 50 year old weapon platform, a weapon not produced in 40 years, apply to today’s weapons?

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 3:42 pm

Clem, you do not understand the references.

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 3:51 pm

You introduced the Sporter in a desperate attempt to create a "civilian provenance" for the AR15 style assault sporting thing 

Now that it has been completely trashed for that purpose, you'd prefer to forget it.

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 3:52 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 3:52 pm

Dwarf, 

One of us holds a Master's degree.

you struggle to spell "woman".

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 3:54 pm

No, you brought up the original AR 15 semi auto on this thread.  Is was called the Sporter.  Clem, the fact you are actually arguing that tell me you are clueless. 

So Clem, what does this all have to do with the semi auto weapons of today?  Whatever you wish to call the weapon you brought into this thread go for it.

No, you brought up the original AR 15 semi auto on this thread. 

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 3:55 pm

Clem,

One of was a trained armored who used to work on M16s and did side work on Colt Sporters.

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 3:57 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 3:57 pm

So what?

I had no idea such existed before you began harping on it.

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 3:58 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 3:58 pm

Then you must be a **** moron to be at odds with all your citations...

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 3:59 pm

Clem, you introduced this topic to the thread.  Not me.

Yeah, a few years ago Clem.  But for like the 10th time, calling the weapon in question whatever floats your boat, what does your argument have to do with today’s weapons?

what does your argument have to do with today’s weapons?

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 4:00 pm

Clem,  I understand my citations.

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2021, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:39 am

Huey » 22 Apr 2021, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2021, 8:34 am

No, Forrest, your idiotic examples are pretty stupid.  

You may have the last word unless you formulate a realistic counter to my argument about the OP.

Dwarf,

The fact that a belt buckle can conceivably be used to make an AR15 sporting thing perform in the manner for which it was originally designed, was not deemed reason to keep them alive.


This is the direct analog for your multiple mag line...

And rather than PREDICTING a result, we can look back and check Reality.
 

 

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 4:02 pm

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 3:59 pm

Clem, you introduced this topic to the thread.  Not me.

Yeah, a few years ago Clem.  But for like the 10th time, calling the weapon in question whatever floats your boat, what does your argument have to do with today’s weapons?

But that's irrelevant.

Nod.

what does your argument have to do with today’s weapons?

YOU introduced the sporter into the argument (not to be confused with this thread - as I am confident you will proceed to do).

Why?

 

 

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 3:51 pm

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 3:48 pm

@Blackvegetable  

Clem, How does your argument concerning a 50 year old weapon platform, a weapon not produced in 40 years, apply to today’s weapons?

You introduced the Sporter in a desperate attempt to create a "civilian provenance" for the AR15 style assault sporting thing 

Now that it has been completely trashed for that purpose, you'd prefer to forget it.
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Apr 2018, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2018, 9:33 am

Huey » 11 Apr 2018 9:31 am » wrote:
Not a variant. The Colt Armalite 15 Semi Automatic Sporter marketed to civilians and law enforcement in 1964 is a redesigned M16 marketed to the Military. The M16 is has a 3 position selector switch (safe, semi, auto) allowing the operator to fire a single shot OR Automatic using Nato 5.56 MM rounds. The Sporter is a SEMI AUTOMATIC firing a .223 round using a different barrel, 2 position selector switch (safe, semi), different bolt, sear, gas pressure, muzzle velocity. The internal workings, so to speak. The 1964 Sporter externally used the same type hand guards, trigger guard, stock. The upper and lower receiver appeared similar. But what makes it a gun is distinctly and mechanically different. This has all been posted for you.



So now that we are aware of what we are actually discussing please begin telling me what is factually incorrect with what I posted.

Not a variant. The Colt Armalite 15 Semi Automatic Sporter marketed to civilians and law enforcement in 1964 is a redesigned M16 marketed to the Military.

I'd say we're done here.....

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 4:07 pm

Clem, stop lying. You have been talking about the sporter for years.

Not a variant. The Colt Armalite 15 Semi Automatic Sporter marketed to civilians and law enforcement in 1964 is a redesigned M16 marketed to the Military

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 4:10 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 4:10 pm

Dwarf,

Are these your words?

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 4:12 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 4:12 pm

Sorry Clem, this is the part where you explain how your argument applies to today’s weapons.

Clem, stop lying. You have been talking about the sporter for years.

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 4:15 pm

Are these your words?

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 4:17 pm

This is a thread about Gun Control. Clem, this is the part where you explain how your argument applies to today’s weapons

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2021, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 4:41 pm

No...if that were the case you wouldn't be finding yourself in the position of not acknowledging your words.......again.

You need to stop adding the flourishes..

Just answer....the first time...

Huey » 23 Apr 2021, 4:45 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2021, 4:45 pm

https://youtu.be/YgSPaXgAdzE