Liberal Forum

Buffalo » 26 Aug 2021, 6:07 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Aug 2021, 6:07 pm

 

Buffybutthurt the LIAR and TRAITOR still pulling BS out of his *** and running AWAY from the FACTS which he ALWAYS HATES



https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02081-w

Flawed ivermectin preprint highlights challenges of COVID drug studies

Throughout the pandemic, the anti-parasite drug ivermectin has attracted much attention, particularly in Latin America, as a potential way to treat COVID-19. But scientists say that recent, shocking revelations of widespread flaws in the data of a preprint study reporting that the medication greatly reduces COVID-19 deaths dampens ivermectin’s promise — and highlights the challenges of investigating drug efficacy during a pandemic.

“I was shocked, as everyone in the scientific community probably were,” says Eduardo López-Medina, a paediatrician at the Centre for the Study of Paediatric Infections in Cali, Colombia, who was not involved with the study and who has investigated whether ivermectin can improve COVID-19 symptoms. “It was one of the first papers that led everyone to get into the idea ivermectin worked” in a clinical-trial setting, he adds.

https://ebm.bmj.com/content/early/2021/ ... 021-111678

Misleading clinical evidence and systematic reviews on ivermectin for COVID-19

Ivermectin is a broad-spectrum antiparasitic agent approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the USA proved to be safe at the conventional dose of ≤200 µg/kg, although severe adverse effects ranging from ataxia to seizures have occasionally been reported.5 And due to its in vitro antiviral activity against a broad range of viruses, it has been used off-label for the treatment of some viral diseases.13 17

In a vertiginous search for COVID-19 treatments, Caly et al conducted an in vitro exploration that showed ivermectin’s inhibitor role on the replication of the SARS-CoV-2 virus,17 18 among few other in silico and in vitro results suggesting the same.19–21 Thus, a considerable amount of preprints and protocol records quickly appeared, reporting the clinical efficacy of ivermectin in standard doses for COVID-19. The dissemination of these results caused confusion, and the general population and some clinicians endorsed the use of ivermectin, especially in Latin America.22 However, in a matter of days since the publication of Caly et al17 and its repercussions, a general publication from the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) stated that “…ivermectin is incorrectly being used for the treatment of COVID-19, without any scientific evidence of its efficacy and safety for the treatment of this disease.”23

An important controversial point to consider in any rationale is the 5 µM required concentration to reach the anti-SARS-CoV-2 action of ivermectin observed in vitro,17 which is much higher than 0.28 µM, the maximum reported plasma concentration achieved in vivo with a dose of approximately 1700 µg/kg (about nine times the FDA-approved dosification).24 25 In this sense, basic fundamentals for assessing ivermectin in COVID-19 at a clinical level appear to be insufficient. Among other reasons, we believe this might have led WHO to exclude ivermectin from its Solidarity Trial for repurposed drugs for COVID-19,12 which raises questions about the pertinence of conducting clinical studies on ivermectin.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/04/scie ... tment.html

https://www.yahoo.com/now/column-major- ... 51048.html

Column: Major study of Ivermectin, the anti-vaccine crowd's latest COVID drug, finds 'no effect whatsoever'

I've had enough abuse and so have the other clinical trialists doing Ivermectin. Others working in this area have been threatened, their families have been threatened, they've been defamed.

Edward Mills, COVID researcher

Among the 1,500 patients in the study, he said, Ivermectin showed "no effect whatsoever" on the trial's outcome goals — whether patients required extended observation in the emergency room or hospitalization.

"In our specific trial," he said, "we do not see the treatment benefit that a lot of the advocates believe should have been" seen.
 
 

sootedupCyndi » 26 Aug 2021, 3:04 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Aug 2021, 3:04 pm

PAY ATTENTION...  you old fart.. I relayed the message.. to GEORGE... an I am going to send you a home email !!  WHAT he said to do... pay attention.. and I better not be a foolish thing about your me me's..   
@nuckin futz

OK Princess, I emailed you! Go ahead with it!

