Ivermectin Works!!!

User avatar
By Buffalo
31 May 2021 11:50 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 15 16 17 18 19 38
User avatar
supraTruth
18 Jun 2021 8:00 am
18 Jun 2021 8:00 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
1,152 posts
Buffalo » 18 Jun 2021, 4:48 am » wrote: I already knew you were a goddamn ****, moonbatty idiot.   There is tons of information and PROOF that Ivermectin isa and effective, proven prophlylaxis  (that means it prevents) the kung flu as well as being effective treatment for the wuhan flu. 

Ivermectin is highly effective as a safe prophylaxis and treatment for COVID-19: Comprehensive review

by PRESS RELEASE

May 9, 2021

Drugs and antibioticsResearch Peer reviewed by medical experts that included three U.S. government senior scientists and published in the American Journal of Therapeutics, the research is the most comprehensive review of the available data taken from clinical, in vitro, animal, and real-world studies. Led by the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), a group of medical and scientific experts reviewed published peer-reviewed studies, manuscripts, expert meta-analyses, and epidemiological analyses of regions with ivermectin distribution efforts all showing that ivermectin is an effective prophylaxis and treatment for COVID-19. 

“We did the work that the medical authorities failed to do, we conducted the most comprehensive review of the available data on ivermectin,” said Pierre Kory, M.P.A., MD, president and chief medical officer of the FLCCC. “We applied the gold standard to qualify the data reviewed before concluding that ivermectin can end this pandemic.”

http://outbreaknewstoday.com/ivermectin ... iew-12291/

That said, I am not interested in your prejudiced, uninformed, ignorant opinion. So, **** OFF!!!
So, u saying every1 should just daily dose with your 🐎**** instead of the vaccine?  For  how long & at what cost?
Image
 
User avatar
Buffalo
21 Jun 2021 11:54 am
21 Jun 2021 11:54 am
User avatar
      
5,214 posts
supraTruth » 18 Jun 2021, 8:00 am » wrote: So, u saying every1 should just daily dose with your 🐎**** instead of the vaccine?  For  how long & at what cost?

 
A daily dose up your **** ***, superliar, should do the trick!!! :die:  

IVERMECTIN WORKS!!!  Big pharma cannot be happy about this.   :clap:  New Study Links Ivermectin to ‘Large Reductions’ In COVID-19 Deaths
BY TOM OZIMEK
 


June 21, 2021 Updated: June 21, 2021
A recent pre-print review based on peer-reviewed studies has found that using antiparasitic drug ivermectin could lead to “large reductions” in COVID-19 deaths and its use could have a “significant impact” on the pandemic globally.

For the study (pdf), published on June 17 in the American Journal of Therapeutics, a group of scientists reviewed the clinical trial use of ivermectin, which has antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties, in 24 randomized controlled trials involving just over 3,400 participants. The researchers sought to assess the efficacy of ivermectin in reducing infection or mortality in people with COVID-19 or at high risk of getting it.

Using multiple methods of sequential analysis, the researchers concluded with a moderate level of confidence that the drug reduced the risk of death in COVID-19 patients by an average of 62 percent, at a 95 percent confidence interval of 0.19-0.79, in a sample of 2438 patients.

Among hospitalized COVID-19 patients, the risk of death was found to be 2.3 percent among those treated with the drug, compared to 7.8 percent for those who were not, according to the review.

“Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease,” the authors wrote.ImageA health worker shows a box containing a bottle of Ivermectin as part of a study of the Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases Studies, in Cali, Colombia, on July 21, 2020. (Luis Robayo/AFP via Getty Images)
Since the start of the pandemic, both observational and randomized studies have evaluated ivermectin as a treatment for, and as prevention against, COVID-19 infection.

“A review by the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance summarized findings from 27 studies on the effects of ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection, concluding that ivermectin ‘demonstrates a strong signal of therapeutic efficacy’ against COVID-19” the researchers wrote, referring to one recent review, which was based on data from both peer-reviewed studies and preprint manuscripts.

They cited another recent review that concluded that ivermectin reduced deaths by as much as 75 percent, while noting that neither the National Institutes of Health in the United States nor the World Health Organization (WHO) have recommended the use of ivermectin outside clinical trials for use in the fight against COVID-19.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in a note on “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19,” warns that it has received “multiple reports of patients who have required medical support and been hospitalized after self-medicating with ivermectin intended for horses.”

