Your claim that the words in the above post that are in bold are BV's and not yours is a lie on your part.Huey » 24 Sep 2021, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑BV words. There is no argument over context or contact. Screen shots have been provided. You will lose if you persist.Phelix_Dacat » 24 Sep 2021, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Ylu are no saying your own words are lies. Too **** got funny. You will call yourself a liar to avoid ad it ting your were wrong.
Your words:
Either I find a post in which I address you as Stroky , from BEFORE Jan 24th, or I don't... That's it...
I'm giving myself 2 weeks to find a post in which I address you as Stroky PRIOR to January 24th... at which time you will have spent ALL your bullets - in time for a 3 month sabbatical...
BV says he is lying.
With the wordsmithing you engineered that I bolded, who could doubt the rest of what you typed?
On the positive side, at least "Too **** [ you ] got funny".
IkeBana » 24 Sep 2021, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑ So Bloomberg News is propaganda?
Oh wait...I forgot...according tho this wanker, any fetid chunks not spewing forth from the orange ****'s festering piehole are propaganda.

nefarious101 » 24 Sep 2021, 6:45 pm » wrote: ↑ hey jennifer....if the shoe fits......fake news is fake news.....doesn't matter whether you like it or not
Blackvegetable » 24 Sep 2021, 7:39 pm » wrote: ↑ but "fake news" is just news you and your Yam Daddy don't like...

I don’t claim they are BVs words.Phelix_Dacat » 24 Sep 2021, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Your claim that the words in the above post that are in bold are BV's and not yours is a lie on your part.
Your mental decline has been quick and steep. Coming to the internet to "win". You're a sad **** joke. But, don't let me interrupt your self-immolation.
BTW, what, in your gibbering, brain damaged, so-called mind, do you believe I will lose?
keep running.
Did you want another look at your lies and stipulations?
Your words concerning the challenge you lost and refuse to admit:Blackvegetable » 25 Sep 2021, 7:58 am » wrote: ↑Did you want another look at your lies and stipulations?
Addressed, and debunked....by your own words.Huey » 25 Sep 2021, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑ Your words concerning the challenge you lost and refuse to admit:
BV says:
Either I find a post in which I address you as Stroky , from BEFORE Jan 24th, or I don't... That's it...
I'm giving myself 2 weeks to find a post in which I address you as Stroky PRIOR to January 24th... at which time you will have spent ALL your bullets - in time for a 3 month sabbatical...
Where is that post…
If you showed you had a remarkable remote diagnosis i would have taken 2 months off.
Sorry, that wasn’t the challenge and there was diagnosis. Below is all that counts.
Huey » 25 Sep 2021, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑ Sorry, that wasn’t the challenge and there was diagnosis. Below is all that counts.
BV says:
Either I find a post in which I address you as Stroky , from BEFORE Jan 24th, or I don't... That's it...
I'm giving myself 2 weeks to find a post in which I address you as Stroky PRIOR to January 24th... at which time you will have spent ALL your bullets - in time for a 3 month sabbatical...
no, controlly..Sorry, that wasn’t the challenge and there was diagnosis. Below is all that counts.
Yes, Dwarf...you have.Huey » 25 Sep 2021, 8:28 am » wrote: ↑
Nope. I have not. The challenge in your ow words.
BV says:
Either I find a post in which I address you as Stroky , from BEFORE Jan 24th, or I don't... That's it...
I'm giving myself 2 weeks to find a post in which I address you as Stroky PRIOR to January 24th... at which time you will have spent ALL your bullets - in time for a 3 month sabbatical...
The lies you tell to avoid losing. There is no post prior Feb 2020 where you call me Stroky. That is not a lie.

Huey » 25 Sep 2021, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑ The lies you tell to avoid losing. There is no post prior Feb 2020 where you call me Stroky. That is not a lie.
BV says:
Either I find a post in which I address you as Stroky , from BEFORE Jan 24th, or I don't... That's it...
I'm giving myself 2 weeks to find a post in which I address you as Stroky PRIOR to January 24th... at which time you will have spent ALL your bullets - in time for a 3 month sabbatical...
Your lie:
You did not deem me Stroky prior to Feb 2020. That is what a lie looks like. You lose
post one.The lies you tell to avoid losing.
I just did. Look at your Iie in the screen shot.
Your words from the screen shot:
No...Huey » 25 Sep 2021, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ Your words from the screen shot:
I deemed you "Stroky" BEFORE your stipulation based on your posting style, unreliable short/medium/long term recall and short fuse...
That is a lie. You deemed me Stroky less than a week after discussing my strokes for the first time. And this is why you posted these words:
BV says:
Either I find a post in which I address you as Stroky , from BEFORE Jan 24th, or I don't... That's it...
I'm giving myself 2 weeks to find a post in which I address you as Stroky PRIOR to January 24th... at which time you will have spent ALL your bullets - in time for a 3 month sabbatical...
So we have at least one lie and the reason for the challenge. Go ahead deny that.
Another assertion.
It is a lie. There is no earlier reference. I showed you the search results in a screen shot. You lost the challenge, admit it. There is no as of yet because it is not there to find. This is the same game you are playing with your lie about a pic that does not exist.Blackvegetable » 25 Sep 2021, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑ No...
We can't determine that it is a lie. I conceded, months ago that I have yet to find an earlier reference.
based on your posting style, unreliable short/medium/long term recall and short fuse...
This is demonstrably true...as your own words, and my post of Nov. 2019 demonstrates.
Now, having addressed it AGAIN, you should now address the predicate ISSUE as identified in YOUR narrative to CP.