You know what the most dangerous thing is?
Aunt Crabby using a chain saw after dark!        


 

Isabel » 26 Aug 2021, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Aug 2021, 2:15 pm

At college level by middle school, you stupid, uneducated, toothless Nazi clown.

YOU:    Ivermectin is not poison. In fact, in its 45 year use it has proven to be SAFER

To treat parasitic worms, you idiot.

YOU:    than the experimental cocktails od so-called vaccines big pharma have hastily concocted that have demonstrated a high percentage of severe drug reactions to those experimental "vaccines".

Complete and total lie, you lying Russian whore.

YOU:    Ivermectin has been administered to humans BILLIONS of time

For parasitic infections, moron. 

YOU:    with virtually NO adverse side effects.

Ivermectin  can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, hypotension (low blood pressure), allergic reactions (itching and hives), dizziness, ataxia (problems with balance), seizures, coma and even death. 

YOU:     Given the evidence of efficacy, safety, low cost, and current death rates, ivermectin is likely to have an impact on health and economic outcomes of the pandemic across many countries.

Lie.

YOU:    Ivermectin is not a new and experimental drug with an unknown safety profile. It is a WHO “Essential Medicine” already used in several different indications, in colossal cumulative volumes.

Yes, for parasitic infections, you brainless stooge.

YOU:    .Ivermectin is likely to be an equitable, acceptable, and feasible global intervention against COVID-19.

Utterly false . 

YOU:    Health professionals should strongly consider its use, in both treatment and prophylaxis.

Health professionals consider it dangerous quack medicine.

COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects Are Underreported Too

This is worth keeping in mind, as the same applies to reported COVID-19 vaccine side effects, which as of April 23, 2021, included a total of 118,902 adverse events, 12,618 of which were serious and 3,544 of which died.15

As tragic as those numbers are, these too represent an undercount, as the U.S. vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) is a passive surveillance system that relies on voluntary reporting. Historically, less than 10% of vaccine side effects are reported to VAERS.16 An investigation by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services put it as low as 1%.17,18

What this means is side effects may actually be 10 times or even 100 times higher than reported. We could, in reality, be looking at anywhere from 126,000 to 1.2 million serious side effects, and anywhere from 35,440 to 354,400 vaccine-related deaths.

VAERS appears to be backlogged for months. Rare but serious side effects may be occurring but we just can’t see the trend, and the longer the backlog, the more people will be exposed to a potentially dangerous vaccine.

Right now, it’s also difficult to get an accurate idea of where we are with regard to side effects as VAERS appears to be backlogged for months. On Twitter, Alex Berenson19 noted that it had taken until the end of April for the CDC to respond to a report from January, which indicates the data you see on VAERS does not reflect the true, real-time numbers of adverse reactions being reported.

This is important to know, since the system’s primary goal is to “detect new, unusual or rare vaccine adverse events” as a way to monitor safety of vaccines. A backlog by months indicates that, quite possibly, there are so many reports coming in that that the CDC can’t handle them. 

Rare but serious side effects may be occurring but we just can’t see the trend because the data isn’t showing, and the longer the backlog, the more people will be exposed to a potentially dangerous vaccine. Why Are Thousands of Deaths Ignored?

In an interview with journalist Alex Newman (video above), Dr. Peter McCullough stated he believes the government’s response to the pandemic has resulted in tens of thousands of unnecessary deaths, and the mass vaccination program is now causing thousands more and they’re just letting it happen. 

He’s baffled at the government’s nonexistent response to the thousands of deaths already logged into VAERS, noting that the 1976 swine flu pandemic mass vaccination program was pulled after just 25 deaths and a few hundred cases of paralysis. Drugs are also yanked from the market at around 50 unexplained deaths. 

On average, there are 20 to 30 deaths reported following the seasonal flu vaccine, which is given to about 195 million Americans each year.20 Compare that to the COVID-19 vaccines. At 95 million vaccinations administered, the death count is already at 3,542, the highest for any vaccine in history. The contrast in response is “alarming,” McCullough says.

