Not odd at all, dick sucker.Vegasgiants » 04 Jun 2021, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Good. That was clear. So you admit that you were a gay man
Yet you call people homophobic slurs all the time.
Does it seem odd to you a a former gay man who is now trans would call people gay and trans slurs ?
I deny it.Vegasgiants » 04 Jun 2021, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Let's be honest. I started my time on this forum by supporting your transition to a woman filling and offering you repeated posts of support and encouragement.
Deny that
Specious **** rent boi. But I suppose, at least you made a comment...**** Buffy went into hiding.Cannonpointer » 04 Jun 2021, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑ You can kill yourself with an overdose of water. Not any more safe than oxy.
I haven't had a drop of alcohol since December 4, 1974.sootedupCyndi » 04 Jun 2021, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑ You clown.. ha ha ha ha. I meant analyze me.. LOL Ok... I'll play along then.
You were drunk and just don't remember.
Specious ****. Jumping in front of a speeding garbage truck will kill you, deplorable imbecile.Cannonpointer » 04 Jun 2021, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Precisely, you stupid ****. I PRECISELY mirrored your **** - anything that can kill you in large quantities = oxy.
Stupid ****
You are calling **** on YOURSELF, specious retard.
I'm teasing you... schmuck? And you don't have a disorder? hummmm I do think I have you figured out.IkeBana » 04 Jun 2021, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑ I haven't had a drop of alcohol since December 4, 1974.
Just remember WITH/WITB it layman talk for several Axis II disorders in the women folk.
IkeBana » 04 Jun 2021, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Specious ****. Jumping in front of a speeding garbage truck will kill you, deplorable imbecile.
So why are you NOW denying my trans status, if you are supportive of trans people?You mocked me for being gay, and then you "supported" me as a transwoman.Vegasgiants » 04 Jun 2021, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Let's be honest. I started my time on this forum by supporting your transition to a woman fully and offering you repeated posts of support and encouragement.
Deny that
YOU SAID YOU ARE A GAY MAN
I did not force you to say that. You said it. You have run from it ever since.
You make repeated gay and trans slurs on this forum and now you want people to believe you have moved from being g a gay man to a trans woman.
Is that right?
You cant write this comedy folks
That was my post. You can erase half of it but I will still just repost it.
You have just admitted you are a liar. You said you were a gay man and now say you didnt really mean it.
So I do not believe your statement that you are trans.
You are a admitted liar now.
Now edit this and I will just repost all of it
I said "I am a gay man" (<<<answered his question) in response to DOZENS of homophobic assertions of that by you - and then asked why you felt the need to be homophobic toward me about it.Vegasgiants » 04 Jun 2021, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Did you say you were a gay man in the past.....and then deny that you were really gay?
Dude....why should I ever believe what you say you are if you have no credibility
Watch....he will never answer my first question and probably edit it out
Asked and answered.Vegasgiants » 04 Jun 2021, 3:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Who knows what you are. You said you were gay and now deny that you were
Were you a gay man?
It's a simple question
Run!!!!!!
But you have already INSISTED that you initially "supported" me, fruit loop. And this was AFTER taunting me for being gay - so your pretense of uncertainty is a day late.Vegasgiants » 04 Jun 2021, 4:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Good.
So you said that because you were a gay man......or did I force you to say it?
I cant support you as a transwoman because I dont know if you are gay or trans. You say you are trans but you said you were gay and now say you never were.
Who knows what you really are.
Oh wait....I know
A liar. Lol
Link to me EVER backtracking from my transwoman claim - even after you mockingly "supported" me, and when that failed, called me a liar, proving that you do not support trans rights, fruit cake.
It is better to have a vaccine that prevents people from catching COVID than a drug that might stop deaths after developing symptoms.Buffalo » 03 Jun 2021, 6:18 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
Politifact is a biased, left-wing, pro-dim-0-crap Soros funded propaganda organization.
