Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 03 Jul 2022, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jul 2022, 9:20 am

READ IT AGAIN.

Do you want the 1994 assault weapon ban reinstated?

TB7 » 03 Jul 2022, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jul 2022, 2:08 pm

YOU DO KNOW THAT THE LIST IS OF STATES THAT ALLOW TEACHERS TO BE ARMED......I MEAN, YOU REALLY DO KNOW THAT.....RIGHT..

DOESN'T MEAN THAT TEACHERS WANT TO BRING GUNS INTO CLASSROOMS, U KNOW THAT, DON'T U?

Texas teachers union survey finds that school employees don’t want to be armed

The survey, conducted by Texas American Federation of Teachers, comes two weeks after the Uvalde school shooting as Republicans call for more school employees to be armed.

BY BRIAN LOPEZ JUNE 8, 2022
5 PM CENTRAL

 A survey of nearly 4,000 K-12 teachers in Texas found that most do not want to be armed while in class or be expected to intercept a gunman at school, according to the state’s teachers union, which released its survey results Wednesday.  The Texas American Federation of Teachers sent an online questionnaire to its 65,000 members, which include public school teachers, support personnel and higher education employees, a week after an 18-year-old gunman killed 21 people — including 19 children — at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde.
Soon after the shooting, Texas Republicans said the solution could be arming teachers.A total of 5,100 members responded to the union’s survey, including 3,673 secondary school teachers. Of those K-12 teachers, 76% of them answered “no” when asked, “Do you want to be armed?” About 90% of all school employees who responded said they are worried about a shooting happening at their school.
 

Huey » 03 Jul 2022, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jul 2022, 2:13 pm

Do you want the 1994 assault weapon ban reinstated?

Yes.

Now read the question again, and answer it.

I answered your questions without rules.  I haven’t spoken about rules in ages.   Answer the question coward.

Were you dishonorably discharged for demonstrating a pathological lack of integrity?

Blackvegetable » 03 Jul 2022, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jul 2022, 3:36 pm

Yes.

Now read the question again, and answer it.

Were you dishonorably discharged for demonstrating a pathological lack of integrity?

Cool.  Since any AR style weapons that was purchased prior to enactment of the ban was grandfathered there will still be millions of them in circulation.   

You will see many AR style weapons that shoot 5.56 and .223 that look this:https://youtu.be/B2XHq9d4OWI

 You could probably legally add a handgrip to to that because the 1994 Assault weapons ban was based on visuals.  Not function.  That is a legally compliant AR 15 that was legally sold during the ban.  Be,low is what defined an “assault weapon”.  Notice nothing about function.Semi-automatic rifles able to accept detachable magazines and has two or more of the following:

• Folding or telescoping stock
• Pistol grip
• Bayonet mount
• Flash hider or threaded barrel designed to accommodate one
• Grenade launcher

As I said you are not knowledgeable enough about this subject to add anything intelligent.  You will still have a firearm that shoots a 5.56/.223 with the same efficiency as one with scary looking attachment.  **** moron.

Game.  Set.  Match.

The answer to your lame question is no.

Huey » 03 Jul 2022, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jul 2022, 3:49 pm

Cool.  Since any AR style weapons that was purchased prior to enactment of the ban was grandfathered there will still be millions of them in circulation.   

You will see many AR style weapons that shoot 5.56 and .223 that look this:https://youtu.be/B2XHq9d4OWI

 You could probably legally add a handgrip to to that because the 1994 Assault weapons ban was based on visuals.  Not function.  That is a legally compliant AR 15 that was legally sold during the ban.  Be,low is what defined an “assault weapon”.  Notice nothing about function.Semi-automatic rifles able to accept detachable magazines and has two or more of the following:

• Folding or telescoping stock
• Pistol grip
• Bayonet mount
• Flash hider or threaded barrel designed to accommodate one
• Grenade launcher

As I said you are not knowledgeable enough about this subject to add anything intelligent.  You will still have a firearm that shoots a 5.56/.223 with the same efficiency as one with scary looking attachment.  **** moron.

Game.  Set.  Match.

The answer to your lame question is no.

You owe me the rule on questions and your stipulation.

Blackvegetable » 03 Jul 2022, 3:52 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jul 2022, 3:52 pm

You owe me the rule on questions and your stipulation.

I answered your question, moron.  You should have read the comment all the way thru.  **** *******.

I am not answering it again.  You lost.  With that one answer from you I have given you the ultimate curbstomping and proven you are you fueling clueless on the gun issue.