Even more concerning, after reviewing 1,600 of these deaths, the FDA declared not a single death was related to the vaccine. McCullough doesn’t believe it, because he knows from first-hand experience it would take months to investigate that many deaths. 

“It is impossible for unnamed regulatory doctors without any experience with COVID 19 to opine that none of the deaths were related to the vaccine,” he says. “We’re sitting on, right now, the biggest number of vaccine deaths, there’s been tens of thousands of hospitalizations, all attributable to the vaccine, and going strong … 

 

In my professional opinion, the safest vaccine on the market was the J&J vaccine. And that was pulled for very rare blood-clotting events. We had seven million people vaccinated but the estimates are for the other two vaccines available [Pfizer and Moderna], the blood-clotting rates are probably 30 times that of J&J, and these others are going strong.”

 CDC Ignores Reports of Serious Adverse EffectsGetting back to the CDC, it has also decided it will no longer monitor all reported vaccine breakthrough cases (perhaps because they’re overloaded with reports of side effects?) and will only investigate vaccine breakthrough infections that result in hospitalization or death.22

Recent complaints from medical professionals raise questions about the CDC’s ability to do even that part of the job. 

As reported by Review Journal,23,24 the medical team that treated an 18-year-old girl admitted for blood clots in the brain, low platelet count and other signs of a rare blood clotting disorder shortly after receiving Johnson & Johnson’s COVID-19 injection, “urgently sought guidance” from the CDC, the U.S. Food and Drug

Administration and Johnson & Johnson for ideas on how to best treat their young patient.


Their inquiries and pleas for help were ignored all around. The FDA “basically hung up on me,” Dr. Brian Lipman told Review Journal, adding, “We basically got no help from anyone.” It took more than a week before the CDC even got around to calling back. That’s hardly what you’d expect from the world’s most preeminent infectious disease experts when you’re dealing with an acutely life-threatening case. 

https://undercurrents723949620.wordpres ... e-effects/

 

Buffalo » 26 Aug 2021, 7:24 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Aug 2021, 7:24 pm

 

Buffybutthurt the LIAR and TRAITOR still pulling BS out of his *** and running AWAY from the FACTS which he ALWAYS HATES

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02081-w

Flawed ivermectin preprint highlights challenges of COVID drug studies

Throughout the pandemic, the anti-parasite drug ivermectin has attracted much attention, particularly in Latin America, as a potential way to treat COVID-19. But scientists say that recent, shocking revelations of widespread flaws in the data of a preprint study reporting that the medication greatly reduces COVID-19 deaths dampens ivermectin’s promise — and highlights the challenges of investigating drug efficacy during a pandemic.

“I was shocked, as everyone in the scientific community probably were,” says Eduardo López-Medina, a paediatrician at the Centre for the Study of Paediatric Infections in Cali, Colombia, who was not involved with the study and who has investigated whether ivermectin can improve COVID-19 symptoms. “It was one of the first papers that led everyone to get into the idea ivermectin worked” in a clinical-trial setting, he adds.

https://ebm.bmj.com/content/early/2021/ ... 021-111678

Misleading clinical evidence and systematic reviews on ivermectin for COVID-19

Ivermectin is a broad-spectrum antiparasitic agent approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the USA proved to be safe at the conventional dose of ≤200 µg/kg, although severe adverse effects ranging from ataxia to seizures have occasionally been reported.5 And due to its in vitro antiviral activity against a broad range of viruses, it has been used off-label for the treatment of some viral diseases.13 17

In a vertiginous search for COVID-19 treatments, Caly et al conducted an in vitro exploration that showed ivermectin’s inhibitor role on the replication of the SARS-CoV-2 virus,17 18 among few other in silico and in vitro results suggesting the same.19–21 Thus, a considerable amount of preprints and protocol records quickly appeared, reporting the clinical efficacy of ivermectin in standard doses for COVID-19. The dissemination of these results caused confusion, and the general population and some clinicians endorsed the use of ivermectin, especially in Latin America.22 However, in a matter of days since the publication of Caly et al17 and its repercussions, a general publication from the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) stated that “…ivermectin is incorrectly being used for the treatment of COVID-19, without any scientific evidence of its efficacy and safety for the treatment of this disease.”23

