It sure does. If you have a parasitic infection. To date no reliable evidence exists to back up claims that it has any effect on covid-19.
The Hushed Long-Term Risks of COVID-19 VaccinesCrazytrain » 02 Jun 2021, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑ Well it seems like the RNA shot is working. New York just reported zero deaths for the first time. Along with Los Angeles and others.
“Development of new vaccine technology has been plagued with problems in the past. The current RNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were approved in the US using an emergency order without extensive long-term safety testing. The results indicate that the vaccine RNA has specific sequences that may induce TDP-43 and FUS to fold into their pathologic prion confirmations.
Amid the challenges of physical adverse effects from the vaccines, the lack of adequate testing and the underhanded methods in which vaccination may ultimately be made mandatory, many are now faced with the moral dilemma of being injected with genetic material that was grown in aborted fetal cell cultures.5The enclosed finding as well as additional potential risks lead the author to believe that regulatory approval of the RNA-based vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 was premature and that the vaccine may cause much more harm than benefit.”
Still waiting for the first topical debate post containing any legitimate information from this schmuck.Vegas » 02 Jun 2021, 5:58 pm » wrote: ↑ I hope you never wonder why nobody here takes you seriously. You really are one dumb mother ****.
There is just as much evidence, if not more, that Ivermectin is effective in all phases of the kung flu. The is no money to be made by the big pharmas and THAT is why they are trying to suppress Ivermectin's use. They want to force you their UNPROVEN, emergency authorized by the FDA with no liability for any of the harmful side effects vaccines that can make them $BILLIONS. Let alone the unknown long term adverse effects of their "vaccines". That is really reassuring, NOT!!!IkeBana » 03 Jun 2021, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑ It sure does. If you have a parasitic infection. To date no reliable evidence exists to back up claims that it has any effect on covid-19.
I said legitimate evidence. A concept that is totally foreign to you.
You wouldn't know what "legitimate evidence" is if it slapped you in the face, IDIOT!!!!IkeBana » 03 Jun 2021, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑ I said legitimate evidence. A concept that is totally foreign to you.
Your post is full of Q-Anon addled conspiracy theorist cretinous propaganda. Anybody who buys in to any of this **** has a skull full of bolts.
Here's your goddamn "Q-Anon addled conspiracy theorist", IDIOT...IkeBana » 03 Jun 2021, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑ I said legitimate evidence. A concept that is totally foreign to you.
Your post is full of Q-Anon addled conspiracy theorist cretinous propaganda. Anybody who buys in to any of this **** has a skull full of bolts.
AP is LYING!!! There is plenty of evidence that Ivermectin is safe and effective. Those being paid and benefiting from big pharma's scam will lie for them. There isn't $BILLIONS to be made from curing the kung flu, just like cancer, the money is in their unproven, unsafe gene therapy treatments.Vegasgiants » 03 Jun 2021, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑ CLAIM: The antiparasitic drug ivermectin “has a miraculous effectiveness that obliterates” the transmission of COVID-19 and will prevent people from getting sick.
AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. There’s no evidence ivermectin has been proven a safe or effective treatment against COVID-19.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checkin ... 9768999400
Who are these "medical experts"? Who do THEY work for?Vegasgiants » 03 Jun 2021, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑ THE FACTS: During a Senate hearing Tuesday, a group of doctors touted alternative COVID-19 treatments, including ivermectin and the anti-malaria medication hydroxychloroquine. Medical experts have cautioned against using either of those drugs to treat COVID-19. Studies have shown that hydroxychloroquine has no benefit against the coronavirus and can have serious side effects. No evidence has been shown to prove that ivermectin works against COVID-19. ADVERTISEMENT
I think he is drawing some topographical distinction here...call a few friends who also drink grapefruit juice..Vegasgiants » 03 Jun 2021, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑ I am living proof grapefruit juice works. Lol
A study of one
Ivermectin has serious side effects
“Data from 18 randomized controlled trials that included over 2,100 patients … demonstrated that Ivermectin produces faster viral clearance, faster time to hospital discharge, faster time to clinical recovery, and a 75 percent reduction in mortality rates,” the statement noted.Buffalo » 03 Jun 2021, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑ There is just as much evidence, if not more, that Ivermectin is effective in all phases of the kung flu. The is no money to be made by the big pharmas and THAT is why they are trying to suppress Ivermectin's use. They want to force you their UNPROVEN, emergency authorized by the FDA with no liability for any of the harmful side effects vaccines that can make them $BILLIONS. Let alone the unknown long term adverse effects of their "vaccines". That is really reassuring, NOT!!!
I would say that Ivermectin has been studied and tested more than the quickie vaccines of big Pharma. Actually they are not really vaccines, as they are gene therapy.Kory noted that numerous studies—including peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials—verified the significant benefits of ivermectin to prevent or treat COVID in the earlier or later stages of the disease.
After appearing before the National Institutes of Health COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel in January, the group released a statement that noted that with dozens of clinical trials now published around the world, it was possible to reliably assess clinical efficacy.