“Using any treatment for COVID-19 that’s not approved or authorized by the FDA, unless part of a clinical trial, can cause serious harm,” the FDA said in the note, adding that it has not reviewed data to support the use of ivermectin in COVID-19 patients.

The WHO said in March that “the current evidence on the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19 patients is inconclusive” and that, until more data becomes available, the agency recommends that “the drug only be used within clinical trials.”

The authors of the ivermectin efficacy study argued, however, that the drug has an “established safety profile through decades of use” and “could play a critical role in suppressing or even ending the SARS-CoV2 pandemic.”

“The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally,” they argued in the study abstract.

The authors noted in their publication that all the studies on which they based their conclusions have been peer-reviewed.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_break ... 39dQ%3D%3D
 
User avatar
supraTruth
21 Jun 2021 12:08 pm
21 Jun 2021 12:08 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
1,152 posts
Buffalo » 21 Jun 2021, 11:54 am » wrote: A daily dose up your **** ***, superliar, should do the trick!!! Image  

IVERMECTIN WORKS!!!  Big pharma cannot be happy about this.   Image  New Study Links Ivermectin to ‘Large Reductions’ In COVID-19 Deaths
BY TOM OZIMEK

June 21, 2021 Updated: June 21, 2021
A recent pre-print review based on peer-reviewed studies has found that using antiparasitic drug ivermectin could lead to “large reductions” in COVID-19 deaths and its use could have a “significant impact” on the pandemic globally.

For the study (pdf), published on June 17 in the American Journal of Therapeutics, a group of scientists reviewed the clinical trial use of ivermectin, which has antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties, in 24 randomized controlled trials involving just over 3,400 participants. The researchers sought to assess the efficacy of ivermectin in reducing infection or mortality in people with COVID-19 or at high risk of getting it.

Using multiple methods of sequential analysis, the researchers concluded with a moderate level of confidence that the drug reduced the risk of death in COVID-19 patients by an average of 62 percent, at a 95 percent confidence interval of 0.19-0.79, in a sample of 2438 patients.

Among hospitalized COVID-19 patients, the risk of death was found to be 2.3 percent among those treated with the drug, compared to 7.8 percent for those who were not, according to the review.

“Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease,” the authors wrote.ImageA health worker shows a box containing a bottle of Ivermectin as part of a study of the Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases Studies, in Cali, Colombia, on July 21, 2020. (Luis Robayo/AFP via Getty Images)
Since the start of the pandemic, both observational and randomized studies have evaluated ivermectin as a treatment for, and as prevention against, COVID-19 infection.

“A review by the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance summarized findings from 27 studies on the effects of ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection, concluding that ivermectin ‘demonstrates a strong signal of therapeutic efficacy’ against COVID-19” the researchers wrote, referring to one recent review, which was based on data from both peer-reviewed studies and preprint manuscripts.

They cited another recent review that concluded that ivermectin reduced deaths by as much as 75 percent, while noting that neither the National Institutes of Health in the United States nor the World Health Organization (WHO) have recommended the use of ivermectin outside clinical trials for use in the fight against COVID-19.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in a note on “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19,” warns that it has received “multiple reports of patients who have required medical support and been hospitalized after self-medicating with ivermectin intended for horses.”

“Using any treatment for COVID-19 that’s not approved or authorized by the FDA, unless part of a clinical trial, can cause serious harm,” the FDA said in the note, adding that it has not reviewed data to support the use of ivermectin in COVID-19 patients.

The WHO said in March that “the current evidence on the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19 patients is inconclusive” and that, until more data becomes available, the agency recommends that “the drug only be used within clinical trials.”

The authors of the ivermectin efficacy study argued, however, that the drug has an “established safety profile through decades of use” and “could play a critical role in suppressing or even ending the SARS-CoV2 pandemic.”

“The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally,” they argued in the study abstract.

The authors noted in their publication that all the studies on which they based their conclusions have been peer-reviewed.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_break ... 39dQ%3D%3D
If U want to BUY & INJECT A DAILY DOSE of your 🐎**** up YOUR ***, THEN PLEASE DO!

