Let's get much clearer.
1. Ivermectin is one of the safest medicines known, with over 4 billion doses having been prescribed to humans (tens of billions to animals, as a dewormer/anti-parasitic) over the past 40 plus years.
2. Ivermectin has been shown to kill covid (prevent its replication) in vitro (in a petri dish) above 99% effectiveness level in multiple studies on multiple continents.
3. Safe in vivo (in the body) and effective in vitro SHOULD AND WOULD equate to
immediate human trials,
if medical protocols were followed.
What we have instead is a new series of "vaccines" which are not known to be safe at anything approaching the level of Ivermectin, and not known to be more effective in vitro above the level of Ivermectin, being advanced ABOVE Ivermectin for human trials purely based on profit motive.
If citizen SAFETY were the first concern, then the first priority for in vivo studies would go to a medicine which has already been PROVEN safe in vivo, has already be awarded the highest possible safety rating by the FDA, has well established side effects which are BOTH rare and rather mild, has been used more than 4 billion times globally, generated a nobel prize in medicine for its inventor
DON'T TAKE MY WORD FOR IT, and has been shown to be as effective or more effective in vitro compared to the less safe, less studied, less established, less prescribed experimental "vaccines."
The medical protocols are clear. One medicine is KNOWN to be safe, the others are not.
All things being equal in vitro, and the first rule of MEDICINE being do no harm, the medicine KNOWN to be safe would be the first to be tested in vivo. That's if MEDICAL protocols were followed.
Instead - scandalously, - political and economic protocols were given first order - by trump and then by biden, and by the complicit media on both sides. The American public and many in various foreign nations were bullied into being guinea pigs.
None of what I just said is even controversial. I am stating the facts of recent history and the protocols of medical ethics, and my fact-statements are unimpeachable. The fact of who is saying it has no effect on its veracity - WHICH CAN BE ESTABLISHED THROUGH RESPONSIBLE RESEARCH, using Professor Google.
You have just been given the plain truth and are at perfect liberty to use your google fu to verify or falsify it if you care.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?