Why are we being lied to about Covid? There’s no good reason
Posted on May 12, 2021![]()
Be in no doubt, among the reasons that voices and opinions like mine are never heard in the main media is extreme censorship more suited to China than a liberal democracy. Please allow me to illustrate with an example close to my heart why it is high time for us to change our response.Ivermectin is one of the WHO’s ‘essential drugs’ which all countries should have access to. It’s very cheap as its patent has long expired; it’s one of the most-used drugs in world history; it’s extraordinarily safe; it is often life-saving against parasitic infections. It is also one of the best-established pharmaceutical treatments for Covid-19, showing benefit in every stage of the disease, in multiple independent clinical trials of varying quality. On January 3, 2021, Dr Tess Lawrie attempted to alert the Prime Minister to the potential of ivermectin. Her video here was pulled from YouTube within hours of posting, though it survives on Vimeo. The paper by the FLCCC group of US intensivists (whose survival rates for severe Covid-19 are best in class) that was the inspiration for Dr Lawrie’s work was accepted after extensive open peer review (including two career employees of the FDA) and ‘provisionally accepted’ by the ‘open science’ journal Frontiers in Pharmacology. The screenshot of the abstract tweeted by Clare Craig shown here attracted more than 100,000 views. Then, mysteriously, it was rejected and pulled by the Frontiers editor in chief. It is still here in cached form though the Ministry of Truth has been at work and placed it in a memory hole, so no trace survives on Frontiers’ own website.
Intended for a Special Issue on ‘repurposed drugs’ for Covid-19, various guest editors were so incensed at this behaviour that they resigned in protest. You can read their letter here. They concluded that ‘these unfortunate events constitute gross editorial misconduct by Frontiers.’ Fortunately this major paper is now published by the American Journal of Therapeutics and can be read in its final form here.
This nevertheless successfully delayed by nearly six months its circulation to leading public health bodies starting mid-November. A copy was sent to Sir Jeremy Farrar (boss of the Wellcome Trust and member of Sage) who passed it on to Professor Peter Horby (also on Sage), amongst others, on November 18, 2020. So the efficacy of ivermectin must be well known to the Government’s advisers, but they have done nothing about it.
Likewise, the formal and rigorous meta-analysis performed by Dr Tess Lawrie’s team at the Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd has been communicated to Matt Hancock, but without reply.
I am telling you about this, because all that governments, their scientific advisers, big pharma (here’s Merck, who originally developed & marketed it) and regulatory agencies will tell you is that ivermectin doesn’t work in Covid-19. They are lying. I am inviting any of them to sue me, but they won’t, for I would win easily.
If ivermectin was more widely used, there’d be no need for vaccines.
To date, despite the brains, expertise and stature of those scientists questioning the official Covid-19 narrative, as a group they quite patently have been ineffective. And this is unlikely to change while, as polite professionals, they won’t say: ‘This is corruption and they’re lying deliberately to scare the people.’ Furthermore, unwittingly, they have been playing the parts intended by those, including our own Government and their advisers, who control the global Covid narrative.
They judged correctly that we polite Brits wouldn’t accuse them of outright lying, even though they often do exactly that. Boris Johnson’s recent piece to camera, telling us that it was lockdown and not vaccination which reduced cases and deaths, is a case in point.
Yet it’s certain this isn’t true, and also certain he and his advisers know it isn’t true.
The government’s advisers are not fools. Some may be, but the upper echelons are very smart. They believe polite people won’t say ‘not only are you lying but you’re doing it in concert with other, non-democratic actors’, because that’s conspiracy theory stuff, right? Powerful people never use their influence to benefit their interests, do they? Hmm. The only thing that’s different is scale and the power their public positions give them. Other than that, they’re just another a bunch of grubby criminals, ripping off unsuspecting people.
Truth is our most powerful tool. And that truth is that we’re being lied to.
The truth also, however hard it is to believe it, is that there is unequivocal and clear evidence of planning and co-ordination. Not to face this fact is to have your head in the sand. Where it’s leading is easy to discern, once people are willing to lift their internal censoring and look objectively at the evidence.
