So, u saying every1 should just daily dose with yourBuffalo » 18 Jun 2021, 4:48 am » wrote: ↑ I already knew you were a goddamn ****, moonbatty idiot. There is tons of information and PROOF that Ivermectin isa and effective, proven prophlylaxis (that means it prevents) the kung flu as well as being effective treatment for the wuhan flu.
Ivermectin is highly effective as a safe prophylaxis and treatment for COVID-19: Comprehensive review
by PRESS RELEASE
May 9, 2021
Drugs and antibiotics, Research Peer reviewed by medical experts that included three U.S. government senior scientists and published in the American Journal of Therapeutics, the research is the most comprehensive review of the available data taken from clinical, in vitro, animal, and real-world studies. Led by the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), a group of medical and scientific experts reviewed published peer-reviewed studies, manuscripts, expert meta-analyses, and epidemiological analyses of regions with ivermectin distribution efforts all showing that ivermectin is an effective prophylaxis and treatment for COVID-19.
“We did the work that the medical authorities failed to do, we conducted the most comprehensive review of the available data on ivermectin,” said Pierre Kory, M.P.A., MD, president and chief medical officer of the FLCCC. “We applied the gold standard to qualify the data reviewed before concluding that ivermectin can end this pandemic.”
http://outbreaknewstoday.com/ivermectin ... iew-12291/
That said, I am not interested in your prejudiced, uninformed, ignorant opinion. So, **** OFF!!!
A daily dose up your **** ***, superliar, should do the trick!!!supraTruth » 18 Jun 2021, 8:00 am » wrote: ↑ So, u saying every1 should just daily dose with your**** instead of the vaccine? For how long & at what cost?
If U want to BUY & INJECT A DAILY DOSE of yourBuffalo » 21 Jun 2021, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑ A daily dose up your **** ***, superliar, should do the trick!!!![]()
IVERMECTIN WORKS!!! Big pharma cannot be happy about this.New Study Links Ivermectin to ‘Large Reductions’ In COVID-19 Deaths
BY TOM OZIMEK
June 21, 2021 Updated: June 21, 2021
A recent pre-print review based on peer-reviewed studies has found that using antiparasitic drug ivermectin could lead to “large reductions” in COVID-19 deaths and its use could have a “significant impact” on the pandemic globally.
For the study (pdf), published on June 17 in the American Journal of Therapeutics, a group of scientists reviewed the clinical trial use of ivermectin, which has antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties, in 24 randomized controlled trials involving just over 3,400 participants. The researchers sought to assess the efficacy of ivermectin in reducing infection or mortality in people with COVID-19 or at high risk of getting it.
Using multiple methods of sequential analysis, the researchers concluded with a moderate level of confidence that the drug reduced the risk of death in COVID-19 patients by an average of 62 percent, at a 95 percent confidence interval of 0.19-0.79, in a sample of 2438 patients.
Among hospitalized COVID-19 patients, the risk of death was found to be 2.3 percent among those treated with the drug, compared to 7.8 percent for those who were not, according to the review.
“Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease,” the authors wrote.A health worker shows a box containing a bottle of Ivermectin as part of a study of the Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases Studies, in Cali, Colombia, on July 21, 2020. (Luis Robayo/AFP via Getty Images)
Since the start of the pandemic, both observational and randomized studies have evaluated ivermectin as a treatment for, and as prevention against, COVID-19 infection.
“A review by the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance summarized findings from 27 studies on the effects of ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection, concluding that ivermectin ‘demonstrates a strong signal of therapeutic efficacy’ against COVID-19” the researchers wrote, referring to one recent review, which was based on data from both peer-reviewed studies and preprint manuscripts.
They cited another recent review that concluded that ivermectin reduced deaths by as much as 75 percent, while noting that neither the National Institutes of Health in the United States nor the World Health Organization (WHO) have recommended the use of ivermectin outside clinical trials for use in the fight against COVID-19.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in a note on “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19,” warns that it has received “multiple reports of patients who have required medical support and been hospitalized after self-medicating with ivermectin intended for horses.”
“Using any treatment for COVID-19 that’s not approved or authorized by the FDA, unless part of a clinical trial, can cause serious harm,” the FDA said in the note, adding that it has not reviewed data to support the use of ivermectin in COVID-19 patients.
The WHO said in March that “the current evidence on the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19 patients is inconclusive” and that, until more data becomes available, the agency recommends that “the drug only be used within clinical trials.”
