Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 9:51 am

If you don't know the "right" number, how do you know it is "too many"?

**** moron..

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 9:54 am

I haven't said that...

Why do you do zerointegrity **** like this, Sheilagh?

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 9:57 am

So exactly what is your point?  The bill will do nothing to reduce mass murders which is the intent, *******.  I am glad you agree the bill is cheese.  You could have said that up front.

Vegas » wrote:

19 Jan 1970, 8:01 pm

On Saturday, a gunman opened fire in a Walmart in El Paso, Texas, killing 22 people and injuring dozens of others before being arrested. The incident is being investigated as an act of domestic terror.

Less than 24 hours later, a man in Dayton, Ohio killed nine people, including his own sister, and wounded 27 others before he was killed by police.

Last weekend, a 19-year-old killed three people (including two children) and injured 13 before fatally shooting himself at a garlic festival in Gilroy, California.

Already in 2019, the US has seen 255 mass shootings, according to the Gun Violence Archive, a non-profit organization that tracks these incidents. Thus far, 8,787 people have died and 17,463 people have been injured by firearms this year across the country.

 

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 9:55 am

I have given you the amount of magazines in circulation based on the fact of an estimated amount firearms that use them.  A conservative estimate at that considering I only counted two magazines per one type and three for another.  That does not include those who HAVE MORE.

Given the fact that when you purchase one of these weapons you get two magazines.  I have given a low number.

The fact the law does not touch those in circulation your argument is not relevant.  Do you have an argument Askholio?

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 9:57 am

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 9:54 am

I haven't said that...

Why do you do zerointegrity **** like this, Sheilagh?

So exactly what is your point?  The bill will do nothing to reduce mass murders which is the intent, *******.  I am glad you agree the bill is cheese.  You could have said that up front.  

 

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 10:08 am

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 9:57 am

So exactly what is your point? The bill will do nothing to reduce mass murders which is the intent, *******.  I am glad you agree the bill is cheese.  You could have said that up front.

My point is unambiguous.

What you are celebrating as "Argument" is nothing of the sort.

For reasons given.

 

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 10:12 am

Now try...

If you don't know the "right" number, how do you know it is "too many"?

Vegasgiants » 21 Apr 2021, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 10:21 am

There is a link between reduced access to guns and lower rates of suicide.

Vegasgiants » 21 Apr 2021, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 10:26 am

Barring people convicted of domestic abuse from owning guns also decreases the number of gun deaths.

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 10:29 am

Don't tell me.  Tell the morons sponsoring the Bill in the OP.  AND idiots like @Blackvegetable  who support it.

Vegasgiants » 21 Apr 2021, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 10:28 am

The Lautenberg Amendment to the 1968 Gun Control Act disqualifies people with a misdemeanor conviction for domestic violence from buying or owning weapons.

According to a 2017 study, gun murders of female intimate partners decreased by 17% as a result of that amendment.

A 2018 report published by Everytown, a non-profit dedicated to reducing gun violence in the US, indicates that in at least 54% of mass shootings, the perpetrator also shot a current or former intimate partner or family member.

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 10:32 am

Spam?

Stalk?

Reportable offense?

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 10:35 am

Nah, just playing your game.  Plus, you are in an active discussion on the thread and support the bill.

Vegasgiants » 21 Apr 2021, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 10:39 am

When people in the US were allowed to start buying military-style firearms with high-capacity magazines (which enable shooters to discharge many rounds of ammunition in a short amount of time), the number of people killed in gun massacres — defined as shootings in which at least six people die — shot up 239%.

By contrast, after the 1994 ban on assault weapons went into effect, the number of gun massacre deaths decreased by 43%, as researcher Louis Klarevas reported in his book "Rampage Nation."

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 10:41 am

What?

Remember the answer to EVERY question beginning with

Why is @Huey  such a zerointegrity lying little coward that she would....

Because Blackvegetable is omnipotent, and my Free Will is but putty in his cruel hands...

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 10:42 am

And you had your wings clipped, again, on this thread.

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2021, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 10:43 am

The evidence of which is you running from yet more Stupid.

Again.

Vegasgiants » 21 Apr 2021, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 10:47 am

There's a widening gap between the number of gun deaths in states with relaxed gun-control laws and states with more restrictive policies, according to a study published in March.

Huey » 21 Apr 2021, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 10:46 am

Well, can you tells us how the bill in the OP will reduce Mass Murders when there are 100s of millions of magazines in circulation that will still be legal if this cheese ever becomes law?

Vegasgiants » 21 Apr 2021, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2021, 10:52 am

They don't make the top ten in lowest gun death rates

Look at the next ten lowest gun death states per capita moron and then the ten highest