I don't need it because I have already taken the free (to me) SAFE VACCINE SHOTS! 
User avatar
sooted up Cyndi
21 Jun 2021 12:20 pm
21 Jun 2021 12:20 pm
User avatar
Water Cooler Poleece
Water Cooler Poleece
10,440 posts
Buffalo » 21 Jun 2021, 11:54 am » wrote: A daily dose up your **** ***, superliar, should do the trick!!! Image  

IVERMECTIN WORKS!!!  Big pharma cannot be happy about this.   Image  New Study Links Ivermectin to ‘Large Reductions’ In COVID-19 Deaths
BY TOM OZIMEK

June 21, 2021 Updated: June 21, 2021
A recent pre-print review based on peer-reviewed studies has found that using antiparasitic drug ivermectin could lead to “large reductions” in COVID-19 deaths and its use could have a “significant impact” on the pandemic globally.

For the study (pdf), published on June 17 in the American Journal of Therapeutics, a group of scientists reviewed the clinical trial use of ivermectin, which has antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties, in 24 randomized controlled trials involving just over 3,400 participants. The researchers sought to assess the efficacy of ivermectin in reducing infection or mortality in people with COVID-19 or at high risk of getting it.

Using multiple methods of sequential analysis, the researchers concluded with a moderate level of confidence that the drug reduced the risk of death in COVID-19 patients by an average of 62 percent, at a 95 percent confidence interval of 0.19-0.79, in a sample of 2438 patients.

Among hospitalized COVID-19 patients, the risk of death was found to be 2.3 percent among those treated with the drug, compared to 7.8 percent for those who were not, according to the review.

“Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease,” the authors wrote.ImageA health worker shows a box containing a bottle of Ivermectin as part of a study of the Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases Studies, in Cali, Colombia, on July 21, 2020. (Luis Robayo/AFP via Getty Images)
Since the start of the pandemic, both observational and randomized studies have evaluated ivermectin as a treatment for, and as prevention against, COVID-19 infection.

“A review by the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance summarized findings from 27 studies on the effects of ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection, concluding that ivermectin ‘demonstrates a strong signal of therapeutic efficacy’ against COVID-19” the researchers wrote, referring to one recent review, which was based on data from both peer-reviewed studies and preprint manuscripts.

They cited another recent review that concluded that ivermectin reduced deaths by as much as 75 percent, while noting that neither the National Institutes of Health in the United States nor the World Health Organization (WHO) have recommended the use of ivermectin outside clinical trials for use in the fight against COVID-19.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in a note on “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19,” warns that it has received “multiple reports of patients who have required medical support and been hospitalized after self-medicating with ivermectin intended for horses.”

“Using any treatment for COVID-19 that’s not approved or authorized by the FDA, unless part of a clinical trial, can cause serious harm,” the FDA said in the note, adding that it has not reviewed data to support the use of ivermectin in COVID-19 patients.

The WHO said in March that “the current evidence on the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19 patients is inconclusive” and that, until more data becomes available, the agency recommends that “the drug only be used within clinical trials.”

The authors of the ivermectin efficacy study argued, however, that the drug has an “established safety profile through decades of use” and “could play a critical role in suppressing or even ending the SARS-CoV2 pandemic.”

“The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally,” they argued in the study abstract.

The authors noted in their publication that all the studies on which they based their conclusions have been peer-reviewed.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_break ... 39dQ%3D%3D
Here here Buffalo.. i saved it for you. Dont know if you saw this... its getting out..  good.  thought you may have been at your dads and missed it. It is a bit low in sound... very interesting.. 
https://twitter.com/MariaBartiromo/stat ... gr%5Etweet
Image
User avatar
supraTruth
21 Jun 2021 12:56 pm
21 Jun 2021 12:56 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
1,152 posts
sootedupCyndi » 21 Jun 2021, 12:20 pm » wrote: Here here Buffalo.. i saved it for you. Dont know if you saw this... its getting out..  good.  thought you may have been at your dads and missed it. It is a bit low in sound... very interesting.. 
https://twitter.com/MariaBartiromo/stat ... gr%5Etweet
& idiots, it was still COVIDIOT REX's administration that did NOTHING about supplying Ivermectin to the American people LAST YEAR as the deaths grew to HALF A MILLION!  ZILCH!  BUT DID THAT RNC WHORE MARIA EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE THAT FACT!  NO!