The authors of the ivermectin efficacy study argued, however, that the drug has an “established safety profile through decades of use” and “could play a critical role in suppressing or even ending the SARS-CoV2 pandemic.”
“The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally,” they argued in the study abstract.
The authors noted in their publication that all the studies on which they based their conclusions have been peer-reviewed.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_break ... 39dQ%3D%3D
Here here Buffalo.. i saved it for you. Dont know if you saw this... its getting out.. good. thought you may have been at your dads and missed it. It is a bit low in sound... very interesting..Buffalo » 21 Jun 2021, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑ A daily dose up your **** ***, superliar, should do the trick!!!![]()
IVERMECTIN WORKS!!! Big pharma cannot be happy about this.New Study Links Ivermectin to ‘Large Reductions’ In COVID-19 Deaths
BY TOM OZIMEK
June 21, 2021 Updated: June 21, 2021
A recent pre-print review based on peer-reviewed studies has found that using antiparasitic drug ivermectin could lead to “large reductions” in COVID-19 deaths and its use could have a “significant impact” on the pandemic globally.
For the study (pdf), published on June 17 in the American Journal of Therapeutics, a group of scientists reviewed the clinical trial use of ivermectin, which has antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties, in 24 randomized controlled trials involving just over 3,400 participants. The researchers sought to assess the efficacy of ivermectin in reducing infection or mortality in people with COVID-19 or at high risk of getting it.
Using multiple methods of sequential analysis, the researchers concluded with a moderate level of confidence that the drug reduced the risk of death in COVID-19 patients by an average of 62 percent, at a 95 percent confidence interval of 0.19-0.79, in a sample of 2438 patients.
Among hospitalized COVID-19 patients, the risk of death was found to be 2.3 percent among those treated with the drug, compared to 7.8 percent for those who were not, according to the review.
“Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease,” the authors wrote.A health worker shows a box containing a bottle of Ivermectin as part of a study of the Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases Studies, in Cali, Colombia, on July 21, 2020. (Luis Robayo/AFP via Getty Images)
Since the start of the pandemic, both observational and randomized studies have evaluated ivermectin as a treatment for, and as prevention against, COVID-19 infection.
“A review by the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance summarized findings from 27 studies on the effects of ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection, concluding that ivermectin ‘demonstrates a strong signal of therapeutic efficacy’ against COVID-19” the researchers wrote, referring to one recent review, which was based on data from both peer-reviewed studies and preprint manuscripts.
They cited another recent review that concluded that ivermectin reduced deaths by as much as 75 percent, while noting that neither the National Institutes of Health in the United States nor the World Health Organization (WHO) have recommended the use of ivermectin outside clinical trials for use in the fight against COVID-19.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in a note on “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19,” warns that it has received “multiple reports of patients who have required medical support and been hospitalized after self-medicating with ivermectin intended for horses.”
“Using any treatment for COVID-19 that’s not approved or authorized by the FDA, unless part of a clinical trial, can cause serious harm,” the FDA said in the note, adding that it has not reviewed data to support the use of ivermectin in COVID-19 patients.
The WHO said in March that “the current evidence on the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19 patients is inconclusive” and that, until more data becomes available, the agency recommends that “the drug only be used within clinical trials.”
The authors of the ivermectin efficacy study argued, however, that the drug has an “established safety profile through decades of use” and “could play a critical role in suppressing or even ending the SARS-CoV2 pandemic.”
“The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally,” they argued in the study abstract.
The authors noted in their publication that all the studies on which they based their conclusions have been peer-reviewed.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_break ... 39dQ%3D%3D
& idiots, it was still COVIDIOT REX's administration that did NOTHING about supplying Ivermectin to the American people LAST YEAR as the deaths grew to HALF A MILLION! ZILCH! BUT DID THAT RNC WHORE MARIA EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE THAT FACT! NO!sootedupCyndi » 21 Jun 2021, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Here here Buffalo.. i saved it for you. Dont know if you saw this... its getting out.. good. thought you may have been at your dads and missed it. It is a bit low in sound... very interesting..
https://twitter.com/MariaBartiromo/stat ... gr%5Etweet
Thank you so much sweetheart for saving that for me.sootedupCyndi » 21 Jun 2021, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Here here Buffalo.. i saved it for you. Dont know if you saw this... its getting out.. good. thought you may have been at your dads and missed it. It is a bit low in sound... very interesting..
https://twitter.com/MariaBartiromo/stat ... gr%5Etweet
& idiots, it was still COVIDIOT REX's administration that did NOTHING about supplying Ivermectin to the American people LAST YEAR as the deaths grew to HALF A MILLION! ZILCH! BUT DID THAT RNC WHORE MARIA EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE THAT FACT! NO!Buffalo » 21 Jun 2021, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Thank you so much sweetheart for saving that for me.![]()
Yes I did miss it.