An important controversial point to consider in any rationale is the 5 µM required concentration to reach the anti-SARS-CoV-2 action of ivermectin observed in vitro,17 which is much higher than 0.28 µM, the maximum reported plasma concentration achieved in vivo with a dose of approximately 1700 µg/kg (about nine times the FDA-approved dosification).24 25 In this sense, basic fundamentals for assessing ivermectin in COVID-19 at a clinical level appear to be insufficient. Among other reasons, we believe this might have led WHO to exclude ivermectin from its Solidarity Trial for repurposed drugs for COVID-19,12 which raises questions about the pertinence of conducting clinical studies on ivermectin.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/04/scie ... tment.html

https://www.yahoo.com/now/column-major- ... 51048.html

Column: Major study of Ivermectin, the anti-vaccine crowd's latest COVID drug, finds 'no effect whatsoever'

I've had enough abuse and so have the other clinical trialists doing Ivermectin. Others working in this area have been threatened, their families have been threatened, they've been defamed.

Edward Mills, COVID researcher

Among the 1,500 patients in the study, he said, Ivermectin showed "no effect whatsoever" on the trial's outcome goals — whether patients required extended observation in the emergency room or hospitalization.

"In our specific trial," he said, "we do not see the treatment benefit that a lot of the advocates believe should have been" seen.
 

Use of Ivermectin Is Associated With Lower Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: The Ivermectin in COVID Nineteen Study



https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33065103/


Ivermectin works!!!

Ivermectin is highly effective as a safe prophylaxis and treatment for COVID-19:

Comprehensive review by PRESS RELEASE


May 9, 2021

Drugs and antibiotics


Peer reviewed by medical experts that included three U.S. government senior scientists and published in the American Journal of Therapeutics, the research is the most comprehensive review of the available data taken from clinical, in vitro, animal, and real-world studies. Led by the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), a group of medical and scientific experts reviewed published peer-reviewed studies, manuscripts, expert meta-analyses, and epidemiological analyses of regions with ivermectin distribution efforts all showing that ivermectin is an effective prophylaxis and treatment for COVID-19.



“We did the work that the medical authorities failed to do, we conducted the most comprehensive review of the available data on ivermectin,” said Pierre Kory, M.P.A., MD, president and chief medical officer of the FLCCC. “We applied the gold standard to qualify the data reviewed before concluding that ivermectin can end this pandemic.”

Many regions around the world now recognize that ivermectin is a powerful prophylaxis and treatment for COVID-19. South Africa, Zimbabwe, Slovakia, Czech Republic, Mexico, and now, India, have approved the drug for use by medical professionals. The results as seen in this latest study demonstrate that the ivermectin distribution campaigns repeatedly led to “rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality.”

“Our latest research shows, once again, that when the totality of the evidence is examined, there is no doubt that ivermectin is highly effective as a safe prophylaxis and treatment for COVID-19,” said Paul E. Marik, M.D., FCCM, FCCP, founding member of the FLCCC and Chief, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine at Eastern Virginia Medical School. “We can no longer rely on many of the larger health authorities to make an honest examination of the medical and scientific evidence. So, we are calling on regional public health authorities and medical professionals around the world to demand that ivermectin be included in their standard of care right away so we can end this pandemic once and for all.”

http://outbreaknewstoday.com/ivermectin ... iew-12291/


Where are your sources isabitch?!!!

Buffalo » 26 Aug 2021, 7:36 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Aug 2021, 7:36 pm

Use of Ivermectin Is Associated With Lower Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: The Ivermectin in COVID Nineteen Study

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33065103/

Ivermectin works!!!