      COVIDIOT REX     

Image
 
User avatar
Buffalo
21 Jun 2021 1:00 pm
21 Jun 2021 1:00 pm
User avatar
      
5,214 posts
sootedupCyndi » 21 Jun 2021, 12:20 pm » wrote: Here here Buffalo.. i saved it for you. Dont know if you saw this... its getting out..  good.  thought you may have been at your dads and missed it. It is a bit low in sound... very interesting.. 
https://twitter.com/MariaBartiromo/stat ... gr%5Etweet
Thank you so much sweetheart for saving that for me.  :wub:   :clap:  Yes I did miss it.  

Isn't it amazing how ****  idiots, like vegasgiant and superliar, a so easily duped by government, lapdog media, and big tech censorship and propaganda all to protect the $BILLIONS in profits for big pharma.

Well, they can have their vaccines made form aborted fetus cells and stick them up their stupid asses!!! 

As I have said, I dosed myself and my 91 year old Dad early with Ivermectin in January 2021 when I found out that a friend of mine had caught the wuhan **** and had no ill effects form the wuhan **** even though I tested positive for it.  Dad never even caught it because I dosed him before he was exposed.


 
User avatar
supraTruth
21 Jun 2021 1:05 pm
21 Jun 2021 1:05 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
1,152 posts
Buffalo » 21 Jun 2021, 1:00 pm » wrote: Thank you so much sweetheart for saving that for me.  Image   Image  Yes I did miss it.  

Isn't it amazing how ****  idiots, like vegasgiant and superliar, a so easily duped by government, lapdog media, and big tech censorship and propaganda all to protect the $BILLIONS in profits for big pharma.

Well, they can have their vaccines made form aborted fetus cells and stick them up their stupid asses!!! 

As I have said, I dosed myself and my 91 year old Dad early with Ivermectin in January 2021 when I found out that a friend of mine had caught the wuhan **** and had no ill effects form the wuhan **** even though I tested positive for it.  Dad never even caught it because I dosed him before he was exposed.
& idiots, it was still COVIDIOT REX's administration that did NOTHING about supplying Ivermectin to the American people LAST YEAR as the deaths grew to HALF A MILLION!  ZILCH!  BUT DID THAT RNC WHORE MARIA EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE THAT FACT!  NO!

  COVIDIOT REX     

Image
User avatar
sooted up Cyndi
21 Jun 2021 1:12 pm
21 Jun 2021 1:12 pm
User avatar
Water Cooler Poleece
Water Cooler Poleece
10,440 posts
Buffalo » 21 Jun 2021, 1:00 pm » wrote: Thank you so much sweetheart for saving that for me.  Image   Image  Yes I did miss it.  

Isn't it amazing how ****  idiots, like vegasgiant and superliar, a so easily duped by government, lapdog media, and big tech censorship and propaganda all to protect the $BILLIONS in profits for big pharma.

Well, they can have their vaccines made form aborted fetus cells and stick them up their stupid asses!!! 

As I have said, I dosed myself and my 91 year old Dad early with Ivermectin in January 2021 when I found out that a friend of mine had caught the wuhan **** and had no ill effects form the wuhan **** even though I tested positive for it.  Dad never even caught it because I dosed him before he was exposed.
Vindication for you and Cannon.. I hunted for it. I figured you may have not caught it.. :wub:   :wub:  its a start... Buffalo. we are so censored here.... all they want to do is sell vaccines.. and its not over yet... this fall will be a another variant.. do it again.. omg omg, they really are so evil...
Image
User avatar
Buffalo
21 Jun 2021 1:25 pm
21 Jun 2021 1:25 pm
User avatar
      
5,214 posts
supraTruth » 21 Jun 2021, 1:05 pm » wrote: & idiots, it was still COVIDIOT REX's administration that did NOTHING about supplying Ivermectin to the American people LAST YEAR as the deaths grew to HALF A MILLION!  ZILCH!  BUT DID THAT RNC WHORE MARIA EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE THAT FACT!  NO!

  COVIDIOT REX     


 
That is because he listened to the likes of fauci...idiot!!!
 
User avatar
supraTruth
21 Jun 2021 3:16 pm
21 Jun 2021 3:16 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
1,152 posts
Buffalo » 21 Jun 2021, 1:25 pm » wrote: That is because he listened to the likes of fauci...idiot!!!
But the 🍊🐷 is still your 🐷 god.
User avatar
Buffalo
22 Jun 2021 6:29 am
22 Jun 2021 6:29 am
User avatar
      
5,214 posts
supraTruth » 21 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm » wrote: If U want to BUY & INJECT A DAILY DOSE of your 🐎**** up YOUR ***, THEN PLEASE DO!