“Data from 18 randomized controlled trials that included over 2,100 patients … demonstrated that Ivermectin produces faster viral clearance, faster time to hospital discharge, faster time to clinical recovery, and a 75 percent reduction in mortality rates,” the statement noted.
A one-page summary of the clinical trial evidence for ivermectin can be downloaded from the FLCCC website. A more comprehensive, 31-page review of trial data has been published in the American Journal of Therapeutics.
U are living proof that u were stupid enough to catch theBuffalo » 03 Jun 2021, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑ Who are these "medical experts"? Who do THEY work for?
There is a mountain of proof that Ivermectin works!!! ****, moonbatty idiots like you just don't want to see it because of what big pharma and the government tells you to believe. Follow the goddamn money idiot!!!
I am living proof that Ivermectin taken as a prophylactic prevented me from getting sick with the kung flu.
I believe Buffy.supraTruth » 03 Jun 2021, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ U are living proof that u were stupid enough to catch thevirus, so why would any1 believe ANYthing U spew?
I caught it from a fiend that was unaware he had been exposed, asshole!!!supraTruth » 03 Jun 2021, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ U are living proof that u were stupid enough to catch thevirus, so why would any1 believe ANYthing U spew?

Crazytrain » 02 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑ You see most con artists tell you not to believe anybody else that is pointing out they are lying. It's literally how they do it. The sheep are running around calling everybody else sheep.
Buffalo » 03 Jun 2021, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑ I caught it from a fiend that was unaware he had been exposed, asshole!!!
How many people have died as a result of getting the "safe vaccines" of the big pharmas?
I checked.. Here’s the answer. The data comes from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System — VAERS — which is managed by the CDC and the FDA: Between late December of 2020, and last month, a total of 3,362 people apparently died after getting the COVID vaccines just in the US. That’s an average of 30 people every day. So, what does that add up to? By the way, that reporting period ended on April 23. How many 100's more have died since? Not to mention the myriad of adverse side effects of the **** concoctions orf who knows what!!!
How many people have died from taking Ivermectin? I couldn't find any reported deaths.
Group of doctors highlight results of successes in more than 6,000 patients with Covid-19 treated with the drug ivermectin.Santo Domingo, DR
At least 6,000 Covid-19 positive patients have been treated with excellent results using the drug ivermectin, by doctors belonging to the Rescue group, with health facilities located in Puerto Plata, La Romana, and Punta Cana.
The antiparasitic and antiviral drug, known in the market for 50 years, has been used by doctors in the country since the beginning of the epidemic to treat patients with the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes the Covid-19 disease; when the first cases began to appear and in the absence of a specific treatment.
The details were offered by Dr. José Natalio Redondo, president of the Rescue Group when he participated as a guest in “La Cita con el Covid,” which broadcasts every Monday at 9:00 pm Listindiario.com.
The advantage of Ivermectin, Redondo points out, is that it is a well-known and studied drug because it has been used for more than 30 years in humans and for around 45 years in animals, while around the world a trillion doses are given per year no side effects.
He said that the group had registered about 6,000 patients with outpatient emergency and consultation services with promising results, “and it forces us to follow the same policy of treatment and management scheme.” Redondo, who, along with a group of researchers from the Rescue Group, has been a promoter of this treatment. He said that although there are still many things that are unknown about this disease, it is undoubted that progress has been made to the point that medicines and drugs are already available, recognized, and approved procedures for the different phases of the disease.
https://dominicantoday.com/dr/covid-19/ ... vermectin/
Did you catch that? while around the world a trillion doses are given per year no side effects.
But you and your fellow idiots can continue to be fooled by big phama and their government lackeys.
Ivermectin is an excellent drug if you have a **** tapeworm up your *** or toxoplasmosis gondii in your addled brain, which I have suspected since the first day I wandered aimlessly into this ****.Buffalo » 03 Jun 2021, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑ You wouldn't know what "legitimate evidence" is if it slapped you in the face, IDIOT!!!!
You go ahead and buy into the unproven, emergency approved gene concoctions of big pharma with their unknown long term side effects then, you goddamn, idiot.
well I will weigh in on this.. I heard that there have been under twenty deaths in the last decade from ALL the vaccines. Yet this one killed 4K and 10k in Europe.. and its not only that... what's gonna happen a few years down the road? does anyone know? All an intelligent person has to do.. Is look at the big pharma ads on TV? you want that crap in your system.... you trust these clowns.. if you do, explain to me why they are pushing this on children? for the next school year..
Trump was right again...Vegasgiants » 03 Jun 2021, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑ THE FACTS: During a Senate hearing Tuesday, a group of doctors touted alternative COVID-19 treatments, including ivermectin and the anti-malaria medication hydroxychloroquine. Medical experts have cautioned against using either of those drugs to treat COVID-19. Studies have shown that hydroxychloroquine has no benefit against the coronavirus and can have serious side effects. No evidence has been shown to prove that ivermectin works against COVID-19. ADVERTISEMENT