First, though, the lies. It’s abundantly clear now that pretty much everything that the public has been told and continues to be told is between untrue and downright lies.
I offer as a shortlist that:
-PCR mass testing reasonably reliably distinguishes infected and infectious people from others;-that masks reduce transmission of respiratory viruses;-that transmission of infection in the absence of symptoms is an important contribution to epidemic spreading;-that lockdowns as executed reduce hospitalisation and deaths;-that no matter how small the remaining susceptible population and no matter that virtually no people who, if infected, might die remain unvaccinated, the position is perilous;-that no pharmaceutical treatments are available;-that variants are different enough to warrant border closures and require new vaccines;-that the gene-based vaccines are safe and effective;-that ‘vaccine passports’ will increase safety while having no material impacts on freedom of choice in a liberal democracy.It is impossible to believe that intelligent, well-connected and well-briefed senior advisers to governments don’t know that almost all, if not all, of the above are simply not true.
[…]
Via https://alethonews.com/2021/05/11/why-are-we-being-lied-to-about-covid-theres-no-good-reason/
https://stuartbramhall.wordpress.com/2021/05/12/why-are-we-being-lied-to-about-covid-theres-no-good-reason/
BIG PHARMA CANNOT MAKE $BILLIONS FROM A N OLD DRUG THAT IS NO LONGER ABLE PATENTED. THAT IS WHY YOU ARE BEING LIED TO ABOUT ITS EFFICACY AGAINST THE KUNG FLU, ****. But I could care less what your being **** about...you are **** about many things!!!
“We did the work that the medical authorities failed to do, we conducted the most comprehensive review of the available data on ivermectin,” said Pierre Kory, M.P.A., MD, president and chief medical officer of the FLCCC. “We applied the gold standard to qualify the data reviewed before concluding that ivermectin can end this pandemic.”supraTruth » 04 Jun 2021, 4:23 pm » wrote: ↑ It is better to have a vaccine that prevents people from catching COVID than a drug that might stop deaths after developing symptoms.
Or are all of uRNC tCON cultists taking daily doses of ivermectin for the rest of your lives?
It is better to have a vaccine that prevents people from catching COVID than a drug that might stop deaths after developing symptoms.Buffalo » 04 Jun 2021, 6:28 pm » wrote: ↑ “We did the work that the medical authorities failed to do, we conducted the most comprehensive review of the available data on ivermectin,” said Pierre Kory, M.P.A., MD, president and chief medical officer of the FLCCC. “We applied the gold standard to qualify the data reviewed before concluding that ivermectin can end this pandemic.”
“Our latest research shows, once again, that when the totality of the evidence is examined, there is no doubt that ivermectin is highly effective as a safe prophylaxis and treatment for COVID-19,” said Paul E. Marik, M.D., FCCM, FCCP, founding member of the FLCCC and Chief, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine at Eastern Virginia Medical School. “We can no longer rely on many of the larger health authorities to make an honest examination of the medical and scientific evidence. So, we are calling on regional public health authorities and medical professionals around the world to demand that ivermectin be included in their standard of care right away so we can end this pandemic once and for all.”
http://outbreaknewstoday.com/ivermectin ... iew-12291/
And except for you, fruit cake, WHO CARES?Vegasgiants » 04 Jun 2021, 4:08 pm » wrote: ↑ I did. Over and over for days. Then you said you were a gay man. And then denied you were ever a gay man.
So who knows what you are
Vegasgiants » 04 Jun 2021, 4:09 pm » wrote: ↑ You backtracked from your admission you were a gay man
Let's clear this up
When you said you were a gay man were you telling the truth?
Watch this folks
Vegasgiants » 04 Jun 2021, 4:09 pm » wrote: ↑ You backtracked from your admission you were a gay man
Let's clear this up
When you said you were a gay man were you telling the truth?
Watch this folks