I don't need it because I have already taken the free (to me) SAFE VACCINE SHOTS! 
Ivermectin has a 40 year record of safety.  YOU and MILLIONS of other guinea pigs have no idea the long term affects of the gene therapy called vaccines.

Not to worry, the big pharma manufacturers are immune from prosecution. That's the only immunity your precious untested vaccine shots give.

GOOD LUCK!!!

mRNA vaccines appear to be damaging red blood cells

By John M. Contino 

Citing experts at the Meedan Digital Health Lab Reuters Fact Check vigorously asserts that the spike proteins induced by the COVID vaccines do not kill or damage cells.

Perhaps so, but something from the vaccines is causing deformations and apparent inflammation in red blood cells, as evidenced by images from microscopy photos. Images of blood cells taken before and after the vaccines can be seen starting about two minutes into the five-minute video. Postvaccine red blood cells exhibit rough instead of smooth edges, irregular shapes, and grouping together over time which is described as the “beginning form of thrombosis,” or blood clots. More research is needed to determine exactly what is causing these cell deformations.

There are also numerous tiny white particles in the photographs which are presumed to be lipid nanoparticles (LNP). The delicate mRNA fragments from Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are encased in LNP, which serves to protect the mRNA from disintegrating before it can do its job in our bodies. Pfizer conducted a biodistribution study where they injected rats with bioluminescent RNA-encapsulated LNP, and found that the LNP had travelled not only beyond the injection site, but throughout the circulatory and immune systems, and had accumulated in virtually every organ in the body.

Meanwhile, Spain and Russia are reportedly advising citizens to avoid air travel if they have been vaccinated for COVID-19. It’s common knowledge that flying frequently, especially on long distance international flights, can cause blood clots, but talk about mixed signals! What’s next, nonvaccination passports? The takeaway here ought to be that whether or not someone gets vaccinated should be a personal decision, and that the practice of forcing people, especially students and younger adults, to get vaccinated, should be abandoned.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/20 ... cells.html


Ivermectin Could Have Saved ‘Millions’ of Lives —But Doctors Were Told Not to Use It

In an interview with Bret Weinstein Ph.D., Dr. Pierre Kory, president and chief medical officer of the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance discussed the importance of early treatment of COVID-19 and the shameful censoring of information about ivermectin.

By 
Dr. Joseph Mercola

Story at-a-glance:
  • Data clearly show ivermectin can prevent COVID-19 and when used early can keep patients from progressing to the hyper-inflammatory phase of the disease. It can even help critically ill patients recover.
  •  
  • Ivermectin has a long history of use as an antiparasitic, but its antiviral properties have been under investigation since 2012.
  •  
  • Studies have shown ivermectin inhibits replication of SARS-CoV-2 and seasonal influenza viruses, inhibits inflammation through several pathways, lowers viral load, protects against organ damage, prevents transmission of SARS-CoV-2 when taken before or after exposure, speeds recovery and lowers risk of hospitalization and death in COVID-19 patients.
  •  
  • Doctors have been told not to use ivermectin as large controlled trials are still lacking. However, once you can see from clinical evidence that something is working, then conducting controlled trials becomes unethical, as you know you’re condemning the control group to poor outcomes or death. In fact, this is the exact argument vaccine makers now use to justify the elimination of control groups and giving everyone the vaccine.
  •  
  • The Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance recommends widespread use of ivermectin for all stages of COVID-19, including prevention.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defe ... ons-lives/
 
 
User avatar
Buffalo
22 Jun 2021 6:46 am
22 Jun 2021 6:46 am
User avatar
      
5,214 posts
DennisTheMenace » 22 Jun 2021, 6:30 am » wrote: How do you know...have you taken the vaccine?
No and I do not intend to take the unproven ****!!!