From 2019 based on the VERY STUDIES that are dealt with in THIS CITATION MY GOD you are STUPID

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02081-w

Flawed ivermectin preprint highlights challenges of COVID drug studies

Throughout the pandemic, the anti-parasite drug ivermectin has attracted much attention, particularly in Latin America, as a potential way to treat COVID-19. But scientists say that recent, shocking revelations of widespread flaws in the data of a preprint study reporting that the medication greatly reduces COVID-19 deaths dampens ivermectin’s promise — and highlights the challenges of investigating drug efficacy during a pandemic.

“I was shocked, as everyone in the scientific community probably were,” says Eduardo López-Medina, a paediatrician at the Centre for the Study of Paediatric Infections in Cali, Colombia, who was not involved with the study and who has investigated whether ivermectin can improve COVID-19 symptoms. “It was one of the first papers that led everyone to get into the idea ivermectin worked” in a clinical-trial setting, he adds.

https://ebm.bmj.com/content/early/2021/ ... 021-111678

Misleading clinical evidence and systematic reviews on ivermectin for COVID-19

Ivermectin is a broad-spectrum antiparasitic agent approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the USA proved to be safe at the conventional dose of ≤200 µg/kg, although severe adverse effects ranging from ataxia to seizures have occasionally been reported.5 And due to its in vitro antiviral activity against a broad range of viruses, it has been used off-label for the treatment of some viral diseases.13 17

In a vertiginous search for COVID-19 treatments, Caly et al conducted an in vitro exploration that showed ivermectin’s inhibitor role on the replication of the SARS-CoV-2 virus,17 18 among few other in silico and in vitro results suggesting the same.19–21 Thus, a considerable amount of preprints and protocol records quickly appeared, reporting the clinical efficacy of ivermectin in standard doses for COVID-19. The dissemination of these results caused confusion, and the general population and some clinicians endorsed the use of ivermectin, especially in Latin America.22 However, in a matter of days since the publication of Caly et al17 and its repercussions, a general publication from the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) stated that “…ivermectin is incorrectly being used for the treatment of COVID-19, without any scientific evidence of its efficacy and safety for the treatment of this disease.”23

An important controversial point to consider in any rationale is the 5 µM required concentration to reach the anti-SARS-CoV-2 action of ivermectin observed in vitro,17 which is much higher than 0.28 µM, the maximum reported plasma concentration achieved in vivo with a dose of approximately 1700 µg/kg (about nine times the FDA-approved dosification).24 25 In this sense, basic fundamentals for assessing ivermectin in COVID-19 at a clinical level appear to be insufficient. Among other reasons, we believe this might have led WHO to exclude ivermectin from its Solidarity Trial for repurposed drugs for COVID-19,12 which raises questions about the pertinence of conducting clinical studies on ivermectin.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/04/scie ... tment.html

https://www.yahoo.com/now/column-major- ... 51048.html

Column: Major study of Ivermectin, the anti-vaccine crowd's latest COVID drug, finds 'no effect whatsoever'

I've had enough abuse and so have the other clinical trialists doing Ivermectin. Others working in this area have been threatened, their families have been threatened, they've been defamed.

Edward Mills, COVID researcher

Among the 1,500 patients in the study, he said, Ivermectin showed "no effect whatsoever" on the trial's outcome goals — whether patients required extended observation in the emergency room or hospitalization.

"In our specific trial," he said, "we do not see the treatment benefit that a lot of the advocates believe should have been" seen.
 
NO IT DOESNT TRAITOR

Buffalo » 26 Aug 2021, 7:41 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Aug 2021, 7:41 pm

 

What the HECK is outbreak NEWS LOSER?

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02081-w

Flawed ivermectin preprint highlights challenges of COVID drug studies

Throughout the pandemic, the anti-parasite drug ivermectin has attracted much attention, particularly in Latin America, as a potential way to treat COVID-19. But scientists say that recent, shocking revelations of widespread flaws in the data of a preprint study reporting that the medication greatly reduces COVID-19 deaths dampens ivermectin’s promise — and highlights the challenges of investigating drug efficacy during a pandemic.