Huey » 03 Jul 2022, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jul 2022, 3:54 pm

I answered your question, moron.  You should have read the comment all the way thru.  **** *******.

I am not answering it again.  You lost.  With that one answer from you I have given you the ultimate curbstomping and proven you are you fueling clueless on the gun issue.

Don't vaguely lie and follow with a bunch of furious yapping, little coward 


The rule on questions  and your stipulation. 


 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jul 2022, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jul 2022, 4:11 pm

Don't vaguely lie and follow with a bunch of furious yapping, little coward 

The rule on questions  and your stipulation.

You are so stupid on the subject you have no clue what the 1994 Ban actually did.  You answered the question and when you di you showed your ignorance.

you post the rules, ****.  You are done on this topic.  I was right.

Blackvegetable » 03 Jul 2022, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jul 2022, 4:11 pm

Don't vaguely lie and follow with a bunch of furious yapping, little coward 

The rule on questions  and your stipulation.

You lost.  

Huey » 03 Jul 2022, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jul 2022, 4:15 pm

You are so stupid on the subject you have no clue what the 1994 Ban actually did.  You answered the question and when you di you showed your ignorance.

you post the rules, ****.  You are done on this topic.  I was right.

Shhhhh...

Ban all civilian possession of Assault Style rifles.

No grandfathering.

You can make a **** wooden model..

For what purpose was the Ruger Mini designed?

On what weapon is it based?
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jul 2022, 4:21 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jul 2022, 4:21 pm

Shhhhh...

Ban all civilian possession of Assault Style rifles.

No grandfathering.

You can make a **** wooden model..

For what purpose was the Ruger Mini designed?

On what weapon is it based?

Sorry, you already said Reinstate the 94 weapons ban.  

Which riuger mini?  And I have already told you what weapon it is a variant of, *******.
 

Huey » 03 Jul 2022, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jul 2022, 4:15 pm

You are so stupid on the subject you have no clue what the 1994 Ban actually did.  You answered the question and when you di you showed your ignorance.

you post the rules, ****.  You are done on this topic.  I was right.

you post the rules, ****.  You are done on this topic.  

No, **** little coward.

You demand answers, but when asked respond with one or another of

Pound sand
Not necessary
Diversion

Irrelevant

First you have to....

You have the gall to talk about "balls".

Have the balls to post a rule and your stipulation to abide by it.

I was right.

About what, delusional little twat?

Huey » 03 Jul 2022, 4:23 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jul 2022, 4:23 pm

Sorry, you already said Reinstate the 94 weapons ban.  

Which riuger mini?  And I have already told you what weapon it is a variant of, *******.

Answer the **** question,  coward.

Blackvegetable » 03 Jul 2022, 4:27 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jul 2022, 4:27 pm

Answer the **** question,  coward.

I have already told you multiple **** times.  Stop using Strike Thru and educate yourself.

 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jul 2022, 4:26 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jul 2022, 4:26 pm

No, **** little coward.

You demand answers, but when asked respond with one or another of

Pound sand
Not necessary
Diversion

Irrelevant

First you have to....

You have the gall to talk about "balls".

Have the balls to post a rule and your stipulation to abide by it.

About what, delusional little twat?

Meltdown Mary is in the house!!!!  **** off punk.  Go whine to your daughter.  She is the one with the brains in your family you useless office boy,
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jul 2022, 4:27 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jul 2022, 4:27 pm

Answer the **** question,  coward.

Look who's talking.   Mr. Q & Q Man.  lol

Blackvegetable » 03 Jul 2022, 4:21 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jul 2022, 4:21 pm

Shhhhh...

Ban all civilian possession of Assault Style rifles.

No grandfathering.

You can make a **** wooden model..

For what purpose was the Ruger Mini designed?

On what weapon is it based?

Define an assault weapon, ******* office boy!

Huey » 03 Jul 2022, 4:31 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jul 2022, 4:31 pm

Define an assault weapon, ******* office boy!

When do you answer questions,  ******?

Huey » 03 Jul 2022, 4:30 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jul 2022, 4:30 pm

Meltdown Mary is in the house!!!!  **** off punk.  Go whine to your daughter.  She is the one with the brains in your family you useless office boy,

Someone is melting down alright..

How do we know?


The Issue.


Zerointegrity.
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jul 2022, 4:31 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jul 2022, 4:31 pm

When do you answer questions,  ******?

Lmao ROTC!  You had options.  Like Trump and Biden.