In January, after being exposed to the virus, from a visiting friend who did not know he had it until he experienced symptoms, I dosed myself and my 91 year old Dad twice with Ivermectin.  My friend got back home and his wife had caught the virus from the same friend as he did.  I lost my sense of smell and taste for about a week and  experienced NO other symptoms. I already had a regular scheduled doctor visit 3 days later and tested positive for the ****. At the follow up my much younger doctor was amazed that I had no ill effects. He had caught the virus back in October and was sick and quarantined at home for weeks.  He still was not fully convinced about Ivermectin.  My Dad never caught it.
User avatar
Buffalo
22 Jun 2021 8:52 am
22 Jun 2021 8:52 am
User avatar
      
5,214 posts
supraTruth » 21 Jun 2021, 1:05 pm » wrote: & idiots, it was still COVIDIOT REX's administration that did NOTHING about supplying Ivermectin to the American people LAST YEAR as the deaths grew to HALF A MILLION!  ZILCH!  BUT DID THAT RNC WHORE MARIA EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE THAT FACT!  NO!

  COVIDIOT REX     


 
Would you have taken Ivermectin had they touted it as the preventative and cure of the wuhan virus it is?  

Fauci is not a trained virologist. As a loyal friend of big pharma, he has shown no skill in following any science that conflicts with that industry's interests.
 
User avatar
Blackvegetable
22 Jun 2021 9:20 am
22 Jun 2021 9:20 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
40,269 posts
Buffalo » 21 Jun 2021, 1:25 pm » wrote: That is because he listened to the likes of fauci...idiot!!!
No, he didn't.


Grifty sucks because Grifty sucks.


 
User avatar
Blackvegetable
22 Jun 2021 9:22 am
22 Jun 2021 9:22 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
40,269 posts
Buffalo » 22 Jun 2021, 8:52 am » wrote: Would you have taken Ivermectin had they touted it as the preventative and cure of the wuhan virus it is?  

Fauci is not a trained virologist. As a loyal friend of big pharma, he has shown no skill in following any science that conflicts with that industry's interests.
Ivermectin shows anti viral capacity, but only at dosage levels you cannot achieve.


There is no evidence that it works against COVID.

https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer- ... t-covid-19
User avatar
Famagusta
22 Jun 2021 11:34 am
22 Jun 2021 11:34 am
User avatar
   
846 posts
Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2021, 9:22 am » wrote: Ivermectin shows anti viral capacity, but only at dosage levels you cannot achieve.

There is no evidence that it works against COVID.

https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer- ... t-covid-19
Does the vaccine?

If so, why does one have to be tested on returning from Spain, despite two jabs?
User avatar
Blackvegetable
22 Jun 2021 12:23 pm
22 Jun 2021 12:23 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
40,269 posts
Famagusta » 22 Jun 2021, 11:34 am » wrote: Does the vaccine?

If so, why does one have to be tested on returning from Spain, despite two jabs?
Yes...it does....**** idiot.
User avatar
Blackvegetable
22 Jun 2021 12:25 pm
22 Jun 2021 12:25 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
40,269 posts
Vegasgiants » 22 Jun 2021, 12:17 pm » wrote: Why didnt trump take it?  Lol
After all that hydroxychloroquene?

He couldn't force down another bite.
 
User avatar
Famagusta
22 Jun 2021 12:42 pm
22 Jun 2021 12:42 pm
User avatar
   
846 posts
Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2021, 12:23 pm » wrote: Yes...it does....**** idiot.
What now, you gutless wonder?
User avatar
Buffalo
22 Jun 2021 12:57 pm
22 Jun 2021 12:57 pm
User avatar
      
5,214 posts
Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2021, 9:22 am » wrote: Ivermectin shows anti viral capacity, but only at dosage levels you cannot achieve.

There is no evidence that it works against COVID.

https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer- ... t-covid-19
****!!!  There is a ton of evidence that proves Ivermectin is effective as a preventative and cure for the wuhan virus at all stages!!!  You just have to look in places that are not owned and controlled by big pharma that do not put out their lies and propaganda.

 
1 15 16 17 18 19 38

Who is online

In total there are 2265 users online :: 19 registered, 19 bots, and 2227 guests
Bots: LCC, DuckDuckBot, app.hypefactors.com, Yahoo! Slurp, oBot, curl/7, proximic, Custo, CriteoBot, facebookexternalhit, semantic-visions.com, Mediapartners-Google, ADmantX, Applebot, DuckDuckGo, linkfluence.com, YandexBot, Googlebot, bingbot
Updated 4 minutes ago
© 2012-2025 Liberal Forum