A couple of things. You cherry picked. You had to edit the comments.Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2022, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑ In a nutshell, I was correct.
Who does that, Sheilagh?
Would you like to see evidence?
@BlackvegetableHuey » 01 Jan 2022, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑Doesn’t matter now you wish to reframe this. You issued a challenge .Huey » 25 Sep 2021, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑ And here you lying by omission. That is 4 lies on this thread alone.
Here is entire post. You left out the important parts. That is why you are not using a link.
It has already been posted the last few day. The issue was he was pumping a poster for info on her occupation, went to school, hammering her for what he thought may have been her weight, etc. WHat he does here. I told her don't give him any info because he will use it later to divert an debate. In a nutshell he denied he did that and I pointed him to his penchant of calling me Stroky. He claimed that he just guessed. So I asked him to post the first time he heard it. He then posted one of my posts from here that contained a pic of me. It was from Mar 13th mentioning my strokes. I asked the mods to take it down. It is gone from here also. The problem with his post was it was not the first time he heard of it. The earliest mention of Stroky from him was Feb 8th 2020. He then made one of his challenges to me where I would take a month off if I couldn't post a mention of my strokes PRIOR to Feb 8th. As my sig box indicates. All he had to do was publicly state that he lost, was wrong, and do it with no excuses. This all occurred in May of this year.
The post PRIOR to Feb 8th is on this thread. It meets the rules of his challenge. As well as all the minutia that occurred this week. This is my thread, it contains the evidence he demanded, so no, I do not need a dedicated thread for it.
After he acknowledges he lost and was wrong with no excuses we then discuss the rest.
Are these your words:
Are these your words?
Either I find a post in which I address you as Stroky , from BEFORE Jan 24th, or I don't... That's it...
I'm giving myself 2 weeks to find a post in which I address you as Stroky PRIOR to January 24th... at which time you will have spent ALL your bullets - in time for a 3 month sabbatical...
Acknowledge your words, Askholio.
Huey » 01 Jan 2022, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑ A couple of things. You cherry picked. You had to edit the comments.
Two, regardless as to how you ish to reframe the challenge you still issued it.
Are these your words?
Are these your words?
Either I find a post in which I address you as Stroky , from BEFORE Jan 24th, or I don't... That's it...
I'm giving myself 2 weeks to find a post in which I address you as Stroky PRIOR to January 24th... at which time you will have spent ALL your bullets - in time for a 3 month sabbatical...
Don’t ever ask me that again, nod, coward.
This is a lie.A couple of things. You cherry picked. You had to edit the comments.
They are your words, lying little ****.Two, regardless as to how you ish to reframe the challenge you still issued it.
Keep min I did not edit the quote. You did.Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2022, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑ This is a lie.
They are your words, lying little ****.
Huey » 01 Jan 2022, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Keep min I did not edit the quote. You did.
And these are your words you lying little ****:
Either I find a post in which I address you as Stroky , from BEFORE Jan 24th, or I don't... That's it...
I'm giving myself 2 weeks to find a post in which I address you as Stroky PRIOR to January 24th... at which time you will have spent ALL your bullets - in time for a 3 month sabbatical...
Acknowledge.
that is a lie...I did NOT "edit" it.Keep min I did not edit the quote. You did.
You deleted most of it. Which is editing. The entire post describes the issue.
Did you or did you not delete most of the post?
I quoted, verbatim, the part of the narrative relating to "the Issue".
No, you did not. Your quoted verbatim a small part of the issue. The challenge you issued and refused to acknowledge was part of it because it showed the example you demanded was correct.Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2022, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑ I quoted, verbatim, the part of the narrative relating to "the Issue".
No, you didn’t.Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2022, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑ I quoted, verbatim, the part of the narrative relating to "the Issue".
Huey » 01 Jan 2022, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑ No, you did not. Your quoted verbatim a small part of the issue. The challenge you issued and refused to acknowledge was part of it because it showed the example you demanded was correct.
When you grow a pair, become a man, and acknowledge your words AND you lost your challenge you can then ask me questions.
Either I find a post in which I address you as Stroky , from BEFORE Jan 24th, or I don't... That's it...
I'm giving myself 2 weeks to find a post in which I address you as Stroky PRIOR to January 24th... at which time you will have spent ALL your bullets - in time for a 3 month sabbatical...
No, dwarf...No, you did not. Your quoted verbatim a small part of the issue
That introduces the definition of "the Issue"..The issue was
Huey » 01 Jan 2022, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑ No, you didn’t.
Speaking of pledges it seems you are running from a pledge:
Either I find a post in which I address you as Stroky , from BEFORE Jan 24th, or I don't... That's it...
You didn’t. You lose. And my comment used an example of what you call the issue was correct meaning you lost.
We are done unless you continue to try and spin your way out. The cost of your loss, since you refuse to hold up your end, is I will no longer be obligated to answer you **** questions or that stupid question “are these your words”. I look forward to you having to make your own case, use the quote function, and posting your own facts.
We were done here.The issue was
Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2022, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ No, dwarf...
That introduces the definition of "the Issue"..
Absent "the Issue",Iyou would not have had a demand meltdown which you know call "the Challenge"
Huey » 01 Jan 2022, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑We are done. You know the consequences of your acting like a coward.
Ill leave you with your words:
Either I find a post in which I address you as Stroky , from BEFORE Jan 24th, or I don't... That's it...
I'm giving myself 2 weeks to find a post in which I address you as Stroky PRIOR to January 24th... at which time you will have spent ALL your bullets - in time for a 3 month sabbatical.
Game, Set, Match.The issue was
Yup, you lost. You k ow the consequences of YOUR decision. You refusal to admit that you lost your own challenge is the biggest display of cowardice I have seen on these forums in quote sometime.
yes, up you lost. Every time you lie you will get the words you refuse to acknowledge.
Watch.Huey » 01 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Yup, you lost. You k ow the consequences of YOUR decision. You refusal to admit that you lost your own challenge is the biggest display of cowardice I have seen on these forums in quote sometime.
Either I find a post in which I address you as Stroky , from BEFORE Jan 24th, or I don't... That's it...
show me refusing to acknowledge them.Huey » 01 Jan 2022, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑ yes, up you lost. Every time you lie you will get the words you refuse to acknowledge.
Either I find a post in which I address you as Stroky , from BEFORE Jan 24th, or I don't... That's it...
I'm giving myself 2 weeks to find a post in which I address you as Stroky PRIOR to January 24th... at which time you will have spent ALL your bullets - in time for a 3 month sabbatical.
Are these your words?The issue was
Are these your words?Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2022, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑ show me refusing to acknowledge them.
Are these your words?