“I was shocked, as everyone in the scientific community probably were,” says Eduardo López-Medina, a paediatrician at the Centre for the Study of Paediatric Infections in Cali, Colombia, who was not involved with the study and who has investigated whether ivermectin can improve COVID-19 symptoms. “It was one of the first papers that led everyone to get into the idea ivermectin worked” in a clinical-trial setting, he adds.

https://ebm.bmj.com/content/early/2021/ ... 021-111678

Misleading clinical evidence and systematic reviews on ivermectin for COVID-19

Ivermectin is a broad-spectrum antiparasitic agent approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the USA proved to be safe at the conventional dose of ≤200 µg/kg, although severe adverse effects ranging from ataxia to seizures have occasionally been reported.5 And due to its in vitro antiviral activity against a broad range of viruses, it has been used off-label for the treatment of some viral diseases.13 17

In a vertiginous search for COVID-19 treatments, Caly et al conducted an in vitro exploration that showed ivermectin’s inhibitor role on the replication of the SARS-CoV-2 virus,17 18 among few other in silico and in vitro results suggesting the same.19–21 Thus, a considerable amount of preprints and protocol records quickly appeared, reporting the clinical efficacy of ivermectin in standard doses for COVID-19. The dissemination of these results caused confusion, and the general population and some clinicians endorsed the use of ivermectin, especially in Latin America.22 However, in a matter of days since the publication of Caly et al17 and its repercussions, a general publication from the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) stated that “…ivermectin is incorrectly being used for the treatment of COVID-19, without any scientific evidence of its efficacy and safety for the treatment of this disease.”23

An important controversial point to consider in any rationale is the 5 µM required concentration to reach the anti-SARS-CoV-2 action of ivermectin observed in vitro,17 which is much higher than 0.28 µM, the maximum reported plasma concentration achieved in vivo with a dose of approximately 1700 µg/kg (about nine times the FDA-approved dosification).24 25 In this sense, basic fundamentals for assessing ivermectin in COVID-19 at a clinical level appear to be insufficient. Among other reasons, we believe this might have led WHO to exclude ivermectin from its Solidarity Trial for repurposed drugs for COVID-19,12 which raises questions about the pertinence of conducting clinical studies on ivermectin.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/04/scie ... tment.html

https://www.yahoo.com/now/column-major- ... 51048.html

Column: Major study of Ivermectin, the anti-vaccine crowd's latest COVID drug, finds 'no effect whatsoever'

I've had enough abuse and so have the other clinical trialists doing Ivermectin. Others working in this area have been threatened, their families have been threatened, they've been defamed.

Edward Mills, COVID researcher

Among the 1,500 patients in the study, he said, Ivermectin showed "no effect whatsoever" on the trial's outcome goals — whether patients required extended observation in the emergency room or hospitalization.

"In our specific trial," he said, "we do not see the treatment benefit that a lot of the advocates believe should have been" seen.
 
My SOURCES are KICKING YOUR *** LOSER

Isabel » 26 Aug 2021, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Aug 2021, 2:15 pm

At college level by middle school, you stupid, uneducated, toothless Nazi clown.

YOU:    Ivermectin is not poison. In fact, in its 45 year use it has proven to be SAFER

To treat parasitic worms, you idiot.

YOU:    than the experimental cocktails od so-called vaccines big pharma have hastily concocted that have demonstrated a high percentage of severe drug reactions to those experimental "vaccines".

Complete and total lie, you lying Russian whore.

YOU:    Ivermectin has been administered to humans BILLIONS of time

For parasitic infections, moron. 

YOU:    with virtually NO adverse side effects.

Ivermectin  can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, hypotension (low blood pressure), allergic reactions (itching and hives), dizziness, ataxia (problems with balance), seizures, coma and even death. 

YOU:     Given the evidence of efficacy, safety, low cost, and current death rates, ivermectin is likely to have an impact on health and economic outcomes of the pandemic across many countries.