Isn't it amazing how **** idiots, like vegasgiant and superliar, a so easily duped by government, lapdog media, and big tech censorship and propaganda all to protect the $BILLIONS in profits for big pharma.
Well, they can have their vaccines made form aborted fetus cells and stick them up their stupid asses!!!
As I have said, I dosed myself and my 91 year old Dad early with Ivermectin in January 2021 when I found out that a friend of mine had caught the wuhan **** and had no ill effects form the wuhan **** even though I tested positive for it. Dad never even caught it because I dosed him before he was exposed.
Vindication for you and Cannon.. I hunted for it. I figured you may have not caught it..Buffalo » 21 Jun 2021, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Thank you so much sweetheart for saving that for me.![]()
Yes I did miss it.
Isn't it amazing how **** idiots, like vegasgiant and superliar, a so easily duped by government, lapdog media, and big tech censorship and propaganda all to protect the $BILLIONS in profits for big pharma.
Well, they can have their vaccines made form aborted fetus cells and stick them up their stupid asses!!!
As I have said, I dosed myself and my 91 year old Dad early with Ivermectin in January 2021 when I found out that a friend of mine had caught the wuhan **** and had no ill effects form the wuhan **** even though I tested positive for it. Dad never even caught it because I dosed him before he was exposed.
That is because he listened to the likes of fauci...idiot!!!supraTruth » 21 Jun 2021, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑ & idiots, it was still COVIDIOT REX's administration that did NOTHING about supplying Ivermectin to the American people LAST YEAR as the deaths grew to HALF A MILLION! ZILCH! BUT DID THAT RNC WHORE MARIA EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE THAT FACT! NO!
COVIDIOT REX
But theBuffalo » 21 Jun 2021, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑ That is because he listened to the likes of fauci...idiot!!!
Ivermectin has a 40 year record of safety. YOU and MILLIONS of other guinea pigs have no idea the long term affects of the gene therapy called vaccines.supraTruth » 21 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑ If U want to BUY & INJECT A DAILY DOSE of your**** up YOUR ***, THEN PLEASE DO!
I don't need it because I have already taken the free (to me) SAFE VACCINE SHOTS!
No and I do not intend to take the unproven ****!!!
Would you have taken Ivermectin had they touted it as the preventative and cure of the wuhan virus it is?supraTruth » 21 Jun 2021, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑ & idiots, it was still COVIDIOT REX's administration that did NOTHING about supplying Ivermectin to the American people LAST YEAR as the deaths grew to HALF A MILLION! ZILCH! BUT DID THAT RNC WHORE MARIA EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE THAT FACT! NO!
COVIDIOT REX
No, he didn't.Buffalo » 21 Jun 2021, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑ That is because he listened to the likes of fauci...idiot!!!
Ivermectin shows anti viral capacity, but only at dosage levels you cannot achieve.Buffalo » 22 Jun 2021, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑ Would you have taken Ivermectin had they touted it as the preventative and cure of the wuhan virus it is?
Fauci is not a trained virologist. As a loyal friend of big pharma, he has shown no skill in following any science that conflicts with that industry's interests.
Does the vaccine?Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2021, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑ Ivermectin shows anti viral capacity, but only at dosage levels you cannot achieve.
There is no evidence that it works against COVID.
https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer- ... t-covid-19
Yes...it does....**** idiot.Famagusta » 22 Jun 2021, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ Does the vaccine?
If so, why does one have to be tested on returning from Spain, despite two jabs?
After all that hydroxychloroquene?
What now, you gutless wonder?
****!!! There is a ton of evidence that proves Ivermectin is effective as a preventative and cure for the wuhan virus at all stages!!! You just have to look in places that are not owned and controlled by big pharma that do not put out their lies and propaganda.Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2021, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑ Ivermectin shows anti viral capacity, but only at dosage levels you cannot achieve.
There is no evidence that it works against COVID.
https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer- ... t-covid-19