Lie.

YOU:    Ivermectin is not a new and experimental drug with an unknown safety profile. It is a WHO “Essential Medicine” already used in several different indications, in colossal cumulative volumes.

Yes, for parasitic infections, you brainless stooge.

YOU:    .Ivermectin is likely to be an equitable, acceptable, and feasible global intervention against COVID-19.

Utterly false . 

YOU:    Health professionals should strongly consider its use, in both treatment and prophylaxis.

Health professionals consider it dangerous quack medicine.

Where are your sources to back up your lies...er...claims other than the bought and paid for by big pharma FDA or the propaganda of the profit seeking big pharmas themselves?  The widespread use of Ivermectin that would stop this plamdemic but it would also KILL big pharma profits and THAT is the biggest danger they see to its use.

https://www.latimes.com/business/story/ ... fect-covid

Column: Major study of Ivermectin, the anti-vaccine crowd’s latest COVID drug, finds ‘no effect whatsoever’

https://www.latimes.com/business/story/ ... -treatment

https://science.slashdot.org/story/21/0 ... ajor-study

In 1999 Los Angeles Times reporter Michael Hiltzik won a Pulitzer Prize. Now a business columnist for the Times, he writes that Ivermectin, "the latest supposed treatment for COVID-19 being touted by anti-vaccination groups, had 'no effect whatsoever' on the disease, according to a large patient study." (Alternate URL here)
That's the conclusion of the Together Trial, which has subjected several purported nonvaccine treatments for COVID-19 to carefully designed clinical testing.

The trial is supervised by McMaster University in Hamilton, Canada, and conducted in Brazil. One of the trial's principal investigators, Edward Mills of McMaster, presented the results from the Ivermectin arms of the study at an Aug. 6 symposium sponsored by the National Institutes of Health. Among the 1,500 patients in the study, he said, Ivermectin showed "no effect whatsoever" on the trial's outcome goals — whether patients required extended observation in the emergency room or hospitalization. "In our specific trial," he said, "we do not see the treatment benefit that a lot of the advocates believe should have been" seen...

The Ivermectin camp, as I reported earlier, is heavily peopled by anti-vaccination advocates and conspiracy mongers. They maintain that the truth about the drug has been suppressed by agents of the pharmaceutical industry, which ostensibly prefers to collect the more generous profits that will flow from COVID vaccines. The problem, however, is that the scientific trials cited by Ivermectin advocates have been too small or poorly documented to prove their case. One large trial from Egypt that showed the most significant therapeutic effect was withdrawn from its publishers due to accusations of plagiarism and bogus data. Nevertheless, the advocates have continued to press their case — without necessarily observing accepted standards of scientific discourse. During the symposium, Mills complained that serious researchers looking into claims for COVID treatments have faced unprecedented abuse from advocates.

NO EFFECT you BRAINWASHED MORON why don't you cite SYDNEY POWELL AGAIN?

IkeBana » 26 Aug 2021, 4:35 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Aug 2021, 4:35 pm

So ****' what?  That's free enterprise for ya.  I'm sure you would prefer the way they do things in....Russia.

Far more than china, fifth columnist.

Ivermectin work for worms in my uncle's horses.
 

Cannonpointer » 26 Aug 2021, 8:35 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Aug 2021, 8:35 pm

Far more than china, fifth columnist.

HARD DATA PROVES BIG PHARMA KNEW COVID VACCINES WOULD WORSEN AND PROLONG THE PANDEMICPosted on May 16, 2021 by State of the NationSee Each National Graph Below Showing How
Covid Vaccines Are Increasing Mortality Rates
And Reversing Downward Death TrendsState of the NationWhat the many graphs below clearly indicate are two crucial data points about the Covid Super Vaccination Agenda.
First, that virtually every country in the world was trending downward — precipitously — as the world community of nations started to approach natural herd immunity for COVID-19 at the end of 2020 and beginning of 2021.

Secondly, that as soon as the various Covid vaccines were rolled out worldwide, virtually every country was saw a sharp spike in SAR-COV-2 cases, and especially in Covid deaths.

The red line in each graph below shows the trending toward herd immunity.  The blue line indicates the extraordinary Covid death spikes which occurred shortly after each nation rolled out their vaccine programs.

Such an obvious genocidal outcome could only have occurred by highly purposeful design; and with the close coordination of numerous national, corporate, NGO and other institutional co-conspirators.

Let’s take a close look at India since their vaccine-rekindled Covid crisis has recently captured the attention of the whole world.  Here’s the relevant graph tracking India’s downward trend followed by an explosion of Covid deaths.

This completely avoidable mushrooming of Covid deaths across India occurred because of two critical developments, which were replayed around the globe with uncanny precision.

#1 — The WHO, Big Pharma, CDC, NIH, FDA and other agencies of the US Government ran a massive disinfo campaign to compel every country to immediately discontinue the use of Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Azithromycin, Clarithromycin, Zinc and/or any other effective treatments and successful protocols being used for COVID-19 patients.

#2 — These same genocidal co-conspirators ramped up the Covid Super Vaccination Agenda throughout the entire world community of nations to get everyone on the same vaccine game plan (aka the Covid Super Vaccination Agenda).  Only in this way could the perps prevent any particular nation from showing off their vaccineless success story.

Now, here’s another graph that reflects this exact sequence of events in India.  New Delhi was trumpeting the tremendous success Indians were experiencing with their very inexpensive Ivermectin kits.  And then look what happened in March of 2021 after millions were vaccinated and Ivermectin was stopped.What else needs to be said when all the “HARD DATA PROVES BIG PHARMA KNEW COVID VACCINES WOULD WORSEN AND PROLONG THE PANDEMIC”.State of the Nation
May 16, 2021N.B. What follows are the graphs correlating the Covid vaccine rollouts with Covid death increases nation by nation which occurred late 2020 and early 2021.More graphs for the remaining nations can be viewed at the following video.

nuckinfutz » 26 Aug 2021, 6:17 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Aug 2021, 6:17 pm

OK Princess, I emailed you! Go ahead with it!

You know what the most dangerous thing is?
Aunt Crabby using a chain saw after dark!      

Ok i'll pm  him and we'll see what he says. @nuckin futz  
 Your pm doesnt work right? i think Misty told me that a long time ago.

Buffalo » 26 Aug 2021, 9:14 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Aug 2021, 9:14 pm

HARD DATA PROVES BIG PHARMA KNEW COVID VACCINES WOULD WORSEN AND PROLONG THE PANDEMICPosted on May 16, 2021 by State of 

I don't believe israelis are really vaxxing. I think their docs are giving them saline. 

They know. 

sootedupCyndi » 26 Aug 2021, 9:39 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Aug 2021, 9:39 pm

Ok i'll pm  him and we'll see what he says. @nuckin futz  
 Your pm doesnt work right? i think Misty told me that a long time ago.

There are other things which don't work. A lot!  
 

nuckinfutz » 26 Aug 2021, 10:14 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Aug 2021, 10:14 pm

There are other things which don't work. A lot!

But enough about your lost youth, powder dick. 

nuckinfutz » 26 Aug 2021, 10:14 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Aug 2021, 10:14 pm

There are other things which don't work. A lot!

he wants you to create a new account and see if everything works on the new account.
It Is probably how he can tell. He is very good at computers.
down below is what he said.  @nuckin futz  

If the new account is broken, then the problem is on his end.

If the new account is not broken, then the problem is on my end
 

Cannonpointer » 26 Aug 2021, 10:17 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Aug 2021, 10:17 pm

But enough about your lost youth, powder dick.

Why ya gotta be such a dick, Dick? GFY!

 
 

nuckinfutz » 26 Aug 2021, 10:21 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Aug 2021, 10:21 pm

Why ya gotta be such a dick, Dick? GFY!
 

Well, well.

Thomeone is thure thenthitive.